Search News


Browse Archives

News

Momentum for Gender Neutrality

August 27, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

While only a small minority of colleges have added gender identity to their anti-bias policies or created gender-neutral dormitories or bathrooms, the movement to do so is growing, especially in the Northeast and among elite universities, according to a report being released today.

The GENIUS Index (for Gender Equality National Index for Universities and Schools) found that:

  • 147 colleges and universities have added gender identity and expression to their non-discrimination policies.
  • 141 colleges and universities have created some gender neutral bathrooms, frequently private bathrooms that students can use without fear of being judged as being in the wrong bathroom based on the way others view the students' identity.
  • 30 colleges and universities have created options for gender-neutral housing, in which the norm for roommates is not presumed to be someone of the same sex.

Policies such as those highlighted in the report have been an emerging goal of transgender students on campus and their supporters, who say that people who don't fit into standard gender categories face not only discrimination, but threats of violence.

The Gender Public Advocacy Coalition, which pushes for policies in educational institutions and the workplace that allow people "to learn, grow and succeed -- whether or not they meet expectations for masculinity and femininity" -- produced the study.

The report notes that these policies are almost always relatively recent and were unheard of just a decade ago. The adoption of such policies is still sufficiently new that a college's actions on creating a new restroom may attract news coverage, as was the case this weekend with the new student center at the University of Vermont would feature some gender-neutral bathrooms.

While the report notes that the gender-neutral movement is attracting support at all kinds of institutions, it also acknowledges the role played by regions and elites in higher education. Of colleges that have amended anti-bias policies, for example, 43 percent are in the Northeast while only 5 percent are from the South. All the Ivy League institutions have amended their anti-bias policies, as have two-thirds of a list of the top 25 universities in the country.

The emphasis on the policies of elite universities mirrors the strategy used by proponents of domestic partnership benefits. By noting that such benefits are the norm at elite universities, proponents at institutions that aspire to be top research universities have won over skeptics by talking about the benefits as a way to be competitive in recruiting faculty talent. The strategy has had numerous successes, but has run into some obstacles recently because of anti-gay marriage measures enacted in some states.

Brittney Hoffman, youth coordinator for the Gender Public Advocacy Coalition, said that the report's emphasis reflected a range of goals. Inclusion in anti-bias rules is an essential "top level" policy, while gender-neutral bathrooms and dormitories are what students want to improve "the day to day lived experiences on campus."

Hoffman said that the issue should be framed as being about safety. "A lot of gender non-conforming youth experience harassment in choosing a restroom, and really suffer this sobering anxiety in making a decision about a bathroom that for the vast majority of the population is really simple," she said. "They have to ask, Which bathroom is going to be safest for me right now?" And when those students are in hostile situations in a dorm, the situation is only compounded, she said.

Gender-neutral bathrooms and dormitories don't just help transgender students, Hoffman said. Gay students, male-female couples or friends or siblings who want to live together, and other students can also benefit. Hoffman stressed that her organization was not pushing to convert all bathrooms or to change all dormitory policies. It's fine to have gender-specific housing and bathrooms, she said, as long as other options are provided. In cases of gender-neutral rooms, she said both roommates should be among those requesting such rooms.

To date, the policies on gender neutrality have not prompted major culture war outbreaks, although that may be in part because the issue is relatively new and hasn't been pushed in culturally conservative parts of the country. On Phi Beta Cons, the higher education blog of National Review, the issue has come up periodically and been mocked. Last year, the blog took note of a campaign for transgender bathrooms at the University of Colorado at Boulder and the developments of a symbol for doors of such bathrooms at a Unitarian seminary in California by writing: "This debate gives a whole new meaning to the expression, 'Get your head out of the toilet.' "

Hoffman said she was aware that some people didn't view her goals with sympathy. "These are very new issues for some people," she said. "But look at how many colleges have changed recently. This movement is taking off."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Momentum for Gender Neutrality

  • Bathroom sign
  • Posted by Charlotte , M.A. Student at UNC-Chapel Hill on August 27, 2007 at 7:50am EDT
  • Am I the only one who thinks the sign looks decidedly male? It seems to incorporate elements from the common male and female symbols (http://images.google.com/images?sourceid=gmail&q=images:+restroom+symbols&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi);
    for instance, the legs are apart as in the male symbol, and the shoulders are rounded off such as in the female one. Yet I see it and think "male." Is this an indication that gender bias is deeply ingrained in my psyche? I'm not sure how I would alter the symbol in order to make it more "neutral" to my mind, except perhaps to give it long hair. But that might be seen as "too female" by some. Interesting, I think.

  • Side effect
  • Posted by Second thought? on August 27, 2007 at 9:05am EDT
  • I would like to have more info on the quoted "harassment in choosing a restroom" and I wonder if there are other solution to it.

    But I worry about the side effects with all these. I think we all understand the reason of the separate restroom in public places. Are human race mature enough that these separation no longer a necessary? I am not so sure.

  • Posted by Bob on August 27, 2007 at 9:55am EDT
  • This appears to me as PC gone amuck. It reminds me of federal regulations that deal with the 1% without practical concerns about the impact on the 99%. This also seems risky PR for a campus that needs public understanding and support. Unfortunately, trying for absolute "neutrality" often ends up creating more problems than to recognize that some common differences aren't all that bad.

    Bob

  • Not really anything new...
  • Posted by Kevin , graduate at Carleton College on August 27, 2007 at 12:30pm EDT
  • Since before my frosh year in college (1990) my alma mater had a mix of single-sex and co-ed bathrooms. Most floors voted, so that students would be comfortable with the arrangement. On floors with 3 or more bathrooms, there was usually one of each and take your pick. On floors with only 2, they were often co-ed between 12-6am, so that no one had to make a long walk to the 'loo at 3 in the morning. Others were co-ed 24/7 and yes, we were mature enough to handle it.

    The only problems arose when a campus tour guide would walk through the dorm with a group and a parent would ask "excuse me, where's the nearest restroom?"

  • Restroom availability
  • Posted by Jim Pakala on August 28, 2007 at 4:10pm EDT
  • Restrooms for men or women in wheelchairs with family members of the opposite sex, when necessary, to assist them are important in public places as my wife and I discovered when, far from home, she broke her leg in 5 places. Restrooms for use by either men or women also are essential in public places unless numerous unisex restrooms or portapotties are provided. In an emergency some other men and I facilitated joint use of a men's room by men and women, but otherwise separate restrooms for men and women are essential, along with the small private ones that I mentioned.

  • Necessary or one more step in the loss of modesty?
  • Posted by DLM on September 1, 2007 at 9:20pm EDT
  • I find this debate troublesome, even as someone with a number of gay and lesbian friends. The bathroom issue doesn't pose a problem for me as it isn't very different from the arrangement I saw at my undergrad. univ. in the early 1990s.

    The roommate issue is problematic. I am female and shared an apt. with a gay man (in separate bedrooms) during my senior year, but it was a decision that I made as a 20-year old and having known this person for the prior three years.

    To suggest that our students should see this "gender bending" housing as standard upsets me. It is inevitably going to lead to more sexual activity and likely harassment than we currently see, even though it is not the intention.

    None of my friends who are homosexual or bisexual (and there are many) found it problematic share a room with a member of the same sex due to sexual orientation issues. I am not suggesting that other people have not experienced such problems, because I know it's not the case. However, a better question for the schools to ask is whether or not the students are comfortable rooming with someone who is gay, lesbian, or bisexual--NOT mixing genders in rooms.

    Maybe I'm an odd mix of the conservative and the liberal, but mixed gender dorm rooms raise nothing but concerns for me. I certainly would not allow one of my children to occupy one while I was paying the tuition.

    Let us not forget the need for modesty, even if our culture denigrates such an "old-fashioned" quality.