Search News


Browse Archives

News

Employment and the Undergraduate Degree

March 5, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

During a period of economic uncertainty, it's not much fun seeing data from generally more prosperous times. A new report from the U.S. Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics takes a look at employment trends over a 10-year span starting in 1993, and the outlook was positive for college graduates. It took time for some to find a job with "career potential," the report notes, but most had done so by 2003.

The path differed somewhat, particularly in the early career years, for students depending on their focus. Those with "career oriented" majors appeared to become more established in the workforce earlier than did their counterparts with "academic" majors, according to the report.

“Ten Years After College: Comparing the Employment Experiences of 1992-93 Bachelor’s Degree Recipients with Academic and Career-Oriented Majors,” includes longitudinal data (surveying from 1994, 1997 and 2003) tracking the work experience of roughly 9,000 bachelor's degree recipients.

The report looks at categories such as employment status, stability and job perceptions. It defines career-oriented majors as those that prepare students for employment in a specific occupation -- business, engineering, etc. Academic majors are everything else -- including social and behavioral science, physical sciences and humanities. (According to that premise, about two-thirds of those surveyed had career-oriented majors.)

Over all, the percentage of graduates who were employed and not enrolled in any type of degree or certificate program held steady at roughly 75 percent in 1994 and 1997. The number increased to 80 percent in 2003, when some of those who had gone to graduate schools entered the work force.

Career-oriented majors were less likely to seek out graduate education, the report showed. A greater proportion of them were employed and not taking classes at all three checkpoints (57 percent) than were their counterparts (38 percent), and if they were without a job, it tended to be for a shorter amount of time.

Ten years after graduating, just under half of the entire cohort had been unemployed -- not working but job hunting -- at one time or another. Temporary unemployment became less and less of an issue the longer graduates were out of college.

And by 2003, most of those surveyed said they were settled in a job that they considered a career. Most reported being satisfied with pay, job security and opportunity for promotion. Career-oriented majors were only slightly more likely to consider their work a career (91 percent) than were their counterparts (87 percent). They were in their jobs longer (5.6 years), on balance, than people in the academic group (4.3 years) -- and that proved true even for those who hadn't pursued more education.

Percentage distribution of 1992–93 bachelor’s degree recipients’ employment and enrollment status in 1994, 1997 and 2003.

Undergraduate Major Only Employed Only Enrolled Both Neither
1994        
Total 75.6% 6.7% 11.3% 6.4%
-Academic 67.8 10.4 14.2 7.6
--Social and behavioral sciences 72.1 8.3 13.4 6.1
--Arts and humanities 72.5 7.9 12.4 7.1
--Biological sciences 52.8 20 17.3 9.9
--Math/physical sciences 57.8 17.5 18.7 6
--Other 66.9 6.7 14.2 12.3
         
-Career-oriented 79.7 4.8 9.7 5.8
--Business and management 85.2 2.5 7 5.3
--Education 74.8 6.1 13.8 5.2
--Health 76.3 6 11.8 5.8
--Engineering 71.5 8.4 12.9 7.2
--Computer Science 84.3 4.9 6 4.8
--Other 80.2 5 8.4 6.4
         
STEM fields 65.5 12.9 14.3 7.4
Non-STEM 77.6 5.5 10.7 6.2
         
1997        
Total 76.3 4.8 13 5.9
-Academic 67.2 9.4 15.9 7.5
--Social and behavioral sciences 69.6 6.7 17.2 6.6
--Arts and humanities 72.1 6.2 12.7 9
--Biological sciences 49 27.3 16.1 7.6
--Math/physical sciences 61.6 13.6 16.6 8.2
--Other 70.9 3.9 19.3 5.9
         
-Career-oriented 81.1 2.4 11.5 5
--Business and management 86 1.7 7.5 4.8
--Education 69.6 2.4 21.1 6.9
--Health 80.6 3.1 9.3 7
--Engineering 80.1 4.4 13.9 1.7
--Computer Science 88.2 2.6 7.1 2.1
--Other 83.3 2.4 9.7 4.6
         
STEM fields 69.3 12.1 14.1 4.6
Non-STEM 77.6 3.5 12.8 6.1
         
2003        
Total 79.9 1.1 7.1 11.9
-Academic 76.1 1.5 8.8 13.6
--Social and behavioral sciences 75 1.7 10.2 13.1
--Arts and humanities 73.5 1.3 7.7 17.4
--Biological sciences 81.2 1.6 8.5 8.7
--Math/physical sciences 83.4 1.6 7.6 7.3
--Other 74.2 0.8 8.5 16.5
         
-Career-oriented 82 0.9 6.2 10.9
--Business and management 85.9 0.4 4.8 8.8
--Education 69.7 1.3 10.2 18.8
--Health 80.6 0.7 7.2 11.5
--Engineering 86.7 0.9 6.7 5.8
--Computer Science 83 2.5 4.5 10
--Other 85.4 1.3 4.4 9
         
STEM fields 84.1 1.4 7.1 7.5
Non-STEM 79.2 1.1 7.1 12.7
         

Source: National Center for Education Statistics

On the whole, academic majors earned lower salaries than their counterparts in 2003. But, as the report notes, the overall salary difference between academic and career-oriented majors who were employed full time was not statistically significant after taking other factors into account.

Career-oriented majors reported being more satisfied with their pay (68 percent) than academic majors, but the report didn't find significant differences in other categories.

Debra Humphreys, a spokeswoman for the Association of American Colleges and Universities, said the report largely confirms the group's feelings that too much pressure is placed on students to choose the "right" major.

"The image is if you major in an academic subject you'll be flipping burgers all your life," Humphreys said. "This report doesn't show that. It does show that [students with career-oriented majors] get into their career track more quickly, but suggests that in a few years, there's not a big difference in job satisfaction."

Humphreys added that while the NCES data is important and relevant, it’s also somewhat dated. The business environment is “changing faster than ever," Humphreys said, and business leaders are telling the group that it's most important that students have a broad set of transferable skills.

AAC&U's survey of 300 employers, conducted last year, showed that new hires had the skills needed for entry-level work but often lacked the background needed to take on advanced assignments. (That report didn’t differentiate among majors.)

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Employment and the Undergraduate Degree

  • Wasn't Michael Corleone an English major at Dartmouth?
  • Posted by Buzz on March 5, 2008 at 6:00am EST
  • “The image is if you major in an academic subject you’ll be flipping burgers all your life .. This report doesn’t show that .."

    I'm reminded of the "Godfather III" scene when Sonny Corleone's daughter and her art-major finance ask Michael for his approval to wed (quaint!). Michael suggests the finance "take some business courses .." to better manage his inheritance.

    How often do "studies" turn out to be contrary to the researcher's goals? Oh .. about as often as GWB and Teddy Kennedy were concerned about their college majors.

  • Posted by Jonathan Potts on March 5, 2008 at 9:05am EST
  • I believe that was a deleted scene from the second film, not the third.

  • Posted by Author, No Sucker Left Behind on March 5, 2008 at 11:50am EST
  • In my opinion, the results of this study are meaningless, because 1992 grads faced a much different economy than today's and because the "Academic" and "Career" categories are muddled. How can "business" be put in the same category as education, or even as health (which can include many low-paid professionals)?

    We don't need a new research study in order to figure out that, in today's world, college debt is soaring, salaries for new grads are dropping, and some majors (like business) tend to lead to much higher salaries than others.

  • Posted by sk on March 5, 2008 at 1:25pm EST
  • No Sucker is right: wouldn't the public have been better served if the study investigated the obstacles to employment at the end of the pipeline?

    More worrisome than who got what job is the question of why all graduates did not find employment. This glaring omission spoils this study.

    On the other hand, longitudinal studies are exceedingly rare, and I suppose we should be happy with what we can get.

  • What A Strange Choice
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on March 5, 2008 at 1:25pm EST
  • Let’s pretend one has reason to be interested in this topic. Well, the first thing you should do is have a look at the study (and it is always entertaining to try to make sense of a longitudinal survey) ...

    http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008155.pdf

    But I can assure you that of all the graphs, charts, and tables in the study, the one displayed in this article heads the competition for being the least interesting ... and it is certainly not indicative of the sense of the NCES study and report.

    Granted it is unfair of me to say this after the fact – and especially after a “fact” that might have seemed so promising ten years ago – but this study is definitely “much ado about nothing.” I trust we have learned what can be learned from these individuals and won’t increase our investment in pursuit of someone’s prejudices about what we could hope to discover from them in 2010, 2015, ad infinitum. As we all know, longitudinal studies – especially in the social sciences – have a momentum that is difficult to stop. It’s just too easy for the research scholars to maintain their $u$tainability.

  • Unemployment?
  • Posted by R.F. on March 5, 2008 at 1:25pm EST
  • "Ten years after graduating, just under half of the entire cohort had been unemployed — not working but job hunting — at one time or another. Temporary unemployment became less and less of an issue the longer graduates were out of college."

    I wonder if the results were modified for the "going" unemployment rates over that time period. The rates could have varied widely?

    Since most companies do not generally feel as though they should have any loyalty to their workers, and increasingly workers return the favor, I wonder what the future trends will show.

    The obstacle for career oriented majors to overcome is that they are often taught the task, but without any other critical thinking skills, so when the technology changes they need to go back for more "education". No surprise why more CEO's want graduates with "transferable" skills. Although, there is still the push to crank up the production line for career oriented majors at many colleges.

    Of course, the CEC's of the world have many obstacles to overcome, not the least of which is their own management.

  • Show us the cite
  • Posted by Buzz on March 5, 2008 at 7:20pm EST
  • " .. The obstacle for career oriented majors to overcome is that they are often taught the task, but without any other critical thinking skills .."

    Excuse me -- where is the foundation for that?

    Journalism students are not taught to deal with deadlines, sometimes under difficult situations? Engineering students do not learn calculus to deal with ever-changing conditions? Law schools do not teach students to handle either prosecution or defense?

    Facts is hard. Pity.