Search News


Browse Archives

News

A Satisfied Full-Time Faculty

November 1, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Many administrators complain about the many complaints of their faculty members, but it turns out that most professors (at least full timers at four-year colleges) are pretty happy with their jobs.

A new national survey by TIAA-CREF found that 53 percent of faculty members are "very satisfied" with their jobs and another 43 percent are "somewhat satisfied." Only 2 percent were "not at all satisfied." By comparison, a recent national survey of Americans in all fields found that only 42 percent reported being "very satisfied," with another 38 percent "somewhat satisfied."

TIAA-CREF's analysis included breakdowns by age groups, and it found that the youngest faculty members (Generation X) reported about the same level of job satisfaction as their older colleagues. But in certain areas -- work/life balance and salary -- the Xers were significantly less satisfied than were others. The younger generation also appears to have some different motivations for entering academe and different career goals (hardly any are contemplating administrative careers, although that may be a reflection of their age and not having yet had the sorts of committee chair positions that frequently are launching pads to the administration building).

Faculty members across generations see academic careers as something they would recommend to promising students, with 54 percent saying that they would be "very likely" to encourage a student who asked about becoming a professor and 34 percent said that they were "somewhat likely" to do so.

Not surprisingly given TIAA-CREF's role in the retirement industry, a number of questions in the survey focused on retirement issues and here the survey found many professors planning to work well past traditional retirement age -- but also strong interest in early retirement incentives and phased retirements.

A key caveat about the survey results are that they exclude community colleges, as well as part timers at all kinds of institutions. Given that community college faculty are paid less on average than their four-year counterparts and focus much more on teaching, and that part timers have a range of salary, benefits and job security issues that in many cases bring down job satisfaction, some of the data would probably be significantly different if based on a broader pool of professors. That doesn't diminish the value of the data, however, in examining the full-time, four-year college professoriate.

"There's very good news for the senior administration in that faculty are very satisfied in general," said Paul J. Yakoboski, principal research fellow at TIAA-CREF. While some areas of dissatisfaction can't be a huge surprise -- "everybody would like to be paid more money," he noted -- others should give administrators pause. There appear to be areas where administrators at the very least should be asking professors why they are dissatisfied with certain parts of their duties. And when they do, he noted, the answers will differ based on age group.

For the purposes of the survey, faculty members were divided into three groups: Generation X (ages 27-42), Late Baby Boomers (ages 43-52) and Early Baby Boomers (ages 53-61). Other ages were excluded. In all age groups, asked if their careers had met their expectations, the dominant answer was "generally," but not "completely." All those who didn't answer completely were asked about the ways in which expectations were not met, with multiple answers accepted. Pay was more of an issue for older academics. And while the total figure was small, the only significant responses about lack of respect were from Early Boomers. Generation Xers were somewhat more likely to cite concerns about work/family balance and were much more likely to cite administrative responsibilities as a concern.

Yakoboski said he was struck by the high percentage expressing qualms about administrative responsibilities and suggested that colleges might want to explore with faculty members what kinds of things they were talking about.

Ways in Which Faculty Careers Haven't Met Expectations

Factor Total % Gen X % Late Boomer % Early Boomer %
Pay not high enough 25% 9% 30% 34%
Too many administrative responsibilities 22% 39% 12% 17%
Inadequate time for research 16% 22% 7% 21%
Unsatisfactory relationships with colleagues 14% 13% 17% 10%
Politics involved/too much of a business 13% 8% 19% 10%
No work/life balance 10% 13% 8% 10%
Not spending time how I want 8% 4% 12% 8%
Don't enjoy teaching or students 7% 4% 13% 4%
Inadequate funding for research/resources 4% 3% 4% 6%
Dissatisfied with administration, institution 3% 4% 2% 4%
Underappreciated, lack of respect 2% 0% 0% 6%
Excessive pressure to publish 2% 1% 1% 3%
Lack of advancement or tenure 1% 0% 0% 3%

In terms of their goals for their careers, some are generational and expected (Gen Xers are more focused than others on winning tenure, and Early Boomers are more focused on saving money for retirement). One notable difference is that there is little Gen X interest in administrative careers. Asked their primary career goal, only 1 percent of Gen Xers cited administration, compared to 3 percent and 4 percent, respectively, for Late and Early Boomers.

Asked what goals they had after achieving their primary goal, Gen Xers still don't want to be administrators. Only 2 percent cited that as a goal, compared to 6 and 7 percent of the Boomer groups.

Finance and Retirement

The data on retirement show that many professors expect to work in their current jobs past 65, and to find new paid employment after they retire from their academic positions. Early Boomers, the group closest to retirement, are less likely than others to envision a late retirement date. Except for Early Boomers, 70 appears to be a more likely age at which to ponder retirement than does 65.

Expected Age of Retirement

Age Total % Gen X % Late Boomer % Early Boomer %
Before 60 2 3 2 2
60-64 12 10 11 14
65 27 23 31 25
66-69 15 16 10 21
70 28 32 34 16
Over 70 9 6 11 10
Never 1 2 0 0
Don't know 6 7 1 11

If given options, many appear interested in incentive programs that move away from a traditional retirement transition. Majorities across age groups would be "very likely" or "somewhat likely" to consider phased-in retirement programs, in which faculty members gradually reduce hours worked. Majorities across age groups would also be interested in early retirement incentive programs.

Yakoboski said that these findings were significant for college administrators, many of whom are concerned about an aging faculty, but aren't certain about which options may be most effective at opening up some slots.

Once they retire, more than 70 percent of faculty members expect to work for pay. Of that group, 29 percent expect to work as teachers, 41 percent in some other role in education, and 35 percent to do something completely different.

Significant numbers of faculty members earn money from sources other than their primary employer throughout their careers, the survey suggests. Sixty-eight percent of faculty members said that they had earned money from other sources in the last two years. For most of those, the share of total income was relatively modest, with 58 percent reporting it was less than 10 percent. But for 31 percent, the total was 10-24 percent, and for 8 percent, it was 25-49 percent.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on A Satisfied Full-Time Faculty

  • retirement age
  • Posted by Wayne on November 1, 2007 at 9:42am EDT
  • One of the reasons the percentage of faculty who plan to retire AFTER age 65 is so high is simply because Social Security now requires them to be 66 before collecting benefits. My guess is that if age 66 had been the cutoff, rather than 65, the results would be radically different.

  • survey
  • Posted by Richard T Hull , Executive Director at Text and Academic Authors Assn on November 1, 2007 at 9:42am EDT
  • The survey doesn't identify the sizeable category of adjunct faculty and part-time faculty that has come increasingly to characterize the profession. Including these individuals would make the survey much more accurate as a characterization of the satisfaction of the career, as many caught in these categories, like community college faculty, despair of advancement to 4-year and research institutions.

  • Degeneration
  • Posted by Unapologetically Tenured on November 1, 2007 at 12:02pm EDT
  • Actually, the most notable thing here--at least to me--is just how little significant difference there is between the generations. Moreover, the most pronounced differences are likely due to normal career fluctuations rather than generational preferences.

    Senior faculty fall victim to salary compression and therefore complain that their pay is not high enough (no doubt comparing themselves to new hires being offered what the market demands). Gen Xers are happy with their pay for now, but that will probably change over time as the Millennials (I hate that term) show up in a decade or so to start demanding their own seemingly outrageous market-driven entry-level salaries.

    Also, when Gen Xers (mostly junior faculty) bemoan the burden of administrative responsibilities, they are reacting as all assistant professors have throughout the ages. They're desperate to build their publication records and teaching credentials in the six years allotted, and they resent having to serve on committees, sponsor student organizations, and advise undergraduates, activities that they know will be unappreciated come "publish or perish" time. My guess is that when the time comes, they will be proportionally just as eager to assume the duties of Chair, Dean, or Provost, as their elders were.
    As for the lifestyle stuff, one can try to make a lot out of a 3% difference, but I just don't see it.

    You know, this whole generational navel-gazing stuff started with the Early Baby Boomers in the 60s and has spun out of control since then. For the most part, it's overblown. There's no great, greater, or greatest generation. There's just a bunch of people doing their best to deal with the hand life dealt them.

  • Posted by Perry on November 1, 2007 at 12:02pm EDT
  • The boomers cite less satisfactory relationships with colleagues and less enjoyment of teaching students. I think this is because the older faculty are treated like geezers. Being socially marginalized is an aspect of age discrimination.

  • where's the outside money from???
  • Posted by LM on November 1, 2007 at 12:50pm EDT
  • I'd like to know what the source of money outside the job is-- are these scientific and social sciences types who consult? I don't know of any humanities outside funding.

  • Whose satisfaction counts?
  • Posted by TL on November 1, 2007 at 2:25pm EDT
  • I have seen a number of these faculty surveys. What I haven't seen is similar surveys of the satisfaction of administrative personnel (not Cabinet level, but all those professional educators who keep academic support services, etc. going). At least where I work, instructional/professional staff who are not faculty are consistently marginalized, and reading one more survey of how happy or unhappy faculty are just drives the point home yet again-- only faculty satisfaction counts....

  • Social Security benefits age
  • Posted by Jack Olson , Certified Financial Planner on November 1, 2007 at 2:25pm EDT
  • Wayne, most people who take Social Security pensions do so before the age of full retirement, as early as age 62. They have good reason to do so, since it takes 13 years of the higher, later benefit to make up for the extra years of the earlier partial benefit. Depending on years of service, participants in alternative pension plans such as the Texas Teacher Retirement System may get a full benefit younger than the full benefit age for Social Security. Or they may take a partial benefit before they qualify for full benefits. Some will forego TRS in favor of an Optional Retirement Program, a defined contribution plan much like a 403(b). And, of course, most people who teach for colleges are eligible to participate in 403(b) plans, whose penalties expire as early as separation from service above age 65. Most of them also qualify for Roth IRA's, whose penalties expire at 59 1/2. With all these other sources of retirement income available, I'm not sure the age of full Social Security benefit powerfully affects their choice of retirement age.

    However, even people covered by pensions such as TRS or who choose the Optional Retirement Plan are generally covered by Medicare, which allows no partial benefits before age 65. Since paying for health care is one of the main concerns of retirees, I wouldn't be surprised if the minimum age for Medicare affects retirement age even more than full retirement age for Social Security.

  • Size of school
  • Posted by Matt , Assistant Professor non-tenure track on November 1, 2007 at 3:50pm EDT
  • The article doesn't mention anything about the size of the school. Small schools going through growing pains, short on space, overextended on teaching and service would seem to be ripe situations for breeding dissatisfaction.

    I strongly doubt the scientific validity of a survey administered by TIAA-CREF.

  • retirement (SS) for me is at 67
  • Posted by il Scotto on November 1, 2007 at 3:50pm EDT
  • I've done the math, taking SS at 62 is a bad bet unless you don't intend to live that long. If I wait 'til 67 (that's my number, not 65 or 66) I do much better. And if I can hold out to 70, I nearly double my monthly check from SS. Grandpa was 97 when he died...

  • So what?
  • Posted by Dr. RingDing on November 1, 2007 at 9:20pm EDT
  • I think that studies of faculty satisfaction make marginal contributions to the national discussion. 'Satisfaction' is just not a stable construct; I'm satisfied one day when I get a publication, I'm dissatisfied the next day when I get a grant proposal rejected.

    Besides, what tangible interventions to improve faculty worklife can be justified from the results of satisfaction studies? None.

    Studies like this oversimplify the issues.

  • Support Staff
  • Posted by Professional Staff on November 2, 2007 at 5:35pm EDT
  • I would love to see a study on the Satisfaction of support staff and their feeling on how they are treated by administration and full time faculty! I think you would see definitely see that they feel marginalized, no regular process for obtaining their feedback (anonymous) and ill treatment by faculty is not addressed by administration.

  • Benefits, especially health/medical benefits pre/post retirement
  • Posted by Ulysses on November 14, 2007 at 10:45am EST
  • Having worked in industry for > 20 years between my teaching phases I seem a similarity other commentators seem to overlook.
    Any employee in any field has an expectation of a relatively constant relationship with her/his employer.
    When an employer says, "OOPS" and essentially in midstream of a person's career journey reneges or attempts to renege on a component of the employment package, it invites anger and frustration unless both employer and employee are involved in finding a solution.
    Attempting to push the responsibility for bad or incomplete financial projections off on retiring and/or new employees is a the tactic of a bully, not a partner.
    Certainly nobody today expects any employer, academic or commercial to live up to the expectations it invites new employees to assume, and even our governments, including the federal government by raiding Social Security funds under the Comprehensive Federal Omnibus Budget process present a model for employers to emulate when the going gets tough.
    Offer employees an "OPT_OUT" option -- no payroll deductions for med/health/dental partial payments; no employer subsidy for individual or family coverage, thereby increasing gross and take home salary -- that way employees have responsibility for their own present and future needs, and employers cannot be accused of squandering the funds deducted from payroll/salary over the years.
    And don't even think about continuation of the current senior executive "golden parachutes" or separation bonuses.
    Everybody should be clear if or if they are not swimming in the same employment pool -- there are now several "entitled" pools such as senior executives, members of US House of Reps and Senators, select federal employees who clearly get the water for their select pools at the expense of others.

    Ulysses --