News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
March 11
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute announced Monday that it would not permit the re-opening of a controversial video exhibit that the university suspended last week. RPI’s announcement — both the decision and the way it was explained — infuriated the artist and art professors, who moved the video to a gallery off the campus. There, students who are active in the College Republicans at RPI followed them to picket and protest outside, while others streamed in to see the show.
At issue is a work called “Virtual Jihadi,” which is the latest in a series of video games inspired by the Iraq war. In the first, “Quest for Saddam,” players tried to capture the deposed and since executed leader of Iraq. That game inspired an Al Qaeda version called “The Night of Bush Capturing,” which features players trying to kill the American president. In “Virtual Jihadi,” a player based on the life of the artist — Wafaa Bilal, an artist-in-residence at RPI — becomes a character in a game based on the Al Qaeda version.
Bilal, who teaches at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, was born in Iraq and sees the work not as a call to arms against President Bush, but as a critique of the situation Iraqis find themselves in — where they dislike the American occupation of their country and feel pressured to support terrorism. Bilal stressed in two interviews that he does not support terrorism, but believes it is important for those who view his art to understand how U.S. policies encourage people in Iraq to support terrorists.
Last week, RPI temporarily shut down the exhibit, pending a review. The exhibit had been attacked by the College Republicans and RPI officials said they needed more information about it.
Monday’s statement said that the exhibit could not re-open at the institute. The statement said that the decision “was based on numerous concerns, including, in particular two characteristics of the video game in the exhibit, as affirmed by the artist: First, that the video game in the exhibit is derived from the product of a terrorist organization; and second, that the video game is targeted to and suggests the killing of the president of the United States.”
The statement — issued in the name of William N. Walker, vice president for strategic communications and external relations — continued: “Rensselaer fully supports academic and artistic freedom. We respect the rights of all members of the Rensselaer community and their guests to express their opinions and viewpoints. However, as stewards of a private university, we have the right and, indeed, the responsibility to ensure that university resources are used in ways that are in the overall best interests of the institution.”
Bilal, in an interview after the statement was released, called it “wrong and misleading.” In particular, he objected to the statement that he had “affirmed” that the art suggests killing the president. Bilal said that the game portrays characters doing that, but does not suggest that as a course of action. “I am making a social statement about terrorism, not supporting terrorism,” he said.
Igor Vamos, who teaches art at RPI, said that by the logic of the RPI statement, “they would have to ban every Tom Clancy novel or the movie United 93″ because those feature terrorist acts. “This is a massive overreaction,” he said. “When a writer or actor plays a role, their beliefs don’t have to match,” he said, adding that RPI administrators should surely know that.
Further, Vamos said that in light of the fact that Bilal is known as a respected artist, as a person who fled Iraq under Saddam Hussein, and is a well regarded teacher, the RPI statement is “completely irresponsible and a travesty on a personal level.” By implying that Bilal supports the assassination of the president — when he does not — RPI has made a “baseless accusation” that could leave Bilal vulnerable to being physically or professionally attacked.
“This is all just shockingly irresponsible on a human level,” he said.
Vamos is a board member of the Sanctuary for Independent Media, an independent arts space near RPI, but off of its campus. The center invited Bilal to install his video art there, and he did so Monday afternoon, attracting a supportive crowd inside and College Republicans marching outside, holding signs that accused the exhibit of supporting terrorism.
The Republican leader in the county legislature is now calling for the show to be shut down.
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
I agree, John. It’s also good to hear about art that makes a point so often left out of the great American media-scape: our adventure in Iraq has increased, rather than lessened, the chance of terrorist blowback, and the sheer number of potential terrorists.
I wonder if the exhibit also challenges the very definition of terrorism. It’s a term used by the strong to castigate the defensive efforts of the weak—and rarely the opposite.
The American killing hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and the Israeli killing of thousands of Palestinians isn’t normally labeled “terrorism.” But in fact, that’s what it is.
millie wink, ass prof, at 11:10 am EDT on March 11, 2008
And meanwhile, thanks to a game machine near you, how many characters are shot down per minute? And the life of fictional Bush is worth more than these fictional others how? Nonsense.
smart ass prof, at 5:35 am EDT on March 12, 2008
This is too sureal! I wonder if these free thinkers would be so open minded if some crazy rightwing exremest put on an exhibit of artwork displaying a gun to the head of each faculty member of his college in protest of the academic jihad that he feels has infultrated American education. “Collect them all". It sure would scare me! There is this ideal that should be upheld in all disciplines, even when protesting, and it’s called civility. But the anarchist agenda that this young man seems to embrace would have no room for civility.
And anyone who compares the act of removing such sickening rotgut from a public place to the Stalanist regime are embarassingly ignorant of world history. Perhaps they would do well to educate themselves by reading the works of Alexander Solzhenitsyn as well as the biography of this courageous man by D.M. Thomas.
Denise, at 1:55 pm EDT on March 13, 2008
Threats or inciting others to terrorist acts against our president should be investigated regardless of the medium. Where is the secret service? These people are supporting terrorism plain and simple.
Karin C, at 8:20 am EDT on March 20, 2008
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Georgia Gwinnett College, the 35th member of the University System of Georgia, is a premier 21st century four-year liberal ... see job
The Department of Dramatic Art at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill invites applications and nominations for a ... see job
FIT Where Creativity Gets Down to Business see job
The Savannah College of Art and Design is seeking candidates for full-time faculty positions in contemporary art history. ... see job
Founded in 1848, Rhodes College is a highly selective, private, residential college, located in Memphis, TN. Rhodes offers an ... see job
Gustavus Adolphus College invites nominations and applications for a one-year position of Visiting Assistant Professor in ... see job
Willamette University is seeking an experienced and creative Jazz performer to join the Music Department team as an Asst. ... see job
Art + Art History The University of Texas at Arlington POSITION: Assistant Professor, Tenure Track, 2D Design and Digital ... see job
Posting Description: Notice of Vacancy Associate Director of Choirs The College of Music at the University ... see job
Drama: Technical Director (Non-tenure-track) see job
Artistic Freedom Matters
People are free to protest art they don’t like, but it should never be banned. A few years ago, postage stamp art showing gun next to the head of Bush was banned at the University of Wisconsin at Green Bay and investigated by the secret service (see http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=15112)It’s time to bring some sense here, and to recognize that displaying work by supporters of Al Qaeda is not material aid to terrorism, and that showing fiction about killing the president is not a death threat.
John K. Wilson, collegefreedom.org, at 9:00 am EDT on March 11, 2008