Search News


Browse Archives

News

Catholic Character

September 25, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Don’t try reaching a Wyoming Catholic College student by cell. Students can't have cell phones on campus -- a donated cattle ranch in western Wyoming’s Wind River Mountain Range -- or in the surrounding towns.

Nor can students have television sets, and while there are four computer stations with Internet access in the student lounge, there aren’t any Internet connections in the (single-sex) residence halls. (“Inter-visitation” is punishable by almost certain expulsion, while alcohol consumption is punishable by expulsion, too, says Wyoming Catholic's president, the Rev. Robert W. Cook).

Faculty members at the brand-new college would be expected to ensure that any research paper they assign could be completed within the confines of the college's library and, anyway, Father Cook says, more than 90 percent of the papers that students will ever write at Wyoming Catholic are “not research papers but thinking papers. To quickly get them to do research papers is to ask them not to think. We’re intent on trying to get these youngsters to engage in critical thinking.”

“We say to them, ‘Look, God gave you the greatest computer ever created: your brain.’ ”

The distractions of ever-present technology and the wasted time spent chattering or surfing online are the main reasons for the college’s ban, Father Cook says. The 35 students who make up Wyoming Catholic’s first class this fall are expected instead to spend their time outdoors (students start their academic careers with a three-week mandatory backpacking trip), and focusing on the college’s fixed “great and the good books curriculum." In addition to the classics -- Aristotle, Aquinas and Archimedes -- the curriculum includes a required year of horsemanship.

The faculty members entrusted to carry out that curriculum are all contractually prohibited from publicly rejecting the official teachings of the Roman Catholic church, and all Catholic faculty annually make a profession of faith and take an oath of fidelity -- highly unusual requirements for non-theology faculty at Catholic colleges.

The students, coming from 23 different states, “are convinced that Wyoming Catholic College is an authentically Catholic college, and that is not easy to find these days,” Father Cook says in explanation of the brand-new college’s national appeal. “Perhaps there are just a handful, 20 to 25, that would meet rigorous standards of being truly Catholic.”

The Millennial Catholic Colleges

Wyoming Catholic is the newest – and arguably the most conservative -- outgrowth of a spurt of conservative Catholic colleges established in recent years. These institutions have quickly established themselves, in some cases implicitly and in many cases explicitly, in opposition to what their leaders see as the secularization of many of the nation's more than 200 Catholic colleges. So it’s not surprising that the long-time players in Catholic higher education – the players that these colleges are positioning themselves against – welcome the new colleges to the flock with some reservations.

“When you start talking about, ‘This is an authentic college,’ that suggests that other folks aren’t authentic, and that’s unfortunate,” says the Rev. Charles L. Currie, president of the Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities. “I wish them well; I just don’t think they should be prescriptive of how to be Catholic today.”

Among the new Catholic colleges:

  • John Paul the Great Catholic University, which opened in 2006 as a specialized institution focused on business, media and technology. Catholic universities, the institution says on its Web site (in reference to a speech by former Pope John Paul II), “exist for one reason only: to proclaim the Gospel.”
  • The University of Sacramento, founded by a conservative congregation, the Legionaries of Christ, after a nationwide market study. The university, which began offering graduate coursework in January 2005 and now has 90 students, plans to accept its first undergraduate class to a campus in the Sierra Nevada foothills in 2012. The goal is to have 7,000 total students enrolled within 25 years, according to the president, the Rev. Robert Presutti.
  • Ave Maria University in Florida, opened in 2003 by Domino’s Pizza mogul Tom Monaghan, whose law school by the same name is moving from Michigan to Florida amid broad concerns about academic freedom.
  • Southern Catholic College, which, located on a lakeside campus just north of Atlanta, became the first Catholic college in Georgia after starting classes in fall 2005. Echoing Father Cook of Wyoming Catholic, also the first Catholic college in its state, Southern Catholic’s president, Jeremiah J. Ashcroft, says the 191 students perceive the place as “a truly Catholic college. When I was at mass today, we probably had anywhere between 90 and 110 students [attendance is not required], which indicates what their priorities are." Trustees for the college — who have explicitly embraced a 1990 Vatican document, Ex corde Ecclesiae, that’s associated with efforts to make Catholic colleges more Catholic — include the vicar general of the archdiocese of Atlanta and the president of Minnesota’s St. Thomas University.

The newest wave of conservative colleges mirrors a similar wave in the 1970s, when institutions including Christendom College in Virginia, Thomas Aquinas College in California and Thomas More College of Liberal Arts in New Hampshire were founded, says Patrick Reilly, president of the Cardinal Newman Society, devoted to strengthening the Catholic identities of Catholic colleges.

“These two waves of new colleges are very much a reaction to the secularization of Catholic colleges in the United states,” says Reilly. “These new colleges, what’s very distinct about them, is it’s just not this perceived need for more colleges for more students. It’s a reaction to a perceived failing at the other Catholic colleges that do exist.”

“The common conservative perception out there is that Catholic colleges and universities are all secular, [that] they just have gone to hell,” says Lester F. Goodchild, who is converting his dissertation on Catholic colleges into a book while on sabbatical from his position as director of the higher education program and professor of education at California’s Santa Clara University. Goodchild describes the history of Catholic higher education instead as marked by vacillation between periods of “re-Catholicization” and modernization, with the tensions exacerbated by Vatican efforts to enhance the Catholic identities of Catholic colleges through Ex corde.

“One of the things about higher education is that students have freedom,” Goodchild says. The “real bugaboo,” he says, concerns those “folks who don’t understand what higher education is generally: They don’t understand this thing ‘freedom,’ they don’t understand how this has vacillated over time, and they have no concept,” he adds, of ways in which most Catholic universities manifest their Catholic characters while respecting student and faculty freedoms.

Student and Faculty Freedoms

The new colleges largely define themselves by their commitments to the Magisterium, the church's authority on doctrinal teachings. John Paul the Great University, for instance, explicitly stipulates that it “will intentionally seek to avoid causing controversy and confusion among its students in matters of faith. JP Catholic [as the university refers to itself on its Web site] seeks to shape and form solid Catholic leaders and innovators poised to put into action the teachings of Jesus Christ, and not to become agitators for change on matters of doctrine."

While the university also officially states that “all teaching faculty will commit to harmony with Catholic church teachings” and that those who knowingly and publicly contradict the church “compromise their relationship with JP Catholic," it also explicitly affirms its commitment to having a variety of faiths represented among its students, faculty and staff -- and an atmosphere of mutual respect.

When asked how Wyoming Catholic faculty would handle a hot-button issue that the church has taken a position regarding -- abortion, evolution or homosexuality for instance -- Father Cook says that any class discussion would be driven and informed by the church's position. “For example, we wouldn’t likely end up telling the students that evolution is purely a matter of random chance, not guided by God.” (Five of Wyoming Catholic's six faculty are Catholic, and the plan is to hire a second non-Catholic faculty member next year, Father Cook says. While all 35 of the current students are Catholic, he expects that non-Catholics will enroll as the college expands to its target 400-student enrollment).

At Southern Catholic, where, unlike at Wyoming, faculty are not required to make a profession of faith or take an oath of fidelity, would-be professors are informed during the hiring process of the expectation that they respect the Magisterium. Ashcroft says that faculty would be encouraged to allow classroom discussion on all sides of a cultural debate but, "What we do expect is that the church's teaching is pointed out, so that students are aware of where the church stands on these issues."

“Faculty do feel that there’s academic freedom here, but academic freedom means that you have a responsibility, and that responsibility is to teach the truth as best you know it,” Ashcroft says.

“Many of these schools are in effect reactionary in a way that they would define positively,” says Richard A. Yanikoski, president and CEO of the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities.

“They’re reactionary in a sense that they assert that there has been a drift of some kind in the broad cross-section, not all, but the broad cross-section of existing Catholic universities as they have modernized and become more ecumenical. These schools hope to provide an alternative for that,” Yanikoski says. “There are students and families that have a strong desire for this kind of insulated, overtly Catholic, small and traditional campus.”

With the exception of the University of Sacramento, these institutions are also distinguished by the fact that, “Most of them, at their core, have a very strong lay presence, often an overwhelming lay presence,” Yanikoski says. Ave Maria and Southern Catholic, for instance, began as the mere brainchildren of entrepreneurial businessmen.

Creating a Subculture

“The phrase Catholic identity is relatively new in the lexicon of higher education,” explains Yanikoski. “Prior to [about 30 years ago], virtually all Catholic colleges were founded either by a religious order or the diocese itself.” With priests and nuns “in religious attire all over the campus…no one ever discussed Catholic identity. It was just so obviously Catholic that identity wasn’t part of the discussion. It was a given.”

Meanwhile, without those visible signs of Catholicism that earlier generations took for granted, survey data suggest that between 10 and 20 percent of under-40 Catholics self-identify as what William Portier, a University of Dayton professor of religious studies, describes as “evangelical.” These “evangelical Catholics, Portier says, choose to be Catholic through the embrace of traditional markers, like the Pope and the Eucharist. “There’s no more Catholic subculture to create Catholic identity and so people create it for themselves. They are choosing to be Catholics in the way that they think is right.”

“It doesn’t surprise me at all that there’s a market” for colleges that define themselves by their strong Catholic identities, Portier says. “But they’re never going to be the majority of schools.”

“The richness of American higher education is diversity, and I think that’s true of Catholic colleges as well,” says Ashcroft, Southern Catholic College’s president. “So I think that what you’re seeing is a demand by many young Catholics for what they consider to be a strong spiritual element and an environment that is committed to the teachings of the church. But I’m not saying that the way we’re doing it is the only way.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Catholic Character

  • priestly duties
  • Posted by the pope on September 25, 2007 at 7:15am EDT
  • So, they are training kids to be priests, whats new about that?

  • More Conservative Indoctrination
  • Posted by Grover Furr on September 25, 2007 at 9:20am EDT
  • Since questioning -- let alone rejecting -- the dogmas of the Catholic Church is forbidden in these colleges, they really are engaged not in education, but in "indoctrination" as that term is usually understood.

    Indoctrination has nothing to do with the rejecting of "conservative" ideas. They ought to be rejected -- though, to do so thoroughly, students have to be exposed to them, to study them for purposes of refutation.

    Nor does it have to do with "injecting politics" into any given subject. It is impossible to study any subject from outside one's own context anyway. Relating any given subject to contemporary political issues -- say, the current US imperialist aggression against Iraq -- can be very helpful to students in demonstrating the unity of knowledge, the interconnections between many different fields, and the immediacy and relevance to their own lives of subjects that may seem to them to be abstruse.

    Indoctrination has to do with declaring certain subjects and conclusions "off limits" to critical inquiry, investigation, evidence, reason, and possible refutation. Indoctrination is EXACTLY what these Catholic colleges are aiming at.

    But "conservatives" thrive off indoctrination! Funded by corporate monies -- for "conservatism" is, at bottom, nothing but the ideological justification of exploitation, inequality, authoritarianism, and obedience -- "conservatives" set up one institute after another devoted not to discovering the truth, but to promoting "the Free Market", "traditional values", "limited government", etc. In a word: to defending Capitalism. The recent founding of the "Alexander Hamilton Institute" is just the latest example of this "conservative" promotion of indoctrination instead of truth.

    I predict that the so-called "conservatives" who profess to oppose "indoctrination" in higher education will find some excuse NOT to criticize these Catholic colleges -- or not to criticize them very much.

    Maybe some excuse like: "We do not object to colleges that state from the beginning that they intend to indoctrinate students, since the students are thereby forwarned." Or, "To say such colleges should not exist is to violate the religious freedom of those who want them." Or maybe: "These colleges have such a tiny proportion of all college students that their impact is insignificant."

    Such excuses are mere cant, dishonest word-play. For suppose some religious cult were to found a college that frankly taught, say, antisemitism, and said "the teachings of our church are not to be questioned here." Would "conservatives" tolerate it? If so, why? If not, then why not criticize ALL such indoctrination?

    "Conservatism" cannot exist WITHOUT indoctrination and the suppression of vigorous intellectual challenges.

    "Conservativism" cannot survive the search for the truth, because "conservative" ideas are false -- all of them, all the time.

    This is what "conservatives" really oppose, when they claim they are opposing "indoctrination" -- the search for the truth, which has always found "conservative" ideas to be false.

  • Catholic Character, is good, as long as it is Character!
  • Posted by Priyavrat Thareja at Pb Engineering College, Chandigarh, India on September 25, 2007 at 9:20am EDT
  • Salvation, Solvation, or Solution: The end of human life is in achieving something unseen and unknown. The lack of it perhaps leads to re-incarnation or rebirth or a vicious circle of attempting to bring in the order. That is the Hindu mythology for life. Education is just one tool which supports or facilitates each of the phase step onto the right path.

    whether education is imparted in -house, in schools, Gurukuls or in Churches; by priests or by professors, education is defined by the piousness or sanctity of sacredness. Educations is ethos, practising your profession ethically and rendering service to society. Humbly!

    Let us speedily re-educate ourselves. At what place? and what way? -it does not matter.

    Priyavrat Thareja

  • Posted by wintercow20 on September 25, 2007 at 9:50am EDT
  • "“Conservativism” cannot survive the search for the truth, because “conservative” ideas are false — all of them, all the time."

    So much for the exchange of ideas in higher education! Sounds like religion to me.

    Let me ask you a few questions for example.

    (1) Do you favor unfettered free trade?
    (2) Do you wish to see a decline in unionism in the US?
    (3) Do you think that consumers have too few choices today?

    My suspicion (perhaps faith too?) is that you would answer a resounding NO to each of those questions. And your prescription would be to keep those situations from getting worse. That sounds pretty conservative to me? So, even your own conservative ideas are false too? All the time?

    You know what the philosophers tell us, a proposition rises to the status of an axiom when he who denies it may be shown to be using it in the very course of the supposed refutation.

    In this case, the axiom of course would be the opposite of your mature, open-minded, enlightened comment.

  • Concerns for independent thinking
  • Posted by Charlie on September 25, 2007 at 10:00am EDT
  • While I'm not sure that I am completely on board with Grover's rant (at least not in its extremely polemical form), my concern for extremely conservative universities is that the claim supporting Wyoming Catholic's rejection of technology--that the human brain is the greatest computer God has given us--no matter how off the cuff it may be, just doesn't jive with a rejection of intellectual freedom. Of course, someone over at Wyoming Catholic could respond, "Well, of course we allow intellectual freedom. It's intellectual freedom within the bounds of a specific tradition whose truth we believe." And, in one sense, they would be right. Nonetheless, intellectual freedom and honesty has always been about questioning basic presuppositions that we take for granted, from Socrates in Plato's "Apology" right down through today (though I won't argue that all modern thinkers question basic presuppositions, but there are certainly a few out there).

    So, as a Catholic and a philosophy Ph.D. student as a Jesuit university, my concern with this new wave of very conservative Catholic universities isn't indoctrination per se (I think, by and large, many of us are indoctrinated in one form of thinking or another no matter how much we may protest; liberalism too involves a great degree of indoctrination); rather, my concern is that the use of one's reason to determine right and wrong, good and bad and to question basic assumptions is inhibited by admitting students only if they accept certain truths as unquestionable.

  • Indoctrination or character?
  • Posted by Blind Man on September 25, 2007 at 12:25pm EDT
  • While indoctrination certainly is a goal of these "colleges", it is not the main point.

    What is lost in the polemic of the blog is the irony of "building" character in people who have already chosen to limit their character.

    These schools already "preach to the choir".
    Students who choose to attend one of these "critical thinking" schools have already determined voluntarily that there are certain subjects that are off limits because they clash with their beliefs and values. This is why they seek a place which will confirm what they already "know", not challenge them to open their minds to new knowledge.

    The process of learning is a tricky thing, though. Knowledge of things unlooked for may intrude into their studies, and it is the job of the catholic faculty to bring them back to the straight and narrow. Only through denial and fanatical zeal can one maintain ones belief in something even when one has learned differently.

    Cardinal Fang; the comfy chair!

  • MIsnomer
  • Posted by Tom on September 25, 2007 at 12:55pm EDT
  • One of my problems with institutions of this type is that they take a version of Catholicism--one way ofunderstqnding one's Catholicism--and pretend that it is normative. In fact, however, most religious "conservatives" are not truly conservative in the sense of preserving the original form or intent of something. Rather, they almost invariably try to reproduce a fairly recent cultural epoch--in this case the American Catholicism of the early 20th century: heavily authoritarian, intellectually narrow, distrustful of higher education as generally understood and practiced. They have also added a layer, borrowed from fundamentalism, of opposition to scientific inquiry, and in some cases have even imbibed its naive biblicism, extending it to uncritical, unscholarly readings of selected texts from Thomaas Aquinas and Aristotle.. The losers are the poor students whose intellectual horizons will be so foreshortened. They will be decades in the recovery, if they make it.

  • neo-Papist education
  • Posted by david , Ph.D., MFA on September 25, 2007 at 1:20pm EDT
  • Hmm--Taliban West?

    Now that the former Hitler-youth cardinal Ratzinger is pope, are we witnessing a new academy, or is it a me-too for envious catholic fundamentalists who see the protestant instituions of fundamentalism on the 'academic' landscape, and the burgeoning of such 'intellectual' debates as 'creationism' and 'intelligent design', and wish to make their mark on the march back toward medievalism?

  • Higher Learning
  • Posted by Jayne , Graduate Student at Loyola University Chicago on September 25, 2007 at 1:20pm EDT
  • I solidly believe in research and that an undergraduate degree should encompass writings using both research and thinking. The ability to think critically depends on development in those areas. A feature I agree with at this institution is the life skills training involved. Developing horsemanship skills is an excellent way to achieve knowledge of one's limitations, physicially, emotionally and intellectually. Academics are often too focused on controlling exogenous factors in their environment rather than connecting with them, and this notion is often transferred to students.

  • Posted by Kevin M. James on September 25, 2007 at 1:35pm EDT
  • As a graduate of an "earlier generation" school mentioned in the article (Thomas More College of Liberal Arts), I wonder how different these new schools are from my alma mater, and how they will look as they mature.

    Judging solely from this article, it would seem that a traditional/conservative sense of Catholic-ness tends to come before all else in these newer institutions...including, perhaps, the curriculum. (The offerings of "JP Catholic", for instance, "focused on business, media and technology", seem awfully trendy and brazenly utilitarian.) That's a contrast from Thomas More, which has always had an integrated vision of education and character formation. The College's idea of the liberal arts has always been at least as important to its mission as its commitment to Ex corde and the Faith.

    And indeed, I believe the founders of Thomas More were driven to found the school more because of their concern over the decline in the rigor, integrity, and enduring value in the curricula of Catholic universities--their loss of the vision of the liberal arts, of their connection to the great intellectual tradition of the West and the Church, and of their commitment to form the character as well as the intellect of their students--than from worries about the orthodoxy and Catholic-ness of existing institutions.

    At Thomas More, I was able to find not only much greater intellectual rigor than at Williams College (where I had first attended), but a more open discussion and exchange of ideas. It should also be noted that I was a Protestant when I showed up in Merrimack, but never suffered discomfort or disapproval. It was, in fact, more uncomfortable being a believing Evangelical at Williams.

    So, while it no doubt comes as a shock to our excitable and comically closed-minded friend Grover, I found more open minds and fewer intellectual taboos at Thomas More than at Williams. This was due not only to the political correctness of the latter, but the fact that no one comes to the former in the first place (or sticks around long) unless they have a passionate commitment to academic inquiry and the liberal arts. Places like Thomas More are not to everyone's taste...but we are in desperate need of more of them in our day. I wish the best of luck, the best of students, and the best of intellectual adventures to the new institutions.

  • Small colleges and intellectual intensity
  • Posted by R.J. O'Hara at The Collegiate Way on September 25, 2007 at 3:05pm EDT
  • I think one of the great virtues of places like the ones described above, irrespective of their religious orientation, is their very small size. Small colleges (and small residential colleges within larger universities) will always produce an intensity of life that cannot be replicated in the massive industrial universities that we inflict on so many students today. A secular St. John's or a Catholic Thomas More, with 400 students or fewer, and all of them in residence, cannot fail to be intellectually vibrant.

    I'd suggest that the people working to develop these new colleges are reacting as much to the quantitative overgrowth of so many educational institutions since the 1960s, and the qualitative consequences of that overgrowth, as they are to any purposeful shift in the educational philosophy of those older and now-overgrown campuses. I'd agree with Mr. James that higher education is in need of more such institutions, but it is the small size that is key, not the religious orientation per se. The growing international residential college movement, in both secular and sectarian universities, is a major generational transformation that acknowledges this very need:

    http://collegiateway.org/news

  • Size and Mission
  • Posted by Kevin M. James on September 25, 2007 at 3:35pm EDT
  • Dr. O'Hara makes a good point. A smaller institution is more personal and more intense, and allows for a more tightly-focused mission and vision of higher education. Much is sacrificed when institutions grow vast, try to be all things to all people, and give too much rein to specialization. (Though there are gains to be had too: in the offering of a wider range of options both academically and otherwise, in the achievements made possible in research, in the quality of the football team.)

    On the other hand, there are disadvantages and dangers to being small. Long-term viability is a great challenge when you're extremely small, like Thomas More or Wyoming Catholic. And there is a danger of groupthink, unprofessional management of the institution, and other quirks and side-effects...especially when religion is also involved. Some of the inflammatory--dare one say bigoted?--remarks above notwithstanding, there are real dangers and temptations there. Not all institutions have been successful in this regard...not even all institutions in New Hampshire.

    In the end, it can be a delicate balance, between remaining true to the mission and to maintaining the College's unique place apart from the world, and remaining open to the world and different and challenging ideas. Between the Scylla of being as closed-minded and dogmatic as Dr. Furr, and the Charybdis of being so open-minded that one's brains fall out. Again, I wish the new institutions success in navigating the difficult passages ahead. It can be incredibly hard, but can bear fruit of inestimable worth when it works.

  • Posted by Mark Press on September 25, 2007 at 4:15pm EDT
  • News items like this predictably elicit foolish, thoughtless and ignorant responses devoid of philosophical understanding or critical thought. We get the usual nonsense about issues that thinkers have struggled with for millenia but that some correspondents like Grover have solved by fiat. The notion that human reason is the ultimate source of truth, that contemporary colleges are bastions of considered intellectual exchange and respectful discussion of all views, that issues which have been endlessly debated can have simple resolutions are either childish or naive. I consider Catholicism to be a false religion but I can appreciate the integrity and intellectual sophistication of those who understand that if one believes in ultimate truth it is one's duty to teach it to one's children. In fact, my reading of the current academic scene is that there are very few places where there is not a general commitment to religion, whether it be liberalism, Marxism, uncompromising secularism or traditional sacral beliefs. Too often claiming to have an open mind really reveals a hole in the head.

  • Post-modern stupidity causes discontent
  • Posted by Jeff on September 25, 2007 at 5:30pm EDT
  • Many, many people dislike the anti-intellectual climate in the modern universities. In fact, the modern university is utterly devoid of practical reason. Professors live in perpetual adolescence, and claim it as a mark of intellectual maturity.

    From the Boston Herald, “Brainpower short-circuits .”
    “There isn’t a barber college or trucking school that would let a Jew-hating nut like Iran’s Whack-Job rant away on their campus. If you’re Adolf Hitler’s agent and you’re trying to book a speaking gig, who do you call: Columbia University or the Carolina School of Straight Chiropractic? If you’re looking for a student to slap on a circuit board and Silly Putty and head for the airport, do you ask a drunk coed from the community college or dial MIT? If you want something done that’s really, really stupid, you need to find someone who is really, really smart. Or thinks they are, anyway…Today, right now, soldiers and Marines who are not allowed to participate in ROTC on Columbia’s campus are being attacked with weapons from Iran. How many Americans do you have to kill before you’re no longer welcome among Ivy League elitists? More, says Columbia University. More.”

    People want an education. You can “learn” how to be a post-modern malcontent for a lot less than most modern universities charge.

  • Posted by Clayton E. Cramer on September 25, 2007 at 6:00pm EDT
  • "Indoctrination has to do with declaring certain subjects and conclusions 'off limits' to critical inquiry, investigation, evidence, reason, and possible refutation. Indoctrination is EXACTLY what these Catholic colleges are aiming at."

    And this is different from many departments of secular universities in what way?

    I must confess that some of these schools don't sound like what I think of as a university.

    But let's not pretend that some departments of secular universities (of which Professor Furr is pretty typical) are so dramatically different. They're just promoting a different religion--and usually with gobs of taxpayer funding.

  • Interesting threads of thought
  • Posted by Clark Roush, Ph.D. on September 26, 2007 at 5:05am EDT
  • Esteemed colleagues - you provide some interesting and diverse views. In the end, I hope we wish each institution staying true to their mission as much success as the ones we work at. Certainly, for both students and faculty alike, they will "vote with their feet" and the college will be no different in that aspect than any of ours.

  • danger down the line
  • Posted by Angelo on September 26, 2007 at 1:50pm EDT
  • The danger is not only what these new "Catholic" (quite ironic sense of the word) colleges will do to their students, but what their graduates will do with their settled worldview when they go on to infiltrate law and graduate schools elsewhere. Provided the new colleges are or become accredited, their conservative leaning will appeal to some on admissions committees in mainstream Catholic (and other) research and law institutions. What today is a fringe conservative ideology may well become "mainstreamed" tomorrow as the sheer force of time turns the novel into the established.