Search News


Browse Archives

News

(Alleged) Crime and (Delayed) Punishment?

December 28, 2007

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Acting on the recommendation of the administration, the St. Louis Community College Board of Trustees voted last week to terminate a music professor accused of sexually abusing a high school student before he came to the college. Denise R. Chachere, the board's vice president, said that members were unanimous in their decision.

The board had suspended Larry Stukenholtz -- a college employee since 2001 and an associate professor of music at the two-year institution's Meramec campus -- in November, pending an investigation of allegations that he had sexually abused a student of his at Mater Dei High School in California in the 1990s. The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) began putting pressure on the college to fire him in 2006 when Stukenholtz’s former student, Sarah Gray, filed a civil suit alleging that he had abused his authority in luring her into a sexual relationship when she was under 18 (Stukenholtz is not a priest, but the alleged abuse happened while he taught at a Catholic high school).

Gray, now an English Ph.D. student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, was awarded $1.1 million in October as part of a $6.7 million group settlement of four lawsuits filed against the Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange. “His job status in no way affects me personally. I’m not better now because he’s fired, and I wouldn’t have been worse if he’d kept his job,” Gray said Thursday. She had traveled to St. Louis in November to express her concerns about Stukenholtz to the community college's board.

“But given my personal experience with him and that he’s abused his authority as a teacher in the past, I don’t believe he deserves a position in a school,” Gray said. “My own personal opinion is that as long as he was in a position of authority over students, he therefore would have access to young people who could be potential victims.”

"I think they made a good decision."

When asked why she had so recently filed the lawsuit, which alleges abuse through 1998, Gray replied, “The best answer is that now, after the time that has passed, I was a lot more ready to talk about it and to come forward." Following the settlement of the civil suit, she said she filed a police report with the City of Fullerton (Calif.) Police Department. A police spokeswoman did not return messages Thursday, but the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported that Fullerton police confirmed receiving the complaint October 17.

Stukenholtz, whose listed home phone number has been disconnected or is otherwise no longer in service, could not be reached for comment. He had previously told the Post-Dispatch that Gray’s allegations were “ridiculous” and that the college was backing him completely.

A college spokeswoman did not return messages. St. Louis Community College is closed until January 2.

“We believe that the college and the St. Louis community will be safer as a result” of this action, said David Clohessy, national director for SNAP. “We wish it had happened sooner."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on (Alleged) Crime and (Delayed) Punishment?

  • Presumed Guilty?
  • Posted by Joe on December 28, 2007 at 11:10am EST
  • What happend to the presumption of innocence? I guarantee no one reading this email would agree to be presumed guilty of a charge relating to something that might or might not have happened over 10 years ago. Why should it be different for this gentleman?

  • Posted by Cactus Ed on December 28, 2007 at 2:05pm EST
  • Welcome to the 21st century, Joe! You're referring, I believe, to a right guaranteed by the U. S. Constitution, a document that has been reduced to the position of a roll of perforated tissue paper during the past six or seven years. If the alleged victim was indeed abused, then the United States legal system should be employed to determine the innocence or guilt (and appropriate punishment) of the accused. For a college to form its own judgment on what amounts to one person's accusation and mete out punishment to a person who has not been given due process under the law is both inappropriate and dangerous. Unfortunately, many advocacy groups like SNAP are two-edged swords: They perform an invaluable service in aiding injured persons who could not fight alone, but they can also abuse their power by hounding individuals and groups into acting irresponsibly in order to be free of the harassment of which the advocates are so capable. It's a world gone mad.

  • Presumption of Innocence
  • Posted by Orson Buggeigh on December 28, 2007 at 6:35pm EST
  • Presumption of innocence? Constitution of the US? Apparently no longer applies on many campuses. You might read Until Proven Innocent, by Taylor and Johnson, or check out Johnson's now in hiatus blog, "Durham in Wonderland."

  • "Presumption"?
  • Posted by BP on December 29, 2007 at 1:55pm EST
  • She won a million-dollar settlement against the guy. Doesn't that at least weaken the "presumption" of innocence? I'm not saying he's guilty, but all of this bluster about the Constitution and loss of liberty is a bit out of place.

    That said, I'm not even clear on what y'all think the appeal to the constitution means here. An employer decided that an employee was unfit and fired him. No constitutional problem there, right?

  • Not all is public knowledge
  • Posted by XCS on December 31, 2007 at 1:40pm EST
  • Based on various public stories about this unfortunate situation, it appears that not all the facts are public knowledge. Dismissal may be only indirectly related to the public drama. It is rare that all facts are known and THE truth is not often only black or only white but it is usually very gray. Judgments from either side of this issue based on the current public facts rarely reflect THE truth. It is a sad time for all involved.

  • There is no easy answer
  • Posted by Bill on December 31, 2007 at 4:10pm EST
  • Accusations are easy to make. A court of law must examine the evidence and determine if a crime happened and if the accused is indeed guilty of that crime. Add to this, that making accusations many years after the fact is irresponsible and makes proving guilt or innocence nearly impossible. Trial by innuendo or by public opinion without all the facts is a very dangerous precedence. Obviously we don’t have all the facts and I doubt that St Louis Community College does either. One might point out that being awarded a settlement in a lawsuit is not proof of guilt. Lawsuits do not determine guilt or innocence, generally just financial responsibility.

    I believe that if there is a question of impropriety, Larry Stukenholtz should be suspended until a through investigation is in place, and he either loses his certification to teach or he is charged and convicted. Then there is a basis for firing. What will happen in four more years when Stukenholtz sues St. Louis CC for wrongful termination?

    The questions are, did the Mater Dei High School, suspend, fire, or investigate him while in their employ and did he misrepresent himself when employed by St. Louis CC. If the answer is YES, then that is a basis for firing. If the answer is NO, then offering up one of instructors due to special interest pressure is spineless. If Sarah Gray’s allegations are found to be true, then Larry Stukenholtz deserves to be fired, decertified and convicted, but the jury is still out! It is not up to public opinion to try him.

  • Posted by Larry Stukenholtz on January 16, 2008 at 5:00am EST
  • I would like to speak with you when my attorneys allow.

    LLS

  • Posted by A thought on February 14, 2008 at 7:40pm EST
  • The civil settlement was a joke - the guy didn't even get to testify on his own behalf. The civil settlement was not awarded with him defending himself or giving him an opportunity to speak his side of the story, it was awarded by the Diocese of Orange whose policy is to pay out and move on.