Search News


Browse Archives

News

Polytechnic Board Approves Merger Into NYU

March 7, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Last month, the board of Polytechnic University bowed to pressure to hold off on approving a merger with New York University. But on Thursday, the trustees voted to approve the deal. While New York State officials must still approve the merger, Thursday's vote was a key hurdle -- as opponents have been hoping to block it from taking place.

The merger, which would be phased in, would combine two universities with the closest of ties to New York City. For Polytechnic, the combination could bring in new funds and a Manhattan connection for students. For NYU, the merger would fill in some key gaps. As NYU gained in national stature in the last 20 years, many have regretted that it dropped engineering programs (which were in fact absorbed by Poly). And with space at a premium in Manhattan, Poly's Brooklyn-based campus laboratories offer all kinds of opportunities.

The idea of joining forces has generally gone over well at NYU, but has met more skepticism -- and some outright opposition -- at Poly. While NYU has an increasingly national and international student body, Poly's emphasis has been very much on New York City. Many alumni and some faculty and trustees at Poly have argued that their institution's values were likely to disappear once a merger is completed.

Many others have criticized the process for reviewing the deal -- a process in which many professors and alumni say questions about the merger have largely been squelched. The scheduled vote last month was put off after State Sen. Kenneth P. LaValle, chair of the New York Senate Higher Education Committee, expressed concerns and asked for a delay. LaValle was not available for comment Thursday on whether he was satisfied that his questions about the merger had been answered.

Craig Matthews, chair of the Polytechnic board, said in an interview after the meeting that he was elated by the outcome. He declined to say what the final vote was, but said that it exceeded the 75 percent supermajority required.

Matthews said that only "a very small minority" didn't agree with the merger, and that the board had "a healthy discussion" about their concerns. In the end, he said, there was agreement that "now it's time for everyone to support this merger."

Edward Sawchuck, an alumni leader opposed to the merger, said he was "very disappointed" in the vote. He said that the "complete agreements" were never released for a full review by alumni or professors, and that "the board never answered our questions."

Some alumni leaders have previously threatened to go to court to block a merger. Sawchuck said he didn't know what steps opponents of the plan would take.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Polytechnic Board Approves Merger Into NYU

  • Impeach the Poly Alum Leaders
  • Posted by majort on March 7, 2008 at 1:35pm EST
  • In my opinion the Alum Association leaders represent themselves and not the Alumni Association. Those of us who are alumni and support the merger have been completely ignored by them, not the university. I further believe that they have no right to speak on our behalve when they know that many of us are pro-merger. Remember my dear alum leaders I am expressing my opinion, which is something you people have done all along.

  • Polytechnic--NYU Merger
  • Posted by Eli Pearce , University Research Professor at Polytechnic on March 7, 2008 at 2:10pm EST
  • I am Research faculty presently at Polytechnic and an alumnus. Prior to this I had been a tenured professor and had held several administrative positions there. I have been a Life Director of the Polytechnic's Alumni Association, and recipient of the Alumni Association's Dedicated Alumnus Award and also its Distinguished Alumnus Award. Being so close to the merger question and the future potential and opportunities for Polytechnic,I am completely supportive of this merger. All agreements require trust of the parties involved until proven otherwise. I believe Poly will become again a
    great technology and engineering institution and will take this place as the Polytechnic of NYU. Obviously, I am strongly in favor of the merger!

  • Not all NYU Students Support the Deal
  • Posted by Duncan on March 8, 2008 at 2:55pm EST
  • It should be noted that there's a reasonable amount of skepticism at NYU towards this deal. Here's one post: http://nyuinc.org/2008/03/07/polytech-merger-approved-before-end-of-ethics-inquiry/

    Just like Polytech students are worried about increased tuition as a result of the deal, NYU students are tired of foolish expansion projects that boost the prestige (and salaries) of the administration that ends up hitting us in the pocketbooks. Andrew Ross' article Global U (published on Inside Higher Ed) gives a good overview of why this deal - and others like it - is undermining education at NYU.

  • NOT ALL POLYTECH STUDENTS SUPPORT THE DEAL
  • Posted by Mark from Polytech on March 11, 2008 at 9:00am EDT
  • After 153 years of independence and serving the needs of children of immigrants who could not afford to go to high-priced engineering schools, Polytechnic University is no more.

    I think the public needs to see the definitive agreement between NYU and Polytechnic University that has been held in secrecy by both parties. We need to know what Polytech and its trustees received in exchange for its hundreds of millions of dollars in real estate, trust funds, plants, equipment, and machinery that reside at the Brooklyn campus. I beleive that all Poly gets is the good name of NYU and the right to borrow against its own assets. All of the other goodies were already provided in Articles V and VII of the 1973 Merger Agreement that NYU fulfilled with Cooper Union and Stevens Institute of Technology. The never did any joint programs with Polytech as provided in the 1973 Merger Agreement. Isn't that a bit strange?

    I never thought this deal was about education, I always thought it was about real estate. With a need for 6 million square feet of space, NYU gets a large chunk of it for free under this merger. There are more than 1.4 million square feet of undeveloped air rights owned by Polytechnic. There are numerous buildings and dormitories already in existence that encompass many more hundreds of thousands of square feet.

    Since 1973, under the merger of the NYU School of Engineering Sciences into Polytechnic Insitutue of Brooklyn, Polytech has nurtured the tenured professors, students, and graduates of NYU at its own expense. The taxpayers of New York paid NYU $62 million for its Heights Campus (where the Engineering School was located) and gave $2.3 million to Polytechnic Institute to absorb the NYU faculty and students. NYU agreed to get out of engineering and NYU President Hester signed his name to a letter of August 27, 1973 to the Alumni of the School of Engineering and Science which states the understanding of the Commissioner of Education who negotiated the agreement "the New York State Commissioner of Education [Ewald Nyquist] interpreted the legislation to require that once our School of Engineering left the Heights campus, New York University would not be authorized to offer engineering instruction at Washington Square or elsewhere." The State Education Department was agreed by both NYU and Polytech Presidents in signed contracts which are part of the agreement to allow Commissioner Nyquist to be the binding arbitrator of the agreement.

    In 1976 and 1977 NYU tried to get back into engineering and physics and was told in letters by Assistant Commissioner Frank C. Abbott and Deputy Commissioner T. E. Hollander that it was the understanding of the NYS Education Department that "New York University did not plan to reinistiute engineering programs follwing the [1973] merger." NYU applications were denied by the NY State Education Department in both years to re-enter engineering. This was because they violated the merger agreement of 1973. A similar decision was made by Commissioner Ambach in 1981.

    While NYU is a great school with a wonderful reputation, I think Polytechnic University and its faculty, alumni, administration, and students may get the short end of the deal with tuition hikes, layoffs, and new priorities set by NYU and not Polytechnic University. What will happen to its Brooklyn campus with all the air rights? Which developers are already in line to get the contracts?

    I have seen Poly go from a first tier school in the 1960's to a third tier school in 2008 due to a lack of leadership and failure to meet its own strategic goals. This "merger" is really an acquisition. It is an easy way out for tired trustees and executives of Polytech who could not figure out a way to remain independent after 153 years of success. Let's all look at the secret merger agreement and see what Poly gets for its assets. Let's see who develops the real estate of the Brooklyn campus. Let's see who goes to the Board at NYU. I share the opinion of many Polytech Alumni that this "merger" is not the best deal since sliced bread. Let's see what happens in the future.

  • Poly Merger
  • Posted by Dennis Landsberg on March 11, 2008 at 10:10am EDT
  • If this is such a good deal, and if it was undertaken in an open process, why are the terms of the merger being kept a secret?

    Just my opinion.