News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
Feb. 25
— Scott Jaschik and Doug Lederman
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
Regarding the student complaint about a professor’s remarks on causes of homosexuality, I think the main point is that the student apparently never confronted the professor in the classroom or in private before lodging a complaint. The university should never have accepted such a complaint, UNLESS the student also asserted that the professor had maintained a classroom environment that discouraged and/or threatened reprisals against dissenting student opinions. In that case, and especially if a student suffered harm from being discouraged from speaking up, the university should investigate. But it should investigate the allegation of anti-academic, anti-intellectual practices by the professor, not the alleged bias or lack of scientific rigor of the professor. Any professorial bias or lack of competence should be exposed in class or in private discussion.
When a university acts on a student complaint about classroom content where the student has not aired the complaint in class, or at least in private meetings with the professor, the university is not only treating the professor unfairly, but is also depriving the student of his/her right to higher education, which includes reasoned disagreements conducted under conditions where evidence and logic are subject to public test. It’s rather pathetic that academics cannot see and insist upon this basic tenet.
Rod Bell, Adjunct Professor at College of DuPage, at 3:35 pm EST on February 25, 2008
Why is Obama against professors writing their own textbooks and “making a mint"? Why is it any better that the large textbooks companies are “making a mint"? This sounds to me like another politician “concerned” about effecting change that would help the little people who is all the while maintaining the corporate status quo. Apparently it’s OK when an impersonal corporation takes the students’ money, but it is not OK if we can identify a real flesh-and-blood culprit. Centralization and big business hand-in-hand. And how are liberals and conservatives any different. . .?
interesting. . ., at 5:40 pm EST on February 25, 2008
The issue here seems to be assigning your own text in classes you are teaching. Many institutions have policies prohibiting this practice for very sound reasons. Among these is the understanding that a good textbook includes the content, perspective, and organization that provides the basis for the course a faculty author has been teaching for some time. Another, of course, speaks to the perceived greed factor. One exception might be a course centered on student-led discussions and projects where the lecture method is neglible. Obama’s reference to his own classroom teaching illustrates, in my judgment, a person who learns from experience.
Robert L. Reid, at 7:35 pm EST on February 25, 2008
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
The Research Coordinator will have responsibilities in five basic areas: (1) Creating new initiatives under the auspices of ... see job
Western New Mexico University, a public, comprehensive, regional institution serving a diverse multicultural population of ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
We’re committed to our vision of becoming the best comprehensive community college in the United States. see job
Everest College, a respected member of the Corinthian Colleges’ network of schools, is dedicated to helping students ... see job
The Department of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts at the University of Alberta invites applications for TWO tenure track ... see job
The Arts & Humanities department at Howard Community College is seeking individuals to be included in a pool to hire adjunct ... see job
Position Summary: The Department of Politics is seeking applications from well-qualified individuals for a ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
The will of the employer
Discussing anything controversial such as sexuality (or religion or ethnicity) can too easily be interpreted wrong by anyone, never mind in the classroom. This is why on-campus groups are so essential to the classroom—to help generate dialogue. Perhaps the instructor could have invited such a group in to have a panel discussion on the topic.
“At will” is always just justification for an institution to dismiss anyone for any reason. I live in a “work at will” state, and it’s TERRIBLE for employees because they too often don’t have job stability or even the feeling of job stability. Unlawful terminations are hard to prove when total power is given to the employer.
kgotthardt, at 10:05 am EST on February 25, 2008