Search News


Browse Archives

News

Dealing with 'Admissions Creep'

October 1, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

While admissions officers and high school counselors don't necessarily agree on all the ways to deal with "admissions creep," the issue has captured their attention.

The Assembly of the National Association for College Admission Counseling, meeting Saturday in Austin, voted to create a special panel to study the issue -- in which high school students report ever increasing pressure about the admissions process, earlier and earlier in their high school careers. At the same time, the Assembly modified (some say weakened) an association guideline that was passed last year to bar colleges from admitting students to their institutions prior to September 15 of the students’ senior years in high school, and from setting application deadlines prior to October 15 of the senior year.

"I think people thought the September 15 policy addressed a narrow part of the problem, and had unintended consequences," said Ken Fox, chair of NACAC’S Admissions Practices Committee. "The issue of addressing deadline creep is clearly before NACAC," he said.

As a result, Fox said he wasn't disappointed to see the Assembly modify the September 15 deadline, which had been adopted on the recommendation of Fox's committee.

The change adopted Saturday says that admissions offers may not be made until a transcript is available for six semesters of high school work, effectively requiring the junior year to be finished, but leaving open the possibility of summer offers that were barred by the September 15 policy. The revision also allows even earlier offers by community colleges or other open admissions institutions that base admissions decisions on the application alone, not on a transcript.

The September 15 deadline was adopted last year after reports that an increasing number of colleges were making admissions offers in the junior year. But the deadline was opposed by many community colleges and large public universities, some of which use early offers to encourage disadvantaged students to stay in high school and prepare themselves for a higher education.

Also on Saturday, the NACAC Assembly voted to urge colleges to provide "comparable” treatment of early and regular decision applicants when it comes to "aid," funds awarded either based on merit or financial need. Fox, of NACAC’S Admissions Practices Committee, said that the rule was consistent with association policies that previously have urged colleges not to create an unfair edge for early applicants. High school counselors report that some colleges -- apparently feeling that they don't need to worry about their early decision applicants -- seem to favor other students with aid.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Dealing with 'Admissions Creep'

  • Aid and ED
  • Posted by Robert J. Massa , Vice President at Dickinson College on October 1, 2007 at 8:10am EDT
  • I was unable to attend the NACAC conference this year, but I am delighted that the assembly adopted a resolution originating in Pennsylvania calling on colleges to eliminate any differences in aid awarding between early and regular applicants. The popular "myth" of aid "discrimination" against ED applicants must be dismantled. What better way than for NACAC to go on record supporting equal financial aid treatment between ED and regular admission candidates. Students and counselors should also know that ED applicants can withdraw and apply elsewhere if ED financial aid (after appeal) is inadequate. In combination with equal treatment, this should help to reverse the common advice of discouarging aid applicants from applying ED. Thank you NACAC!

    Bob Massa
    Dickinson College

  • Understand creep
  • Posted by One who sees the big picture on October 1, 2007 at 12:50pm EDT
  • Remember, admissions creep is only a problem in the environment of highly-selective institutions. Furthermore, these institutions don't deserve all the blame. The admissions frenzy is fed by persons from multiple sectors including students themselves, "helicopter" parents, admissions officers, private guidance counselors, and even school-based counselors. There are plenty of fine regionally-accredited institutions of higher learning, public and private, small and large, urban and rural, that have zero concept of admissions creep because they don't operate in a highly-competitive admissions environment. No amount of policy-making can fix this frenzy. Instead, why don't we encourage all of our youngsters to think outside the box and explore more than just a handful of "selective" institutions?

  • What about athletes?
  • Posted by Ellen on October 1, 2007 at 5:45pm EDT
  • Division I athletes are recruited as early as the summer before junior year, and are pressured to commit during that year. Did NACAC address these youngsters?

  • It's Not Just Highly Selective Colleges
  • Posted by Curious Cat on October 2, 2007 at 12:55am EDT
  • In my experience, admissions creep is not limited to highly selective colleges or athletes.

    A number of colleges with separate Learning Disabilities programs start accepting students in early summer before senior year. In small programs with limited spaces, this creates enormous pressure on college bound high school students who know that they need a LD/ ADD program, to apply as early as they can.