Search News


Browse Archives

News

Quick Takes: Big 10 Provosts vs. Drew Faust, Student Turnout Up in New Hampshire, Earmarks Are Back, 3,850 Denied In-State Tuition in Arizona, Fresno State Adds 2 Women's Teams, NCAA Punishes Prairie View, BBC Exposes Dubious University

January 9, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement
  • The provosts of 11 public universities in the Midwest (the Big 10 except for Northwestern University, which is private, plus the University of Illinois at Chicago) have published a letter in Business Week taking exception to quotes attributed there to Drew Faust, Harvard University's new president. Faust was quoted last month as expressing concern about the state of federal support for research. She predicted to the magazine that Harvard and a few other elite universities would be fine. "They're going to be -- we hope, we trust, we assume -- the survivors in this race," she said. The article went on to say: "As for the many lesser universities likely to lose market share, she adds, they would be wise 'to really emphasize social science or humanities and have science endeavors that are not as ambitious' as those of Harvard and its peers." To provosts at Big 10 universities, those are fighting words. The provosts' letter said that they "emphatically reject" the idea that they should settle for less ambitious research. The letter acknowledged that budget limits have hurt public universities, but went on to say that the solution is providing these universities with adequate funds, not diminishing their role. "If we are to continue the extraordinary process of discovery and creativity that is the hallmark of our great research universities, we must be willing to provide the support our public institutions need to sustain their educational and scientific excellence. The ultimate stakeholder is the nation. And the stakes are high," the letter concluded. Harvard officials could not be reached, but have been quoted in The Harvard Crimson, the university's student paper, as saying that Faust's quotes in Business Week were taken out of context.
  • Student turnout was apparently up -- and favored Barack Obama -- in New Hampshire's primary Tuesday. Among eligible voters under the age of 30, 37 percent voted, an increase from 18 percent in 2004 and 28 percent in 2000, according to data from the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement, a nonpartisan group. In both the Democratic and Republican races, candidates who lost the primary showed their support with younger voters, according to exit polls from The New York Times. While Obama won 37 percent of the vote overall, he was backed by 60 percent of voters aged 18-24. On the Republican side, Ron Paul came in fifth overall, but in the 18-24 demographic, he came in second, according to the Times poll.
  • Congressional earmarks for specific research and development projects -- long criticized as pork-barrel politics and a poor way to finance science -- were largely absent from 2007 appropriations bills, but are back and in a big way. An analysis from the American Association for the Advancement of Science found that Congress included $4.5 billion in earmarks in 2008 appropriations bills -- much more than in previous years. Much of the increase, however, is due to new budget rules that make many earmarks more visible than they have been in the past, when they may not have been detected.
  • Nearly 4,000 students at Arizona's public colleges and universities were denied in-state tuition rates this year because they could not demonstrate that they had the legal right to be residents of the state, The Arizona Republic reported. Most of the students are from community colleges and some also lost access to state financial aid.
  • California State University at Fresno, which in 2007 lost two multimillion-dollar lawsuits alleging gender bias in athletics programs, and settled another suit for millions more, announced this week that it is adding two women's teams: swimming and diving, which last competed in 2003-4, and lacrosse, a new women's sport for the university.
  • Prairie View A&M University's women's basketball program got thumped by the National Collegiate Athletic Association Tuesday. Citing a pattern of major violations, the association's Division I Committee on Infractions put the university on four years' probation, cut women's basketball scholarships to 12 from 15 for three seasons, and limited its practice time and the number of recruiting visits its coaches can take. Coaches held improper practices and gave players small amounts of cash, and the university's athletics department was marked by an "environment of noncompliance" with NCAA rules, the infractions panel said.
  • Sometimes a campus scene may be real but the impression it gives may be false. The BBC this week investigated the way an unaccredited university based in London has duped foreign students -- in part by filming ceremonies in public spaces at the University of Cambridge and the University of Oxford, giving the appearance of links to such esteemed institutions.
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Quick Takes: Big 10 Provosts vs. Drew Faust, Student Turnout Up in New Hampshire, Earmarks Are Back, 3,850 Denied In-State Tuition in Arizona, Fresno State Adds 2 Women's Teams, NCAA Punishes Prairie View, BBC Exposes Dubious University

  • Big 10 Wakeup Call
  • Posted by Jim on January 9, 2008 at 9:45am EST
  • I am sympathetic to the defensive response of the Big Ten provosts to Drew Faust's comments about their schools' growing inability to compete for scarce research funding. However, I think they're blaming the messenger. Yes, their problems could be solved by more government money, just as most problems in academia could. But, realistically, that is not going to happen.

    Public universities are in a state of chronic decline and it is time to face that fact. Professor's salaries there lag those at privates by an average thirty thousand dollars. Public university campuses are increasingly in a state of disrepair. Public universities are saddled with expensive non-academic social obligations to provide public service, sports entertainment, and recreational facilities for their communities.

    With the exception of a handful of elite flagship universities -- Berkeley, Illinois, Michigan -- most publics just aren't going to be able to compete with the elite privates for shrinking research dollars. They will not be able to compete with the privates in hiring the best research professors, equipping them with multimillion dollar laboratories, releasing them from burdensome teaching loads, providing them with travel and operating funds, and scraping together cost-sharing dollars for their grant proposals.

    Railing against fate is not going to diminish its inevitabilty, and Faust's message, however distasteful it may be to the Big Ten provosts, may be a dose of realism they should take seriously. Rather than lobbying futilely for money that isn't there and isn't going to be their, they should spend their time looking realistically at their long-range revenue projections and figuring out how to spend those dollars most effectively.

  • Unaccredited institution
  • Posted by Kevin on January 9, 2008 at 9:50am EST
  • Why not mention the name of the "unaccredited institution"?

  • Harvard's nobless oblige
  • Posted by Patricia R. Kelvin, Ph.D. , COrdinator for Teaching and Learning at Thiel COllege on January 9, 2008 at 10:35am EST
  • Forty-five years ago as I was considering transferring from Radcliffe College to a campus of the University of California, one of the deans expressed her concerns to me as follows: "Well, dear, we know there are many intelligent people who work as waitresses and gas station attendents, but are you really sure that's what you want for your life." Looks as if some institutional attitudes don't change.

  • Universities are in it together
  • Posted by Theda Skocpol at Harvard University on January 9, 2008 at 10:45am EST
  • I am certain that President Faust was quoted out of context and that she, along with many leaders in elite private universities, would agree that the United States -- and the world as a whole -- benefit from a broad-based universe of strong universities and colleges that cooperate as well as compete in fostering cutting-edge research, first-rate teaching, and enlarged access for undergraduate and graduate students. Today more than ever the university system stretches across the globe, and that will be more and more true in the future. Retrospectively, any historical look at the dynamic U.S. university and college system reveals that it has flourished because MANY public and private institutions gained the resources and energetic leadership to excel -- while sharing ideas and faculty with one another along the way. Harvard itself has always recruited new faculty from many other excellent places, and has also admitted top students from the ranks of applicants whose undergraduate or parental backgrounds were in the state universities. Harvard cannot go it alone, even with partners in the Ivy League. Huge and growing inequalities across leading institutions should worry us all -- in key respects we are all in it together to persuade governments and private friends to support excellence across many institutions of higher learning.

  • quatsch
  • Posted by George Gollin , Professor of Physics at University of Illinois on January 9, 2008 at 11:10am EST
  • Jim said: "With the exception of a handful of elite flagship universities — Berkeley, Illinois, Michigan — most publics just aren’t going to be able to compete with the elite privates for shrinking research dollars."

    But I do not think the record shows that this is the case.

    What is really meant by "publics" is the set of universities that do not hold multi-billion dollar endowments. This enlarged class includes smaller private schools.

    An interesting example is Oberlin College, a smallish liberal arts college with a fine physics department of eight faculty. All eight professors have active research efforts; the department's efforts focus primarily on condensed matter physics and astrophysics. It's good stuff, and also provides good opportunities for undergraduates to participate in scientific research. I expect that investigators at Oberlin will continue to compete successfully for federal research funds.

  • Name of fake college
  • Posted by Alan Contreras at Eugene, Oregon on January 9, 2008 at 11:30am EST
  • The name of the fake college "outed" by the BBC is Irish International University. There are several fake or substandard schools operating on the fringes of Irish law, including the well-known unaccredited supplier Warnborough University. These pseudo-Irish entities tend to conduct most of their operation in the UK or in east Asia. The Irish government is beginning to crack down on this problem because it is tainting the otherwise excellent reputation of Irish higher education.

  • Harvard comment
  • Posted by tired chair on January 9, 2008 at 12:55pm EST
  • If you take Harvard's comments literally, you are talking about the death of science in the future. Harvard's students rarely go into research. They go to Wall Street or med School. It is the students from the public institutions that provide the next generation of researchers. If research on public campuses is downgraded, undergrads from publics will not go into research careers. Then where will the Harvards get their post-docs and faculty?

  • Reality Check Time
  • Posted by Scrawed on January 11, 2008 at 5:20am EST
  • "If you take Harvard’s comments literally, you are talking about the death of science in the future." Is this level of hyperbole merited in relation to this particular discussion? I suspect there are far worse issues threatening American science and engineering research.

    "Harvard’s students rarely go into research. They go to Wall Street or med School." I'm not a fan of Harvard but even I'll admit this is demonstrably untrue - there are Harvard students that go into research.

    "It is the students from the public institutions that provide the next generation of researchers. If research on public campuses is downgraded, undergrads from publics will not go into research careers." These students are mostly not going into research careers anyway, and most of them aren't even going to graduate school. Rising costs and wholesale department takeovers by foreign students account for a lot of that - more so in engineering than in the sciences. I'm sure there may be at least some exceptions, but the Research I public universities I've attended, seen and/or heard about really couldn't be bothered to involve even their graduate students in their research much less teach them anything, and that goes double for undergraduates. These students often have to contend several times with professors and TAs who not only stand a good chance of flunking basic ESL, but who also have some disturbing prejudices about the Americans they are "forced" to teach.

    "Then where will the Harvards get their post-docs and faculty?" - Well, some institutions eat their own, including MIT. Gee, MIT is just a short commute away from Harvard - I guess poor Harvard will have to put up with what it can get.

  • Posted by MRD on July 19, 2008 at 10:00am EDT
  • The Drew Faust quote is so clearly expressed that it hardly matters what the context was, the meaning cannot be mistaken. It is of a piece with other Bush-era favoritism towards the wealthy. Perhaps this attitude will change with the 2008 elections, perhaps not. But it is very real and those who interact with Harvard professors and staff will be all too familiar with it.