Search News


Browse Archives

News

How Offensive Can a Trustee Be?

February 26, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Nationwide, colleges have been bolstering their programs in Arabic and the study of the Middle East, responding to growing student interest and awareness that Americans benefit from better understanding the region. At the College of the Siskiyous, in California, such a plan prompted a tirade of anti-Arab and anti-Muslim comments from a trustee, disturbing many on the campus. The trustee is refusing to apologize or resign.

The community college is planning to offer its first credit courses ever in both Arabic and Middle Eastern history. At a board meeting last month, the additional courses were included among the "consent" items for the board -- non-controversial items that are typically approved collectively at the start of a board meeting, unless a board member objects.

Dorris Wood, the board member, objected last month, with the following comments: "When I look at this proposed class, my one thought is that we know all we need to know about the Arabs and Islam. They are our enemies: pure and simple.... They have declared war on the United States and are committed to our destruction.... When our schools fail the citizens of this great country by undermining the basic principles of democracy and support the sworn enemies we will fail completely.... Study history and understand how the Muslims have over the centuries invaded other countries and forced their religion by killing, plundering, and ravaging... Now they are invading Christian countries of the world from inside, one method being through our schools and universities.... If you want to give yourselves to Islam, you have the right and freedom to do that. But don’t give my country to them.”

The statement didn't sway the board and the courses were approved, but the fact that a trustee would describe Arabs and Muslims in this way (without any distinctions among Arabs and Muslims, who are not monolithic in their views) stunned those at the meeting, and many who heard of the comments later.

Concern over the statements prompted the college president, Dave Pelham, to meet with Wood and then to apologize to everyone associated with the college for her statements. In an e-mail he sent to students and professors, Pelham said that after talking with Wood, he had a better understanding of her perspective. "She raises the concern that the impact of religion in the development of our country is not dealt with in the same manner as it is when we teach courses about other cultures. In other words, her argument is that the impact of Christianity in the formation of the United States does not receive the same focus in our American history classes as the impact that Islam had in the development of the Middle East will receive in the proposed course on Middle Eastern history. Regardless of your opinion on this issue, it is a valid concern for discussion/debate."

However, Pelham continued in language that is unusually harsh for a president (even one who happens to soon be leaving for another position) to use about one of his board members. He said that her comments on Arabs and Islam as "enemies" demonstrated a "logical fallacy has been used many times throughout history to marginalize, isolate, and in extreme cases, eliminate large groups of people."

He continued: "As logically flawed as I find these remarks in the abstract, I am incensed by the fact that they classify members of our own staff, faculty, student body and community with the terrorists that attacked this country on 9/11. These people love and support our country AND are of Arab descent and/or follow Islam. It is to these members of our campus and community that I offer my most sincere apology. They deserve better treatment, especially at an institution of higher education."

Wood did not respond to messages seeking her comment. But at this month's board meeting, local press accounts said, she rebuked Pelham for having sent out his apology, saying that she is "an elected official, elected by the voters of Siskiyou County and not by the staff of the college.” She added, according to the Mount Shasta Record, that "when I speak about an item or an issue I am speaking on behalf of the public based on my judgment of that issue.”

Further, she told Pelham that he should not apologize on her behalf, saying "this is way beyond your authority."

A coalition of student and faculty groups, including the Academic Senate and the Associated Student Body, presented a joint resolution asking Wood to resign immediately, saying that her comments violated the anti-bias rules of the college, and that her seeking to block new courses based on those views amounted to an infringement of academic freedom. Wood ignored the request.

Pelham said that Wood has indicated that she plans to run for re-election to the board this fall.

A spokeswoman for the Association of Community College Trustees said officials there could not comment on the situation because they have a policy of never commenting on anything said by a board member during a meeting.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on How Offensive Can a Trustee Be?

  • Dorris Wood-Arab and Muslims
  • Posted by kathleen on February 26, 2008 at 8:00am EST
  • We need to learn as much as possible about every kind of visitor to our country. I have lived in most of the democracies of the world and have learned that these countries try to parrot the US by getting to know who is around and within. When we stop learning about our 'enemies' we cannot learn from them and we cannot know how to stop them, if we must do that. Islam has been misinterpreted by those who use whatever means necessary to undermine what they want to conquer. We must remain a democratic republic by keeping ourselves educated, aware and unblinded by the prejudices of others, inside and outside our country.

  • The Enemy?
  • Posted by kgotthardt on February 26, 2008 at 8:00am EST
  • Um...can't they just fire her?

    Clearly, she is prejudiced and does not have the capacity to perform her job duties effectively since she obviously cannot treat all students and faculty fairly or even civilly.

  • This person is an education official?
  • Posted by Jocelyn Bowie on February 26, 2008 at 8:00am EST
  • Leave aside for the moment any feelings about insulting Muslims or Arabs and consider instead what this woman is suggesting, which is essentially: "Let's fight them, not study them." So, um, how, exactly? One of the first things you're supposed to do is study the problem, or in this case, "the enemy." When the Soviet Union was in existence, Slavic Language programs thrived, precisely because of that. Arabic language and Middle Eastern history and culture programs are thriving in part because of the US government's need for experts in these areas. This person does not belong on any sort of educational board if she does not grasp that basic fact.

  • Surprised and Not
  • Posted by Issam Khoury , Doctoral Student at Penn State University on February 26, 2008 at 8:00am EST
  • How does one even respond to the likes of Dorris Wood? Her bigoted and uninformed views should not be represented at an institution of higher education, whose goal is to introduce new views and knowledge. At a community college (a state institution), this is even more so. At other institutions, I'm sure that her views might be welcome and promoted as viable, but that her bigotry, racism, and exclusive views are represented (albeit shut down QUICKLY) is an atrocity.

    On a personal note, as an Arab with a degree in Middle Eastern Studies, I am incensed by this kind of talk. It is the kind of attitude that makes me never feel at home in this country because one should not have to defend themselves constantly in a place that is "home". I know she is not representative of American views at large (at least I THINK that Americans are not as ignorant and uninformed as she), but I do know that her "kind" does exist, and it is a blemish on the American character. That one person who knows so little about another people can say such derogatory and inflammatory comments, and stand by them at that, is stupid. But we know that there are many examples of this throughout world history, but in our day and age, I ideally expect more. Thanks for shooting down my idealism, Dorris.

  • Need a history lesson
  • Posted by Tom on February 26, 2008 at 8:00am EST
  • I wonder what happened during World War II? Were German, Italian, and Japanese/Asian studies in colleges, and even high schools, suspended? I'm not being sarcastic; this is an honest question.

  • Posted by Terry L. Corsello at Kent State on February 26, 2008 at 8:00am EST
  • Her remarks were shameful. She should be removed as a trustee. Universities have no place for this kind of bigotry. The president was well advised to speak out against her shameful remarks. It is just to overcome this type of ignorance that we need these types of courses.

  • More of the Same
  • Posted by Muhammad Eissa on February 26, 2008 at 8:15am EST
  • The voicing of such negative comments on everything Arabic and/or Islamic is an expression of long-time masqueraded tendency that ought to be alive in the conscious of the enlightened American public. We should be vigil and watchful of such ignoramus expressions produced by those who are still locked in the caves of stereotyping and narrow mentality. Ms. Wood is a representative of so many other Americans who should be enrolled in continued education courses such the proposed ones. They owe that to themselves in order to deserve and maintain the world leadership status they think they have. You do not have to be a sympathizer with an issue and consider it as a prerequisite to study it. However, you will be better informed hence a better judge of the others when you have some reliable and unbiased knowledge. Arabs and Muslims may be different but all of them are not necessarily evil.

    As for Mr. Pelham, he may be more of the right person to represent a community of American good citizens who happened to include Arabs and Muslims and happened to be among those who might have voted for Ms. Wood. I applaud his enlightened views and eloquent statements. After all, we are all Americans and we care about our united and multi-populated nation. We will not allow negative views to drive our advancement and humanitarian respect and care about all people of the world, regardless of their creed, faith, gender, or any other distinguishing factors. Look around you Ms. Wood and try to identify who of those hard working and dedicated service men and women is an Arab or a Muslim and who is not.

    Muhammad Eissa

  • Posted by Judith on February 26, 2008 at 8:30am EST
  • Guess what, folks. You don't need any credentials to serve on the board of trustees of a community college. You don't need a college degree. You don't need to be certified. You don't get assessed.

    I showed a list of the professions of the members of my c.c.'s board of trustees to my class. They read them over and said, "No one here is in education!"

    Precisely.

  • Boards have got to go
  • Posted by PS on February 26, 2008 at 8:40am EST
  • CC Boards are supposed to work with the college collaboratively in moving forward on strategic issues. But the reality is that they are much more interested in micro-managing and dealing with operational issues, as this story shows. I have seen presidents spending days on their silly little requests, when they could have been spending that time raising money or working on education. I have seen Boards get angry and threaten administrators because a friend of theirs who works at the college got their feelings hurt (e.g., were asked to do some work or, God forbid, change). I have seen Boards fire very good people for absolutely no reason, other than that they were trying to make their college better and that involved instituting change and ruffling the feathers of all their buddies at the college.

    To make matters worse, Boards refuse to evaluate themselves. There is no - I repeat, no - evidence that Boards add any value to the quality of an institution. In fact, based on the amount of time CC executives spend trying to shield their colleges from the harmful actions of a Board, they probably do much more damage than good, as this story clearly illustrates. Additionally, accountability controls in the form of state and federal data requirements and financial audits render this part of their jobs useless.

    In 2008, there is no need for a Board because they add nothing to accountability or quality - in fact, they make both much more worse.

  • Posted by Dawit on February 26, 2008 at 9:05am EST
  • The same type of argument based on ignorance and intolerance has been used in the past to block courses that focus on the experiences African Americans, Native Americans, Latinos, and Women. I am sure xenophobic and ignorant people like Ms. Wood will use the same line of argument in the future to stand in the way of diversity, understanding of other religions, coexistence, and multiculturalism.

    College leaders should not be intimidated by hate mongers like Ms. Moore and abandon their mission of educating the future leaders of this great nation.

  • Dorris Woods
  • Posted by Jerry , Regents' Professor at University of Oklahoma on February 26, 2008 at 10:15am EST
  • I think Trustee Woods has done a great public service. At a time when we celebrate and are committed to diversity, she has demonstrated conclusively that there is a place within higher education for the bigoted and stupid, a group, one would hope, that is underrepresented in the academy.

  • Posted by momar on February 26, 2008 at 10:20am EST
  • How surreal is this? I have no idea how someone so close-minded made it as far as she did. And it's not just close-mindedness; it's stupidity. Her statements seem drug-induced. It is seriously difficult for me to accept the situation as fact, that her opinions are what someone actually thinks.

    People like Dorris Wood scare me, depress me. She is making decisions about the education of others. So much hate in her. What can you do with someone like Dorris Wood?

  • If You Don't Make Your Bed, Sleep In It Anyway!
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on February 26, 2008 at 10:40am EST
  • Hey ... they’re not called COMMUNITY colleges for nothing.

    If you want a sense of the intellectual status of America, just spend a week surfing channels on one of your (n >2) tv sets. For the most part, that’s where our youngsters are getting their educations.

    The reason the posters to this article believe Ms. Wood is both offensive and stupid is because they’ve been hanging out in the wrong places ... academic institutions. If you want a quick pic of mainstream America, spend a week in front of one of your tubes (I guess they’re not tubes any more, are they?) and follow that up with another week on-line.

    I would boast that upwards of 85% of Americans are high school graduates were it not for the fact that a great many of this crew know virtually nothing about mathematics, science, history, geography, world events, art, etc. It makes one wonder what they did there for four years.

    http://nces.ed.gov/ssbr/pages/dropout.asp

    I would boast that upwards of 20% of us have four years of college except that 42% of American college graduates never read another book after graduation.

    http://www.americancivicliteracy.org/

    Credentials inflation in our fair land is a scandal that is best ignored ... even up to sharing office space with full-time faculty colleagues with Ph.D.s from diploma mills.

    What I’m suggesting, dear friends, is that Ms. Woods is much more mainstream than you might imagine. Apologize for what a majority of over-fifteen-year-old residents of her neighborhood think but do not say in public? I should think not. We have become a nation of whiney apologizers. It is refreshing to see stand-up Americans like George W. Bush and Dorris Wood say what they think ... and then remain true to their words.

    http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=319

  • Posted by Neil Holman on February 26, 2008 at 10:45am EST
  • Tom:

    To answer your question, during WWII, the United States interned American citizens of Japanese ancestry in camps. This was not a stellar moment in our history, and one would hope that we would have learned something in the past 65 years. The comments of this trustee are amazingly insensitive and feed the climate of fear which has overtaken us since 9/11.

  • Open mind?
  • Posted by R.F. on February 26, 2008 at 10:50am EST
  • This trustee has closed her mind, and for this alone should be removed from the board of the college. It is imperative that those folks charged with such an important task remember their mission. Perhaps we need to have courses for new Trustee's to familiarize them with the constituencies they are charged with representing. She may be an elected official, but I doubt that the majority of her voters wanted her to speak in such a way for them. Perhaps she won't understand the extent of her errors in thinking and judgement until she runs again, and does not get elected.

  • Accreditation
  • Posted by An Old Goat on February 26, 2008 at 10:50am EST
  • The incident deserves the attention of the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges, Western Association of Schools & Colleges. Trustees who cannot distinguish between information and advocacy and who further attempt to use their hatred to interfere with legitimate academic operations call into question the capacity of a college to fulfill its mission.

  • Posted by Historian on February 26, 2008 at 11:15am EST
  • @Tom:

    WWI and WWII are a big reason why Western Civilization is a general education requirement at many universities. The course was, among other things, intended to insure that a broad swathe of the educated public understood why we ought to give a damn about a European war.

    Doris Wood is a poor choice for an education official, but thank her God (or any other divinities who may wish to involve themselves) that she doesn't work for the Pentagon!

  • Power Doesn't Have to Be Smart, Just Powerful
  • Posted by Rentro on February 26, 2008 at 11:55am EST
  • This guy sounds like a real low-IQ reactionary moron. Classic stupidity added to a simplistic political view of the world, with both hands on the reigns of power.

    Q: What should we call someone like this?
    A: Chairman of the Board

  • Posted by Carol on February 26, 2008 at 12:05pm EST
  • This trustee will soon run for reelection. Local voters need to send her a message by defeating her in a landslide,

  • Posted by Larry on February 26, 2008 at 12:40pm EST
  • Oh for god’s sake, why is it that every time someone in the US says something dumb, people have to declare that it represents the attitudes of everyone in the US.

    I seriously doubt that there is any groundswell of support for the notion that there should be no study of Islam, Arabic, or Arabs. But, just like flashing a football game will get you attention, making outrageous statements will get you publicity.

    Now, if you really want to annoy her, you can ignore her.

  • Posted by Elizabeth on February 26, 2008 at 12:40pm EST
  • Ummm, that's one really diverse-looking board of trustees there:

    http://www.siskiyous.edu/board/

    (Not!)

  • knowng 'the enemy" (NOT)
  • Posted by Frank F. Conlon , Professor Emeritus at University of Washington on February 26, 2008 at 12:40pm EST
  • With reference to the posts from "Tom"--and "Historian"--I can report that when the United States entered World War I, my mother's class in German at Omaha Central High School was cancelled. She recalled later in her life that the school board was anxious that in such classes, students might get a wrong impression that there was something of value in German culture.! As for Western Civ classes, those were launched in the post World War One (not Two) period, but were, I think, less in response to the war, than to the idea that there were all of these "aliens" who had entered the USA during the preceeding three decades and that they needed to be 'instructed' in the proper values. In other words, Western Cvilizatio courses had a didactic element that was not based on "know your enemy" nor upon ignoring your enemy. I recall once at the end of my course of civilizations of India when an undergraduate said he wished they had a course like that on Western Civilization... I joked that if he looked at our liberal arts curriculum it was basically a Western civilization area studies program.

    People like the benighted trustee at the College of the Siskyous make easy targets, but remember that in a democracy all of our opinions can count, and in a rural community college district, there are likely to be some bodies of thought that would not be heard in a senior common room at an Ivy League school.

  • I am not the enemy
  • Posted by Odeh Muhawesh , Professor on February 26, 2008 at 4:10pm EST
  • What bothers me about this story and some of the posts is the undertone which seems to accept Islam and Muslims as "enemy". I am an American Muslim who loves this country. Don't count me and my faith as the enemy. Osama and the Saudis are, but not 1.4 Billion good people.

  • Posted by J A DeLater on February 26, 2008 at 4:10pm EST
  • Congratulations to Fritzbane Manley as the first academic to make the inevitable (though doubtless erudite and sophisticated) connection between the stubborn prejudice of Dorris Pelham and . . . the views of President Bush. Is it treasonous to suggest that academics might harbor a few prejudices of their own?

  • Unelect her
  • Posted by Sandra on February 26, 2008 at 4:15pm EST
  • Carol is right. The same people who organized themselves to ask her to resign should now organize themselves to find a person to run against her and then work for that person's campaign. It's a quite meaningful form of a vote of no confidence.

  • Posted by J A DeLater on February 26, 2008 at 5:50pm EST
  • correction: read "Woods" for "Pelham" (mea culpa)

  • Manley’s Conjecture
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on February 26, 2008 at 5:50pm EST
  • I want to thank J. A. DeLater for noticing that I was the first person to equate the actions of someone making a truly stupid decision with a typical action of George W. Bush.

    I have long envied (1) Gordon Moore for observing that the capacity of the most efficient computer chip doubles every 18 months and (2) Mike Godwin for observing that as the discussion grows longer the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Adolf Hitler approaches one. In truth, I don’t think there are proofs of either Moore’s or Godwin’s “Laws” ... indeed, I think they are merely conjectures, not laws.

    In any event, I take it as given that George W. Bush will go down in history as being one of the three worst presidents of all time ... and I assume I am being generous in that respect. So Manley’s Conjecture is “As a discussion of the general stupidity of a decision-maker grows longer, the probability that the stupid person will be compared with ‘W’ is equal to one.”

    In the spirit of the Clay Mathematics Institute prize of $1,000,000 for anyone who proves any of its seven famous problems – including the Reimann Hypothesis – I will offer a prize of $1,000,001 for a proof of Manley’s Conjecture.

  • Point of information
  • Posted by Curious on February 26, 2008 at 5:55pm EST
  • As a point of information: Is it correct that these trustees are elected in (municipal? state?) elections? At the public university level, trustees are most often appointed by the legislature or governor, rather than elected, are they not? Are there any US states that elect university trustees? (Or where they are elected by alumni?)

  • Posted by Judith on February 26, 2008 at 8:40pm EST
  • Where I live, the board of trustees appoints other trustees, except for a couple of mandated slots (like for a student trustee. No, no faculty.)

  • Posted by Siskiyou Resident on February 26, 2008 at 9:15pm EST
  • Being a resident of Siskiyou County, I believe that Ms. Woods' statements represent the beliefs of many residents. This IS rural America. Many undereducated and underemployed people accept that "others" are responsible for their situation and need someone else to blame. I believe these folks are a minority.

    I hope Ms. Woods runs for re-election. I believe that democracy works, and I hope that even here, her opinions will be rejected and an open-minded person will be elected to replace her. That demonstration will be good for us all.

  • Posted by Samuel K. on February 27, 2008 at 4:25am EST
  • To Elizabeth: The college in question is located in far northern, inland California. The board may not show the diversity that a simple lump-sum statistic of the United States may indicate, but it likely does reflect what the community looks like.

  • Appropriate Resources?
  • Posted by Scrawed on February 27, 2008 at 4:25am EST
  • In the war of words on Ms. Wood that's erupted here, amid all the self- congratulatory uber-tolerant PC parlance, I have to wonder if anyone is asking ANY of the following questions:

    Are courses on Arabic and Middle Eastern history better uses of Siskiyou County community resources than any of the alternatives?

    Are courses on Arabic and Middle Eastern history appropriate to the populace of Siskiyou County? Or are other foci of education more apropos (e.g. vocational and business training relevant to the area served)?

    Who will provide the materials for such courses? Will said materials provide for critical appraisals with multiple perspectives, or are they propaganda pieces printed by the Saudi Ministry of Education (many of which fail to identify Israel as an independent nation)? Even textbook printing in the US is subject to undue censorship from other nations.

    How will teaching staff be provided? Will the hiring of such staff result in other expenses not originally anticipated or even budgeted? Would there ultimately be calls for foot baths, a dedicated prayer facility and ultimately a dedicated campus-funded mosque (all of which have occurred at other educational - and even other public - institutions at great expense)? Might the related expenses not have undue impacts on a rural community college?

    Just some thoughts.

  • Posted by sam i am , the beverlly on February 27, 2008 at 4:30am EST
  • hillbillies!!!
    once you leave the big diverse cities in the
    USA this is what you get,
    bubba's and bubbettes
    talk about backwoods

    yeehaw....

  • Posted by Denise on February 27, 2008 at 10:10am EST
  • Now, wait a minute. This case requires more diplomacy. Ms. Wood apparently feels like community colleges are becoming mere colonies of what she sees as the proverbial political correctness that has invaded the University. Her choice of words may sound a little extreme to us, but surely they rise out of a sense of hopelessness and frustration as she sees her own rich heritage/cultural identity continually demonized and ridiculed by the very same group who are trying to enforce an appreciation of another. Throwing out senseless insults does nothing to bridge the gap of understanding on either side. At the same time, I don't feel it's appropriate in an educational setting to call out for a censure of views that dissent from the norm; controversy inspires thought. Its important to keep an open mind.
    However, we need not worry; I don't think her (Ms. Wood's) ilk will begin pouring out into the streets calling for our blood. There IS....HOPE!

  • Intolerance of Intolerance is not Intolerance
  • Posted by Paco the Wondernerd on February 27, 2008 at 3:50pm EST
  • Go ahead, Rush Limbaugh fans -- Yell all you want to about us liberal PC folks! That doesn't change the fact that Ms. Woods and her ilk are the reasons that Bush was able to march our nation off to war on lies and falsehoods. The previous comment said that it wasn't as if Ms. Woods and her ilk were about to start spilling blood -- it's too late! It's already happened. There are hundreds of thousands dead in Iraq -- which had NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11!

    By the way, the most populous Muslim nation in the world (and the fourth most populous nation in the world) is Indonesia! So this elected official has just fingered the 220 million people of Indonesia as Enemies of the State.

    Someone once said that this country is so strong, it can survive its leaders. I sure hope he was right.

  • Trying to make a difference.
  • Posted by Megan Riedel on February 28, 2008 at 5:10am EST
  • I am a student at COS. I am also part of the coalition of students bringing awareness to the public about this issue. It gives me great pleasure to see that the story is appearing in many different publications. My club, Students for Progressive Political Change, has interviewed with the local newspaper and I was interviewed, along with the teacher of Arabic I and History of the Middle East, as well as the President of the Academic Senate, by the local radio station, Jefferson Public Radio, speaking out against the trustee's statements. We are certainly working on finding a person to run against her and have taken it upon ourselves to continue to rally support in opposition of Ms. Woods' re-election.
    It is important to me to let the readers of this article know that her statements do not reflect the view of the majority of people who live in Siskiyou County. Though our town may be small, in the sticks and filled with more than your average amount of hicks, it is also filled with some very progressive and intelligent individules. The majority of people up here support the, seemingly obvious, idea that the actions of one person (or group) do not necessarily reflect the belief of an entire nation of people. Similarly, the actions of one board member do not reflect the beliefs of the vast majority of residents out here in Siskiyou County.

    I am happy to see that so many people give a crap...seriously. Martin Luther King Jr. once said that "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter". What she has said and done will not be ignored.

  • Posted by COS student on February 28, 2008 at 5:20am EST
  • I am a student at College of the Siskiyous, and i for one do not share the views of Mrs. Woods. and i agree with previously made comments, i wish they could fire her, but she is elected in. i personally didn't vote for her, and i most certainly won't when she re-runs, which she has decided that she will. we discussed her statement in one of my classes and the entire class was in agreement that the letter and views of Mrs. Woods were offensive and inappropriate. She claims that she doesn't reflect the views of the college, she reflects the views of her constituents and her constituents only. so pleas before any more people jump to conclusions about the rest of the the community realize that by making an over-generalization, such as calling us all hillbillies, or uneducated know that next to nobody agrees with her, or her beliefs

  • Posted by A Face In The Crowd on February 29, 2008 at 4:10am EST
  • As a member of this rural community and a student at COS, I think that I can say without a doubt that her veiws do not reflect those of most of the students or faculty at COS. All of the people that I have heard speak of Ms. Moores comments have been appauled by her bigotry. To those of you who think that we are all just country bumpkins and hillbillies, who must be ignorant and agree with these veiws because of where we live, are you not committing the same kind of bigotry and descrimination that you find so offensive?

  • Dorris Woods
  • Posted by Heidi Jacobson at College of the Siskiyous on March 2, 2008 at 11:10am EST
  • I simply can't believe the appalling behavior of Dorris Woods. Her comments about Arabs and Islams are insulting, not just to those who are Arabs or Islams, but to those of us who know them and like them and accept them as friends of ours.
    She has no business speaking for the college or community. Despite her long-time position on the board, she does not represent us. I attend COS and there are many, many, many people who are incensed by this woman and the situation she is creating. She is allowing the country to view the entire community and school as "racist, undereducated, unemployed hillbillies." We do come from a simple community, a delightful area that is beautiful. But living here does not require us to be idiots, people who can't find a job, or have no common sense. Our only mistake is allowing this woman to have served on our board way past her usefulness.

  • Posted by Saleh on March 4, 2008 at 5:15am EST
  • Dear Dorris,
    I read an article which was in Inside Higher Ed web site that shows your opinion about Islam, Muslims, and Arabs. Actually, I liked something in you that you spoke out and showed other your opinion. Indeed, it is a good thing when you have an opinion and want to show it to other as long as you are not hurting any of them. If so, that’s mean you have insulted them. First of all I want to ask you some questions. First, from where you got your idea about Islam..? Second, why did you judge Arabs and Muslims as bad people..? Finally, have you lived between Arabs and Muslims to judge them…? Relax; I am going to answer those questions instead of you. First, I am sure about that you have gotten the idea you have about Islam from the media. If you believe everything which is in media that mean you shouldn’t be in a school as a higher educated person. Because most of the reporters talk about a topic that attract many people without caring about other thought. Second, to judge Arabs and Muslims as bad people just because of few people who did a bad thing is just showing your limited thinking. In every society there is a bad people and a good people. Why you didn’t mention what has the U.S.A did in Iraq. The U.S.A navy has killed more than a million of civilian in Iraq. Of course you don’t know this, because it is something that is not important!!! Why didn’t you judge all American as a bad people…? Finally, have you been in an Arab society to tell whether there are a good people or not? Have you read about Islam to judge it…? You can’t judge other religion just because of their actions; their actions are something and the religion they are related to is something else. In short, I advice you dear to read and know more about Islam, then you can say whatever you want to say as long as you are honest of what you saying. Try to be flexible and understand other because may be your thought is wrong. If you find that what I have said is wrong, try to show me what is the correct, and I’ll listen to you…
    Thanks