Search News


Browse Archives

News

Shining a Spotlight on 2-Year Colleges

December 11, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Community colleges have been slowly creeping into more and more policy discussions at the state level, with governors and legislators increasingly recognizing the key role that two-year institutions play in developing workers, educating adults and, to a larger extent every day, serving as an entry point for traditional age students.

And while community colleges have received a few head fakes in their direction from Washington in recent years, with President Bush creating a small new grant program for two-year institutions, the Spellings Commission recognizing their significance (though only in passing) in its 2006 report, and Congress creating a community college caucus, the institutions have largely remained low on the federal policy making agenda.

That is despite the fact that the institutions educate nearly half of all undergraduates in the United States; that community colleges already educate a majority of the low-income and first-generation college students who are the fastest-growing portion of the young American population; and that if the country is to succeed in closing the “degree gap” that it faces in producing a sufficient number of educated citizens, two-year institutions will have to play a key role.

“If students who started at community colleges [earned four-year degrees at] comparable rates” to students who start at four-year colleges, said Judith Flink, chairwoman of the advisory panel and executive director of student financial services and cashier operations at the University of Illinois system, “we could gain more than 2 million bachelor’s degrees over the next decade.”

It was with that background that the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance, the federal panel that advises Congress on issues related to student aid, held a daylong symposium Monday on community colleges. The panel’s executive director, William Goggin, said that its members had decided to hold the session in recognition of the fact that the institutions have received relatively little attention from federal policy makers, including the advisory committee.

Goggin said the panel’s members wanted to better understand community colleges so that, “if the federal government is interested in making community colleges a more viable pathway to four-year degrees, we can help answer the question, 'what would that look like?'"

At one point in Monday’s proceedings, Diane Auer Jones, the U.S. assistant secretary for postsecondary education, asked a similar question to state and other officials who are working to try to ease the transfer of students from two-year to four-year colleges.

“What's the best thing [Secretary Margaret Spellings] could do to enable you to do your work?” Jones asked. “If we came up with $2 million” -- “no guarantees” on that, she quickly warned -- “what could we do?”

If the panel’s aim was to flood its members and Jones with possible ideas, they succeeded; more than one participant in the meeting joked that the phrase “best practices” was getting a workout at the session. While officials from various states, foundations, and advocacy groups promoted what they have done on the three big topics discussed -- bolstering initial enrollment, improving students’ persistence once in community colleges, or easing transfer to baccalaureate institutions -- many acknowledged that data to prove their success was sometimes in short supply.

The opening discussion, focused on "enabling enrollment," examined an effort in Maryland that over three years increased the proportion of state need-based financial aid flowing to community college students to 15 percent from 8 percent. It spotlighted the California Community Colleges' "I Can Afford College" campaign that produced a 20 percent increase in the number of two-year college students there qualifying for state aid. And it drew attention to Northern Virginia Community College's Pathway to the Baccalaureate Program, which has helped draw more low-income and first-generation students to the institution and seen them stay in college at higher rates than better prepared peers.

The enrollment session also featured Valencia Community College's unusual -- to the point of startling -- marketing campaign, which seeks to tap into the same fashionable inclinations that attracts the current generation to television's "Project Runway."

The campaign gives education at the Florida community college a haute couture theme -- "Education by Valencia," with models wearing wild costumes that represent the college's different disciplines -- that plays well with its mostly 18- to 24-year-old audience, said Christian Campagnuolo, assistant vice president for marketing and media relations, who previously worked at an ad agency and at Walt Disney Company. "The idea is, 'what are you going to wear when you go out in the world?'" he said. "We give out more A.A. degrees than any other community college, and we wanted our campaign to be a little different. We wanted to have a little swagger in our message."

A panel on student persistence returned to more mundane (if slightly more grounded) material, examining programs in Louisiana in which small scholarships were shown to help keep students enrolled and in Florida, where community college students who enrolled in "College 101" were 8 percent more likely than their peers to earn a credential (the gap was slightly wider for those enrolled in remedial courses, said Thomas Bailey, director of the Community College Research Center at Columbia University's Teachers College. David Prince, assistant director for research and analysis at the Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges, described the effort there to build a student achievement goal into the state's funding formula for two-year institutions.

In the day's third major session, on "facilitating transfer," focused on the burgeoning effort by the Kentucky Council for Postsecondary Education to increase the number of degree recipients in the state, in part by requiring four-year colleges to begin reporting a slew of data, including on the number of transfer students they took. That helped the state increase the number of two-year-college transfers by 19 percent from 2002-3 to 2006-7, but to meet its overall goals for degree recipients, Kentucky needs to increase that number by 10 percent a year, said James Applegate, the council's vice president for academic affairs.

As the next step, the Kentucky council hopes to begin rewarding institutions monetarily for producing more graduates, and that (if approved by legislators) is likely to encourage even more collaboration between two-year and four-year institutions on easing transfer, said Applegate. "It didn't take really smart presidents very long to realize they couldn't get to their numbers without transfer students."

Jane Oates, executive director of the New Jersey Commission on Higher Education, meanwhile, described her state's new law -- an agreement that produced "tears but no blood," she said -- that mandates that an associate degree awarded by a county college must be fully transferable and count as the first two years toward a baccalaureate degree at any of the state’s public institutions.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Shining a Spotlight on 2-Year Colleges

  • Your daughter and your brother-in-law at community college
  • Posted by Clifford Adelman , Senior Associate at Institute for Higher Education Policy on December 11, 2007 at 9:15am EST
  • Virtually all the panelists at yesterday's meeting instinctively acknowledged two major populations of community college students, divided by age at the point of entry. Nobody cited the data, but the numbers are unescapable: roughly 40-45 percent of beginning community college students are traditional-age and are a key link in the a secondary-to-postsecondary analysis line that we think we understand fairly well. Conversely, 55-60 percent are over the age of 22, some considerably so, and out of the range of conventional understanding. Your daughter and your brother-in-law live on different planets, and evidence very different educational histories, yet the usual presentation of community college data lumps them together in an undifferentiated mass, distorting our understanding of what community colleges do for whom. Within 8 years of community college entry, the transfer rate for traditional-age students is about 35 percent, and their bachelor's degree completion rate is 60 percent (compared to 68 percent for traditional-age students who entered 4-year colleges). For older beginning students, who are far more likely to attend part-time, we don't have 8 year data, rather 6, and that is clearly an insufficient censor to determine their transfer and degree completion behavior. To grasp what happens to these students, to mark their paths more accurately, to identify blockages in their progress, and to design more effective strategies for advisement and enrollment management, we have to clean all of our analyses up and go "Eyes Wide Open." The place to start is with our formulas and categories for reporting completion rates under the Federally-required "Graduation Rate Survey." It ain't hard, and will wake everybody up to what community colleges do and can do better.

  • Community Colleges
  • Posted by Randall Hansen , Retired on December 11, 2007 at 9:15am EST
  • I have written a book about the GI Bill 1944 and the lesson is: We must to the best of our ability, provide others the opportunity to rise to the best of their ability--New legislation to provide free 13th and 14th grades--as a public good paid for by taxes. Pose review of government taxes and create taxes suitable to all. The taxes now enable great wealth for a few. the book contains this as the last section. I have written an early version and am redoing it.

  • Harper's Junior College idea
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project on December 11, 2007 at 11:25am EST
  • What we now call the “community college” originally began in the late nineteenth century and early 1900’s as a way of screening out candidates for 4 year colleges.

    This was the idea of William Rainey Harper, the University of Chicago president. One of the earliest junior colleges began at his prompting in Illinois, Joulet. Another of his students began junior colleges in California. The plan was to divert unsuitable candidates into appropriate vocational or "termainal" programs, thereby freeing up professors and upper-classmen for genuine scholarship and research at the colleges, modeled on the German research university. This was Harper’s plan.

    However, once the culture of aspiration and professionalism took root, and the American dream became identified with having a college education, the explosive growth of the colleges created make-shift “13th” grade classes scattered at high schools all over the nation. Typical of the time, these were modeled on the classical Latin and Greek language curriculum, which was still required for admission to America’s colleges in the 1900s.

    Bowing to market pressures, these informal classes of wanna-be college-men eventually were absorbed into the higher education system, newly christened as “junior colleges,” and associated with public 4 year schools as feeders. Everyone was happy.

    But the original diversionary intent of the junior colleges, subsequently documented by Burton Clark as the community college “cooling-out” process, is fundamentally at war with prevailing ideas of American meritocracy. Junior and community colleges still aren’t sure if their mission is vocational or academic, or both. This inner contradiction plagues community colleges in interesting ways.

    William Harper’s comprehensive plan (elementary schools, junior high schools, high schools, junior colleges, colleges and research universities) owes much to the pyramidcal German model of higher education, with its base in the cultural naturalization of education as the means of attainment (“opportunity”), and schools and colleges ranging upwards in increasing differentiation.

    Harper’s plan was to hive-off those less well-prepared students to the newly established Junior Colleges. I believe that this had a significant impact on the composition of the student body at the 4 year level: it *upgrades* the overall student population -- but notice that it does this without having to “improve” any individual students!

    For the educator interested in maintaining high caliber students in the classroom at the apex, to say nothing of the social and cultural capital benefits, this effect must have seemed like a miracle.

    When people complain about the poor rates of student transfer to the 4 year colleges, they forget that this was the original intent – to divert unsuitable candidates into appropriate vocational training. Community colleges, to this day, continue to do what they were designed to do.

  • Improving Transfer to University
  • Posted by William McGinnis , Trustee at Butte-Glenn Community College on December 11, 2007 at 11:40am EST
  • As we have looked at this challenge over the past decade two issues keep rising to the top during our local conversations. First, better qualified students entering the pipeline. To over come this barrier, we are starting an Early College High School program with the goal of increasing the number of qualified students and also to demonstrate the type of learning that must occur at the high school level to better prepare students. The 2nd issue is at the other end of the pipeline and that is to change the attitude of University officers on the ability of our students. As an example, half of every local university graduating class is made up of students starting at a community college. Our transfer students maintain a higher GPA than the native University students for the 3rd & 4th year of university programs. However, the University officers always claim their native students are better prepared to graduate form the university and the quality of transfer students is well below that of native students. While I agree community colleges need to better allign their course work with the universities, the universities need to stop resisting transfer students and help advertise the alternative route to graduation.

  • Collaborative Effort
  • Posted by Linda Michalowski , Vice Chancellor, Student Services and Special Programs at California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office on December 11, 2007 at 1:55pm EST
  • I was pleased to present to the Advisory Committee yesterday on California's "I Can Afford College" financial aid outreach campaign and I apprecitate the mention in this story of it's impact on increasing the numbers of community college students receiving financial aid. As I emphasized in my remarks to the committee, the campaign has only been successful because of its collaboration with the financial aid offices at our 109 colleges to staff campaign events and work locally to help students navigate the financial aid application process and then process those applications to deliver financial aid to more students. The statewide campaign has been able to get people's attention with spokespersons like Ryan Seacrest, but its the staff in our financial aid offices who are the real stars.

    Linda Michalowski

  • Second Chance for Some
  • Posted by miracatta on December 11, 2007 at 3:05pm EST
  • One function of a community college is to provide a second chance to enter a 4-year college. For various reasons, some students who would benefit from a 4-year college education achieved low GPA's, riddled with C's and D's, in high school . By proving themselves during the first two years of college, they can then transfer to a 4-year college which might otherwise have been closed to them. One such student I know graduated high school with a 2.0 GPA, made dean's list throughout community college, and will soon be graduating from UC Berkeley. Another one was accepted at Tulane. It's nice when doors don't slam permanently when one is 18 years old.

  • Posted by Carol Tulikangas , Dean of Academic Affairs at Miami Dade College on December 11, 2007 at 5:55pm EST
  • Clifford Adelman's comments about the two kinds of students attending two-year colleges is so important. Our students are as varied as the adult population of the United States! Nearly every working adult at some time will need or decide to return for some type of educational upgrade. Asking us to account for all our students as if they are all 18 years old and speaking English as their first language, is doing a disservice to the intense educational work that takes place every day, night and weekend at two-year campuses across the country.

  • Affordable and Accessible
  • Posted by Leslie R. Leach , Writing Center Manager at College of the Redwoods on December 17, 2007 at 4:30pm EST
  • First of all, there is no question at all at the community college where I work of whether it exists to serve vocational or transfer students. Numerous certificated programs are available for those who want to learn skills to enter the workforce as peace officers, firefighters, nurses, etc. And numerous courses are available that are transferable to four-year colleges. Harper’s idea is nice and simple, but too simple to describe today’s community colleges. Instead what should be addressed are the ideas of all those who posted comments. First, money is an issue for so many students. For example, consider those students who got B’s in high school so didn’t qualify for scholastic scholarships and whose parents make too much money for their B student children to qualify for financial aid, but not enough to support them even at a community college, let alone a four-year college or university. More financial aid for community colleges should be made available, wherever possible. Second, the idea of your brother-in-law and your daughter being on different planets is absolutely true, and the conclusion of that response it true as well: there need to be better ways to track students who have such different backgrounds, experiences, and needs. Third, those high school students who are bright enough to excel in college, but were not mature enough to consider their futures when they were in high school certainly deserve a second chance, and should be welcomed back into the educational fold. Finally, the idea that students who complete two-year degrees at a community college should be able to attend a state four-year college or university may take quite a bit of work initially to align institutional requirements, but it’s a great idea, a very bright light at the end of the community college tunnel. After two years or more of working and going to school, as so many community college transfer students do, how encouraging for students to know there’s a place for them at an institution that grants bachelors degrees instead of having to apply, worry, and wait to see whether or not they’ll be accepted. If we really want an educated populace, then we should make education affordable and accessible, which are not the same as “easy.”