Search News


Browse Archives

News

Different Tacks on Textbook Choice

February 19, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

At times over the past year, as several states mulled legislation mandating more textbook pricing disclosure from publishers, it seemed as if each state legislator would have something to say about the rising cost of textbooks.

Congress already has taken interest, buoyed by studies showing that textbook prices are rising faster than the rate of inflation, but not as much as tuition costs and other higher education expenses. Legislation approved earlier this month by the House of Representatives to renew the Higher Education Act would follow the state bills in asking publishers for more information about pricing and changes from past editions -- even though the group that represents those companies says much of the requested information is already readily available.

That bill also would call on colleges to put information about required books in their course schedules to help students shop for books more cost effectively. And an amendment that passed would create a pilot competitive grant program (available to no more than 10 colleges) to assist them in setting up textbook rental programs.

It's possible to lose sight of the fact that, following much public concern, colleges are thinking about many of these issues on their own and in many cases acting voluntarily in order to give students options.They are adopting book rental or buyback programs. Students and other advocacy groups are calling on professors to release book information as early as possible so that those taking the course can track ISBN numbers and scour the internet for price comparisons.

The University of Virginia Bookstore is combining several methods in an effort to reduce cost for students. The college-run store this spring expanded textbook rental and guaranteed buyback programs, and added electronic book offerings. Jonathan Kates, executive director of the bookstore, said more and more professors there are deciding to purchase copies of older book editions, which can be sold back and bought more cheaply, so long as the material in the updated version isn't a necessity for students. Using this option, students save an average of 75 percent over new book prices, according to the university. According to the National Association of College Stores, used book prices typically range from $22 to $72, with the average price being $44.

Kates said the key is to work closely with faculty to identify the types of books that have a long shelf live. It's also a matter of speculation from the bookstore's end. "The whole goal is to ensure that professors have the academic freedom they need while helping them make decisions that can benefit the student as well," he added. "It became so clear that students were getting fed up; they were taking hits."

Professors who take part in the rental program are asked to use the same edition of their textbook for at least two semesters, Kates said. That can be a hindrance for some faculty, which is part of the reason why as of spring 2006, textbook rental services were offered by only about 1 percent of institutions whose bookstores were members of the NACS. The organization doesn't have a formal position on such programs, though Charles Schmidt, an association spokesman, said his group supports the pilot competitive grant program idea. Publishers often say that one reason prices are higher on new textbooks is they know those books will be sold, resold and possibly rented -- thus the need for the initial premium.

Another problem is the startup costs associated with the programs. Jennifer Libertowski, a spokeswoman for the college stores, has explained that it takes a few semesters of rental use before a store recoups its initial costs of purchasing the titles. Libertowski also pointed out that college stores don’t select much of their inventory; professors most often provide them with a list of titles.

The Virginia bookstore is also upping the number of digital “e-book” titles, and those texts cost up to 30 percent less than new printed ones, according to the university. Still, early results from a college store association study show that only 18 percent of students indicate they have actually purchased electronic course material. The consumer trends research shows that the majority of students still prefer a traditional textbook to an electronic version.

Still, some companies are betting that the tipping point for e-texts, if it hasn't already come, is on its way. They are investing in resources for e-books and preparing for what they deem student and faculty demand.

Some colleges also have experimented with custom publishing arrangements. This fall, Rio Salado College, in Arizona, announced a partnership with Pearson Custom Publishing to allow the college's professors to patch together single individualized textbooks from multiple sources. College officials said students could save up to 50 percent on the material, and professors would save time not having to revise course materials to keep pace with continuously updated editions. Professors can pick from among the books in Pearson’s library as well as outside sources in preparing their custom textbooks. For works not published by Pearson, there’s a limit of 10 percent of the contents, but the company will then handle copyright clearance.

“Our stores do work on custom publishing, and the best thing about it is that it increases utilization of the books," Schmidt said. "The odds are you're going to use the whole book.”

The University of Notre Dame has also made changes to the process of ordering and buying course packets. Professors have long had two options -- go through the campus bookstore, which uses a third-party custom publishing company to do copyright and clearance, or go through the College of Arts and Letters, which has an internal print and copy shop.

Last semester, the college's decision to consolidate course packet distribution by selling all of them through the bookstore was met with widespread student dissatisfaction, because the store marked up copyright costs and production fees -- and thus the packets were more expensive. Another issue was that students were pulling the wrong packet from the shelves, because in some large classes different sessions had different versions of the material.

The consolidation move was made because it was thought to be more convenient for students to buy all the material in one place, according to Dan Skendzel, director of administrative services for the university.

But this semester, after a flurry of student complaints, the college moved back to selling packets internally (though professors can still sell through the bookstore). This time around, instead of selling the packets out of its production site, the college is selling them in a conference room in an academic building, and is allowing students to pay with their accounts.

Rob Becht, director of budget and operations for the college, said faculty support the move. And at the same time, the bookstore has agreed to stop marking up copyright costs, which has lowered the price of books for students, Skendzel said.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Different Tacks on Textbook Choice

  • Textbooks Should Be Free!
  • Posted by Grover Furr on February 19, 2008 at 10:30am EST
  • Last February I posted this, arguing that textbooks are a scam, period. They could, and should be free.

    http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2007/02/02/brandl

    It's still true.

    The textbook industry is all about profit and exploitation. It should be put out of business.

  • Posted by Book lover , Course revision on February 19, 2008 at 10:45am EST
  • I think it's interesting that a benefit listed for not using new editions is that professors won't have to update courses. When I was teaching, a complaint was that lazy professors didn't update courses frequently enough, relying on lectures from 5 or 10 years in the past. Even if a new book edition contains basically the same material, a new edition almost always has slightly better language, slightly better examples, slightly better explanations, and a few mistakes fixed -- that's why they revised it. If revisions are not selling, authors and publishers will not take the time to make these improvements.

  • Why bother with paper?
  • Posted by H. E. Baber on February 19, 2008 at 11:05am EST
  • Quite a few of the textbooks we use in my discipline are essentially collections of readings and journal articles that are either in the public domain or accessible through the journal databases our library buys into, which makes articles available online for faculty and students.

    I'm now teaching a course with NO textbook--all the readings are linked to the class website. It's legal--and it's free. And it's not that hard to do. Students can print off the articles--which most do. The costs of printing and a three-ring binder for those articles doesn't come close to the cost and waste of getting a textbook.

    Publishers are now trying to persuade us that there's some value added in the textbook--introductions, study questions, CDs and various "ancilliaries." But I don't know anyone who actually uses this stuff. You buy the collection of articles and do your own handouts, study questions and the like.

    Some kinds of traditional books will always be important. But the textbook-anthology has got to go. Even apart from the expense and waste, they constrain instructors and encourage selecting material according to what's in the least-worst anthology. Publishers are now trying to hold onto the trade by offering customized textbooks with instructors choice of materials. For the most part though this is an expensive waste. If you're going to make the selection yourself, you might as well just link the articles to your class website: why bother with the paper and binding?

    I probably wouldn't dare do this if I weren't tenured. Students are very conventional and don't like anything untraditional. But this is the way things will go and one hopes that eventually they'll get used to it.

  • Experience counts
  • Posted by Book lover on February 19, 2008 at 11:40am EST
  • Do you think a teacher with five years of experience is usually better than one with a year's experience and therefore should be paid more? (If not, I hope you don't support your teacher's union.) If so, why don't you think a book in its second edition is probably worth the price? The author often has tested the material in his/her own class, received emails and letters from adopters making suggestions, hired new academic reviewers for the new edition, and so on. No, the book might not be significantly better if it is a copy of Hamlet -- but yes, if it contains commentary on Hamlet.

  • Posted by Patricia R. Kelvin , Coord. Teaching and Learning at Thiel College on February 19, 2008 at 12:30pm EST
  • If textbooks were put on CDs, their costs could be reduced substantally. The links to referenced materials or companion sources could be embedded, and revising content would neither require the destruction of untold trees nor necessitate gallons of petroleum-based inks.

  • newer editions better?
  • Posted by Douglas Lewis on February 19, 2008 at 12:35pm EST
  • A couple of posters argue that newer editions must be better. I can answer for the venerable lit anthology I use. Each new edition--they come out every couple of years--is bulkier and more expensive (the latest 'compact' is as long as the full edition I started with). But I see no substantial improvement from the one I started with in 1991. None. Is it possible that publishers put out new editions to ensure continued proifts (which may be slim enough)?

  • Posted by Recent Grad Student on February 19, 2008 at 2:00pm EST
  • To the person who encouraged digital content and the comment that the price of printing is so much cheaper than the cost of the same book from the store obviously has not had to do that. It's true that on the surface the cost is lower, but when I was in school and printing out 50 page articles, I went through many printer cartridges and paper. Printer cartridges are a scam and the cost was much higher than the cost of my textbooks or if I could have purchased a course packet.

    The bottomline is that students will pay somehow, the cost may just be spread out a little more but they will still be paying.

  • Online readings
  • Posted by H. E. Baber on February 19, 2008 at 3:30pm EST
  • Recent Grad Student: if you're cheap, you can just read online. That's how I read most journals. I split the screen and take notes in a file alongside. Or if you have the full version of Acrobat you can highlight, underline and comment on pdfs in the text. I do that to. Or you can print off 4 or more to the page to save paper. And you might think of getting a laser printer--nowadays quite affordable and much cheaper on the consumables.

    Of course students will pay: the question is how much. Whichever way you cut it putting stuff online is not only cheaper but provides more choice in terms of format and expense. You can have it in any format you want. In addition, if it's online you can access it from anywhere.

  • Posted by CCPhysicist on February 20, 2008 at 5:40am EST
  • Back in the day, publishers brought out a new "printing" to fix errors, not a fully revised new edition that adds new errors while fixing old ones. That edition might be used for a decade or more, so lots of used books were available.

    What we get now is a book with more pages, more complicated and (when a new author comes in for the 12th edition) unclear writing styles, and pretty pictures that add nothing but color. A new version comes out every 3 years, more often than cars are redesigned. Some of those revisions would bore the professor to death, so little wonder the students don't read them.

  • It's already being done
  • Posted by jmellett on February 28, 2008 at 8:35am EST
  • Publishers know they will only survive by giving the customer what it wants. That is how any industry survive.

    There are a ton of publisher initiatives to bring prices down.

    two that immediately jump to mind are

    ichapters.com

    coursesmart.com