News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Feb. 25
Once again, it looks like Antioch College won’t be operating in the fall. Antioch University’s Board of Trustees announced Friday that it had “reconfirmed” plans to shutter the undergraduate institution in Yellow Springs, Ohio, for several years of planning on how to revive the institution academically and financially. That’s what the board first announced in June — igniting fury from students, alumni and professors — and leading to several proposals to keep the college operating.
Trustees said in June that the college lacked the students or resources to operate, and that there were no possible ways to keep it open. Facing both outrage and lawsuits, the board agreed first to negotiate with alumni leaders on plans to keep the college operating as part of the university. More recently, the board has been negotiating with a small group of alumni over plans to not only keep the college operating, but to make it independent of the university. That prospect has been particularly desirable to many fans of the college, who view it as a victim of a university structure that grew up around it and didn’t appreciate it.
With the university’s leaders saying that they didn’t know how to manage the college — and college supporters saying that they needed to be free of the university — many hoped that the latest round of negotiations would yield a plan to keep the college going. While board leaders characterized the announcement as just affirming the status quo, many on the campus were deeply disappointed. About 100 students will now push to finish degrees this semester while another 100 must prepare to transfer — and all faculty members need to look for new jobs.
The question for many is why the negotiations — which both sides say are continuing in good faith — haven’t succeeded, and what will come next. Sources with knowledge of the negotiations say that sticking points have included control of the university’s endowment and what financial compensation is appropriate for the college to provide to the university in return for its freedom from the university. These questions are extremely sensitive for both sides because the college is the historic base of the university and many of the donors coming forward to try to save it have made clear that their donations will go only to an independent institution, not to bolster the university. There are also signs that some students and alumni — fed up with the pace of negotiations and with their secrecy (which would probably be standard at most institutions, but which is uncharacteristic for Antioch) — will look again at protests, lawsuits and other strategies for keeping the college going.
Antioch was founded in 1852, with Horace Mann serving as its first president. The college played a role in the abolitionist movement and was an early institution to admit students who were women or black. In the 20th century, Antioch was among the pioneers in “co-op education” in which students alternated positions of work all over the country with their education in Yellow Springs.
Known for leftist activism and student participation in governance, Antioch has a very loyal alumni body, but in recent years has had only a few hundred students on a campus designed for 2,700. A university structure grew up around the college, creating campuses from California to New England — boosting total Antioch enrollment to around 5,000. Tensions have run high between college loyalists, many of whom blame the university for ignoring the college or subsuming its interests to the new campuses, and university officials, who say they have been trying hard to save the college.
In interviews Saturday, the chairs of Antioch University’s board and of the alumni body trying to gain independence for the college both declined to discuss why negotiations hadn’t concluded, but both also hinted at the difficulties in the talks and at the (slim) possibility that college operations might not have to end with the conclusion of this academic year.
Art Zucker, chair of the university board, said that Friday’s announcement was “not a new decision” in that the board has said since June that barring some dramatic change, operations would need to be suspended. Even if an agreement takes place in the months ahead, he said, “it’s felt by the administration that there might not be the right faculty and the right course structure even if everything went positively,” he said. The announcement Friday was to encourage students and faculty to plan accordingly, he said.
At the same time, Zucker acknowledged that if the university turns the college over to its own board, that board might be able to do something not currently envisioned to prevent a suspension. “Perhaps that could be the case,” he said.
As to why such a deal hasn’t been reached, Zucker said that this is “a very complex financial transaction.” He declined to comment on reports that the university wants some sort of payment for the college, but said that the negotiations were based on two goals. One is “full transfer” of the college, and the other is that “in this transfer, the university shall not be harmed.”
Eric Bates, co-chair of the alumni group, said he didn’t agree that it was impossible to envision the college operating next year. He acknowledged that “the clock is ticking,” and that students and faculty members need to plan to be elsewhere. But he said that if an agreement materializes, alumni leaders see it as desirable to avoid a suspension of operations.
“If I were a student right now, I would make other plans,” Bates said. “If in April or May or June or whenever, there is announced a plan that enables the college to keep operating, you can always come to Antioch,” he said. Bates said that he believes an agreement that gives the college true independence will lead to an outpouring of donations that might create options to keep the college operating.
At the same time, he said that barring an agreement, the university is making that decision — and has said it can’t run the college. For the alumni leaders, he said, there is a balancing act. “We said all along that we’ve been in a position of wanting to give hope but not false hope,” he said.
So if the university says it can’t figure out how to keep the college open next year, and an alumni group has donors lined up who want to do just that, why isn’t there a deal? “That’s an excellent question,” Bates said. “That’s exactly what we think — that this is good for the university, too.”
Bates declined to comment on whether the university wants money from the college, but said this about the lack of a deal: “The generous answer would be that it’s very complex. There are a lot of assets involved, a lot of details involved, what goes where. How do you make sure that the university isn’t financially harmed in the transfer of those assets? That’s harder than it sounds.”
There is also another challenge, he said.
“The people who are negotiating this deal for the university — this is not their preferred choice of how things would play out. These are people who believe in the university and want the university to continue,” he said. While they have come to the negotiations to try this approach sincerely, it is “to their credit” that they are there but also true that they “are being asked to negotiate something that is not really the outcome they would like to see.”
For the alumni, he said, “it’s easy for us to be at the table because this is the outcome we want.”
Bates stressed, however, that the financial contributions his group is making (and encouraging from others) will happen only with independence. “The whole reason we’re having these discussions is the only way to really get contributions flowing by alums is a structure where it’s very clear that all of that money is going to and for the college,” he said.
For now, he said, people need to be patient. “I know that it’s enormously difficult for everybody in the Antioch community to have to sit by and be told month after month that they can’t be told anything,” he said. “The level of anxiety and distress that provokes is extreme and understandable and it breeds all kinds of speculation.”
On campus and in student and alumni e-mail discussions, all kinds of ideas are being discussed. One main point of contention is whether to hope the alumni group can secure a deal or to assume that won’t happen and to resume some combination of protests and lawsuits to try to force the university to change course. Organizers aren’t ready to tip their hands, but some who had high hopes for a deal by now to give the college independence were clearly frustrated and angry.
The Blaze, a student publication at Antioch, has gone so far as to organize discussions about creating “Antioch in Exile” in which courses would be taught off campus if the university doesn’t permit the college to operate. A statement from the Blaze on this plan says: “We refuse to accept what has been handed down to us. We want to secure the spirit of the current community and enable it to be passed on to the next generation of Antiochians. We are not ready to let it die!”
Tim Noble is an alumnus who has been involved with The Antioch Papers, an effort to post leaked documents about the college online, in an attempt to argue that university leaders are responsible for the college’s difficulties. Noble said it was time to stop negotiations with the university and to explore legal and other ways to challenge the university. The reason many people have supported the negotiations was the belief that they might prevent a suspension of operations, and the university is now taking that off the table, he said. “The university is clearly more interested in its financial well being” that making a deal, he said.
Added Noble: “This process has been exceedingly closed, in a particularly non-Antiochian way, and it has helped the university stall all progress, and has allowed them to run out the clock.”
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
The organized Antioch alumni seem resolutely determined to scapegoat the University Board and adamantly opposed to reasonable efforts to correct the problems within the college itself. Antiochians know how to organize a protest, but they resist self-criticism or realistic accounting. For a sensitive and even touching analysis of the fate of the college see Charlotte Allen’s “Death by Political Correctness” in the Weekly Standard, November 12, 2007 at http://www.weeklystandard.com/Con...c/Articles/000/000/014/306jqecg.aspI know it is a right-wing publication and many Antiochians will reject it out-of-hand, but I’ve followed this closely and it is the best account I’ve seen by far. Ted Goertzel, Antioch 1964
Ted Goertzel, Professor at Rutgers University, at 4:10 pm EST on February 25, 2008
This is an important ongoing case study in the administration of an unusual university. If the liberal arts residential college is closed or liberated, what are the pros and cons of maintaining the branches (There are campuses in Seattle, Los angeles, Keene, N. H., and Yellow Springs; They are somewhat different in purposes, specialties and clientele.) Would they be better or worse off as independent organizations? What do their faculty and administrations think about the situation in Yellow Springs as it may effect them?
Arthur A. Dole, Emeritus Professor of Education at U. of Pennsylvania, at 4:10 pm EST on February 25, 2008
The faculty at Antioch Seattle, McGregor, New England, LA, and Santa Barbara are not protected by tenure, and so it is unfortunately difficult to have a public discussion even within the system about what’s happening with Antioch College or about the actions of Antioch University’s administrators. Only the faculty of Antioch College are protected by tenure, and they will be suspended/fired as of June 30, 2008.
Chris Hill, associate professor media arts at Antioch College, at 7:35 pm EST on February 25, 2008
I was Faculty at Antioch College Yellow Springs from 1968-75. It was the source of my early learning about teaching and the great value of empowering students to engage learning which matters to them. I went on to a 30 year career as Core Faculty with the Ph.D. program of the Union Institute and University, where I am now emeritus faculty.
Beyond nostalgia for this unique and wonderful environment, it needs to be said that there is a larger context for saving Antioch. In recent years, especially under the Bush Administration, a huge squeeze has been placed upon alternative education. It has taken the forms of punitive measures regarding Federally funded financial aid applied to alternative visions of student progress, as well as more vigilent accreditation reviews of non-mainstream institutions. Institutions such as the Union Institute, which once provided humanistic, respectful, process-oriented edcational opportunities, have succumbed to the insistence of the U.S. Department of Education that progress must be measured through forms which effectively prevent the educational model from functioning.
As we leave the dismal Bush years behind, the community of alternative educators will hopefully look to a time of rebuilding, to a process of making learner-centered education and life-long learning a vibrant and developing concern, where places which have long held up the banner of educational change can stand up again.
This is the context for Antioch College to determine its future, and the enthusiasm, energy and finances of the alumni who have come together could provide the new beginning. As an outsider to Antioch for many years, but as one who has closely followed and participated in alternative educational models for my entire teaching career, I believe it is much more likely for the alumni initiative to flower than for the Board to achieve a rebirth of Yellow Springs. The reasons are almost self-evident.
There is a large group of “consumers” out there — and it is just possible that the renaissance of Antioch can coincide with a larger turning of the tide on progressive models of education.
Robert Atkins, Former Faculty at Antioch College, at 8:10 pm EST on February 25, 2008
I was a coop faculty member at the College in the 1950’s and Dean of Students in the 1960’s when we were bursting at the seams with students. The financial success in those days (although money was always tight) was based on having two alternating student bodies paying the bills— a design that could work again with sufficient students. I would like to have someone in the University explain to me why they are so anxious to hang on to the college which they admit (and have demonstrated) that they do not know how to run and do not really want to try, Why not let it go to a group that wants to take it over and relieve the University of all that expense and trouble? I have seen no indication from the university of a viable plan for doing anything with the college. As a Yellow Springs citizen I find that puzzling and frightening.
Walter Sikes, Former Dean of Students at Antioch College, at 9:45 pm EST on February 25, 2008
I am concerned that Art Zucker, Chairman of Antioch University’s Board of Trustees has deeply confused the public situation regarding the closing of Antioch College. When he comments that the current faculty (who have labored mightily under duress to keep the institution going against all odds) might not be the “right faculty” for the job ahead, he missed the point. I think he might have referred instead to the Board of Trustees seriously flawed decision-making processes that have systematically negatively impacted the College for at least the fifteen years of my tenure here. I wonder if any small liberal arts college survives on tuition alone as Mr. Zucker and other Board members have suggested should be the case. The idea is laughable. What would Harvard or any other viable institution say to such a ridiculous assertion. Believe me, the theater of the absurd is alive and well here, and the College faculty are far removed from the centers of power despite our longstanding tradition and commitment to shared governance. Mr. Zucker and a majority of Board members (not all) have been significantly absent and have neither operated in good faith nor with the due diligence required for realistic institution building. Perhaps the Board would like to publicly address the issue of their institutional administrative and fundraising record, or their failure to produce promised financial support for the curricular changes that they themselves initiated. I believe that Mr. Zucker’s attack on the faculty was conducted to obfuscate both his and the Board’s operational dysfunction and inability to responsibly resolve the structural problems of Antioch University that have led to the difficulties we face. Anyone who seriously examines the record will no doubt have many weighty (and unanswered) questions, as many of us do. I look forward to some excellent investigative reporting on the subject in the future. In the meantime, I think Mr. Zucker and the Antioch University Board would be well-advised to publicly apologize for the unsubstantiated insult to the faculty that has been reported in this respected publication. His comments come perilously close to both character and professional defamation.
anne bohlen, Professor at Antioch College, at 7:05 pm EST on February 26, 2008
I am horrified by Mr. Zucker’s anti-faculty remarks. My daughter is a Freshman at Antioch this year. She has had what can only be described as an intellectual awakening, based on the level of teaching. She has been inspired, stimulated, and challenged. All this by faculty members about to lose their tenure and jobs. Teaching is more than a profession—it is an avocation. The Antioch faculty has been superb. And all this has taken place in an atmosphere of collapse—poor food, deteriorating dorms, unfunded library, few services—not to mention an emotional atmosphere of attack, uncertainty, and loss. The Antioch faculty are heroes, and should be treated as such.
Miriam Sagan, Assistant Professor at SFCC, at 4:25 am EST on February 27, 2008
A classic case of the young eating its mother. When the Antioch University system was given birth by the college it spelled the demise of the Antioch College.
Bob Gates, at 11:10 pm EDT on July 11, 2008
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The nation’s first university, Penn is a world-renowned leader in education, research, and innovation. Situated on a ... see job
The nation’s first university, Penn is a world-renowned leader in education, research, and innovation. Situated on a ... see job
The nation’s first university, Penn is a world-renowned leader in education, research, and innovation. Situated on a ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, dedicated to premier engineering research and the provision of a definitive, ... see job
Located just north of Houston, Texas, our five campuses serve 1,400 square miles. Our student enrollment is nearly 50,000 in ... see job
Position Summary: Under the supervision of the Director of Richardson Auditorium, the Assistant Director of ... see job
The nation’s first university, Penn is a world-renowned leader in education, research, and innovation. Situated on a ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, dedicated to premier engineering research and the provision of a definitive, ... see job
Dear Mr. Zucker:
One particular comment you made strikes me as very unAntichiocian. You said, “it’s felt by the administration that there might not be the right faculty and the right course structure even if everything went positively.” Let me remind you that the Board of Trustees forced the curriculum change to which you refer.
Also, let me remind you that 3 of last year’s graduates received Fulbright Scholarships. This year we have 2 of our next graduating class currently with their Fulbright applications under review in the countries of their choice. Even though those numbers seem small, they represent 3% and 2% respectively. Can you name other colleges with that level of success? Certainly the quality of their education is to credit for this success rate.
I am not ashamed to be part of this amazing faculty. I regret that you appear to be ashamed of your alma mater.
Susan J. Eklund-Leen, Ph.D.
Susan Eklund-Leen, Associate Professor at Antioch College, at 3:35 pm EST on February 25, 2008