Search News


Browse Archives

News

Facelifts for the Facebook Generation

September 14, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Web sites aren't about throwing some text and pictures onto a page anymore. Colleges, catching on to the evolving online habits of their prospective students, are starting to wise up -- and that often means making their online presence more appealing to Facebook-surfing high schoolers.

They can be demanding, this new cohort, and in the ever-intensifying marketing contest to attract the most qualified applicants, universities are turning to one of their most effective recruiting tools: their Web sites, often the first stop for those shopping for colleges and usually tailored for those off campus, not on it.

"I think that design is increasingly important," said Steven B. Lewis, the treasurer of a group of Web professionals in higher education called HighEdWeb and the Web manager at the State University of New York at Brockport. Universities, he noted, are "realizing that the Web is a primary marketing tool."

But now that most desirable of Web audiences has a name, and a set of characteristics that go with it -- and the so-called "millennials," we're told, have shorter attention spans than ever. They like pictures, have a knack for exhibiting themselves online and, more importantly, are tech-savvy and sophisticated.

College and university Web operations have been adapting to these realities incrementally for some time, revamping their designs and adding more pictures, interactivity and various other bells and whistles. But more recent redesigns suggest that when institutions go back to the drawing board, the entire process is informed by a more all-encompassing conceptual framework that views site visitors as content creators, values user input and emphasizes showing over telling.

In short, Web designers in higher education are starting to embrace the grab bag of technologies loosely referred to as "Web 2.0," a realm in which streaming media are readily available, people can share or remix content and communication is always a two-way street.

That goes for the design process itself. In recent years, a number of institutions began the ground-up process of rethinking their Web framework by asking students, faculty and others what they thought. Cornell University did it as early as 2004, with a redesign blog that attracted lively comments and feedback from people on campus, and whose contributors gave it a personality of its own.

"We knew that the project was much bigger than a design project, so we were really deliberate in trying to create a collaborative environment," said Jason Simon, the director of marketing and creative services at North Carolina State University, which recently completed a bottom-up redesign and also sought input during the process through a blog.

The idea of making the redesign process participatory signals that it's about more than just a Web site -- it's the college's identity that is being forged anew. "When we started, we knew that we wanted to ensure that it wasn’t just a design makeover, that we were really taking a look at how the university was presenting itself from a brand standpoint, from a tone standpoint," Simon said.

So the university overhauled its entire approach to the Web. No one at all had been responsible for regularly updating the old version of the site; now, Simon has hired four people for the new Office of Web Communications, which itself is under the university's marketing arm. "I think now people are really starting to understand the power of the medium," he said. It "shifts the way we really communicate about ourselves," from media relations to reaching out to alumni.

At the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, a greater focus on communication began with a shift to an easier-to-remember, more elegant domain: simply illinois.edu, rather than the original uiuc.edu. Underscoring what officials feel is the importance of the site name change is the effort going into it, which will involve months of converting links and e-mail addresses over to the new domain.

Often, boosting online marketing efforts also means a more "community"-centered approach, a central component of Web 2.0 that has permeated the thinking of institutions like North Carolina State, from the initial planning stages through online outreach efforts for alumni fund raising. The redesign blog, for example, came from experience. The last major overhaul of the site, five or six years ago, resulted in a backlash, Simon said. "It wasn’t accepted as well as it probably could have or should have been, partially because it was a surprise to a lot of people."

Lewis has seen similar results. If people "sense that the process is open and you’ve contributed to it, you might be more amenable to the result," he said. Now, at North Carolina State, added Simon, "people feel like the Web site is theirs, and they have some ownership of it."

As universities start to unveil the next generation of college Web sites, their efforts include a mix of approaches that tend to overlap. Lewis and other Web administrators note several trends:

  • The Facebooking of college Web sites. Lewis said colleges were looking toward variations on social networking to keep in touch with students after they graduate and maintain databases for fund raising. "How do you keep in touch with your alumni when they leave?" he asked. The answer: "develop a presence for them [so they] keep coming back." Since so many students today use Facebook (or MySpace), though -- to the point where meeting one's roommate online and evaluating prefrosh prospects before even arriving on campus are becoming college rites of passage -- the issue is how, or whether, universities should try to supplant the social-networking powerhouses. The solution, Lewis said, is to "embrace prospective students where they are" by coordinating activities and setting up events within the existing interfaces. For Simon, taking the social-networking approach is "next on our list."
  • Showing, not telling. Simon said that focus groups expressed a preference for more "showing" and less "telling": in other words, less text and more photos and video. For students more and more likely to carry an iPod in their pockets, that's a potentially winning strategy -- one that North Carolina State embraced. The site produces five to seven new videos a month that tell student-centered stories and offer a glimpse at life on campus. One recent offering shows (rather than tells) students packaging meals for a hunger relief effort.
  • Blogs and more blogs. One way universities have found to more directly reach applicants is to find current students to blog about their lives on campus. The University of Texas at Austin, one of the first to experiment with the idea, has a site called Longhorn Confidential that features a "behind-the-scenes" look at student life through the eyes of several bloggers. The site design boasts a deliberate "unauthorized" feel, with the apparent hope that readers will find the content more appealing as a sort of "word of mouth" rather than official glimpse of what college is actually like. At the Tepper School of Business at Carnegie Mellon University, which recently revamped its Web presence, student bloggers have literally no content restrictions on what they can post. "We didn’t then, and we don’t now, monitor those blogs. In the ethic of blogs, we trust the bloggers and the people they correspond with ... to sort of establish a community of trust and credible information," said Tepper spokesman Geof Becker.
  • Bringing lectures to your iPod. With iTunes U, institutions can post audio and video content at customized portals for anyone to download for free; with YouTube, they can create their own pages with streaming video. More colleges and universities are creating their own presence at these sites with the hope of reaching out to students at online venues they frequent.
  • Leaving room for improvement. As redesigning Web sites becomes more of a multiyear, multistep ordeal, administrators are realizing that along with surface improvements, the content management systems underlying them need to be rebuilt from the ground up as well. As they design the foundations of their online platforms, the emphasis is on flexibility to make room for future additions. At Tepper, the system is equipped for features that aren't even implemented yet, like allowing user comments and supporting tools for sharing and editing links, such as del.icio.us and Reddit. But for unforeseen improvements in the future, the database is robust enough for developers to build extra functionality -- such as social networking.

Tepper's new site is a case study in adapting Web 2.0 techniques to its specific mission, while boosting its online marketing presence and making the site more relevant to its intended audience.

"Our belief is that the millennial generation really kind of wants to see and experience what they would get in a business school," Becker said, rather than just read about it or hear it from an admissions officer.

So the site emphasizes video, podcasts, photo galleries and student blogs in a simple yet elegant Flash-inspired layout. Like North Carolina State, the main page focuses on a limited number of feature stories and showcases specific professors and students, offering entry points into the site. And clutter is reduced by arranging the links in a logical fashion, with a prominent list of academic programs near the top and a box of news briefs at the bottom of the page.

Besides just posting official university-produced videos, though, Becker said students will be able to post their own content and collaborate with Web staff. One student has already approached the office with the idea of interviewing local businesspeople about entrepreneurship in the Pittsburgh area. Becker said they're now collaborating to post a weekly video podcast on the site and iTunes U to showcase startup CEOs who have found success.

"It’s really just up to the imagination of the people now using the Web site," he said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Facelifts for the Facebook Generation

  • Supplant the social-networking powerhouses?
  • Posted by Karine Joly on September 14, 2007 at 7:40am EDT
  • "the issue is how, or whether, universities should try to supplant the social-networking powerhouses. "

    I really think this is the most important question for institutions as third-party social networking websites are now widely used by prospective and currents students, their parents (Facebook has made a big push recently in +35 crowd) and young graduates.

    Some institutions like Allegheny College (PA) have been embracing MySpace and Facebook for a couple of years with great results. Others have chosen to create their own social networking website for their students and alums with the help of a vendor (UMich, UF) or even in-house. Elon University has followed the last path with some success.

    If Andy Guess is interested in this topic, I'm happy to extend a press invitation for Social Networking Website Week: All You Ever Wanted to Know about Facebook, MySpace and Co. (Oct 1-5), a 5-webinar series that will address all these questions.

    More info can be found at:
    www.higheredexperts.com/socialnetworking

  • Can't fake it
  • Posted by Tom McCool on September 14, 2007 at 8:00am EDT
  • One of the pitfalls of creating institutionalized blogs and social networking is that millenials can instantly spot a posuer. More than one business aiming for the youth market have ventured onto MySpace and Facebook, tried to be "cool" and failed miserably. Once your online attempts have been exposed as frauds, you may never regain the trust of your students.

    I would be interested to see if UT-Austin's site is truly successful. I visted the link the article and the site is indeed deliberate and highly polished - too polished and obvious to me.

  • Like democracy
  • Posted by Duncan on September 14, 2007 at 10:00am EDT
  • I wonder if institutions realize that this is like democracy - there is no going back.

    These changes will inevitably lead to rate professors, classes ... etc. Changes will eventually changes instructors role in institutions. Taped lectures will change instructors role to consulting and tutoring. Of cause, graduate school may sustained a bit longer. But the undergraduates will be impacted first.

    I see these changes as positive. But institutions could do more and prepared ahead for what will come next.

  • Posted by J.M. McLean on September 14, 2007 at 10:05am EDT
  • "...the content management systems underlying them need to be rebuilt from the ground up as well. As they design the foundations of their online platforms, the emphasis is on flexibility to make room for future additions."

    I think this is they key to this entire article. Smart institutions have a long-term vision that looks beyond current fads and buzzwords and are building the infrastructure now that can support whatever the web may throw at them next year an beyond. This is evidenced by the growing number adopting enterprise class open source web content management platforms.

  • Follower or Trail Blazer?
  • Posted by Corey , Can't fake it? on September 14, 2007 at 10:35am EDT
  • In response to the "can't fake it" post, capitalizing on web 2 concepts is about user interaction not about pretending. Nobody said facebook is only for teens and twenty somethings. It is open to everyone and that is what web 2 is all about. Everyone having their voice heard and having a say on what is quality content and what is spam. No doubt posers will be weeded out by the masses but that does not mean that a University profile on Facebook is a poser. Spammers try to spam blogs and social networks all the time and their content is inevitably deleted or voted to the bottom of the content pile. However a College or University creating a presence on a social networking site is about blazing a trial and those that don't follow will be left behind with the less creative and courageous folkes. "If your not the leader the view never changes."

  • Posted by Michael Stoner , President at mStoner on September 14, 2007 at 10:35am EDT
  • Classic case of Boomers making decisions about communications for Millennials. Giving up control over the message is really hard. But Millennials DO value authenticity and blogs work. Ball State University has done some research to understand how prospective students and parents view the University's blogging program (more here). And other institutions--like Lewis & Clark and Eckerd College--have had impressive results from Web 2.0-like websites focused on student recruitment.

  • Web accessibility
  • Posted by Liz on September 14, 2007 at 1:55pm EDT
  • I agree with many of the points made in this article but I wish it had addressed some of the web accessibility issues faced by colleges and universities as they try to use new media to "show not tell." For example, where will the financial and human resources come from to create transcripts of the iTunes U lectures, podcasts and the online videos? Will web developers be given the time and training to make their flash movies accessible? Also, in the current economic climate, will many administrators of public institutions understand the value in hiring "four people for the new Office of Web Communications" as those who work in the field do?

  • Couldn't Help But Notice
  • Posted by lauren on September 14, 2007 at 6:20pm EDT
  • That the vast majority of schools who were featured (Cornell, NCSU, Tepper and not featured but also applicable: Carnegie Mellon University)share an interactive agency - Ripple Effects Interactive. http://www.r-effects.com

  • Posted by Call Me Paranoid on September 14, 2007 at 9:05pm EDT
  • Universities are running their own social networking sites? How long before a sexual predator turns up on one of them? Parents (not to mention legislators) would not be pleased.

  • Time to wake up
  • Posted by maxCohen on September 17, 2007 at 3:15pm EDT
  • It saddens me when I see articles like this. There a 'decision makers' everywhere reading this and thinking, 'Ugh, we are behind and need social networking for our web site so let us throw everything we can get out there!' You know it's true, so stop shaking your head. I even hear it in meetings: 'I just read an article online about XYZ and web sites and so that is what we need to do.' After all, one article, or is it two?, makes you a web design expert does it not?

    Unfortunately, no, but that does not stop the 'decision maker' from jumping ahead in something they have no concept about while the web team is spinning their wheels trying to get items out the door that makes no sense what-so-ever. Why? Because the web people weren't included in the decision making because that's up to a committee of people who have no concept of what the web is about. So here is a new concept, let the web team do their job. Believe it or not, it's not just about giving up control of content to your audience, a concept that has been around for YEARS and higher education is just catching up to. It's about giving up control of power to those that know what they're are doing so they can make the decisions to move forward. If you had done this already, you wouldn't be trying to play catch up, now would you? Face it, how many people in your web team already have been using social networking and blogging for years? Don't know? Thank you for proving my point.

    If you want to think of the money aspect, let's put it this way. How many students are not going to your college because you don't want to give up the control where it's needed? Guess what, your web team gets paid whether you listen to them or not. But when you don't, students don't go to you school, which brings in less money. So why not listen to the web team?

  • Posted by cranky on September 27, 2007 at 4:00am EDT
  • "the so-called 'millennials,' we’re told, have shorter attention spans than ever. They like pictures, have a knack for exhibiting themselves online and, more importantly, are tech-savvy and sophisticated."

    Can someone please officially dispel this myth soon?

    jst cuz tha cn rit in txt dznt men tha r tek savy or sufistikatd

    Many of the generation in question have difficulties using search engines to find anything other than porn and faux-scholarship from which to plagiarize. And don't get me started on their inability to use a word processing program! [How many of us had to actually use a freaking typewriter before the prices on computers dropped into the affordable range?]

    Add to this the short attention span, exhibitionism, and love of the visual image, and we have a lovely mix of narcissism. Incompetent narcissism. Thank goodness some of them had parents who instilled older, more prosocial values.