News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Feb. 22
Ask anyone with an M.B.A.: Business school provides an ideal environment to network, learn management principles and gain access to jobs. Professors there use a mix of scholarly expertise and business experience to teach theory and practice, while students prepare for the life of industry: A simple formula that serves the school, the students and the corporations that recruit them.
Yet like any other academic enterprise, business schools expect their faculty to produce peer-reviewed research. The relevance, purpose and merit of that research has been debated almost since the institutions started appearing, and now a new report promises to add to the discussion — and possibly stir more debate. The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business on Thursday released the final report of its Impact of Research Task Force, the result of feedback from almost 1,000 deans, directors and professors to a preliminary draft circulated in August.
The consensus report, which was approved by the group’s international board of directors, asserts that it is vital when accrediting institutions to assess the “impact” of faculty members’ research on actual practices in the business world. But it does not settle on concrete metrics for impact, leaving that discussion to a future implementation task force, and emphasizes that a “one size fits all” approach will not work in measuring the value of scholars’ work.
The report does offer suggestions for potential measures of impact. For a researcher studying how to improve manufacturing practices, impact could be measured by counting the number of firms adopting the new approach. For a professor who writes a book about finance for a popular audience, one measure could be the number of copies sold or the quality of reviews in newspapers and magazines.
“In the past, there was a tendency I think to look at the [traditional academic] model as kind of the desired situation for all business schools, and what we’re saying here in this report is that there is not a one-size-fits-all model in this business; you should have impact and expectations dependent on the mission of the business school and the university,” said Richard Cosier, the dean of the Krannert School of Management at Purdue University and vice chair and chair-elect of AACSB’s board. “It’s a pretty radical position, if you know this business we’re in.”
That position worried some respondents to the initial draft, who feared an undue emphasis on immediate, visible impact of research on business practices — essentially, clear utilitarian value — over basic research. The final report takes pains to alleviate those concerns, reassuring deans and scholars that it wasn’t minimizing the contributions of theoretical work or requiring that all professors at a particular school demonstrate “impact” for the institution to be accredited.
“Many readers, for instance, inferred that the Task Force believes that ALL intellectual contributions must be relevant to and impact practice to be valued. The position of the Task Force is that intellectual contributions in the form of basic theoretical research can and have been extremely valuable even if not intended to directly impact practice,” the report states.
“It also is important to clarify that the recommendations would not require every faculty member to demonstrate impact from research in order to be academically qualified for AACSB accreditation review. While Recommendation #1 suggests that AACSB examine a school’s portfolio of intellectual contributions based on impact measures, it does not specify minimum requirements for the maintenance of individual academic qualification. In fact, the Task Force reminds us that to demonstrate faculty currency, the current standards allow for a breadth of other scholarly activities, many of which may not result in intellectual contributions.”
Cosier, who was on the task force that produced the report, noted that business schools with different missions might require differing definitions of impact. For example, a traditional Ph.D.-granting institution would focus on peer-reviewed research in academic journals that explores theoretical questions and management concepts. An undergraduate institution more geared toward classroom teaching, on the other hand, might be better served by a definition of impact that evaluated research on pedagogical concerns and learning methods, he suggested.
A further concern, he added, is that there simply aren’t enough Ph.D.-trained junior faculty coming down the pipeline, let alone resources to support them, to justify a single research-oriented model across the board. “Theoretically, I’d say there’s probably not a limit” to the amount of academic business research that could be produced, “but practically there is a limit,” Cosier said.
But some critics have worried that the report could encourage a focus on the immediate impact of research at the expense of theoretical work that could potentially have an unexpected payoff in the future.
Historically, as the report notes, business scholarship was viewed as inferior to that in other fields, but it has gained esteem among colleagues over the past 50 or so years. In that context, the AACSB has pursued a concerted effort to define and promote the role of research in business schools. The report’s concrete recommendations also include an awards program for “high-impact” research and the promotion of links between faculty members and managers who put some of their research to use in practice.
The recommendations still have a ways to go before they become policy, however. An implementation task force is planned to look at how to turn the report into a set of workable policies, with some especially worried about how the “impact” measures would be codified. The idea, Cosier said, was to pilot some of the ideas in limited contexts before rolling them out on a wider basis.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
The Australian research quality framework, modelled on the UK research assessment exercise, proposed to evaluate universities’ research impact as well as peer-evaluated research quality.
It would have required an enormous amount of evidence gathering and reporting and no convincing method for evaluating this largely anecdotal evidence was described.
The new federal government abandoned the research quality framework, partly because of difficulties with evaluating research impact.
Gavin Moodie, Principal Policy Adviser at Griffith University, Australia, at 3:50 pm EST on February 22, 2008
The point about making a comparison to education’s inability to do the same is well taken. While both business and education utilize scientific tools, neither are sciences—they are realms of practice in culutral and political art. The impact of any “research” can never be predicted nor traced to any sort of pure cause and effect relationship. The fact that we don’t really understand this is demonstrated that even the exploration in this article, as interesting as it could be, falls back to the academic prejudice that only someone with a “genyooine P-H-D” could possibly do research. Nuts. More business and educational change is driven by everyday problem solving thinking in the field than by all the PhD’s in academia.
DavidA, Academic VP, at 10:45 am EST on February 24, 2008
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
PART-TIME TEMPORARY FACULTY TO TEACH A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ADMINISTRATION COURSES Central Michigan University seeks ... see job
Join a vibrant campus community whose excellence is reflected in its diversity and student success. West Chester University ... see job
The University of Miami is committed to educating and nurturing students, creating knowledge, and providing service to our ... see job
Accountancy: Assistant or Associate Professor to teach undergraduate and graduate courses; participate in publishable ... see job
FINANCE (Mgmt-2-09) About The American University in Cairo: Founded in 1919, AUC’s campus is currently located in Cairo, ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
The Center for Biofilm Engineering (CBE) was established in 1990 as a National Science Foundation Engineering Research ... see job
At least one full-time faculty position in Marketing see job
NYU is currently seeking an Institutional Research Analyst I to conduct policy research and perform initial analyses on ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
How To Demonstrate Impact?
I must add that I am impressed that the AACSB is brave enough to stick its neck out and state that one purpose of research is to impact practice, teaching, and curriculum. However, schools of education have been trying to assess impact for quite a few years, and have not yet been able to do it. What I like about this AACSB document is that it contains a table of suggested ways to assess impact, something that is rarely done.
Sean McKitrick, Assistant Provost for Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment at Binghamton University, at 8:00 am EST on February 22, 2008