Quick Takes: Young Americans and Libraries, Probe of Disputed Degree, Squatter's Rights at Toronto, Concerns About Minority Underrepresentation in Law Schools, Parody of MLA Convention Guide
Many librarians and others in higher education have worried that undergraduates, having learned to find information (accurate and otherwise) online, would lose interest in libraries. Actually Americans in the so-called Generation Y (ages 18-30) turn out to be more likely to visit libraries than are other adults -- both for problem solving and for general use. That is a key finding of a study released Sunday by the Pew Internet & American Life Project and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
West Virginia University has appointed an outside panel to investigate why and how the university revised its records to show that a politically connected executive earned an M.B.A., when an initial records check indicated that she had left the program without a degree, The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported. The university originally insisted that record-keeping flaws were just corrected and that there was no need for an investigation. But the newspaper reported on students and faculty members who questioned the university's analysis of the situation and some said they believed the executive had left the program without a degree.
A lawsuit filed by Adam Rogers against the University of Toronto asserts that when it offered him and his family housing, he assumed that the rejection notice he received on his transfer application must have been a mistake. The university sees the housing offer as the mistake, although Rogers, his pregnant wife, and his three children moved in. Now, Maclean's reported, the university is trying to evict the family (now featuring four children), and Rogers is suing for $5 million. Student groups are backing Rogers, saying that the university is responsible for the situation.
African American and Mexican American students have been applying to U.S. law schools in consistent numbers and with increasingly strong credentials over the last 15 years, at a time when the combine capacity of the schools has grown. Yet the number of people from those ethnic groups who are actually enrolled in law schools declined over that period, a situation laid out on a new Web site produced by faculty members and students at Columbia University's Lawyering in the Digital Age clinic.
Andy Warren and Aaron Winter, two graduate students at the University of California at Irvine, decided to have a little fun at the annual meeting of the Modern Language Association, so they prepared a parody of the convention guide and left hundreds of copies at various places around the meeting. They've posted the guide online. Our favorite parts include their replacement of the MLA rules on smoking with rules on smirking, the replacement of the MLA's directory of who is staying where with the far more important "Who's Important" directory, and the substitution for the hotel map with a guide to graduate students' brains.
Comments on
Quick Takes: Young Americans and Libraries, Probe of Disputed Degree, Squatter's Rights at Toronto, Concerns About Minority Underrepresentation in Law Schools, Parody of MLA Convention Guide
Law school data
Posted
by Patrick Mattimore
, Teacher
on December 31, 2007 at 7:50am EST
The problem with the supposed increase in the credentials of non-Asian minority applicants to law schools is that the analysis doesn't include statistics as to the higher credentials of both Asian and white applicants during the same time frame. Admission to law school is a variable and competitive process. A 3.5 GPA and 150 LSAT, for example, carries different weight each year.
Can't afford to go to the MLA anyway
Posted
by kgotthardt
on December 31, 2007 at 8:55am EST
Even if I could get there, I always assumed I wouldn't fit in at an MLA convention. This guide has reaffirmed my belief.
On the other hand, since apparently no social skills are expected, perhaps I would do fine if I duct-taped closed my source of smirks, giggles and stupid comments.
Thanks Andy & Aaron
Posted
by Working on New Years Eve Day
on December 31, 2007 at 8:55am EST
A sincere thanks to Andy & Aaron for taking the time to put together a very funny piece. I have been starved for satire and parody for weeks now with the Daily Show being off the air due to the writers strike. This hit the spot. Well done!
More on Law School data
Posted
by Glen S. McGhee
, Dir.,
at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project
on December 31, 2007 at 10:55am EST
The increases in minority enrollments were confirmed in an earlier IHE brief on NCES: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/projections/projections2016/
However, the big question is why this is not translating into jobs in the field, resulting in "whitebread" law firms.
As David Wessel of the Wall Street Journal has noted, something is going on at "the top" (i.e, advanced degree levels), and not just in regard to Law schools either (see link below).
Welcome to the hyper-competitive world of credentialism and credential inflation.
Posted
by AD
on December 31, 2007 at 7:45pm EST
"However, the big question is why this is not translating into jobs in the field, resulting in “whitebread” law firms."
It's a possibility that after you've given a boost to people who weren't as qualified as the other applicants, when it comes time to enter the business world, they won't be as qualified to handle the job as other applicants.
Ivy League still have their quotas, outside of a case like Berkeley, most elite schools still have the same number underrepresented students graduating with top degrees. Either those graduates can compete or they can't. It's great that the grade/LSAT statistics for underrepresented minorities are improving, but there's still a pretty big gap. A study like this can be used to advocate more programs along the lines of affirmative action, but it could just as easily be read as a demonstration that the methods and reasoning behind current programs are faulty.
Why whitebread law firms?
Posted
by Glen S. McGhee
at FHEAP
on January 1, 2008 at 2:05pm EST
Here is more problem analysis and the ABA response.
This is all highly controversial, both for sociologists like Pierre Bourdieu and others studying the "reproducability" of cultural capital, and for the ABA accreditors trying to change the system.
Take the LSAT: used as an admissions, gatekeeping device, it ends up tracking socio-economic status. Even the usefulness of the construct of "better preparation" is very limited: are white-lawyers really "better prepared" to understand the needs of minority clients?
Yet, when the ABA accreditors tried to require "diversity" standards, both the US DE and laws schools objected.
Maybe we are looking at this all in the wrong way. Maybe the system *is* working the way it is supposed to be. Maybe our system is only partially meritocratic, and that, left to itself, would be even less so.
Indeed, the history of higher ed points in this direction, if we see that the education system and the professions co-evolved (Bledstein) to serve as social stratification devices, guild-like hierarchical career structures grounded in meritocratic rhetoric, but in actuality, operating in ways that maintain social and class advantages (Collins, 1979).
The very essence of professional licensing and certification is exclusionary -- just look at the end result.
The underlying inequality that affirmative action seeks to address is real enough, but it lies so deeply buried that it is invisible, ungraspable, and certainly not readily remediated.