Search News


Browse Archives

News

Unusual Job Requirement

November 26, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Brian Leiter, a professor of law and philosophy at the University of Texas at Austin, blogged that it might be "the oddest job ad of the season."

And over at A Philosophy Job Market Blog, scholars have been weighing in on a job announcement by Mississippi State University for a tenure-track position, teaching three courses a semester. Areas of specialization appear fairly standard and flexible. But one thing jumps out: "Applicant must be a member of PBK...."

The anonymous blogger who noted the requirements was taken aback. "Wait. What? Applicants must be a member of Phi Beta Kappa? You might think, what the fuck for?" wrote the blogger. "In fact, that's exactly what I did think when I read that ad. Now, via a trusted friend of PJMB comes word that, yes, applicants must be members of PBK. Apparently Mississippi State's got some initiative going where, for god knows what reason, they're trying to increase the number of faculty who are PBK members. So get this: the line is contingent on the new hire being a PBK member."

Commenters then weighed in on whether such a requirement is appropriate, with critics noting that the requirement would favor older, traditional colleges' graduates over other institutions, and questioning whether Phi Beta Kappa membership has any relevance to teaching philosophy. Some light-hearted philosophers declared themselves to be PBK in the sense that they once worked at Burger King and so were "Post Burger King."

As it turns out, the job requirement relates to a specific goal at Mississippi State: Winning a Phi Beta Kappa chapter. One of the requirements is that 10 percent of professors in arts and sciences fields be Phi Beta Kappa members (or 10 professors at colleges where 10 percent would be fewer than 10).

A spokeswoman for Mississippi State said that to support the university's goal of winning a Phi Beta Kappa chapter, departments have the option of making Phi Beta Kappa membership a "preferred credential." In addition, some departments (including philosophy) have been told that if they make Phi Beta Kappa membership a requirement, and hire someone with the credential, they can get support for a new faculty slot, "provided all other requirements are met and the hire would in fact strengthen scholarly capacity of the department."

The spokeswoman said that that the policy wasn't new, but that she thinks the philosophy opening may be the first time it is receiving attention.

John Churchill, secretary of the Phi Beta Kappa Society, said he was unaware of the Mississippi State position requirements and couldn't discuss any negotiations with the university about setting up a chapter because of confidentiality requirements.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Unusual Job Requirement

  • language
  • Posted by John Foubert , Assistant Professor at William and Mary on November 26, 2007 at 8:30am EST
  • Do you think it is possible, even preferable to stay away from gratuitous f-bombs in an article about a job posting? Language of the sort has a place when describing pop culture phenomena by is there really a reason to dumb down intellectual discourse in such a way in THIS kind of article?

  • Posted by Bennett Boggs on November 26, 2007 at 8:45am EST
  • I agree with the first post - a simple "f***" would have clearly indicated what was being said. Let's please keep these news articles civil and professional.

  • Eff Bombs
  • Posted by Poster on November 26, 2007 at 9:55am EST
  • People: stop taking yourselves so seriously. Mature readers should be able to read an "f-bomb" in context and not get their proverbial pant*@# in a w-d.

    In response to the issue raised by this article, what is wrong with a university trying to elevate the baseline credentials of its new hires? Like it or not, Phi Beta Kappa membership is a sign of intellectual capacity and past achievement. It may not be a good predictor, or even a predictor, of success at teaching any particular subject, but that does not mean that the achievement has no place as a hiring criterion.

    I would be willing to venture that most people who cry foul at this form of job posting are not themselves members of Phi Beta Kappa.

    So life's not fair...

  • Posted by Sara Orel , Dr. at Truman State University on November 26, 2007 at 9:55am EST
  • My undergraduate college (Bryn Mawr) does not have a Phi Beta Kappa chapter, or indeed (to my knowledge) no honour societies. So they are throwing out anyone with a Bryn Mawr degree, even if it is someone with a spectacular record, etc.. I understand the reason, but it is very short sighted if you look at the long run goal of getting the best faculty member in any position.

  • The main problem with this is...
  • Posted by Allison on November 26, 2007 at 9:55am EST
  • What if you attended institutions that did not have a PBK chapter? My undergrad did, and I'm a member, but my parents for example both graduated from a good school that to this day does not have a PBK chapter.

    Also, what if you were just a dope as an undergrad but straightened up your academic record in graduate school?

  • What the...?
  • Posted by Mike Hickerson on November 26, 2007 at 9:55am EST
  • I guess I'll have to start marking my links to Inside Higher Ed as "NSFW." :)

  • F-bombs
  • Posted by John Foubert , Assistant Professor at William and Mary on November 26, 2007 at 10:25am EST
  • I am perfectly capable of reading f-bombs in the proper context. I have included quotes with them in my own scholarly work on sexual assault and pornography to describe the experience of others when it has scholarly merit. My point is that using the f-bomb to describe one's reaction to an article in a forum such as Inside Higher Education to describe ones reaction to a job posting reduces academe to the lowest common denominator. Then to suggest that those like me are just getting our "panties in a wad" (my translation) serves to equate my critique to something that is associated with women. In so doing, the person who posted is equating my objection to something female, equating "female" with weakness, thus perpetuating a culture of patriarchy that said individual would do well to read up on in the literature. I recommend Jackson Katz's "The Macho Paradox" for a start.

  • Keep the language civil
  • Posted by michael on November 26, 2007 at 10:35am EST
  • Yes, please remove all references to the f word, the n word, the c word, the j word, the d word, and especially the k word. Do not let the k word get past the editors.

    Because in academics, where we demand tenure to say whatever the fuck we want, words can actually hurt us.

  • Posted by Judith on November 26, 2007 at 10:35am EST
  • So Miss. State is not interested in providing an education for its students, but in providing a PBK chapter for its PR department?

  • And Mississippi wonders why it has a dubious reputation . . .
  • Posted by Suzanne on November 26, 2007 at 11:25am EST
  • This job requirement is discriminatory in the worst sort of way. Meritocracy is fine, but merit is not the same as attending an undergraduate institution that has a PBK chapter.

  • Posted by Raoul on November 26, 2007 at 4:05pm EST
  • In the STEM world, being a PBK is on par with joining Mensa, a badge of being a pompous buffoon.

  • PBK requirement opens racial issues.
  • Posted by Ben , Adjunct Instructor at Shasta Community College on November 26, 2007 at 4:05pm EST
  • Asking for PBK membership is like asking for the applicant to be white:

    "Despite the distinction by the two schools and their chapters, the upcoming anniversaries may serve as a reminder to many that Phi Beta Kappa has had limited influence on historically Black schools and on Black students at predominantly White college campuses with Phi Beta Kappa chapters.

    Of the 262 higher education institutions having a Phi Beta Kappa chapter, only four are at historically Black schools. In addition to Howard and Fisk, Morehouse College and Spelman College have chapters. The national society maintains no records on the racial and ethnic background of its members, but guesses by knowledgeable individuals put the Black population at 3,000 to 5,000, which is less than 1 percent of the national membership."

    "...Phi Beta Kappa officials say that diversity is a serious concern of the organization."

    Black Issues in Higher Education, Oct 10, 2002 by Roach Ronald

    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0DXK/is_17_19/ai_92800206

  • An MSU degree not good enough to teach there
  • Posted by Tom on November 26, 2007 at 5:35pm EST
  • I guess this means that since they do not have a chapter, anyone who received their degree from Mississippi State is not properly educated to teach philosophy there, regardless of their credentials or record of achievement. It seems like a slap in the face of MSU alumni.

  • EEO Law
  • Posted by Nathan T. Carter at Bowling Green State University on November 26, 2007 at 7:35pm EST
  • I agree with the person who wrote about diversity concerns.. That should be a serious concern for MSU in pursuing such a search.. Using Phi Beta Kappa membership to select people could be a "proxy" variable for race in hiring professors.. Keep in mind that EEO law (Civil Rights Act) does NOT require intent for arriving at the conclusion that hiring practices are discriminatory.. So in response to another commenter, Life is NOT fair, however, hiring practices SHOULD BE!

    If a black professor applies to MSU and is better-published or has other merits but is passed up because they are not PBK, the EEOC lawyers would have a hey-day with the institution.

    Also, save the arguments about language for a time when it is relevant to the subject matter being discussed, please.

  • Quiet, kids!
  • Posted by Mark Silcox at University of Central Olahoma on December 2, 2007 at 4:35pm EST
  • Good grief! What's all this infantile cant about "f-bombs"? Is this a website about higher education or the blog of some earnest Presbyterian Youth Camp Counselor? I got into academia precisely in order to escape from this kind of prudery, which is far, far more offensive to any thoughtful person than the judicious use of a few Anglo-Saxon verb forms.