Search News


Browse Archives

News

Quick Takes: Ore. Tech President Dies, Jena 6 Walkout, TA Contract, Randolph Will Sell Art, Mich. Averts Shutdown, Memphis Shooting, Noose Furor, Flag Furor, Alumni Furor, Suit Against Career Ed, Wittenberg Goes SAT-Optional, Unusual Idea on College Costs

October 2, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement
  • Martha Ann Dow, president of Oregon Institute of Technology, died Saturday, six months after being diagnosed with breast cancer, The Oregonian reported. Dow was credited with enrollment increases at Oregon Tech and with expanding programs in the health professions. In September, Dow wrote a column for The Oregonian on the importance of educating more health professionals and she recounted trying to encourage some the nursing assistants she met in the hospital to enter nursing degree programs. Dow became president at Oregon Tech in 1998, after six years as provost.
  • Students at campuses nationwide walked out of classes Monday as part of continuing protests on behalf of the Jena 6, a group of young African American high school students facing charges for attacking a white student after a series of incidents, including one involving the placement of a noose on a tree outside school, that black students say were ignored. In September, thousands of students traveled to Jena, La., for a massive protest. Among the campuses where students walked out: Arizona State University, California State University at Long Beach, the State University of New York at Binghamton, the University of Colorado at Boulder, the University of Louisville and the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
  • Just hours after a previous contract expired, the University of California and the United Auto Workers union that represents teaching assistants, tutors and other academic employees who are students reached a tentative contract agreement. A statement released by the university, and quoting its officials and the UAW, said that the contract would run for two years and contained "significant improvement in wages, child care, parental leave, workload protections and health care." Details are expected after a ratification vote by 12,000 employees covered by the agreement.
  • In a move that has been widely expected and that is likely to infuriate alumnae, Randolph College's board has voted to sell four masterpieces from its collection, in the hope of raising millions of dollars, The New York Times reported. Randolph, which recently started to admit men, has struggled financially and officials have said an art sale might be necessary to raise money. Alumnae, many of them opposed to coeducation, say that the college is destroying the integrity of a key collection of American art.
  • Michigan narrowly avoided a threatened government shutdown Monday after legislators approved a 30-day continuation budget and measures to raise the personal income tax and expand the sales tax base in the wee hours of the morning. Michael Boulus, executive director of the Presidents Council for the State Universities of Michigan, said that public institutions expect to get their first payment of the new year, based on last year’s appropriation, October 16. And while a deferred August payment from last year’s budget cycle won’t be forthcoming this month, he’s optimistic that, given the tax increases, universities will eventually get their money back -- and even perhaps see an increase in funding. State appropriations for higher education in Michigan have been negative for the past five years, Boulus said.
  • The University of Memphis called off classes Monday after a football player was fatally shot on campus, in what authorities believe was a targeted attack, the Associated Press reported.
  • Grambling State University is investigating reports that adults at a university-run elementary school, in a discussion of why nooses can be used as a racist symbol, placed a noose around the neck of at least one student, the AP reported. Photographs of the incident appeared in The Gramblinite, the student newspaper, but were removed from its Web site. Editors posted a statement indicating that they made the decision themselves to remove the photographs, but that others at the university had for a time removed an article about the incident without consulting the editors.
  • The Penn Valley Campus of Metropolitan Community College of Kansas City removed a Vietnamese flag from its lobby Monday, following anger over the flag from Vietnamese immigrants who said that the flag reflected the tyranny of the country's Communist Party leaders, The Kansas City Star reported. The inclusion of the flag in displays of flags from many nations has provoked controversy at numerous campuses, among them the University of Texas at Arlington.
  • A state judge has ordered the Mississippi University for Women to recognize its long-standing alumni association, and to end relations with a new alumni group allied with the president of the university, Claudia Limbert, The Commercial Dispatch reported. The judge ruled that Limbert's actions violated the rights of the original alumni group to criticize her.
  • Career Education Corp. faces a lawsuit from dozens of students alleging that its California Culinary Academy misled them about the quality of education they would receive and their prospects for career advancement afterwards. A Career Education spokeswoman said company officials had not seen the lawsuit and could not comment, but that the culinary academy "remains proud of its outstanding 30-year history."
  • Wittenberg University, in Ohio, has become the latest liberal arts institution to make the SAT and ACT optional rather than required for applicants.
  • Richard M. Daley, the mayor of Chicago, has an unusual approach to college costs. The Chicago Sun-Times reported that he is calling for colleges to cut course requirements in half so students can all graduate in half the time, at half the cost.
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Quick Takes: Ore. Tech President Dies, Jena 6 Walkout, TA Contract, Randolph Will Sell Art, Mich. Averts Shutdown, Memphis Shooting, Noose Furor, Flag Furor, Alumni Furor, Suit Against Career Ed, Wittenberg Goes SAT-Optional, Unusual Idea on College Costs

  • re: Mayor Daley
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at FHEAP on October 2, 2007 at 8:30am EDT
  • Mayor Daley previously drew national attention to the fact that student debt has an inhibiting effect on starting new families for those working to pay their loans off.

    His call for a national debate on skyrocketing higher ed costs is warranted, especially if such a debate confronts the unaddressed problems of credential inflation (see link) and overschooling.

    His remarks about overschooling deserve a response as well; however, his call for reducing 4 yr education to 2 yr -- isn't that already covered by the community college system (which originated under William Rainey Harper, erstwhile Univ of Chicago president and former Chautauqua wizard)?

  • so many furors?
  • Posted by Larry on October 2, 2007 at 8:55am EDT
  • Three furors in one day?

    I ask you... can the Republic stand this many?

  • College Costs
  • Posted by Mary Boehm on October 2, 2007 at 8:55am EDT
  • I find the juxtaposition of the articles on Randolph Macon selling off its art collection and Mayor Daley's cry for lowering college costs by cutting the requirements in half telling. I remember in the late 1960's when tuition, room and board were $3,000 a year and merit scholarships did not exist because one didn't want to take money from deserving scholarship students. Now that colleges are so expensive, even someone in the upper middle classes feels a real pinch and looks longingly at the merit scholarships. It is a shame that students are mortgaging their earnings for so many years to pay for climbing walls and other toys that have been brought in to entice naive eighteen year olds to enroll in an institution.

  • College Costs
  • Posted by Vicki on October 2, 2007 at 10:00am EDT
  • Mary- I think the exponential rise in technology costs has more to do with the increasing costs of higher education than a climbing wall in a fitness facility. When I started college 20 years ago, our classrooms had blackboards, and occasionally, overhead projectors. Today my graduate school has a computer, a digital projector, an Elmo, and internet access in every classroom. Instructors can borrow a cart with enough laptops for their entire class. Almost every building has wireless internet access. The technology costs are always ongoing because computers and software need to be replaced every three years and internet access needs to be paid every month. There is an army of tech specialists on staff to keep it all running. This is the price we pay to prepare students to compete in a global economy.

  • College Costs
  • Posted by DocA on October 2, 2007 at 11:45am EDT
  • There's another approach that actually might cut costs -- rethink the tradtional definition of a college course. Who said 3 credit hours is a sacred doctrine. As simple a move as escalating 300 and 400 level courses to 4 credit hours each would allow each more carefully selected and designed course to penetrate 25% further into the nominal 60 hours (15 courses instead of 20) and increase the program leverage of each faculty member. I don't know that it would reduce time to graduate, but it would reduce instructional costs -- and might teach a bit more in depth and insure more cross connections among courses. Combined with actually using summers, then you could cut time to graduate while potentially increasing depth of instruction in upper division courses. Art and studio programs have known this for year.

  • Daley and college costs
  • Posted by Timothy J. Duszynski at Continuum Learning on October 2, 2007 at 11:45am EDT
  • Mayor Daley 's comments underscore that if the individual is viewed as the sole, or primary, beneficiary of a college education, then continuing current policies of cost-shifting to the individual make sense; and one way for the commodity of a higher education to be affordable by its beneficiary is by requiring less of it (schooling) for the benefit derived. If, on the other hand, the beneficiary is all of us, then we should all contribute to the cost, and have a concommitant stake in the commodity we are paying for. We (implicitly) have the latter through government oversight, accreditation, and the like, imperfect as these aproaches and systems may be. Why not address the real issue of who pays for a college education. Maybe we ought turn our attention to setting our priorities on who benefits from all of this learning and education--we all do--and put our money where our priorities clearly are, and where they should be in the future.

  • Wittenberg
  • Posted by G. Craig on October 2, 2007 at 12:15pm EDT
  • Why is it that every time a college decides to go "SAT optional" it appears to be of such significance that we have to hear about it? Is this a subtle form of pressure on the rest of us?

  • Daly's plan
  • Posted by Dave at USC on October 2, 2007 at 4:40pm EDT
  • Sure, Mayor Daly, but why not save even more money for students by having them buy their degrees on line, using "life-experiences" and such instead of courses? After all, what does it matter how you "get your degree" as with many high school diplomas?

    Gee whiz, if the Mayor's pop, the former mayor of Chi, had gone to college, he might have gotten all morally confused by those humanities and social science requirements and not ended up running the most corrupt and powerful political machine since Tammany Hall. Wouldn't that have been a loss for the Windbag City?

  • College Costs
  • Posted by ACF on October 3, 2007 at 4:10am EDT
  • College costs have increased because colleges have decided to sharply increase the "retail" cost of tuition while using that excess cash to pay for lower income students.

    The result is that the retail cost has skyrocketed above the rate of inflation while the real cost (after "need-based" grants) has been at, or below, inflation.

    So, no problem. This is just another way to tax those who produce more of economic value for the benefit of those who produce less. I am surprised that colleges don't advertise this wonderful achievement.

    Not only do the data support this conclusion, but it should be obvious that no additional net revenue is being generated because salaries of Professors and staff have only kept up with inflation.

  • College Price - The market
  • Posted by Duncan on October 3, 2007 at 9:35am EDT
  • Higher Ed had been promoted as the way to make more income. People believe in it and that is their goal.

    But, the current higher ed system is not build based on that goal (Community college are close, but traditional 4 year are not) and this is why there are costs that are not directly associated with that goal and there are probably courses that are definitely needed to achieve that goal?

    Personally, I believe competition is the way to bring the price close to the costs. It is true that technology could cost money. But on the other hand, it also save money in reducing labor needs. There is really no sense in trying to pin point a source of the rising cost. All we can ask for is the effective costs that will help students reach their goal.

    The free market model is a good one to learn from. By setting objective standard on the product and set corporation free to compete.