Search News


Browse Archives

News

In Colorado's Chosen Chief, Faculty See Tenure Foe

February 7, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The sole finalist to become president of the University of Colorado system was, as a state teachers' union describes it, “the architect and chief proponent” of changes at Metropolitan State College of Denver that "eliminated tenure as we know it.” Bruce Benson, the owner and president of an oil and gas exploration and production company since 1965, served as chair of Metro State’s Board of Trustees during the 2003 policy alterations.

“Just to have someone like this who’s worked so hard to undermine academic freedom being the only person considered for the president at CU just blows our minds,” said David Sanger, president of the American Federation of Teachers’ Colorado chapter. The union sued over the 2003 changes to the faculty handbook, which deleted earlier protections ensuring that, in the event of layoffs, non-tenured faculty would lose their jobs before tenured professors and that the university would make efforts to relocate tenured faculty within the institution, in addition to changing hearing procedures.

The lawsuit is now pending in the state's Supreme Court; a trial court originally ruled there was no breach of contract, although the Colorado Court of Appeals in March 2007 reversed the ruling in part to uphold the union’s claim that “providing the president with final authority to dismiss a tenured faculty member even though the president is not an impartial decision maker” violated faculty members' due process rights. The union had complained that the new handbook gave the president both the original authority to dismiss a faculty member and the ultimate authority in any appeal.

"It's just unbelievable that he is the lone finalist for the position," Sanger said of Benson. "It looks like a political power grab."

Even the system spokesman calls Benson a “lightning rod.” An energy industry executive with impressive fund raising credentials but only a B.A., Benson has faced tough questions, as the Rocky Mountain News has reported, for his lack of advanced degree, his old driving record (relative to driving under the influence), and conservative ties (he’s a former state GOP chairman and is national co-chair for the Romney for President campaign). But ultimately, said Joanne Addison, an associate professor of English at the University of Colorado at Denver, most professors’ problems with the possible president fall into two main categories: his lack of credentials and record on tenure.

“I’m quite concerned that when I say to people on the search committee or to regents who are supporting his efforts, ‘He doesn’t have the experience required of someone to lead a major research institution,’ I receive one of two responses,” said Addison. “One is, he was on the board of Metro State, and he chaired the [Colorado Commission on Higher Education]," which is charged by lawmakers with long-range planning for state colleges.

But the problem, she said, is that “if you’re holding these sorts of things out as evidence of his experience, well, what he did [at Metro State] was work to dismantle tenure.”

Asked whether Colorado professors are justified in their concern, Hal Nees, the Faculty Senate president at Metro State, a 21,000-student public institution, said, “Based on what the Board of Trustees did at Metro State College, yes, I would be concerned.”

“Whether he would attempt to do that at the University of Colorado, I have no idea,” said Nees, an associate professor of criminal justice and criminology.

Metro State's president, Stephen M. Jordan, said in a letter Wednesday that he was convinced that Benson understood “the difference between governance and management, an important distinction in a system with three campus chancellors.” And at least one faculty leader at the University of Colorado said that while the tenure issue was a concern, so are Benson's prodigious fund raising skills a boon.

Benson, whose name graces a geology building on Boulder’s campus and who chaired the system’s billion dollar campaign from 1997 through 2003, has donated an estimated $8 million to the University of Colorado. In the 2004 election season alone, as The Denver Post reports, he raised more than $3 million for the state and national Republican Party and $2.1 million more for President Bush’s reelection campaign. (Interestingly, however, Benson finds himself as the chosen one for Colorado's presidency in a Democratic climate. The state's governor is a Democrat, and its General Assembly is Democratically controlled.)

“He visited with us, the faculty, on Monday, and he said very clearly that he supports tenure, but I’m afraid he sees it from a business point of view, not from an academic point of view," said Uriel Nauenberg, a full professor of physics at the university’s Boulder campus and chair of the Faculty Assembly there. "So he needs to understand the academic society, and he said that he was here to learn and that he would only concentrate on monetary issues for the campus -- mainly how to increase the funding.” (Benson has reportedly said he would leave academic decisions to the campus chancellors.)

“Very frankly, we are at a critical threshold.... He is quite good at getting funding.”

“The critical issues for us are funding, funding, funding,” added Ken McConnellogue, associate vice president for university relations for the University of Colorado. Colorado is ranked 48th in the nation this year in terms of both appropriations per $1,000 in personal income and per capita appropriations, according to data from Illinois State University’s Center for the Study of Education Policy. McConnellogue pointed out that Benson was a leader in pushing the successful Referendum C campaign, which offered some short-term relief to Colorado universities squeezed by the state’s TABOR (Taxpayer Bill of Rights) law severely limiting state spending.

“Not only is he perhaps the most prodigious fund raiser in the state in general, but he’s shown he can work to develop coalitions of education and business leaders,” McConnellogue said. And, while Benson was not available for an interview Wednesday afternoon, McConnellogue pointed out that his response to questions on his stance on tenure has been consistent.

“He’s been asked that question a couple of times during the open forums that we’ve been having for him,” he said. ”Number one, obviously, and he tells folks this, he has to be cautious because there is some litigation. But one of the general statements he’s made is that he’s learned a lot from that whole experience about tenure, about working with faculty. He said there were mistakes made on both sides of the fence on the issue. Learning from mistakes was an important part of that whole enterprise.”

But Sanger, of AFT, scoffs at the argument that Benson changed his views, pointing out that the board could have backed down at any time while Benson chaired it through 2007. And more generally, Addison, of the Denver campus, questioned the wisdom of bringing in a chief fund raiser as president without disavowing him of academic oversight.

“The response I hear is that the role of president is changing. The role of president at many universities is primarily as a fund raiser. Someone like Bruce Benson could be helpful,” Addison said. “The problem is, even if you believe that -- and let’s say we do -- then the regents would have to change the laws and the policies of the university to make clear that the president is not the chief academic officer and has nothing to do with curriculum or tenure or any of those other things. But that has not happened.”

The system’s Board of Regents, which announced its choice one week ago, is statutorily required to wait at least 14 days after naming a finalist to appoint him or her president. Such an appointment would follow upon Benson’s heavy involvement with local educational issues through committee and commission work: He’s served as finance chair for the City of Denver Public Schools “pay for performance” and bond campaigns, currently sits as chairman on the Denver Public Schools Foundation, and is chair of the P-20 Education Coordinating Council, in addition to his service on the statewide higher education commission in the 1980s and, more recently, on Metro State’s board. (He also served on Smith College's Board of Trustees and Parents' Advisory Council in the 1990s.)

“He is a very straightforward shooter,” said Nauenberg of Boulder, who added that the Faculty Assembly will meet today to discuss the potential president and that he’s still withholding judgment. “He doesn’t hide in wording or speech nuances. I take him at his word: that academic freedom and tenure are not something that he will monkey around with.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on In Colorado's Chosen Chief, Faculty See Tenure Foe

  • Where's the sense?
  • Posted by Buzz on February 7, 2008 at 7:30am EST
  • So AFT unionists oppose CU candidates, CU funding goes down, and CU people lose their jobs.

    Where's the sense in that?

    Heck'a of a job, Brownie.

  • Second Tier Wannabe
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on February 7, 2008 at 7:55am EST
  • My only question is “So what’s new?” The University of Colorado is a second tier wannabe stuck in a beautiful location populated by wealthy Texans and Californians and their gazillion-dollar “rustic” cabins and shiny HumVees, and the most conservative business community (and businessmen) west of ... omigod, practically anywhere.

    Let’s pretend this isn’t happening and focus our attention on Aspen and Vail ... oh yes, and maybe on physics.

  • Time for.....
  • Posted by John F. DeFelice , Associate Professor of History on February 7, 2008 at 8:05am EST
  • Work-to-rule!

  • Good reason to retire; good reason to avoid academic life
  • Posted by Joseph Bernt on February 7, 2008 at 8:20am EST
  • Everytime I see stories such as this about the new corporate, Republican, uncredentialed "leadership" that more and more is given the keys to colleges and universities, I am pleased to be closing in on retirement rather than just entering on what will only become a devolving career in what used to be the academy.

    First-generation university graduate and, boomer-generation academic.

  • Not competent for the position...
  • Posted by Bob on February 7, 2008 at 9:05am EST
  • So make him the chief development officer and let him go out a hobnob with the wealthy.

  • CU-Boulder
  • Posted by CU alum on February 7, 2008 at 9:10am EST
  • That "second-tier wannabe" has one of the best programs in molecular biology in the nation. It was where the Nobel Prize winner Tom Cech discovered ribozymes. John Hall at the JILA lab won the Nobel Prize in 2005 in physics. LASP (Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics) is unparalleled for its space sciences program. CU's resident Takács Quartet won a Grammy in 2003. So, no it isn't Chicago or Berkeley, but it is a decent research university.

    That said, I would agree state funding for the university has always been very low, as the western slope is die-hard conservative republican.

  • Academia immune from economic cycles?
  • Posted by Buzz on February 7, 2008 at 9:10am EST
  • " .. I am pleased to be closing in on retirement .."

    Gad, the insufferable obtuseness of academics! As if academia is above the problems of the world.

    Try this on for size --

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/business/media/07paper.html?ref=media&pagewanted=all

    There are a lot of people who are pleased as well about the aforementioned retirement trend.

  • Leaderhip
  • Posted by Scott , still Independent after all these years on February 7, 2008 at 9:40am EST
  • . . . and every time I hear or read comments from a “soon-to-be-retiring” member of the academic community whose comments reflect a uniformed political bias against one party or the other, I say, “You are not retiring soon enough!” One has to wonder how many developing minds he and others of his type have tainted in the classroom. For the record Mr. Bernt, "unqualified" Democrats have darkened at least as many academic hallways as Repblicans, or are you implying that being a Republican is, ipso facto, cause for disqualification?

    Whether based on ignorance or bias, it is extremely unfortunate that much of academia in America seems to have lost its capacity for objectivity. Rather, it has succumbed to the shrill rhetoric that assigns all blame for social ills on one political party (typically Republican), while ignoring the antecedents of cultural malaise that can be traced to the economic welfare programs of FDR, JFK and LBJ. Buying votes with welfare-based promissory notes, their programs have had the unfortunate effect of maintaining social and cultural divisions rather than mitigating them. The formula has paid political dividends to the Democratic Party, but it has undermined the republican principles on which American democracy was founded. Of course, this perspective is of little interest to those whose minds are closed and who prefer not to be confounded by inconvenient alternative points of view. Anyway, I suggest that Mr. Bernt devote a portion of his retirement years to some scholarly pursuits in search of the truth that lurks behind the baggage of his narrow-minded postulates.

  • Response to CU Alum and Buzz
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on February 7, 2008 at 10:20am EST
  • CU Alum wrote “It was where the Nobel Prize winner Tom Cech discovered ribozymes. John Hall at the JILA lab won the Nobel Prize in 2005 in physics. LASP (Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics) is unparalleled for its space sciences program. CU’s resident Takács Quartet won a Grammy in 2003. So, no it isn’t Chicago or Berkeley, but it is a decent research university.”

    As I implied in my earlier post, I especially like a subset of the CU Physics Department. Nevertheless, you’re right “it isn’t Chicago or Berkeley” ... or Michigan or Wisconsin or Minnesota or Northwestern or Southern Cal or Texas or UNC or UCLA or Ohio State or Illinois or Washington or Indiana or U Va or NYU or Johns Hopkins or Carnegie Mellon or Syracuse ... and probably not Florida or Penn State or Pittsburgh or Maryland .. should I go on ... and on ... and on (and, of course, I’m not even mentioning the creme de la creme). Well you get the point.

    And Buzz, I sent this URL

    http://chronicle.com/daily/2008/02/1551n.htm

    to a friend this morning with the comment that higher education in the U.S. will soon be more wealthy than the Catholic Church. Poor Stanford, a $4.3 billion fund-raising campaign. Hell, I’m old enough to remember when those guys talked in terms of $millions. What’s a poor boy to do?

  • CU Later
  • Posted by Unapologetically Tenured on February 7, 2008 at 10:20am EST
  • I assume that Scott's claims of independence are meant purely in jest. His diagnosis of society's current ills (our "cultural malaise", as he so fatuously puts it) reeks of twenty year old Republican talking points. He should understand that the audience here is a wee bit more sophisticated than, say, readers of the Limbaugh Letter.

    Nevertheless, he is largely correct that Republican and right-wing leadership is not inherently damaging to public universities. Some very conservative states and their legislatures cherish their flagship campuses and recognize the benefits of academic freedom to faculty development and institutional prestige. Colorado, unfortunately, does not.

    As the alum above points out, the University of Colorado is, in many ways, a fine institution despite frequent interventions by the philistines sent to Denver by an electorate overrepresented by misguided rubes. (No, not all country folk are rubes. But many of the those who select Colorado's governing class clearly qualify.) Given the superior quality of life in Boulder combined with the benefits of access to a major city, CU ought to compete with the finest public universities in the nation. That it does not is the result of a devastating failure of leadership.

    My state and many like it look forward to the brain drain out of Colorado should CU's incoming leader decide to treat his new campus like he treated Metro State.

  • Higher ed in Colorado
  • Posted by Ann Little , Associate Professor at Colorado State University on February 7, 2008 at 11:50am EST
  • Aside from the very reasonable faculty objections to Benson's lack of academic credentials and his attacks on tenure, the appointment of a highly partisan Republican to lead CU at this point in state history is just dumb. The Democrats run both the House and Senate here, and we've got a newly elected and very popular Democratic governor who was targeted by Benson's 527 in his election campaign. Benson's Republican contacts won't give money to CU on principle, and Democrats won't give to Benson because of his partisan hackery.

    See my post on this from last week:

    http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/01/local-yokels-affirmative-action-republican-style/

  • Posted by Simplex Scholasticus on February 7, 2008 at 12:05pm EST
  • Bob is right--if the guy is a strong fundraiser, make him head of the foundation. The real puzzler is that allegedly the Board of Regents conducted a "nationwide search." Could anyone seriously believe that a local political hack (by the way, he helps bankroll the Trailhead Group, one of the most disingenuous pack of prevaricators since the Swift Boat Veterans) with a bachelor's degree is the best candidate in the nation? There are plenty of real, qualified educational leaders out there who both understand higher education and can raise funds. This is a huge step toward making CU a national joke.

  • In Colorado's Chosen Chief,
  • Posted by Dr. Tony Medlin , Assistant Professor at Texas Woman's University on February 7, 2008 at 2:00pm EST
  • Liberal professors are now a target for the right. Government interference on the state and national level is simply an attempt to control and manipulate the political culture within institutions of higher learning.
    Dr. DH

  • So?
  • Posted by Ryan on February 7, 2008 at 2:55pm EST
  • Eliminating tenure is a good thing, along with union. Unions and tenure do nothing but breed mediocrity.

  • Hopeful
  • Posted by L.L. on February 7, 2008 at 4:50pm EST
  • " .. Unions and tenure do nothing but breed mediocrity .."

    God, there is hope for this new generation, burdened by the $53,000,000,000,000.00 in debts and "intellectual" deadwood of the past.

    Praying for ya, bud.

  • Posted by Orson Buggeigh on February 8, 2008 at 5:05am EST
  • "Aside from the very reasonable faculty objections to Benson’s lack of academic credentials . . ."

    I might take this complaint more seriously if there were evidence that CU's faculty actually worried about academic credentials. But then we have Ward Churchill, hired and tenured for a faculty post in ethnic studies with an MA in graphic arts. So where were all the concerned faculty when this was going on?

    Partisan? Well, a Democratic governor seems to be willing to proceed with the nomination of the candidate for president of CU. Get a grip folks. Or are you determined to prove that academics are simply the political monoculture that your critics claim you are?

  • Hopeful:
  • Posted by Ryan on February 8, 2008 at 5:05am EST
  • I just wish there were more people like me working in higher ed.