News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Dec. 20
Educators for years have made it their mission to lure top college graduates to teaching. They’ve directed students to fellowships and pointed them to programs such as Teach For America that place graduates in some of the most troubled secondary schools.
Those who criticize the efforts typically point to the longevity issue: Many students enter the programs, finish their requisite one or two years and then use the experience as a springboard to another career.
A teaching fellowship program announced Wednesday by the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation focuses on identifying students who plan to stay with the profession.
“We’re trying to produce teachers who won’t view teaching as episodes in their lives but as a career,” said Arthur Levine, president of the foundation and former president of Teachers College at Columbia University.
The program, funded initially at $17 million, includes both a state and national component. Students receive stipends to attend master’s programs and then are placed in high-need classrooms for a minimum of three years.
That’s a year longer than is required from some programs, but who’s to say students still won’t opt out after their time’s up? Levine said it’s a matter of training them differently in teacher education programs and giving them a larger support network.
“Education schools aren’t strong enough,” Levine said. “Students leave afraid of what will happen to them in the classroom. They need to get out of the ivory tower and into schools.”
The fellowships are asking a range of institutions to alter or expand on their curriculums in a way that emphasizes clinical training for students. Many of the specifics aren’t yet worked out, Levine said, but students will be asked to shadow teachers and themselves teach in public schools from the outset of the program.
Fellows in some cases could work with public school teachers in developing lesson plans. They’ll be paired with professors and other secondary school teachers who serve as mentors once the students begin working full time.
The national program, called the Leonore Annenberg Teaching Fellowship, is being funded by the Annenberg Foundation and Carnegie Corporation of New York. Over three years, 100 recent college graduates or career changers are expected to use the $30,000 stipends to complete a master’s program at one of four listed teacher education programs – Stanford University, University of Pennsylvania, University of Virginia and University of Washington.
Those institutions were chosen, Levine said, largely because of their commitment to student practicums and their relationships with surrounding high-need schools. The universities nominate their own students (each is expected to receive 25 fellows over the three years) and then eventually feed those who are selected as fellows into the local school districts, both rural and urban.
Levine expects the majority of student learning to come via clinical experiences. And he said he’ll measure the program’s success based on two outcomes: teacher retention and (secondary school) student learning.
“My hope and expectation is that an overwhelming majority of teachers will stay on,” he said. “We don’t know; this is being tried.”
He said he didn’t have in mind a certain number — say, 50 percent of a cohort staying on past five years at the same school — that would make the program a success. Nor did he give specifics on what tests would be used to determine what students in a fellow’s class had learned. (That information has yet to be decided, according to Levine.)
At the state level, the fellowship program is starting with Indiana. Eighty students will receive the $30,000 stipend each year to complete a master’s program at either Ball State University, Purdue University, Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis or the University of Indianapolis. Any college senior or person interested in changing careers is eligible to participate, but the requirement is teaching in a high-need Indiana school district after graduating from one of the four institutions.
Unlike the national program, which will send students into any number of teaching fields, the Indiana program will prepare only math and science teachers. The fellowship program is asking schools to hire students in cohorts — at least two at a time.
“Students shouldn’t be alone in this new experience,” Levine said. “This is one way of lending support.”
Ball State University is creating an entirely new program for its expected class of fellows. Roy Weaver, dean of the Teachers College there, said the fellowship program will rely more heavily on field work than does the program offered to the majority of students.
Weaver expects Teachers College faculty to work with math and science professors at Ball State to create course content for the students who will be teaching those fields. A new media module might be taught by the college’s instructors and professors from the College of Communication, Information and Media.
Public secondary school faculty will also team with Ball State faculty on the curriculum, Weaver said. “It’s not a matter of Ball State faculty and administrators sitting here creating a program and dropping it somewhere.”
The Wilson foundation expects Ohio and other states to follow Indiana’s mold next year. Both the Indiana and the national fellows will be named in spring 2009, start master’s work later that year and be in the classroom by 2010.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Interesting that the FIRST impulse for teacher quality and retention in hard-to-teach schools is Math and Science (in Indiana). While such teacher training is ultimately valuable for the corporate world, what doesn’t seem to be expressed in this latest program is the culture-wide decline in critical reading skills and rerading generally. The WHOLE democratic fabric of our country is a risk from political and corporate spin-doctors who prey on those unable to decode the hidden messages really being sent — from increased spending to political Rove-like manipulations.
I would hope this latest initiative would pay greater attention to the humanities — where the pay-off in jobs may not be so immediate but the pay-off for our Democracy would be enormous.
John V. Knapp, Professor of English at Northern Illinois University, at 12:50 pm EST on December 20, 2007
This is a positive development, and it will do much to improve the quality of primary and secondary education.
Is there anything similar that could be done in higher education itself? One of the weakest areas of higher education is the residence life sector, which is plagued by bureaucratic management and a deeply non-academic culture.
How about funding a program to replace most of the existing lower-level residence life positions with academic graduate students (both as a way of providing graduate student support and of increasing the quality of the residential environment). And then a parallel program to reconfigure most middle and upper-level residence life positions so they can be filled as part-time administrative positions by academic faculty (similar to department chairmanships, deanships, or academic advising positions). Programs such as these could effect durable, systemic reform in a perpetually troubled area.
If we believe in liberal education, then we know that education is more than the curriculum. And if we believe that education is more than the curriculum, then we owe it to our students to put strong educators in charge of campus life as a whole.
This is just what many of the best universities in the world already do:
http://collegiateway.org/news/2006-us-news-college-rankings
If it’s good enough for students at the best universities, it ought to be good enough for students everywhere.
R.J. O’Hara, The Collegiate Way, at 1:15 pm EST on December 20, 2007
There is vague aura of self-congratulations about offering our best university graduates 3 years of $30,000 per year to become good teachers (including an MAT, mentoring placement and so forth.)
The same best students will be offered $40,000 per year for 5 years if they are accepted into a humanities PHD programme at some of the Ivy League universities and $60,000 per year for 5 years at some of teh Biz School Phd Programmes.
I am sure there would be no problem filling programmes & retaining dedicated teachers if someone (foundations?) started offering serious money or at least equivalent money, not $30,000 but $50,000 would do the trick (they could offer $30,000 tax free with medical which would be about the same money)
This of course will never happen because few people respect teachers.\
Ex-pat, Senior Lecturer at Strathclyde University, Glasgow, UK, at 7:30 am EST on December 21, 2007
This is an good program which addresses one of the greatest needs of new teachers — good mentoring. I hope that the new teachers are also given a lighter teaching load, given that mentoring, and preparing for new classes, takes a lot of time.
What concerns me is where these new teachers will be placed — in “high need” schools. These are by definition the hardest places to teach, which is why experienced teachers (like me) avoid them. I taught for nine years in a such a school, and was one of the few of the new hires to remain in the profession.
If the goal is teacher retention, put the trainees in suburban schools for two years of training, then move them to a “high need” school.
If the goal is simply putting good teachers in challenging urban schools, pay them according to the challenge and there will be no shortage of qualified, experienced applicants.
This program seems to have contradictory goals, and I think will have mixed results.
Thomas Henning, at 8:20 pm EST on December 23, 2007
“Students leave afraid of what will happen to them in the classroom.” I don’t blame them. My undergrad Chair encouraged me to pursue teaching high school. He said he had done it for years and loved it before he worked in higher education. But I remembered the public high school I graduated from. Being a STUDENT was difficult enough. Being a TEACHER in a place like that was unthinkable. Classrooms full of rowdy teens demanding more discipline than education never appealed to me.
It may be some of these new teachers face similar fears based on their own experiences. I hope somewhere in their program, someone is addressing those fears. Otherwise, these hopefuls will never step out of the secure, college classroom.
kgotthardt, at 8:30 am EST on December 28, 2007
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The Department of Education is establishing a pool of qualified applicants as Lecturer in Education for the 2008-09 Academic ... see job
The position is a five-year fixed-term appointment, with the possibility of renewal. The Associate Director will: Assist the ... see job
Howard Community College is building a pool of applicants for adjunct faculty positions in Continuing Education in the areas ... see job
California University of Pennsylvania, a comprehensive regional institution & 1 of 14 members of the Pennsylvania State ... see job
Join the Pack! A community with nearly 8,000 faculty and staff, and 30,000 students. NC State is one of the largest employers ... see job
El Paso Community College (EPCC) is a dynamic, innovative, and rapidly expanding multicampus organization serving the needs ... see job
East Carolina University, a constituent institution of the University of North Carolina, is a doctoral institution with an ... see job
The Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, invites applications for a tenure-track position in the area ... see job
Faculty/Dept: Faculty of Education Reference No: 23174 Closing Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 Position Type: Permanent Full Time ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
Illinois and Columbia College Chicago
When will the program come to Illinois? Columbia College was one of the first colleges to join The Teachers for Chicago program which educated career changers for the Chicago Public Schools. Although the program was discontinued, our retention rate for teachers still remaining in hard to staff schools is at 95% after nine years.
Clara Fitzpatrick, Faculty at Columbia College, at 11:25 am EST on December 20, 2007