Advertisement

Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

The Future of Progressive Higher Ed

On a weekend that was supposed to be crucial for the survival of Antioch College, an anticlimactic announcement from Antioch University’s board said only that discussions were continuing and that no decisions had been made. The board had been expected to either approve or reject an alumni plan drafted to prevent the college’s operations from being suspended at the end of the current academic year, as the board announced in June it would do.

The statement quoted the chairman of the university’s board and the president of the alumni board as expressing optimism about the talks, which could continue this week. Timing is critical, as the college would need to be able to recruit a new freshman class, and faculty members — who were told in June that their jobs were being eliminated — would need to be encouraged to stay.

As Antioch alumni were focused on the developments in Yellow Springs, Ohio, about 30 leaders in progressive higher education gathered for a retreat some 700 miles away, in Plainfield, Vt., to consider the future of their philosophy in a political era that may be hostile to it.

They gathered at Goddard College, like Antioch an institution that is proudly nontraditional — and the group included educators from Antioch (its Los Angeles campus), Bard, Evergreen State College and Union Institute and University, as well as educators at more traditional institutions with divisions or individuals who come out of the progressive higher education tradition. (While there is no agreed upon philosophy for progressive colleges, they are generally institutions with close student interaction, student responsibility in determining the course of education, non-traditional majors, and left-leaning politics.) The meeting at Goddard was being planned well before the June announcement that Antioch College’s operations would be suspended, but news from Antioch added impetus for the event, organizers said.

Among the ideas discussed, participants said in phone interviews: creating an accrediting institution to focus on progressive institutions, identifying opportunities for programs outside the United States, and more outreach by progressive educators to various social movements with the idea that the work of progressive professors or colleges should not be confined to higher education.

“Progressive education rose out of particular historic moments,” said Suzanne Richman, director of health arts and sciences programs at Goddard. “The question now is: What is the next wave?”

No firm plan emerged, except for the idea of continuing the discussions and setting up another meeting, perhaps involving more people. Participants acknowledged that many of the ideas that have momentum in higher education run counter to their views.

“How do we address the strategic planning movement?” asked Stephen Rowe, a professor of philosophy at Grand Valley State University, in Michigan. Progressive educators, he said, need to define that “education is a great transformative practice in the Western tradition — and is very different from mere training.” He said that he fears the Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education — commonly referred to as the Spellings Commission — is pushing the education as training idea “as opposed to education of the whole person.”

The Education Department has been prodding accreditors to focus more on measurable outcomes of student learning, and several of those at the meeting — people who pride themselves on highly individualized instruction and a deep skepticism of standardized tests — said this led them to think about the need for new accreditors.

“If accrediting agencies no longer want to be responsive to the values and traditions that progressive education holds,” progressive colleges need new review bodies, said Kenneth L. Bergstrom, a professor of education at Union Institute and University. “They often don’t understand what we try to do in education settings and push us in directions that need to be resisted.”

Others said that they had had positive experiences with accreditors, and all stressed that they weren’t trying to avoid accountability, but some sort of uniformity of expectations.

“I don’t want to vilify the accrediting bodies. I’m not opposed to strategic plans and accountability. The question is, what are the right goals to have?” said Emily Lardner, co-director of the Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education, at Evergreen State.

Mark Schulman, president of Goddard, said one issue discussed was how progressive educators can talk about ideas that they and their institutions pushed and that are now common — ideas like interdisciplinary education, service learning and so forth. “We have to cherish and celebrate our victories,” he said, and not be afraid to do so when colleges embracing these ideas aren’t necessarily progressive.

But at the same time, he said it was important to speak out when others “appropriate” these concepts “without the values commitments” that are part of these ideas.

Another challenge facing the movement, Schulman said, is that of those who gathered at Goddard, “the age was not young.” He said that while the wealth of experience was valuable, he was concerned about the lack of younger participation. He speculated that there may be fields such as environmental studies — important at places like Goddard and other progressive colleges before the field was hot elsewhere — that could build bridges between progressive educators and younger faculty members and students.

Schulman also said it was important for progressive colleges to point out that despite the problems at Antioch and New College of California, other progressive institutions are thriving. Those conservatives who seem to be enjoying Antioch’s difficulties should ask themselves whether all religious or conservative colleges should be judged by the scandal at Oral Roberts University, Schulman said.

Scott Jaschik

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

They “die of democracy”

In a compilation of essays in 1960 on why the North won the Civil War, historian David Donald penned an ironic piece contending that the southern army “died of democracy.” The soliders often refused discipline, elected their own officers, came and went as they pleased for planting and harvest, ignored orders, and remained individualists. Look at the persistent culture of the institutions mentioned in the report, where ideology is too often mistaken for vision and where faculty who were once client/student centered have become practitioner centered — defending “how we do things here.”

Hugh Hammett, Vice President for External Affairs at Empire State College, at 10:02 am EDT on October 29, 2007

Antioch and progressive education

I hope the alumni can save Antioch. Higher education needs a variety of educational models and Antioch provided a “path less traveled” for many students over its lifetime. I understand that one big problem at the school was a decaying infrastructure. If that is true, then the administration at the school should be held accountable by the alumni in any plan to save the insitution. No one will contribute to a school that lacks administrative competence.

feudi pandola, at 10:45 am EDT on October 29, 2007

start your own accrediting guild!

“Among the ideas discussed ...creating an accrediting institution to focus on progressive institutions [which] pride themselves on highly individualized instruction and a deep skepticism of standardized tests — said [Spellings Commission’s focus on student learning outcomes] led them to think about the need for new accreditors.”

Are we, then, witnesses to the birth of yet another specialized higher education accrediting guild? Perhaps.

In any case, this is certainly a first: with “tight coupling” institutional measures from the accreditors anticipated in the future, the response is to start your own accrediting guild as a way to retain “loose coupling” conditions of the institutional environment.

‘If accrediting agencies no longer want to be responsive to the values and traditions that progressive education holds,’ progressive colleges need new review bodies, said Kenneth L. Bergstrom ... . ‘They often don’t understand what we try to do in education settings and push us in directions that need to be resisted.’

But why would starting your own accrediting agency be a possible form of hegemonic resistance?

As mediating organizational structures, accrediting guilds serve to insulate member institutions from market shocks and disruptions, and as guilds, they seek to control and stabilize the institutional environment through state sponsorship and state-granted privileges. This much is clear.

But neo-institutionalism also suggests that higher education institutions will find ways to evade the increased demands of ‘tight coupling’, like the newly proposed measures of accountability that the progressives are reacting against. They will accomplish this through appeals to their uniqueness and through the use of other intangibles, that is, through rhetorical appeals to their own institutional legitimacy.

“Institutional logic holds that schools can retain a loosely coupled structure by evading direct monitoring of their instructional effectiveness, whether by evolving nonmeasurable goals, creating new mandates, or embracing norms of teachers’ professional discretion.”

This, however, is quite different from the accountability demands “that market-based schools must signal their quality to parents and hence should systematically report their outcomes, whether in the form of test score rankings, ratings, or widely recognized curricula.” (The New Institutionalism in Education, Meyer and Rowan, 106)

Glen S. McGhee, Dir., at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project, at 11:30 am EDT on October 29, 2007

Too Moderate for Progressives

Great, just what we need. Yet ONE MORE accreditation body to say, “Yeah. Your program is great. Go get money from the government and from students.”

Oh, I’m sorry. Is my attitude coming out again?

While I like the idea of students having input on curriculum, I completely balk at students creating their own academic programs. Why? Students don’t know what they don’t know! No one does! So, how are they supposed to know what to study? The very premise upon which some of these programs are built is illogical. And if you get instructors who do nothing more than say, “No, that’s not right,” you will get frustrated students who fail.

I don’t know anything about these other colleges. But I do know this: not every institution claiming to be “progressive” fosters close student relationships. In fact, they foster divisive student interactions and corruption.

Furthermore, not all “progressive” institutions operate on the up and up. Many have become fraudulent, unethical, hypocritical leeches, feeding on students, on the student loan system, and a bogus liberal philosophy that claims to help the “underserved.”

Sorry. I have NOT had good experiences at a “progressive” institution.

Maybe I was just too “moderate", huh?

kgotthardt, at 12:15 pm EDT on October 29, 2007

Self-designed majors are only ever devised with direct, mandatory guidance from an academic adviser. At Antioch, my SDM essentially replicated the OxBridge model; history, political philosophy and economics.

My academic adviser had to approve my schedule every quarter and had to approve my senior thesis. I have found that the resulting education was no less rigorous or impressive to graduate schools and employers than that of students with more narrowly defined degrees developed by departmental committees.

There are many reasons that Antioch has teetered on the edge of closing and I hope that its survival (fingers crossed) will become a case study in what can go wrong for small residential liberal arts colleges and how they can be turned around. However, SDM and student involvement in curriculum planning are not among the factors leading to the closure announcement.

The hands-on, take-charge-of-your-own-education, nature of Antioch education has, in fact, been one of the greatest attractions of the college. This demands a higher degree of maturity and intellectual development than most colleges demand of incoming students and IS in part responsible for fairly high attrition rates at the college (for the first time in Antioch’s modern history, only 1 student has withdrawn during the fall quarter).

And as for those who would claim that there is no market for progressive liberal arts colleges, the response of faculty, staff, students and alumni to Antioch’s troubles have driven admission queries of interest to an all time high. It sad that, as yet, we can not encourage the young bright things who want to come to Antioch to go for it, but I know that when resolution is reached our problem will shift from too few to too many for our dilapidated infrastructure to handle. A nice problem to have.

travis sanford, at 2:46 pm EDT on October 29, 2007

“Self-designed majors are only ever devised with direct, mandatory guidance from an academic adviser. At Antioch, my SDM essentially replicated the OxBridge model; history, political philosophy and economics.” I am quite sure there is a huge difference between self devised MAJORS and self-devised CURRICULA, which is what I experienced. Additionally, it sounds like you got one-on-one attention, and that’s a good thing. I didn’t attend Antioch, and as I said, I don’t know anything about how they treat their students.

It also sounds like you attended a real, AUTHORIZED campus. I didn’t have that luxury at the “progressive” institution I “attended.”

kgotthardt, at 4:55 pm EDT on October 29, 2007

Perhaps there is no longer a need for a few alternative institutions now that the mainstream has adopted the progressive agenda.

Jason, at 4:55 pm EDT on October 29, 2007

“Perhaps there is no longer a need for a few alternative institutions now that the mainstream has adopted the progressive agenda.”

I’m not sure this comment warrants a response, but in case there are others deluded into thinking (How, I cannot imagine!!) that the mainstream is in any way progressive, I could let this one go. The mainstream is corporatizing education so that students are rarely asked to understand the ways they are manipulated into becoming a tax base to support imperialistic wars, economic policies that destroy national sovereignty and human sustainability, a violent wealth gap both domestically and internationally, practices that maintain an international sex trade in women and children, and the refusal to protect the environment or provide disease control that could maintain vital natural resources and prevent hundreds of thousands of deaths... all in the name of democracy and human rights in terms of capitalist profit. Whatever classes or programs may exist in “mainstream” universities and colleges that challenge these politics, if they are not coopted into a non-critical and unaccountable agenda, are almost never stable and are always fighting to remain a priority. Just because certain language and concepts exist in more classes doesn’t mean students are enabled to construct critical arguments and alternative political locations from which to begin to speak.

Katherine, university of massachusetts, at 10:59 am EDT on October 31, 2007

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to The Future of Progressive Higher Ed

or search for jobs directly.

Director, Finance
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Center Services Coordinator
DeVry University

Exciting Center Support position in Sandy, UT! see job

Part-Time Program Administrator, Achieving the Dream
Lone Star College System

Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job

Director, University Assessment
Florida Atlantic University

Florida Atlantic University is seeking an experienced professional to assume leadership of its efforts to reinvigorate and ... see job

Director of Rural Medical Education
Oklahoma State University, Tulsa

The OSU College of Osteopathic Medicine has been consistently ranked nationally in rural medicine and primary care by US News ... see job

Director of Assessment and Student Learning
Cedarville University

Cedarville University is seeking a Director of Assessment and Student Learning. This position’s primary purpose is to create ... see job

Assoc Director New Ventures
University of Pennsylvania

The nation’s first university, Penn is a world-renowned leader in education, research, and innovation. Situated on a ... see job

Faculty Assistant
Princeton University

Position Summary: The Department of Geosciences is seeking a Faculty Assistant to support the Geophysics ... see job

Nursing Assistant — Per Diem
Princeton University

Position Summary: PER DIEM NURSE’S ASSISTANT This is a casual hourly per diem position (September — June) ... see job

Director, Program & Student Services (111937)
Northeastern University

Northeastern University, founded in 1898 and located in Boston, is a private research university that is a leader in ... see job