Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Benefits of Dual Enrollment

October 17, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A new study from the Community College Research Center finds that dual enrollment programs – which have rapidly proliferated in recent years in part because of state support – are associated with positive outcomes on such measures as high school graduation and college enrollment rates, college grade point averages and progress toward college completion.

Finding that students from a broad spectrum of backgrounds benefit from enrolling in college courses while still in high school, the authors of “The Postsecondary Achievement of Participants in Dual Enrollment: An Analysis of Student Outcomes in Two States” argue that the recent expansion of dual enrollment programs, heretofore not well studied, may well be "warranted."

Furthermore, they write that “states and programs should consider ways to encourage participation for a broad range of students.” Traditionally, the authors point out, dual enrollment programs focused on high-achieving students, but they're increasingly perceived as beneficial in promoting academic rigor and easing the high school to college transition for students with average grade point averages and an interest in technical careers.

The Community College Research Center study, conducted by Melinda Mechur Karp, Juan Carlos Calcagno, Katherine L. Hughes, Dong Wook Jeong and Thomas R. Bailey, tracks high school and college outcomes for dual enrollment participants in New York City and Florida, with a specific focus on students pursuing career and technical education (although, for Florida, the researchers also examine outcomes for all students enrolled). Controlling for a number of student characteristics, the researchers compare the outcomes for dual enrollment students to those of their respective peer groups, comparing dual enrollment students involved with technical education to their peers also in technical education but not involved in dual enrollment, for instance.

The researchers find in Florida that dual enrollment is positively associated with the likelihood that students – both the full sample of students and the subset involved in career and technical education -- will earn a high school diploma, initially enroll in a four-year institution, enroll full-time and persist in college to a second semester. Students who participated in dual enrollment in high school had significantly higher cumulative college GPAs three years after high school graduation than did their peers who did not participate in dual enrollment programs, and they had also earned more college credits (indicating progress toward a degree) than non-participating peers.

Also in Florida, researchers conclude that male and low-income students seem to glean a particularly strong benefit from the dual enrollment programs, while, on some measures, students with lower high school grades benefit more than students with higher grades.

As for New York City, the researchers track the outcomes of vocational high school graduates who participated in College Now, a partnership involving the City University of New York. Researchers find that the College Now participants are more likely than their peers to pursue a bachelor’s degree, earn higher first-semester GPAs and progress toward a degree.

The study finds conflicting evidence on the question of whether the intensity of dual enrollment participation has an effect on outcomes. In Florida, they find that the outcomes remain relatively constant whether high school students take one college course or more than five, while in New York City, the effect on GPA, for instance, seems to hinge on students taking two or more college courses.

Because they find that dual enrollment programs seem to benefit a wide range of students, the authors suggest that dual enrollment courses be offered tuition-free for low-income students, that offerings be expanded, including those involving career and technical fields, and that restrictive eligibility requirements should be loosened -- in Florida, for instance, a state law guarantees access to dual enrollment programs only for students with a GPA of 3.0 or above. Schools of course don't want to set students up for failure by sending them to college courses they're unprepared for, but Katherine L. Hughes, an author of the study and assistant director of the Community College Research Center, housed at Columbia University’s Teachers College, pointed out that programs like College Now offer participating students extensive support.

"The big conclusion is that we have some real evidence now that this is an effective strategy for helping students make a better transition to college and persist in college once they're there," said Hughes. "We see that as being particularly effective for lower-income students and for males and if you're looking at lower-income students, states and policymakers are weighing how to invest their money."

"If traditionally these programs have been for the high-achieving students, the ones who are already going to be successful in college, it seems pretty clear that we should invest in these programs for those who don't necessarily see themselves as college-bound."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on The Benefits of Dual Enrollment

  • Lax QC in dual enrollment
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project on October 17, 2007 at 9:55am EDT
  • In a surprise move earlier this year, the Florida council of community college presidents voted to approve a comprehensive overhaul of dual enrollment courses for the entire state. The initiative is unparalled in its breadth and scope.

    http://home.earthlink.net/~fheapblog/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/DualEnrollmentOverhaul.rtf

    In sharp contrast with the laissez faire attitude of the past, the Council of Presidents, an administrative body made up of community college presidents, has defined an ambitious set of goals for shoring up the lax oversight of the statewide program that allows tens of thousands of high school students to earn both high school and college credit while taking college level courses. These courses are usually given at local high schools by high school instructors for college credit that is transferable to 2 year and 4 year colleges and universities. Community colleges are responsible for the awarding of dual enrollment (called Early College by the Council) college credits.

    The central challenge facing the state has been the problem of bridging the organizational and historical gaps between the 28 community colleges and the 68 school districts in the state. Compounding these difficulties, is the fact that over the past decade, dual enrollment programs have sprung up around Florida in great variety and with diverse levels of rigor and quality.

    The initiative is comprised of standards covering every aspect of the articulating relationships between the community colleges and local school districts, including standards for admission into dual enrollment courses, faculty credentialing and oversight, curriculum standards, classroom expectations, assessment and program review, and Articulation Agreements.

    For example, in prior years, community colleges sometimes did not have written agreements (Articulation Agreements) with school districts in which EC/DE courses were given, and this has resulted in deep concern regarding the quality of these courses.

    It remains to be seen, however, how this ambitious initiative will be implemented. The Statement of Standards included no deadlines, and the group promulgating it has no legal standing to enforce it. It is also unclear why the Council of Presidents, a relatively minor body, has taken the lead on this rather than the Office of Articulation or the Division of Community Colleges and Workforce Education, FL DOE.

    But by its very nature, dual enrollment / Early College programs inhabit a murky zone that straddles the realms of secondary and postsecondary education. The present initiative, however, seeks to bridge this gap in unprecedented ways that may also have an impact on other states.

    Compounding these problems, the regional accrediting association for the South, SACS, has been officially moving away from enforcing faculty standards since 2002, which apply to courses and course credits awarded by community colleges. This has left much confusion in its wake, and makes the provisions in the Florida DE overhaul problematic.

    At this time, it is unclear what additional measures will be needed to fill the vacuum created by SACS backing away from faculty standards, thereby leaving it up to the individual institutions themselves to decide who can teach college-level courses. The diversity for which the South is famous makes this problematic, especially with the spotlight now on standards and quality control in higher education.

  • Dual Enrollment
  • Posted by Steve on October 17, 2007 at 9:55am EDT
  • I tried to get Greenwich to substitute classes at local colleges for AP courses when I was on the education committee and I got two good arguments. First from the parents that colleges expect and demand AP courses not college courses. Second, the high school teachers would not give up the AP courses because they are fun to teach and gave them status teaching “college level courses” in the community. The bad argument was the extra cost of transportation when we would save money.
    I think taking real college courses instead of fake college courses called APs is a great cost effective idea but there are significant social problems.

  • Posted by Linda , Parent on October 17, 2007 at 9:55am EDT
  • As a parent of a student in dual enrollment, I also feel very positive about the program. I think it will make the transition to college much easier and less stressful. She has still maintained nearly the same GPA of 3.6 and has learned some lessons about how a college class is stuctured early on when it almost doesn't count.
    I am concerned that there be some bar set rather than opening the program to anyone. There must be a min GPA, or at least ability to pass the college's assesments or it is a waste of the students time and effort and the tax payers money.
    I would guess that the reason these students have been so successful is a combination of their desire to succeed and their academic ability. My daughter persued this choice on her own. It would never have worked if I pushed it on her. It takes a great deal of time management and self disapline to succeed in a program like this. It is also not for the student who is heavily involved in the High School community. The student does miss out a lot in the High School experience like schoold spirit type events. All in all I would highly recomend investigating the oportunity to participate in a dual enrollment program if a student is interested.

  • AP vs EC
  • Posted by Faculty Person on October 17, 2007 at 12:45pm EDT
  • Steve,

    I agree that in general early college courses should not replace AP courses. Instead these courses can cover subjects that are not available via AP at local schools.

    In addition in some cases it may be advantageous to the student to take EC rather than AP for scheduling reasons (such was the case for one course for my daughter).

  • Concurrent Enrollment
  • Posted by Gillian B. Thorne , Director, UConn Early College Experience at University of Connecticut on October 17, 2007 at 4:45pm EDT
  • It is important to make a distinction between dual enrollment in general and concurrent enrollment specifically. The latter, a special case of dual enrollment, requires that the college courses are taught on the high school campuses by high school instructors who have been certified as adjunct professors. Professional development is required for instructors, and a close relationship to university faculty and university resources is fostered. UConn Early College Experience serves 5,000 students annually; these students begin their college educations in their familiar environment that allows them to focus on the academic aspects of college as they prepare for a more complete transition. Concurrent enrollment programs are often (and should always be) accredited by national standards developed by the National Alliance of Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships (www.nacep.org).
    College Now (the CUNY program cited in the article) has a focus on concurrent enrollment; however, the research cited (Hughes) in this article unfortunately did not differentiate between generalized dual enrollment and the more specific concurrent enrollment. The mission and goals of each are different, and both are different from Advanced Placement, which is a high stakes testing program based on performance in a single sitting, and not intended to holistically improve the high school environment. Colleges do NOT universally accept AP scores, nor is their educational value beyond dispute.

  • DE spells disaster
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project on October 17, 2007 at 9:05pm EDT
  • Thorne makes the following points:
    Point 1. It is important to make a distinction between dual enrollment in general and concurrent enrollment specifically.

    Response: I am not clear on this. NACEP doesn’t make this distinction, does it?

    Point 2. DE requires that the college courses are taught on the high school campuses by high school instructors who have been certified as adjunct professors.

    Response: This is a myth. There is no reason that the micro-situational factors producing the out-of-field teacher assignment problem at the secondary level (cf. NCLB HQT) are not also present at the postsecondary. See papers at: http://www.gse.upenn.edu/faculty/ingersoll.html

    Point 3. Professional development is required for instructors, and a close relationship to university faculty and university resources is fostered.

    Response: There is no evidence of this. FL School districts are not even distinguishing between AP / IB / DE in their articulation agreements. From this perspective, then, DE is a disaster here.

    Point 4. Concurrent enrollment programs are often (and should always be) accredited by national standards developed by the National Alliance of Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships (www.nacep.org).

    Response: The Florida “Statement of Standards” (linked in prior post) is modeled on the NACEP “Statement of NACEP Standards.” The problem is in the implementation: the CCs and school districts are ignoring this guidance, perhaps because it is seen as an infringement on their autonomy in assigning teachers, which, by the way, is a cherished right here in the South. Almost 50% of DE HS instructors do not meet adjunct faculty credentialing guidance in the local district, which has the highest EC/DE participation levels in the state.

  • Concurrent Enrollment
  • Posted by Jerry Edmonds , Director at Syracuse University Project Advance on October 18, 2007 at 2:55pm EDT
  • I am pleased to see research being conducted on dual enrollment from agencies outside of NACEP that furthers the scholarship on dual and concurrent enrollment. Many of us involved with concurrent enrollment programs (CEP) conduct program specific research and evaluation studies to ensure that the quality and integrity of the courses offered in the high schools matches or exceeds those of the campus sections.

    In regards to NACEP definitions, they define concurrent enrollment as follows:

    "Through Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships, qualified students can earn college credit prior to high school graduation. CEPs differ from other pre-college credit programs because high school instructors teach the college courses during the normal school day. Such programs provide a direct connection between secondary and post-secondary institutions and an opportunity for collegial collaboration.
    Although courses in some CEPs may have some elements or characteristics of the programs stated below, CEPs are distinct programs from the following:
    - Programs in which the high school student travels to the college campus to take courses prior to graduation during the academic year or during the summer.
    - Programs where college faculty travel to the high school to teach courses to the high school students.
    - The College Board Advanced Placement Program and the International Baccalaureate Program where standardized tests are used to assess students’ knowledge of a curriculum developed by a committee consisting of both college and high school faculty. "

    Source:
    http://nacep.org/pdfs/NACEP_Standards1.pdf

    I think part of the problem we encounter is the different definitions that are used, sometimes interchangeably, to describe dual and concurrent enrollment. The NACEP standards are excellent resources for ensuring quality programs as well as outlining the college/university's responsibilities toward the participating high schools and students.

  • Competing jurisdictions?
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project on October 18, 2007 at 5:35pm EDT
  • Although I am still not clear on this, or who the partnerships are with, etc., it is clear that a major obstacle to the diffusion of this innovation is the problem of competing jurisdictions.

    Traditionally, and according to federal law, national and regional accrediting associations have jurisdiction over the awarding of college credit by institutions.

    Standards promulgated outside the federally recognized arrangements, whether private or public, can only confuse an already perplexed public.

    Since NACEP lies outside this pre-existing structure, without any federal mandate, it can and will be ignored by institutions and their accreditors.

    Symptomatic of this overcrowding problem is the College Board's new AP certification process. It is doubtful that any of these quality assurance mechanisms will become stabilized; they simply lack institutional legitimacy.

    Since this is the jurisdiction of the federally recognized accreditors, this initiative cannot compete. That said, I have to admit that if individual states were to implement the NACEP standards, maybe it can survive this way.

    But I am watching NACEP fail in Florida, this year, because none of the exogenous institutional actors have committed to it. And the endogenous actors are ignoring it.
    (see link).

    I wish you the best of luck, because this is very much needed.

  • CE is high stakes and..
  • Posted by StrumpetwithaTrumpet on October 20, 2007 at 7:15pm EDT
  • I wanted to comment on the CE parent's post, when she said that the CE classes were low stakes. One of my major problems with them (and I have plenty!) is that they really aren't low stakes. They are part of the student's college transcripts and, in my state at least, are counted as transfer credit. We have students come in with so much CE that some first-time freshmen have 30, 40, even 60 credits and an associate's degree. Low grades in CE can affect both incoming scholarship status and long-term GPA. We have 250+ "freshmen" who entered on academic probation because of CE classes!

  • Take it from an actual DE student...
  • Posted by Max Z. , Full-Time Dual-Enrollment Student at LSCC and Mt. Dora High School on May 9, 2009 at 11:00am EDT
  • I was curious about how dual-enrollment students performed over the long run compared to those taking regular and/or AP HS classes and the results aren't surprising. I chose to enroll in this program as a Junior and decided to do it full-time as well (12 or more credits/semester) with the intention of receiving an AA and my HS diploma at the same time. I'm now 3 of 5 semesters into it with a college GPA of 3.8. I'm not entirely sure what my HS GPA is yet; unweighted it should stay put around 3.4+ and weighted it may be in the 4.25-5.50 range.

    Before enrollment:
    I was a normal HS student with a consistent 3.3 GPA and a few extra-curriculars. I learned about the program from my guidance counselor during a class meeting and I was all ears. When the possibility of receiving an AA while in HS was mentioned, my thoughts were accelerated. I imagined what it would feel like to have an AA as an 18 year old...how great it would be to be 2-years ahead of my competition...and finally, the expanded list of colleges I could have a chance attending. But then came the self-doubt: "this is for smarter students, not me." "I have no idea what college is going to be like...some say it's easy, others say it's hard." But I was smart enough just to sign my life away anyway and enroll. Shortly thereafter I doubted myself again and said to myslef, "I can't believe I did that." Confidence then set in and I told myself that no matter how hard the classes were that I would pass them with flying colors.

    Steps to Enrollment:
    I had to talk to a few people, then pass the College Placement Test, and a whole check-list of other items to do. It was very intimidating at first; just the paperwork and registering process itself, but this is a good thing because it enabled me to figure things out for myself. I was also burdened with the responsibility of not missing deadlines and picking classes and exploring majors that would shape my entire life thereafter. In hindsight, the process isn't that bad.

    D/E Experience Itself and My Thoughts:
    I take all of my classes directly at the college (LSCC) and the experience is unbelievable. All of my classes have been at the very least, interesting, unlike tedious and ultimately lackluster public HS classes. I believe this is what motivates me to do well in these college classes and most importantly retaining the information.
    For once in my life I thourougly enjoyed going to class. This immediately changed how I approached school life. I wake up now in a positive mood, pondering the possible topics that will be covered in class. It's also anxiety free; there are no detentions, referralls, or other petty greivances. You come to class, adhere to the professors rules and everything runs smooth. The worse thing that could happen is that you are thrown out of class. For a while I got a kick out of saying profanities, informally, to other students in the class without getting in trouble. The point is that in college you realize that life is open-minded and interesting; it's all a matter of choice. The faculty at the college is extremely helpful as are the professors who relay real-world experience to our eager questions. This is a stark contrast to HS life which I remember being quite boring and repetative. In addition, HS can cause students to be close-minded and ignorant of what the real-world entails. Think about it...ask any HS student what college they want to go to, let alone what they actually want to do. In college, I was forced to look forward because I realized I had complete control over my future (something HS students don't fully realize until much later): once I complete my AA in business, I plan on enrolling into UF's accounting program (Macc), passing the CPA exam, and furthering my education to a 2nd masters degree in some sort of business related field.

    Disadvantages (maybe?):
    A noticable disadvantage to dual-enrolling full-time is that the college now becomes your HS. You will be spending your time there. This means you may be alienated (perhaps forgotten) at your HS. This wasn't a problem for me because I was still very social with my friends. There's also a possibility of missing out on the fun activities that HS does offer. I was very concerned that I'd be missing out on the best years of my life. I now know I've been experiencing them. All in all it depends, I believe it has made me a more well-rounded person and consider it another vital part of the program.

    Questions...
    I also have a few questions I hope that I hope could be answered:
    - Once I've completed the DE program, I'm assuming I apply to colleges as a transfer student considering I will have an AA at an acredited community college. How exactly does this work? Do colleges prefer dual-enrollment comparatively?
    - There is concern (I've noticed too), that college courses courses are much easier than their AP counter-part. There is no doubt this is true. My friends spend hours studying for their AP classes while I just need a light study for mine. I know that the first year of college is relatively easy and it will get a bit more rigorous, but my question is from the college admissions perspective how do they feel about this? Also, students at my HS are begining to figure out how true this is...this year 18 people chose to take at least 1 college class. Of those 18, 1 of 3 (including myself) chose to do it full-time. Next year there will be over 65 students dual-enrolling. As far as tuition costs for the state for college, will this negatively affect the program and cause budget problems for the state?
    - How does dual-enrollment affect ACT/SAT/ or scholarship opportunity?

    Self Analysis:
    Throughout this program I have seen many changes in myself. I'm always open minded and can hold long conversations with adults and teens alike. I write noticeably clearer and my overall attitude is positive. I like trying new things, learning from those failures, and tryign again. I've noticed an entrepreneurial spirit that shines sometimes. I'm also humble and privelaged that I was able to do this and appreciate how much I've grown through it all. I believe I am "college ready" because I'm in college and I'm on my way to becoming a well-rounded person.

    The purpose of this comment was to give some first-hand information about dual-enrollment in the sense that acheiving an AA in HS is the goal, not just 1 or 2 classes, my own personal opinions, and questions that I hope can be answered as well as any other information.

    Thanks
    -Max