Search News


Browse Archives

News

North Carolina and Coach Settle Sexual Harassment Suit

January 15, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has settled a former female soccer player's lawsuit alleging that the university's high-profile women's soccer coach harassed and sexually discriminated against her and that North Carolina officials failed to stop the behavior.

As part of the settlement, the university agreed to pay $385,000 to Melissa Jennings and to revise its sexual harassment policies and procedures after an independent review; Anson Dorrance, the coach, went further than he had before in acknowledging having engaged in "inappropriate and unacceptable" behavior by participating in "group discussions of ... team members' sexual activities." Dorrance will face no punishment from the university.

The North Carolina settlement comes as numerous other colleges and universities have absorbed multimillion-dollar verdicts in cases brought by current or former athletes or coaches under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibits sex discrimination at educational institutions receiving federal funds.

Dorrance and the university had for a decade vigorously fought the charges -- originally brought by two players, one of whom, Debbie Keller, settled in 2004 -- that Dorrance created a hostile environment that amounted to sexual harassment and denied her a right to an education under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 and the Constitution’s equal protection clause, and that North Carolina and its officials permitted the hostile environment to occur. Lower courts rejected the players' case, but last spring, a divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ordered Dorrance and UNC to stand trial, saying Jennings had “proffered sufficient facts for a jury to find that Dorrance’s degrading and humiliating conduct was sufficiently severe or pervasive to create a sexually hostile environment.”

The majority opinion -- basing its opinion on the former athletes' version of events, as is the norm when considering a motion that would otherwise dismiss a case -- said that Dorrance, who also coached the U.S. women's soccer national team, regularly “bombarded players with crude questions and comments about their sexual activities and made comments about players’ bodies that portrayed them as sexual objects. In addition, Dorrance expressed (once within earshot of Jennings) his sexual fantasies about certain players, and he made, in plain view, inappropriate advances to another.”

Dorrance and university officials have consistently contested the athletes' assertions, and that did not change even as they agreed to settle the lawsuit. "This settlement in no way constitutes an admission of anything beyond what Coach Dorrance has already apologized for," Richard A. Baddour, the athletics director at Chapel Hill, said in a prepared statement.... He apologized to Jennings 10 years ago for making comments in jest that were thought to be inappropriate. The University and Coach Dorrance steadfastly deny the other allegations."

Although North Carolina officials characterized Monday's settlement as breaking no new ground, the agreement seems to go further in acknowledging past errors and the need for change in the future than the university has previously.

Under the arrangement, a copy of which is available here, Dorrance agreed to provide Jennings with a letter saying that he had "participated with members of the UNC-Chapel Hill women’s soccer team in group discussions of those team members’ sexual activities or relationships with men. I realize that my comments offended Ms. Jennings. I understand that my participation in those discussions was inappropriate and unacceptable. I apologize to Ms. Jennings and her family, as well as all other members of the soccer team." Unlike his previous apology, the letter makes no mention of his having made "comments in jest that were thought to be appropriate;" Monday, he acknowledged that they were inappropriate.

"If he had written a letter like that 10 years ago, we could have avoided all this," Jennings's father, Craig Jennings, said in an interview with Inside Higher Ed Monday.

And while Jennings agreed to provide the university with a letter acknowledging that "neither Mr. Dorrance nor any member of the coaching staff for the UNC-Chapel Hill women's soccer team made a pass at me or asked for a sexual relationship," her letter also states that "Mr. Dorrance and members of the coaching staff made multiple overt sexual comments that were uninvited and offensive."

University officials said that the $385,000 payment -- which is significantly more than the $70,000 North Carolina paid in 2004 to settle the claims brought by Debbie Keller -- was merely to "reimburse her for most of the attorney's fees she accumulated" over the course of the lawsuit.

Craig Jennings said that the most important part of the settlement from his daughter's perspective -- though it went unmentioned in the university's news release about the agreement -- is the provision that will require the university's Sexual Harassment Advisory Committee to hire Nancy Hogshead-Makar, a professor of law at Florida Coastal School of Law, to review and "propose appropriate changes to" the university's sexual harassment policy and procedures by March, and to adopt a revised policy by next fall.

"This is what we've worked hard on," said Jennings. "There is an opportunity for UNC to build a model for all universities and schools, to protect all future students and community members."

The North Carolina news release and other university statements focused mostly on defending Dorrance.

"He is an outstanding worldwide ambassador for women¹s sports, amateur athletics and the University of North Carolina," said Baddour, the athletics director. "We have heard from a countless number of players who stand firm in their belief in, support of and thanks to Anson and the women's soccer program. Many of our former student-athletes expressed their desire to testify on Anson's behalf and about the positive experiences they had while playing for him. But, we just didn¹t want to subject them to a court proceeding."

Added Chancellor James Moeser: "We have never believed that the case had any merit. We've stood by Coach Dorrance since this case started and we stand by him now. Anson has for 25 plus years demonstrated a strong support of his student-athletes, is a great teacher, and has been a leader in advancing opportunities for women in intercollegiate athletics."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on North Carolina and Coach Settle Sexual Harassment Suit

  • Woof Woof
  • Posted by kgotthardt on January 15, 2008 at 6:55am EST
  • ..."Dorrance expressed (once within earshot of Jennings) his sexual fantasies about certain players, and he made, in plain view, inappropriate advances to another.”

    What a total DOG and poor role model! Why would they allow him to continue to coach at all? I wouldn't want THIS guy around MY locker room!

  • North Carolina Coach
  • Posted by Armando on January 15, 2008 at 9:25am EST
  • What a waste of resources! It is an absolute shame that a fine coach has been legally harassed for all these years and that UNC has spent is money on this rather than, say, scholarships. Moreover, this is the type of event that makes men unwilling to mentor women because they don't know when the woman will take something said in jest and hit him over the head with it. Also, the young lady involved in this affair clearly needs to get a life.

  • Involve HR
  • Posted by Kevin Leonard , Sr. Program Coordinator at Michigan State University on January 15, 2008 at 9:25am EST
  • If univeristies would use their Human Resource departments and lawyers to take preventive measures to assess the environment concerning sexual harrassment and discrimination practices that still exist on our college campuses, unfortunate situations like this could be minimized. I have to believe that this over a quarter of a million dollar settlement could have been used more wisely by NC.

  • Here's why kgotthardt
  • Posted by VM on January 15, 2008 at 9:35am EST
  • Here's why Dorrance is still around . He's a god in women's college soccer (see below for what qualifies as a god). Another coach would hvave been shown the door, particularly after the second incident. Maybe UNC has a 3 strikes policy.

    "Anson Dorrance is the head coach of the women's soccer program at the University of North Carolina. He has one of the most successful coaching records in the history of athletics. Under Dorrance's leadership, the Tar Heels won 18 of the 25 NCAA Women's Soccer Championships. The Tar Heels record under Dorrance is an amazing 603-27-18 in the 28-year history of the program, or a .930 winning percentage. Other indications of his remarkable success as a women's NCAA soccer coach include an 101 game unbeaten streak and coaching 13 different women to a total of 20 National Player of the Year awards. The NCAA has recognized Dorrance as the Women's Soccer Coach of the Year seven times (1982, 1986, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2003 and 2006)."

  • Settlement without Shame
  • Posted by Sheldon on January 15, 2008 at 11:20am EST
  • As an alumnus of UNC, I am ashamed that the University is represented by an AD who is incapable of admitting wrongdoing by his institution. The Jennings Family deserves praise for its persistence in the face of stonewalling. If the Athletic Director is a dolt or a coward, doesn't the University have a chancellor with the moral fiber to stand up for the truth and admit wrong to this young woman and her family? Apparently not.

  • Same old, same old
  • Posted by LM on January 15, 2008 at 1:00pm EST
  • Top 5 excuses to retain male predatory coaches:
    1. They are winning games therefore good PR and good for recruiting, fundraising, etc.
    2. You whiny girls need to buck up and get used to it. You're just too sensitive!
    3. If he's so bad, why isn't the whole team complaining?
    4. Hey, at least they're not lesbians!
    5. Did I mention money?

  • Posted by kgotthardt on January 15, 2008 at 1:45pm EST
  • Thanks, VM. I still don't get it, though. Who cares if he's a great coach if he's a sexist jerk, harasses women, and carries on like he's in a bar?

  • Understandable
  • Posted by Former College Soccer Player on January 15, 2008 at 5:15pm EST
  • As a former college soccer player (and a female), I can understand why this happened, and why Jennings got upset, and why Dorrance is still around. The girls I played with had pretty bawdy conversations on the field that should have been relegated to the locker room. In that atmosphere, it's not surprising that a coach who's close to his players might think it's OK to participate in those conversations. That doesn't make it OK, and I can understand how Jennings would be offended - I usually felt uncomfortable during these conversations. I'm not saying I would have sued, but I'm glad she came forward. But with enough of his players supporting him, and with his amazing record of success, I can also understand while he's still around. It seems the best thing that came out of this was a reexamination of existing policies and an open conversation about the relationships between coaches and players. I believe these issues are more common than people think and there are a lot of women like Jennings, bothered by the situation, sitting in silence.

  • Posted by fx on January 15, 2008 at 8:40pm EST
  • What difference does it make if the coach is great at winning games or not? What is (was) wrong is (was) wrong.

  • Posted by soccerfan , part of the problem on January 15, 2008 at 8:40pm EST
  • a couple questions for the UNC coach-

    were you named in the lawsuit?

    How are you going to react when the result of the harassment guidelines is that you will be required to go to sensitivity training?

  • Posted by High School Coach on January 15, 2008 at 8:40pm EST
  • As a male high school coach of girls, I have to disagree with Armando. Good coaches set absolute, inviolate boundaries in their relationships with their players. It is not a matter of avoiding liability. It is a matter of caring about the players enough not to allow even the slightest inkling that there is an inappropriate element to the relationship. Hands off, and keep the conversations appropriate and away from sexual matters. In addition, good coaches keep the "open" conversation among teammates at team events appropriate. Coaches are supposed to demonstrate high standards to players, not gutter standards.