Search News


Browse Archives

News

Quick Takes: Anti-Science Bias Seen in Political Science Textbook, How Yale Was Duped, Business Officers Back Cell Phone Tax Reform, Double Dipping in Florida, House Panel to Consider Loan Legislation

April 9, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement
  • A New Jersey high school student has prompted a major publisher to remove some passages and consider revisions in a textbook used for Advanced Placement government courses and in many introductory colleges in political science, the Associated Press reported. Matthew LeClair noticed statements questioning global warming and implying that climate change -- now accepted by a wide consensus of researchers -- is not reality. The textbook in question is Houghton Mifflin's American Government, by James Q. Wilson and John J. Dilulio Jr., both prominent conservative scholars. The scholars did not respond to inquiries, but the AP reported that the publisher said it had removed some passages and was studying others. The College Board is also reviewing the appropriateness of the text for use in AP courses. LeClair shared his concerns with the Center for Inquiry, a nonprofit group that is critical of religious efforts to restrict science and that center has issued a highly critical report on the textbook. LeClair and others are also questioning the book's statements about separation of church and state.
  • A former student at Yale University is facing charges that he used a fake transcript to earn admission and thus defrauded the university to collect $47,000 in financial aid. An article in The Hartford Courant details how the former student went through an entire year at Yale without being detected. His story apparently fell apart when his then-boyfriend learned his real age (26, not the 21 he was telling people) and then found other details that weren't consistent in his stories about himself. As their relationship ended, the then-ex-boyfriend reported that the fake student threatened to kill himself and the ex reported receiving a threat, at which point he turned to a Yale professor and the police were informed. The story was first reported by The Yale Daily News.
  • The National Association of College and University Business Officers is backing legislation that would end requirements that colleges and other employers keep detailed records on the cell phones and Blackberrys and similar services that they give to employees to show any non-work use of the devices. While a college need not track the use of a college land line for periodic personal use, tax law has never caught up to newer technologies, creating a significant record-keeping burden. NACUBO's president, John Walda, has written to Congress backing legislation that would change the law. "We strongly support this legislation to bring a decades-old policy on cell phone usage in line with today's work environment," Walda wrote.
  • More than 475 employees of Florida's public colleges have "retired" but returned to the payroll, while also collecting retirement benefits, The St. Petersburg Times reported. The news comes at a time that Florida higher education is bracing for major budget cuts.
  • The U.S. House of Representatives education committee will meet today to vote on legislation, unveiled last week but formally introduced Tuesday, aimed at ensuring that students continue to have access to the federal financial aid they need to go to college despite the credit crunch now affecting student loan providers and the broader financial markets.
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Quick Takes: Anti-Science Bias Seen in Political Science Textbook, How Yale Was Duped, Business Officers Back Cell Phone Tax Reform, Double Dipping in Florida, House Panel to Consider Loan Legislation

  • dereliction of duty at Houghton Mifflin?
  • Posted by Peter on April 9, 2008 at 9:30am EDT
  • Where were Houghton Mifflin editors when this slanted textbook was being prepared for publication?

  • Rehiring "retired" profesors in Florida
  • Posted by Jim on April 9, 2008 at 10:30am EDT
  • I'm afraid I don't see what the concern is. Nearly all states have reemployment provisions for retired public university faculty. This is a good thing.

    A pension is based on prior service, so "double-dipping" isn't an issue. Reemployment agreements benefit both a retiree and their institution. I hope academic leaders in Florida strongly support the practice and not allow the state's small-minded politicians (of which there are an abundance) to spin it inaccurately.

  • Anti-Science Bias
  • Posted by Dave on April 9, 2008 at 11:30am EDT
  • "Tolerance" is a term used all too liberally, until those who embrace it are confronted with conservative, main-sream, Christian values. Then, it seems, that INtolerance is the status quo.

    Why the harsh action to the authors presenting both sides of the argument? Is it fear?

    If publishers begin to respond to the opinions of high school students on topics they most likely have "researched" through the liberal media, we might as well have each individual teach themselves what they "feel" most comfortable knowing. Then they won't have to deal with the bad feelings they get reading about historical events such as the Holocaust, WWII, or 9/11.

  • Anti-Science Bias?
  • Posted by Assistant Professor on April 9, 2008 at 1:25pm EDT
  • I'm confused. Being a scientist myself, I fully expected that the controversial passages in the text would actually be -against- science; i.e. those passages would speak against using data to support hypotheses, or against the methodology of scientific study.

    Having passages detailing issues with "Global warming" is not "anti-science". Regardless of what the media tends to portray, anthropogenic global warming is not as universally accepted as say, gravity or Einstein's relativity. There are still competing studies and dissenting opinions.

    That's the nature of science. It is "anti-science" to declare global warming (or indeed any physical process) as sacrosanct and un-falsifable. It is not "anti-science" to say that there are dissenting opinions, or to describe that dissent.

    Dissent is patriotic, right? That's what I learned from professional protestors!

  • Double Dipping in Florida
  • Posted by John B. on April 9, 2008 at 2:05pm EDT
  • The K12 system in Florida routinely rehires experienced retired teachers. They put in so many years to earn their pension, then they are rehired and can earn a second pension if they stay on long enough.

  • Posted by JBM on April 9, 2008 at 3:25pm EDT
  • "It is not “anti-science” to say that there are dissenting opinions, or to describe that dissent."

    Science both supporting and questioning belief in global warming is completely beside the point. Ironically, the cause has been so thoroughly politicized and equated with virtue that it has become an article of faith. Dissent takes on the aspect of heresy and must be purged to safeguard right-thinking people.

    None of this has anything to do with science, which, as you correctly state, supports dissenting views.

  • "Bias" is in the headline
  • Posted by Rod Bell , Adjunct Professor at College of DuPage on April 9, 2008 at 6:05pm EDT
  • If you're interested in the "anti-science bias" charge, follow the link in the article to the CFI site, which lets you read a PDF version of their criticism of the textbook--and their demand that the publisher withdraw or "correct" it. From that document, one gathers that the text authors used global warming as an example of "entrepreneurial politics," a much-studied phenomenon in political science. CFI, which is itself an example of political entrepreneurialism, takes umbrage at any remark that fails to live up to their high standards for the (i.e., their) truth. The authors even disparage the text for "not understanding" the Supreme Court, as though we should accept their authority over James Q. Wilson, a professor at Harvard for over 20 years, a professor emeritus at UCLA, and a professor at Pepperdine (aha! Probably a conservative!). How did they get there from an "anti-science" bias? By acting pretty much the way the textbook authors say that political entrepreneurs typically act: Making overblown charges from an ideological stance, hoping to draw others into, and on their side of, a controversy of their own making. The textbook authors reportedly didn't respond to CFI, but Inside Higher Ed and Houghton Mifflin did, so I guess it's a small win for the folks who make their livings being CFI.

  • More Florida Double Dipping
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project on April 10, 2008 at 5:15am EDT
  • The DROP program has allowed retired state employees to return to their former jobs, while collecting retirement benefits in addition to their new salary.

    Hordes of DROP retirees are now clogging the hiring pipeline, wasting precious time, while the hiring and training of new hires is at a standstill.

    The DROP program was (I believe) put in place to entice irreplaceable "talent" to come back after retirement, but here's where corruption plays a role: Not all the new retired re-hires were advertised publically, as they were required to by law. This particular aspect of the corruption of public officials is worthy of a full investigation.

    Worse yet, Florida lawmakers were well aware of the double-dipping taht was aided and abetted by complicit school boards and trustees, but did nothing to prevent it.

    This has been going on for about ten years, maybe longer.

  • What double dipping?
  • Posted by AYY on April 10, 2008 at 5:15am EDT
  • I agree with Jim. What's the problem?

    There's a lot of innuendo in the article that's cited but not much substance.
    I don't pretend to know how Florida's pension system works but where' I'm at you put your money into the pension fund, the employer contributes to it (as part of what would otherwise be available for wages), the money earns a return on the investment, and you get your pension out of that. It usually takes years before you get your own money (plus the return on investment) back.

    Rehiring the employee also benefits the employer if the retirement system rather than the employer pays for the health benefits. So what's the problem?

  • Bias in textbooks
  • Posted by Peter (another one) on April 10, 2008 at 9:30am EDT
  • Before you criticize the publisher, why not ask which school district or which teachers selected the book and question their qualifications to continue their jobs. A publisher only publishes what teachers buy.

  • Teachers over publishers?
  • Posted by Nunn on April 11, 2008 at 5:10am EDT
  • Peter (another one),

    You have obviously never been a K-12 teacher. Teachers don't dictate to publishers. Publishers dictate to districts through slick salesmen and colorful presentations. Your comment is WAY off base.