Search News


Browse Archives

News

List of Top Academic Employers Evolves

December 5, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Through its surveys and reports, the Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education has stressed the importance of a wide variety of policies -- and not just those about pay and benefits -- in attracting and keeping young faculty talent. The project's new list of "exemplary" higher education employers offers further evidence of that theme.

Based on surveys of junior professors about various policies and attitudes at their colleges, the project continues to identify some well known liberal arts colleges and research universities in that group, but also to find plenty of regional institutions that are finding ways that don't require mega-endowments to keep their younger professors happy.

Generally, private colleges dominate the list in categories related to compensation or other categories where finances would be a major factor. But on qualities related to the clarity of procedures (a category many junior faculty members take very seriously), publics tend to do much better.

The Harvard University-based collaborative -- known by its acronym, COACHE -- has become an influential player in discussions of how to make colleges more "family friendly" and how institutions should prepare for a generation of professors who may not accept the traditional hierarchical model of many academic departments.

Much of COACHE's work is done through surveys of junior professors at various institutions, with colleges receiving their own results and comparative data. The release of the top institutions in various categories is one of the few instances in which the project publicly praises institutions -- and is intended to identify places that others might consult to improve various policies.

And given that young faculty members are telling COACHE researchers that they care about more than prestige and money, the list may provide examples of particularly ideal institutions for some prospective employees.

"We're hoping that as more institutions sign on, junior faculty start asking [potential employers] the question: What's your COACHE profile?" said Kiernan Mathews, assistant director of the program.

The new results are based on surveys conducted at 78 colleges and universities, up from 52 last year. This year's results come from two years of data (where available) instead of just one. Many of the additions are among a new group in the study: master's level universities. In the past, the study has focused on research universities and liberal arts colleges. Mathews said that the master's institutions were welcomed because they are as likely, if not more likely, to hire young faculty members as are other sectors. Several California State University System campuses participating for the first time did well enough to earn "exemplary" status.

"University of North Carolina Pembroke and California State San Marcos are right in there with Stanford and Duke," Mathews said.

The numbers of participants in the survey continues to grow -- currently there are more than 100 institutions involved for the next iteration. Currently, they are all four-year institutions, but Mathews said that COACHE is in discussion with community colleges about conducting surveys in that sector as well.

The exemplary list is made up of the top two liberal arts colleges (among 22) and the top four universities (among 56), based on the faculty surveys. The institutions are listed alphabetically. But institutions with ratings that were within .05 of the second (or fourth) institution were also included, so some categories have more than the expected number of designated institutions. Brown and Stanford Universities achieved exemplary status in 8 of 12 categories, while Duke University was outstanding in seven categories. Three colleges (Bowdoin, Davidson and Kenyon) achieved exemplary status in five categories.

Exemplary Institutions in COACHE Survey of Junior Faculty Members' Satisfaction

Category Liberal Arts Colleges Universities
Tenure practices over all

Davidson College

Kenyon College

Trinity College

Auburn U.

Brown U.

California State U. at Fullerton

Fayetteville State U.

North Carolina State U.

Ohio State U.

U. of Kansas

U. of North Carolina at Pembroke

Clarity of tenure process

Davidson College

Kenyon College

Trinity College

Brown U.

Cal Poly Pomona

California State U. at Fullerton

California State U. at San Marcos

Fayetteville State U.

North Dakota State U.

U. of Connecticut

Reasonableness of tenure policies

Goucher College

Wabash College

Auburn U.

Brown U.

Fayetteville State U.

North Carolina State U.

Ohio State U.

U. of Kansas

U. of North Carolina at Wilmington

U. of North Carolina at Pembroke

U. of Virginia

Overall effectiveness of policies

Denison U.

Goucher College

Hamilton College

Kenyon College

Auburn U.

Duke U.

North Dakota State U.

Ohio State U.

Stanford U.

U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

U. of Kansas

U. of Minnesota

U. of Notre Dame

Overall nature of work

Amherst College

Bowdoin College

Carleton College

College of the Holy Cross

Davidson College

Goucher College

Brown U.

Dartmouth College

Duke U.

Stanford U.

U. of Notre Dame

Nature of work: teaching

Bowdoin College

Carleton College

College of the Holy Cross

Davidson College

Brown U.

Dartmouth College

Duke U.

Harvard U.

Stanford U.

Nature of work: research

Bowdoin College

Denison U.

Brown U.

Dartmouth College

Duke U.

Stanford U.

U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

U. of Notre Dame

Nature of work: support services

Bowdoin College

Davidson College

Brown U.

Dartmouth College

Indiana U. at Bloomington

Stanford U.

U. of Notre Dame

Work and family balance

Barnard College

Carleton College

Hamilton College

Duke U.

Stanford U.

U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

U. of North Carolina at Pembroke

Compensation

Bowdoin College

Carleton College

Macalester College

Dartmouth College

Duke U.

Stanford U.

U. of Connecticut

Climate and collegiality

Goucher College

Kenyon College

Trinity College

Wabash College

Appalachian State U.

California State U. at Fullerton

California State U. at San Marcos

U. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Western Carolina U.

Global satisfaction

Kenyon College

Trinity College

Appalachian State U.

Brown U.

California State U. at San Marcos

Dartmouth College

Duke U.

Stanford U.

U. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

U. of Minnesota

U. of Virginia

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on List of Top Academic Employers Evolves

  • Research?
  • Posted by Wayne Lowen on December 5, 2007 at 10:10am EST
  • Wow....impressive research to select this list of top institutions......a survey of 78 colleges out of more than 3000. Sounds like the List of Top 10 Steak Restaurants in American, as determined by a survey of the 10 restaurants.

  • Parts of speech, people.
  • Posted by LanguageMatters on December 5, 2007 at 11:30am EST
  • I almost stopped reading this piece when I saw that the organization's name uses an adjective as a noun. How credible can they be?

  • Clarity???
  • Posted by Amused on December 5, 2007 at 11:30am EST
  • I am confused; so e.g., Goucher Colleges tenure policies are reasonable and effective, ...but not clear?

    How did all of the "unclear" people figure out that the policies were reasonable and effective?

  • Posted by UC Stafff on December 5, 2007 at 11:30am EST
  • Great point, a list of institutions can be found at http://gseacademic.harvard.edu/%7Ecoache/info/members.html.

    I was in a bit of a panic this morning until I realized not a single University of California institutions is a member of COACHE.

  • What are they measuring?
  • Posted by Hoosier Prof on December 5, 2007 at 11:30am EST
  • I agree, Wayne. Hopefully, someone from COACHE will weigh in and explain to us how and why the 78 surveyed institutions were selected. Were these the only institutions that allowed their faculty to participate in this survey? Or were they selected and intended in some way to be representative of a larger group? The report at their website has NO methods section. It's just four pages long, and really doesn't say much about anything. What kind of research does Harvard think this is?

  • Top Academic Employers
  • Posted by Amused at Former Duke Faculty on December 5, 2007 at 1:45pm EST
  • Also confused. Was this a survey only of tenure-track junior faculty? Or did it include the "of the practice" (non-tenure track, long term adjunct) faculty who comprise over half of Duke U.'s teaching faculty and many of its Undergraduate Teaching Award winners?

    Whichever, I must agree their policies and practices are family-friendly: Spouses of senior faculty get super campus positions as part of the spouse's employment package.

  • COACHE's Top 10--and use of an adjective for a noun, O horrors
  • Posted by Tom Clayton at University of Minnesota on December 5, 2007 at 6:30pm EST
  • I am of course delighted to find myself in an institution—the University of Minnesota—ranked in the Top Ten in Global Satisfaction, and am also pleased to offer COACHE a touch of counter-pedantry against the complaint by Language Matters that it “uses an adjective as a noun. How credible can they be?’” English is constantly evolving, and "collaborative" is a perfectly reasonable coinage with the venerable precedent of “collective,” which dates at least from 1655, according to the Oxford English Dictionary.

  • COACHE schools
  • Posted by David on December 10, 2007 at 12:30pm EST
  • The sample of 78 is indeed small. It is also self-selected, not selected by COACHE. Schools elect to participate in the project voluntarily. And must pay between $10,000 and $20,000, annually, to participate. Which probably explains quite a bit about the size and self-selection of the sample. It is not a national cross-sectional study, and simply shouldn't be interpreted as such.