News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Oct. 24, 2007
Less than a year after releasing its first College Sustainability Report Card, which measured campus greening efforts and related endowment practices, the group behind the report is out with another edition that evaluates twice the number of institutions and offers a generally positive assessment.
The Sustainable Endowments Institute looked at the 200 colleges with the largest endowments in the United States and Canada, as measured by 2006 data from the National Association of College and University Business Officers. (More than half the institutions provided endowment data that will appear in the 2007 NACUBO survey, and those that did are noted in the sustainability report.)
Campuses are given a letter grade in each of eight categories — food and recycling, administration, green building, transportation, climate change and energy, investment priorities, shareholder engagement and endowment transparency — as well as an overall grade. The institute, which relies heavily on colleges’ self-reporting and public data, is aiming to show the correlation between an institution’s environmental practices and its investment decisions.
Much like in the first report, colleges this time generally fare better in the categories relating to green practices (building, recycling, etc.) than in those that measure shareholder voting procedures and willingness to share information about the use of endowment money. Just over 100 “F” grades were given out in five campus practices categories collectively, but what the report calls a “widespread lack of endowment sustainability activity” led to 131 flunking marks in shareholder engagement and 116 in endowment transparency.
Over all, the report says progress is being made – a conclusion also reached by the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education in its recent report on campus environmental action. In the latest institute survey, more than two of every three colleges improved their total grade over the previous year, and higher education’s overall mark improved from a C to a C+. Among the reasons why, according to the report:
“We could tell there were early signs of progress, but it’s encouraging and remarkable that about two-thirds of colleges have improved their overall grade, because several categories were made more difficult,” said Mark Orlowski, founder and executive director of the institute.
For instance, in the climate change and energy category, the report took into account whether colleges made carbon reduction pledges, whereas the previous version put little emphasis on that — in part, Orlowski said, because few colleges in the sample had begun to take that action. Therefore, a college that didn’t promise a carbon reduction but wasn’t penalized last year could lose points this year for essentially being inactive.
In all, about 10 percent of colleges saw lower scores than in the last report, in part because of the addition of the transportation category.
The top grade earners over all, each of which received an A-, are Harvard University, Dartmouth College, Middlebury College, Carleton College, the University of Vermont and the University of Washington.
Vermont earned high marks not only for signing the climate commitment but for actions such as running some campus shuttles on biodiesel and switching much of its fleet to natural gas. Since 1996, the university has assembled an environmental council made up of students, faculty, staff and community members that advises the president and other top administrators on energy purchases and other green initiatives.
Students in residence halls are paid to organize sustainability projects. The campus also has a full-time environmental coordinator, Gioia Thompson, who helps connect council members to university officials.
“If it were just me, I couldn’t possibly make everything happen,” she said. “All this goes on because of grassroots organizing and without a lot of money.”
The report says more than one in three colleges now has a full-time staff member dedicated to sustainability. When Thompson took the position in 1996, she said only a handful of other colleges had what equated to her position, and now she estimates that number to be in the hundreds.
Another major area of improvement, the report notes, is in the category of endowment investments — which takes into account prioritizing return on investment, investing in community development loan funds and investing in renewable energy funds.
Measuring only the 100 colleges included in the first report, the percentage of institutions with endowment investments in renewable energy funds, or similar investment opportunities, more than tripled, from 9 to 31 percent. In large part because of these investments, 38 percent of colleges received “A” grades in the investment priority category, as opposed to 13 from a year ago.
Looking at all 200 colleges, 19 percent report having endowment investments in renewable energy funds, and an additional 17 percent report exploring endowment investments in this area.
But the report notes that shareholder engagement and endowment transparency are still lagging. The engagement category measures how colleges conduct shareholder proxy voting, noting that about one in eight colleges has an advisory committee or shareholder responsibility committee, and 13 percent have a committee of several stake holders (students, faculty, staff) to inform trustees’ moves on shareholder proxy resolutions.
More than half of the institutions received a flunking grade in endowment transparency, which looks at how colleges control information about the investment holdings of their endowments. About one in four colleges makes its list of endowment holdings available to the campus, a modest improvement over the previous report’s findings, Orlowski said.
“We’re seeing progress, but we aren’t seeing the same jump in level of activity as we are seeing on the campus side,” he said. “It’s not all that surprising, because while colleges are dedicating more and more people to campus sustainability, I can count on one hand the dedicated staff for sustainable endowment and shareholder responsibility issues.”
College policies vary on how or if they make public information on endowment holdings. The public universities lauded in the report largely were located in states that have open records laws.
Matt Hamill, senior vice president of advocacy and issue analysis at NACUBO, said this is an area where expectations and market practices collide. For investment managers, he said, whether they are working on a college endowment or a mutual fund, the general practice is not to disclose investment strategies that can benefit a competitor.
Both Hamill and Thompson, the Vermont coordinator, said the report sheds light on important sustainability categories, and has furthered the conversation about what it takes to be green.
But Thompson also says the report has its limitations — most notably an ability to track the actual performance and outcomes of some campus efforts. “Having more [green] programs doesn’t necessarily mean you’re doing a good job,” she said. It can, for instance, indicate that a college had a long way to go in the first place to reach its environmental goals.
“I believe that nobody deserves an ‘A’,” Thompson said. “We could all be doing a lot more.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Anything to try to discredit efforts to combat global warming. Anything at all. Our faculty, or I, should be incensed at “administrative intrusion?” Get a grip on reality, Pope. We don’t need any “administrative intrusion” to get this subject into the curriculum! Pope is one of the most conservative “think” (and I use the term loosely) tanks you’ll come by. So, just toss off anything they can “think” of as a lever to say something negative about sustainability. Nothing directly about sustainability. Just “administrative intrusion.” I’ll say this to Pope: I would not expect to see any faculty revolts about curricular initiatives in this arena. Or, perhaps better, please do hold your breath waiting for faculty revolt on this one. You’ll pass out waiting and the rest of us can get on with what needs to be done without insipid, off-target “thinking” such as the above. And the apostrophe? If anyone ever fiddled while Rome burned, this has got to be the most quintessential case ever. As the last islands of Palau and Tuvalu sink below the waves, Pope is there, “thinking” about some apostrophe.
David, at 12:05 pm EDT on October 24, 2007
Since when have faculty had anything to do with physical plant construction?
Reader, at 1:45 pm EDT on October 24, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Position Summary: The Director of Planned Giving is responsible for identifying, cultivating, soliciting, ... see job
Job Summary: Serves as the director of planning and budget for The Women’s College. Coordinates ... see job
The University of Memphis invites applications and nominations for the position of Vice President for Business and Finance. see job
Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job
Saint Louis University is a Jesuit Catholic University. Through teaching, research, health care and community service, Saint ... see job
Angelo State University’s work environment is often described as an employee community. This applies to the work culture ... see job
Northeastern University, founded in 1898 and located in Boston, is a private research university that is a leader in ... see job
General Purpose
Under the direction of the Section Administrator, using considerable latitude for exercising ... see job
Posting Description: The Department of Pathology Administrator at the University of Colorado School of ... see job
To perform a variety of technical and clerical accounting duties involving the accounting, budgeting, recording and reporting ... see job
That Climate Change Commitment
I’m surprised that the Presidents Commitment on Climate Change has raised no hackles. As Jenna Robinson observes at http://popecenter.org/clarion_call/article.html?id=1913 the presidents pledge to “integrate sustainability into their curriculum.” Why aren’t faculty complaining at this administrative intrusion into educational areas usually controlled by faculty? (And I must admit to being irked that the presidents omit the apostrophe in the title of their commitment title.)
Jane Shaw, Executive vice president at Pope Center for Higher Education Policy, at 10:25 am EDT on October 24, 2007