Advertisement

Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Bringing the Gun Debate Back to Campus

Almost instantly, the Virginia Tech massacre last April set off a chain reaction of public responses, from investigations into privacy statutes to wide-ranging evaluations of colleges’ emergency notification plans. But one issue that has not been dominant — to the surprise of some activists — is gun control.

The absence so far of any sustained public outrage over the availability of guns stands in stark contrast to the aftermath of the Columbine shootings in 1999. The nature of the response this year can be chalked up to a number of factors, not least of which was the consensus by several task forces convened after the killings — such as the one ordered by Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine — that faulted university policies and pointed to the effects of confusing mental health laws and a state loophole (since closed by an executive order) that essentially left unenforced a federal law that would have prevented a shooter with a mental health history like Seung Hui Cho’s from legally obtaining a gun in the first place.

Immediately after the shootings, advocates for a strengthened instant background check system, a renewed assault weapons ban and other measures embarked on an unusual strategy to bring more awareness of gun laws in the United States, one that is becoming visible on more campuses. On Monday afternoon at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, for example, 32 people — donning Virginia Tech colors atop black clothing — stood in silent protest of state and federal laws that make it too easy, they believe, for people with criminal backgrounds or mental health issues to obtain guns.

It was the 32nd such demonstration since the Protest Easy Guns campaign began in earnest almost as soon as the news of Cho’s killing spree reached Abigail Spangler, a cellist with a Ph.D. from Columbia University whose father was the former chancellor of the UNC system. Her campaign is simple. At each protest, 32 people (also the number Cho killed at Virginia Tech) spend three minutes (the length of time it apparently took Cho to purchase his weapons) at a “lie-in,” offering themselves as the visual equivalent of the 32 or so daily victims of gun crimes in the United States.

“It’s a matter of getting the message out there that our protest movement is happening,” Spangler said.

She’s already created what she calls a “protest in a box,” which makes it easy for local activists to set up their own demonstrations around the country. Lie-ins have been staged at campuses including Carleton College and the University of Virginia — with the University of South Carolina and other institutions on the horizon — as well as in New York, Chicago, Washington and other cities.

“After the Virginia Tech shootings ... I think it would be impossible to overstate the feeling in the pit of everyone’s stomach about how easily this could have happened on any campus,” said Kate Torrey, the director of the University of North Carolina Press, who participated in the protest on Monday. Torrey was at UNC in 1995 when a former law student who had stopped his medication for schizophrenia shot and killed two people in downtown Chapel Hill and wounded a police officer.

Still, more of the highly symbolic demonstrations have taken place in towns or cities than on college campuses, and that’s partially an indication of who’s doing the organizing. The protest at UNC, for example, was co-sponsored by the local Million Mom March chapter and North Carolinians Against Gun Violence (NCGV) but no student groups.

At the University of Virginia, though, students organized a lie-in on Oct. 16 that coincided with the six-month anniversary of the Virginia Tech shootings. Spangler has also tapped Facebook to try to recruit more organizers in college; her group currently has 218 members, not an insignificant number but far less than that of many advocacy organizations on the site — including Students for Concealed Carry on Campus, which has 7,542 members.

At UNC, said Lisa Price, the executive director of NCGV, “some people from campus” joined the demonstration, bringing the total number of protesters to about 34. “Students just don’t seem to be caught up in this issue the way they were in the civil rights movement. I don’t know whether things will change because of these demonstrations and other things....”

Spangler thinks it’s natural for students to participate in the movement, and she’s made sure her protests are self-contained enough to allow even a busy physics major to set up an event. “Students understand this issue better than most because it was students at Virginia Tech,” she said.

In truth, Protest Easy Guns isn’t the only post-Virginia-Tech movement that’s spread across college campuses. The concealed-carry organization, which has student chapters at about 125 campuses nationwide, organized an “empty holster” protest last week to demonstrate that those with a license to carry concealed weapons are “left defenseless ... when they walk on college campuses” that do not allow guns on their premises, said W. Scott Lewis, a spokesman.

“Our opinion is that concealed handgun licenses are the perfect compromise between what the gun control advocates and the gun rights advocates support,” said Lewis, 27, who has a concealed weapon license for the State of Texas.

Protest Easy Guns takes pains to point out that it isn’t against guns per se, only the ability of criminals to obtain them. Students for Concealed Carry on Campus argues that those with the licenses have already gone through background checks and training, making campus bans unnecessary.

Spangler’s group, which does not “raise a penny or spend a penny,” according to its Web site, hopes that the individual lie-ins will lead groups to lobby their state and local governments. Price, the NCGV executive director, said her husband, Rep. David Price (D-N.C.), voted for a bill that would strengthen the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. And Spangler said she is readying questions to submit to YouTube for the upcoming Republican debate sponsored by the video-sharing site.

“[W]e hope that college students will be inspired by our social movement ... because we need their help!” she said.

Andy Guess

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

No Students? No Surprise

I have great respect for C.D. Spangler and what his daughter is doing to try to improve campus safety.

But no student involvement? Protesting guns would be too sissy in N.C. — and besides they’re too busy preparing for(or recovering from)university-encouraged tailgating.

Comm Prof, at 12:50 pm EDT on November 1, 2007

“Empty Holsters” demonstrations

In Ohio students who demand the right to carry guns demonstrate on special days by attending classes while wearing empty holsters.

David Fahey, at 2:25 pm EDT on November 1, 2007

Guns Don’t Kill People. Stupid Laws Kill People.

It seems to me that the campus gun nuts could strap on something other than a holster and it would have the same compensatory effect, if you know what I mean.

I’m reasonably libertarian on the Second Amendment, as least as academics go, but there’s a time and place for everything. I certainly don’t want students with concealed weapons in my classroom. And I would hope that I would, as instructor of record, retain the right to enforce that restriction regardless of the prevailing state of the law.

All school shootings are horrible, of course, but they are still relatively few and far between. Many more people are killed each year by handguns that are pulled out in white hot anger or in the heat of an argument. I’ve seen students almost come to blows in class before, as I am sure many of you have; the last thing we need is to add firepower to that equation.

Must every debate end in common sense ceding the floor to ideological fanaticism?

Unapologetically Tenured, at 9:20 pm EDT on November 1, 2007

And The Beat Goes On

Guns and education are divisive when used together.

Unapologetically Tenured has obviously not been robbed, beaten, shot, stabbed, raped or stalked. In the search of academic excellence, those at the top or even in the middle react with predictable fervor when potential victims express a desire to be able to defend themselves when seconds count and law enforcement officers are only minutes away.

Students who are 21 years of age and have met the stringent requirements of the state for training and FBI background checks can legally carry concealed handguns in more than 35 states everywhere but “gun free” zones that include college campuses. Unapologetically Tenured should consider that his student standing in line with him at the grocery store could be licensed to carry and could have a handgun concealed on his/her person or could be sitting beside him in the movie theater or just about anywhere the two of them might meet off campus.

Less than.02% of concealed handgun license holders are ever convicted of any violent crimes but can be there to someone if the bubble should burst and the police are only minutes away.

Untinured and sane, at 10:25 pm EDT on November 1, 2007

The VT campus was a “gun free zone.” Tell me again how well that worked. The shooter planned his deeds over the course of several months, even complying with the one gun a month rule in effect in Virginia. Does anyone seriously believe that had he been rejected for a legal sale that he would have just given up? Right, just like there is no underage drinking or drug use on campus because of the rules against it. To go to the trouble of acquiring a weapons permit takes some serious dedication. Students intent on partying won’t bother, especially knowing that mixing carry and drinking is a short trip to having the license revoked. Oh, and if I were inclined towards rape or robbery, I would be ever so greatful for such a defenseless victim rich environment.

LAB, at 12:10 pm EDT on November 2, 2007

> Must every debate end in common sense > ceding the floor to ideological fanaticism?

> Unapologetically Tenured

Prof. Tenured:

If you define “ideological fanaticism” as any disagreement with your own views then yes, every debate in which you engage will end in common sense ceding the floor to ideological fanaticism.

Jeff Hall, at 5:55 pm EDT on November 2, 2007

You Talkin’ to Me? Well, I’m the Only One Here!

Quick responses (a shotgun approach, if you will)...

U&S:

“Unapologetically Tenured should consider that his student standing in line with him at the grocery store could be licensed to carry...”

Maybe, but I rarely see students at the supermarket moments after I assign a grade that will cause them to lose their scholarship. I’ll take my chances at Safeway or Piggly Wiggly. I shouldn’t have to do so while cornered in my classroom or office.

LAB:

“The VT campus was a “gun free zone.” Tell me again how well that worked.”

OK, I will. A very troubled young man took advantage of living in a state with some of the most lax gun laws in the nation. Would he have bought the guns illegally had he lived in, say, New York? We’ll never know. But it wasn’t like the guy had connections to street gangs or the mob. If he did manage to acquire illegal guns, it probably would have been from some Second Amendment fanatic at a gun show.

In any event, given the specific history of the Virginia Tech tragedy, I think it is a case that the guns nuts would be wise to leave alone.

Jeff Hall:

“If you define “ideological fanaticism” as any disagreement with your own views then yes, every debate in which you engage will end in common sense ceding the floor to ideological fanaticism.”

No, Jeff, I define ideological fanaticism as holding a point of view so obsessively that one is unable to see any gray area or to concede that there might be circumstances under which the knee-jerk response is the wrong one.

But thanks for asking.

Unapologetically Tenured, at 9:25 am EDT on November 3, 2007

Guns

I am surprised? In all the turmoil in the aftermath of both events that one key issue has not been brought up. Guns—maybe these are symptoms of a far deeper problem. Cars kill more people in the U.S. daily than guns. Yet there is no public outcry against cars. I believe that one student interviewed at Virginia may have inadvertantly touched on the issue when she described Cho as an “animal". Maybe he was just a human being in such pain he reacted through the only option he felt open to him. Most likely once all the information on this new case is out it will reveal a somewhat similar story. In a society emphasizing techonolgy and intellectualism we have become great technocrats and pseudo-intellectuals. Yet emotionally and socially we are probably the most backwards country in the world. The truth is we have simply forgotten/ignored our growth as human beings. The result is in the news. Until we begin to place importance on this guns will simply be replaced by something else. Amazingly in the after math of Virginia Tech there was an immediate awareness across campuses to care for the emotional needs of students. How long will this last before it all forgotten and swept into the closet. Afterall learning to be a healthy emotional human being has no immediate monetary value and brings home no accolades. Besides it demands we have more depth as responsible individual persons.

Miguel, at 5:05 pm EST on February 15, 2008

Gun Free Zone?

Dear UT, As a fellow faculty member I share your experiences with students. I also have a couple of questions to ask you: 1. If there is a fire in your classroom building, are you responsible to get your students out of the building, and safely away from it? 2. If there is inclement weather, are you responsible to get your students to a safe location? If your college is like mine, the answer to both of those questions is, “Of Course!"Now for #3: If a someone comes into your classroom with the intent to do harm, or even kill, your students, what is your responsibility? To, as they did at VA Tech, hide under a table? To watch, helpless, as your precious students, (at least mine are precious to me), are slaughtered? I would have a real tough time living with that afterward. You see, the Great State of Texas has licensed me to carry a pistol, the State and Federal government have done due diligence in checking my background, I have been through classes on concealed carry, and I have proven to the State’s satisfaction that I am competent with my pistol. Knowing that, knowing that I have both the skill and the tool to save my students, but being prohibited from doing so, well, that is terrible.

Doc G, Professor, at 9:00 pm EDT on April 16, 2008

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Bringing the Gun Debate Back to Campus

or search for jobs directly.

Emergency Services Officer
Princeton University

Position Summary: Provide specialized security and emergency services including securing access to facility, ... see job

Director of Research
Business-Higher Education Forum

BHEF, an organization of Fortune 500 CEOs, prominent college and university presidents, and foundation leaders, is looking ... see job

Director, Homeland Security Programs
Eastern Kentucky University

Eastern Kentucky University, located in Richmond, Madison County, Kentucky near the Heart of the Bluegrass, is a ... see job

Campus Safety Officer Coordinator
North Orange County Community College District

CAMPUS SAFETY OFFICER COORDINATOR JOB # FCC669 Salary: 3,195-3,863 CLOSING DATE: August 28, 2008 POSITION LOCATION: ... see job

Associate Dean, Institute of Public Safety
Broward College

Reporting to the Dean of the Institute of Public Safety, the Associate Dean of Criminal Justice Training Oversees ... see job

Emergency & Security Services Officer
University of Idaho

Emergency & Security Services Officer Risk Management Open for Recruitment: August 15, 2008 — September 5, 2008 Announcement ... see job

Police Officers
Yale University

General Purpose
Responsible for the preservation of public peace and order, the prevention and detection of crime, ... see job

Supervisor I
Columbus State Community College

Columbus State Community College invests in employee development by providing numerous resources, partnerships, training and ... see job

Lieutenant/Shift Commander, Campus Police
Loyola College in Maryland

SPECIFIC DUTIES: — Assures that subordinate employees receive the appropriate training that develops and improves needed ... see job

Supervisor I
Columbus State Community College

Columbus State Community College invests in employee development by providing numerous resources, partnerships, training and ... see job