Search News


Browse Archives

News

Averting Assault

December 17, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

A new study finds that fraternity members who participate in a one-hour rape prevention program are significantly less likely to report committing a sexually coercive act during their first year of college than are fraternity men in a control group.

The study is unusual in that it documents evidence of actual behavioral changes in a campus setting, in addition to attitudinal changes (which have been the focus of most prior studies). “That has been something that people in the rape prevention community have sought to do for decades,” said John D. Foubert, an assistant professor of higher education at the College of William and Mary and lead author of the study, which was scheduled to be published Saturday in the National Association of Student Personnel Administrators Journal.

The study evaluates the Men’s Program, a prevention program offered by the national nonprofit founded by Foubert, “One in Four,” that maintains chapters at about 30 college campuses and also hires educators who travel by RV to offer the program at another 50 campuses per year. The study tracks 565 men -- 90 percent of males in the freshman class at a “mid-sized campus in the Southeast” -- throughout the course of the academic year. Students in the control group participated in a program that reiterated information on sexual assault already communicated during orientation, Foubert said, while the balance of students participated in the Men’s Program.

The idea behind the Men's Program, Foubert said, “is that you’re going to get a lot farther with men if you treat them as potential helpers rather than potential perpetrators.” The Men’s Program includes a screening of a video that describes a male-on-male rape to foster empathy for survivors among the male participants, and focuses on how men can support survivors and intervene to prevent possible assaults. The program has been the subject of some controversy, as outlined in this 1999 Journal of College Student Development article, particularly because of concerns about the use of a video depicting male rape to foster empathy for female survivors and objections to the program’s appeal to the "men-take-care-of-women archetype.”

In the U.S. Department of Education-funded study, Foubert bolsters results from an earlier research finding that participation in the Men's Program is associated with long-term attitudinal changes, in addition to behavioral ones. Focusing on fraternity members, he finds that participants who went on to join fraternities as freshmen were more than three times more likely than peers to report committing a sexually coercive act -- defined as everything from unwanted touching to rape -- during their first year of college. Foubert found that 8 percent of freshmen who joined fraternities reported committing a sexually coercive act their first year of college, compared to 2.5 percent of men who did not join fraternities.

However, on a survey completed seven months after the program, 6 percent of fraternity members who participated in the Men’s Program reported committing a sexually coercive act, with all of the reported acts among the least severe -- all were in the unwanted sexual contact category. Meanwhile, 10 percent of fraternity members in the control group reported committing a sexually coercive act on the follow-up survey, with those acts spanning the spectrum from unwanted sexual contact to attempted rape. (No one reported rape. While Foubert acknowledged that the dependence on self-reported behaviors might be a limitation of the study, he noted limitations of crime data and indicated that surveys are the best tool available for this sort of study).

“Especially now that we’ve shown some behavioral change we would like to see it spread to other campuses as well while we simultaneously try to improve the program," Foubert said, adding that One in Four's goal is to have a chapter on every campus. He cautioned, however, that the new study was campus-specific and not national. He’s hoping to obtain funding for a multi-campus study of the program’s effects, and is also interested in studying older college students.

Asked about the study Friday, Mary P. Koss, a leader in campus rape prevention research and professor of public health at the University of Arizona, said the study raises a lot of important points. She’d like to see a follow-up study also question fraternity members on their drinking habits in order to see if there’s a difference in reported assaults between fraternity and non-fraternity members once alcohol consumption is controlled, and also would like to see a study replicating Foubert's procedure focused on student athletes. “All of that is characteristic of a good study,” said Koss, who has collaborated with Foubert. “It’s showing where we can go from here.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Averting Assault

  • we need the raw numbers
  • Posted by Marty on December 17, 2007 at 11:45am EST
  • The problem with such stories is that we need the raw numbers. "The balance" of students were in the program, which suggests an extremely small control group. Only a minority of students typically joins a fraternity, often 10 to 20%. By now, the control group fraternity members could be as low as 10 to 15 men. One person, maybe two, admitting to some form of sexual assault could account completely for these findings. Using a large control group on another similar campus or two without a major program would be much more instructive.

  • Questions About Bias
  • Posted by Pete M , Grad Student on December 17, 2007 at 12:15pm EST
  • While this article does note that the program that Foubert studied is his own program, I continue to be concerned that more questions are not raised regarding this. I have read some of Foubert's research in the past. It is generally sound methodologically. However, I am concerned that the claims he makes over-reach what he has found. I am also concerned that the program that he wishes be replicated on ALL other campuses has not been studied by OTHER independent researchers. A one hour workshop that changes behaviors permanently? That is quite a claim. I would also encourage those that find these findings intriguing to look at the concerns raised by others about contents of the workshop.

  • additional perspective
  • Posted by John Foubert , Assistant Professor at William and Mary on December 18, 2007 at 9:20am EST
  • Thank you Marty for raising important questions. The control group was the same size as the experimental group. The behavioral difference was evidenced by much more than just one or two people; details are in the NASPA Journal article being released this week. Pete the grad student calls the methodology "generally" sound. How could it be improved? In what way does any claim made about this study over reach the findings? Thank you for noting that a one hour program that changes behavior is quite a claim, however the study does not claim it does so permanently -- only for the seven months measured; please read more carefully before jumping to such conclusions.

  • From Inside the Fraternity Walls
  • Posted by Todd , Frat Boy on December 18, 2007 at 4:05pm EST
  • I must admit that I am new to the concept of sexual prevention. This was never something that came up in a high school or college context for me. As I have begun to research the topic, I came across this article and thought I would comment. I noticed that Marty says that only 10-20% of students join a fraternity. First, it really depends on the school...mine for example was about 80%. I realize that is abnormally higher than many colleges, but still... Also, who cares about the percentage anyway? I think if this program is going to start somewhere, a fraternity is it. Talk about not backing down from an issue and putting it in the lion's den! Fraternity life is right where this prevention needs to go regardless of a percentage. In my opinion, Greek Life consists of the "cool" kids that set the standard for others to follow most of the time...much like the star athletes in high school. Immature I know, but still the reality. If people disagree with that, then they probably were not in a fraternity. This was absolutley the case for my fraternity and those I've been to on multiple campuses.

    Anyway, I thought this article was great and I think Dr. Foubert is really on to something that many don't dare attempt. No program is ever perfect, so I hope more people will support this one rather than pull out potential flaws to make themselves look intelligent. Don't slow down Dr., our youth culture needs this type of program!

  • Men started this, so men should step up to stop it!
  • Posted by Allen on December 19, 2007 at 2:45pm EST
  • I agree with Mary Koss, we need to take a look at our sports programs. These guys have just as much status on college campuses as fraternities. I am sure if there were to be a wide survey done nationally we would definatley see those numbers rise. We need to have more men talking about this issue. Gaining access to fraternities is hard. I have been working at a Sexual Assault Center for about 5 years, and the only time I was approached to do a presentation was for them to say they had some kind of training. My issue is it was not that they wanted it, but because they has some kind of issue with a memeber they had to have it. But I have to give them credit because after the training I had 3 members approach me about taking our 32 training. Men are the leading cause of violence against women and children, and until we (men) start putting the word out that we won't stand for it then it will continue. I give John credit, because he took a major step, and I hope he gets funding to take it further. You are looking at these young men who join frats when they get to college, but what I would like to know how much exposure has any of them had to this issue? You see no one wants to talk about this issue in public, let along in our schools. I thik if we start in our K-12 schools then we will and can curve this issue before it gets to our college campuses. My program goes out to Middle and High Schools to do presentations and let me tell you, the mind set of some of these young men are dangerous. But we need to look at what causes these behaviors. This is an issue we can go on and on about, but untimatley we need society to talk and listen about this issue. No one wants to talk about this dirty subject. Lets change that attitude!!! Keep up the good work Dr.

  • Masculinity in Tact
  • Posted by Brian on December 19, 2007 at 7:30pm EST
  • While I have not been through the Men's Program described in the article, I have spoken at length with several men and professionals who have, and I do have some concerns about the male-on-male rape depiction as a tool for increased empathy. Increasing empathy is certainly a noble and needed strategy in reducing gender violence, but I don't take it to be the panacea that I think this program may make it out to be. If we really want to get to the core of men's violence then we need programs that ask participants to look at and deconstruct masculinity itself. As men in contemporary society construct and perform their masculinity, they also, whether conscious or unconscious, also develop notions of femininity. Whereas masculinity is thought of by many as "good" and "right," femininity, in a false dichotomy, has been set-up as inferior. Hence the horror of every young male in America to be told he throws like a girl, or even worse, that he is gay. To be a real man means that one must have multiple sex partners, multiple times, and that women "play hard to get" because they rely on us to make those moves so that they are not perceived as being a slut or whore. Not to oversimplify the point, but this notion of hyper-sexualized masculinity also means that violence and sex are intertwined as men must sometimes assert and affirm their sexual righteousness by taking the pleasure that is rightfully theirs from women. In addition to the hyper-masculinized sexualization of men, hegemonic masculinity also suggests that masculinity is a zero-sum game that stands to make some men more powerful than others. If "real" masculinity is to be thought of as White, heterosexual, Protestant, athletic, affluent, able-bodied, and so on, then what does that mean for the men who do not and can not adhere to this hegemony? It means that they then are seen as performing a deviant and virulent masculinity. Hence homophobia, racism, etc. Concerning homophobia and to my ultimate point, if this program discusses or depicts a male-on-male rape scene without thoroughly deconstructing hegemonic masculinity, it stands to reason that it only reifies the toxicity of hegemonic masculinity in other ways. Violence is transferred from women towards gay-men. While I understand this program asserts the attackers are not gay, I think the nuance of the message is much more powerful than program developers may acknowledge. This brings me to last point. If violence is inseparable from the formation and performance of narrowly defined masculinity, then ALL men can be understood as potential perpetrators of violence rather than a select few, i.e. fraternity members, athletes, etc. I advocate for a cohort model approach, but I think we tread on some thin ice when we couch men’s violence as particularly associated with certain male group cultures and memberships. I simply think it their collective, they amplify the worst that masculinity has to offer rather than instill or create it.

  • See it for yourself and read the research too
  • Posted by John Foubert , Assistant professor at William and Mary on December 20, 2007 at 5:50am EST
  • For those who have not seen the program, I invite them to do so before criticizing it based on hearsay -- criticism which is often based on earlier versions of the program (which has now been around since 1993) before substantial changes were made based on valuable feedback from multiple audiences. In addition, a recent study on the program was published showing that the program led to increased empathy toward female rape survivors among male program participants. See Foubert & Newberry (2006). If one has heard many criticisms of the program over the years, chances are these criticisms have been addressed in subsequent versions of the program given that the script is updated annually. Maybe we can find ways to be excited about a development in the research and the cause about fighting rape instead of singing sour grapes?

  • Point Taken
  • Posted by Brian on December 20, 2007 at 12:50pm EST
  • Dr. Foubert,
    My macro-critique of one of element of the program should not be interpreted as my advocation for scrapping the program in its entirity, or that I am not excited about good work being done by researchers like yourself. I never questioned the assertion that the program can and does increase the empathy towards women as victims, what I question is the use of the male-on-male rape scene as tool for addressing the big tent issue of men's violence in general, if in fact the scene is still used in the program, which I understand it is. Brod stated that "homophobia is the glue that holds masculinity together," and so I am simply a bit anxious about the use of the scene if we are looking at addressing some of the larger issues concerning men's violence. Congratulations on your work, truly, and I understand that you likely address questions and comments like mine on a daily basis, but to depict those of us who have concerns of questions as not excited or feasting on "sour grapes" concerning the work of ending gender violence is rather unfair. Genuine and thoughtful people can disagree about the means to end violence against women, and rather than take every comment as "poo-pooing" your work, simply make an effort to address the questions raised. Is the male-on-male rape scene still in the program? Are undergraduates left to unpack the scene in the context of violence at large with other undergraduates? Is violence as related to the formation and performance of masculinity addressed by the undergraduate facilitators?

  • Rape myths
  • Posted by Zach , Violence Prevention Specialist on December 20, 2007 at 3:25pm EST
  • First off, before starting, I want to thank Brian for his last comment. I don't believe this conversation should be one that becomes divisive, nor should it be classified in terms of an either/or solution, meaning either you are "on board" or you are not, in which case you are against rape prevention work.

    Dr. Foubert, one of the grave concerns I have about your program is that the male-on-male rape scene used furthers some damaging rape myths, namely that rape is something that occurs in dark alleyways, is perpetrated by strangers, and is something done by the sick and depraved. While it is true that rape can indeed happen in these places and by strangers, the overwhelming number of cases do not follow this "stranger danger" scenario. Hence, to use this sort of model when talking about rape goes to further perpetuate these myths and create a community of people who are less likely to believe it can happen any other way. I think it is clear to see how this could be an issue when an overwhelming majority of rapes and sexual assaults (both completed and attempted) are perpetrated by acquaintances who are not sick/deranged and in places where other people are/have a good likelihood of being (i.e., residences).

    So, my question then becomes: are you still using the same male-on-male police training video you were using a year ago, when I saw a presentation you gave? If so, I truly hope the content is considered for review, as I know furthering rape-myths is the last thing we all want to do when addressing this troubling issue.

  • Combating Homophobia
  • Posted by John Foubert , Assistant Professor at William and Mary on December 21, 2007 at 6:05am EST
  • The video used in The Men’s Program, co-directed by a member of the ACPA standing committee for LGBT Awareness, refers to one attacker as being married and the other as having a girlfriend – establishing their sexual orientation as presumably heterosexual. This allows us to emphasize the violence of the attack without and puts the emphasis on what many male-on-male rape situations involve: a heterosexual perpetrator. The script for “The Men’s Program” reinforces the presumed heterosexuality of the rapists, and uses this to reinforce male-on-male rape as an act of violence where many perpetrators are presumably heterosexual. Were a male on female rape to be used, this would likely arouse men likely to rape, according to the conversations I’ve had with Mary Koss.
    Many programs show or describe a male-on-female rape situation. Does this practice promote violence against women and/or misogyny? Of course not. Would we show a male-on-female rape scenario without framing, disclaiming, and processing? No. Why not? It doesn’t warn people, there is no context set for why we show it, it could reinforce people’s perceptions. Also, what if we showed another kind of video that described something painful and/or hurtful – for example a speech that was anti-Semitic. Are there contexts within an institution where this could be useful as a teaching tool? Yes, to teach people about the affects of hate and what it can lead to as referenced by the holocaust. Would we just show an anti-Semitic video without framing, disclaiming, and processing? Of course not. Stimulus tools are all in how we as educators use them to teach others. In any college audience, some men are probably homophobic. Do we then not discuss this scenario because some might be homophobic? Of course not. Talking about male-on-male rape is not something that is homophobic by nature. Discussing this scenario appropriately can both reduce likelihood of raping and it also gives us the chance to educate men in a way that confronts a common homophobic misperception – that male-on-male rape is motivated by sexual desire and is most commonly done by a homosexual man. Discussing male on male rape can dismantle homophobia by dismantling homophobic misperceptions. In The Men’s Program, we make sure that the rape is described (in the video and in processing) as a violent act by nature committed by presumably heterosexual men. Thus, we use the male-on-male rape scenario as a teaching tool to help men understand rape more fully, empathize with survivors, and identify rape as an act of violence. Not knowing if you saw an overview of the program or the full thing I cannot speak to your reactions to the program and whether you saw the entire program or an overview, but I hope this addresses your concerns. If you would like to talk further, please contact our national office.

  • interpretation problems
  • Posted by Bill on December 21, 2007 at 7:40pm EST
  • There are two problems with the report of this research. First, the effectiveness of such a program should be tested not only by asking men about their own behavior, but also by asking a representative sample of women on this campus about their survivor experiences. Demonstrating a significant decrease in survivor rates would provide converging evidence that the program has an effect. Second, perusal of the manuscript reveals that the authors sometimes characterize their findings appropriately, and sometimes not. Indicating that the men "reported committing fewer and less severe cases of sexually coercive behavior" (pp. 14-15) is consistent with the findings. Indicating one page later that "men who joined fraternities and participated in The Men's Program committed fewer acts of sexual coercive behavior" is going well beyond the findings. Just because the men claimed fewer sexual assaults does not mean that they actually committed fewer assaults. One might well imagine that men who've been given special attention in such a program might be less likely to report such behavior. Of course, the indirect nature of evidence is a problem for sexual assault research. But claims for the effects of anti-assault programs could be buttressed by reports from women that such programs are having the effects that men say they are.

  • Posted by Mike , Male Peer Educator at St. Cloud State University on January 4, 2008 at 4:30pm EST
  • I would like to make a comment. I am using this book to train my male peer educators and I believe it is an effective book with great insight to the true problem of rape and sexual assault in our society today. I believe the goal of educating men about this problem is first understanding where these attitudes and behaviors come from, and second to get them to change their minds about how our society and media instituions socializes us as men to see women. This is our problem as men and we as a collective group should come together to solve it. We are only hurting our mothers, daughters, sisters, and friends when we do not talk about this issue. I don't want us to miss the point, I want us to understand the true importance of this issue. I am only telling you because this is what I am seeing on TV, Music Videos, Magazines, and I hear it come out of men's mouths. We should re-evaulate what our culture is teaching us, and use our intellegience to either support the material or not. It is up to us to buy into this stuff. I know we can not tottally stop this problem, but we can speak out about this in a way that is effective enough to get men thinking about this problem. Thank you