Search News


Browse Archives

News

Faculty Salaries and Priorities

April 14, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The American Association of University Professors is today reporting an increase in average faculty salaries of 3.8 percent -- the same as last year. But because inflation is up this year to 4.1 percent from 2.5 percent, the association says that this year's increases point to a real decline in faculty standards of living.

The annual data from the AAUP -- which include campus by campus averages for various faculty ranks -- are widely discussed and used by faculty members and administrators to measure institutions' competitiveness in attracting and retaining talent. This year's data show the continued gaps between haves and have-nots in higher education. At 15 research universities this year, the average salary for full professors is more than $150,000 (with Rockefeller University in the lead at $191,200); and the number of institutions where the average salary for associate professors hits six figures is 15 this year, up from 7 a year ago. But at another 16 colleges and universities, the average salary for full professors does not top $50,000.

Gaps are also visible between public and private institutions. The top paying 15 research universities (as well as the top liberal arts institutions) are all private. Of those institutions paying six-figure average salaries to associate professors, only one is a public institution (New Jersey Institute of Technology). And the AAUP study does not include part-time professors, who tend to be paid significantly less (even on a pro rated basis) than full-time professors, and who tend to receive far fewer benefits. The full AAUP report on salaries as well as tables showing individual figures for various colleges will be available today on the AAUP Web site.

While the accuracy of the figures for individual institutions and categories by rank are widely praised as definitive, questions are being raised this year about the way the AAUP has calculated the overall increase in average salary. That is because the AAUP has reported increases for every subcategory into which it groups faculty salary data that are higher than the total increase.

Here are the data, as provided by the AAUP:

Average Salary and Percentage Increase by Rank, 2007-8

Category Average Salary 1-Year % Increase Number of Faculty
Full professor $103,521 +4.30% 113,040
Associate professor $73,275 +4.12% 94,243
Assistant professor $61,359 +4.06% 96,439
Instructor $44,382 +3.93% 22,466
Lecturer $50,215 +4.35% 21,468
Unranked full-time $56,811 +10.01% 5,319
All $76,216 +3.84 352,975

The original totals released by the AAUP to reporters did not include the subcategories of lecturers or unranked full-time faculty member (generally a group found at community colleges) and Inside Higher Ed asked the AAUP for those figures separately, assuming that their average increases would be less than the 3.84 percent average given for all groups. But the figures provided show that those two groups' average salaries went up by more than the total given, and that those two groups are not a large share of the total AAUP pool.

Some others who have looked at the data believe that the apparent inconsistency -- that all the subgroups in the total have a higher percentage change than the total -- reflects a statistical problem created because the AAUP does not use weighting. The AAUP simply calculates its averages by adding up all of the salary dollars (per category and total) and dividing by the number of faculty members -- basic averages. The problem may be that the pool changes each year -- there are not the same number of full professors or unranked full timers in the pool from year to year, so a pure comparison may overstate or understate the average change from the previous year, some believe.

The American Council on Education took the base numbers provided by the AAUP, along with the data on the number of people covered by the figures last year and this year, and applied such a weighting so the same share of people in different job categories would be compared. When the ACE ran those numbers with weighting, it found an average increase of at least 4.1 percent, not 3.8 percent.

Terry W. Hartle, senior vice president for government and public affairs at the council, called the AAUP's analysis "a curious result that stems from a flawed methodology." While the 0.3 percent difference between the weighted and non-weighted averages may be small, he noted that "it changes the entire analysis" of the AAUP that faculty salaries are falling behind inflation.

Hartle said that he has great respect for the AAUP's work collecting this data each year, and that presidents rely on it as "an important source of information." He also said that his concerns focus only on the way the AAUP calculates totals that cross faculty ranks, so that he is not raising questions about the accuracy of the individual campus figures or the calculations within ranks. "But it's important that this study be 100 percent accurate," he said.

Saranna Thornton, an economist at Hampden-Syndey College and chair of the AAUP's Committee on the Economic Status of the Profession, said that Hartle's criticism was "a legitimate research question." She said that because of the way the academic job market is changing these days, it may be more appropriate to consider medians rather than averages in the future. But she also said that every labor market changes, so that the numbers the AAUP released were valid in that they showed the average salaries in each of two years.

Further, she noted that even with the ACE analysis, faculty members are keeping even with inflation, not beating it, so this does not negate the association's point about the purchasing power of faculty paychecks.

Thornton said that the real issue is one of priorities. Professors are earning modest raises, while colleges and universities pay ever increasing sums to presidents and coaches. To drive home that point, the AAUP released figures on the ratio of salaries of presidents to full professors at various types of institutions.

Ratio of Presidential Salaries to Full Professors' Salaries, 2007-8

Category Median Minimum Maximum
Doctoral - public 3.49 1.91 6.24
Doctoral - private 3.49 2.55 6.00
Master's - public 2.83 1.84 4.60
Master's - private 3.13 1.26 7.62
Baccalaureate - public 2.52 1.47 4.28
Baccalaureate - private 3.18 1.16 8.56
Public community colleges with ranks 2.49 1.46 5.05

Gaps between public and private professors continue to grow, especially at the doctoral level. Last year's survey found that the average salary for a full professor at an independent private institution was $30,194 more than the equivalent at a public institution. This year, the gap grew to $34,687. For assistant professors at doctoral institutions, the gap grew from 12,0924 to $13,421.

Average Salary by Rank and Sector, 2007-8

Category Public Private, Independent Church-Related
Doctoral      
--Full professor $109,569 $144,256 $124,435
--Associate professor $77,033 $92,148 $84,004
--Assistant professor $65,416 $78,840 $71,061
--Instructor $44,116 $55,982 $56,833
--Lecturer $49,079 $59,153 $50,289
Master's      
--Full professor $85,726 $95,171 $86,158
--Associate professor $68,034 $71,931 $67,328
--Assistant professor $57,540 $58,930 $55,845
--Instructor $41,794 $47,459 $45,912
--Lecturer $47,263 $51,311 $47,762
Baccalaureate      
--Full professor $80,408 $94,333 $72,445
--Associate professor $65,431 $69,562 $58,293
--Assistant professor $54,844 $56,621 $49,240
--Instructor $44,349 $45,441 $41,668
--Lecturer $47,699 $56,832 $41,877
Two-Year Colleges With Ranks      
--Full professor $71,910 $59,969 n/a
--Associate professor $58,708 $49,144 n/a
--Assistant professor $51,329 $41,434 n/a
--Instructor $44,174 $40,015 n/a
--Lecturer $48,338 n/a n/a

Top 10 Lists

So which institutions are on top of the salary list this year? A key caveat for all of the top 10 lists is that they do not reflect cost of living. Institutions on the top 10 lists tend to come from expensive areas to live, and the buying power of some salaries at institutions in rural areas may be higher.

The following is the list for research universities, always the most highly compensated category. The top seven institutions are identical in order to last year's list and the new arrival at No. 8, Columbia University, did not participate in the survey last year, and probably would have made the list had it done so.

Top 10 Private Research Universities in Average Salary for Full Professor

University Average Salary
1. Rockefeller University $191,200
2. Harvard University $184,800
3. Stanford University $173,700
4. Princeton University $172,200
5. University of Chicago $170,800
6. Yale University $165,100
7. University of Pennsylvania $163,300
8. Columbia University $162,500
9. New York University $162,400
10. California Institute of Technology $162,200

Among public research universities, there is considerable change this year, with the University of Maryland at Baltimore grabbing the top spot from the New Jersey Institute of Technology. But some of the institutions making the list this year may not be on for long. The University of California, which typically is a major force in this category and last year occupied slots 2, 3, and 10 with its Los Angeles, Berkeley, and San Diego campuses, respectively, did not participate. The AAUP was told that problems with new database software made it impossible to provide the data on time.

Top 10 Public Research Universities in Average Salary for Full Professor

University Average Salary
1. University of Maryland at Baltimore $142,700
2. New Jersey Institute of Technology $139,500
3. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill $138,500
4. University of Michigan $137,000
5. Georgia Institute of Technology $134,700
6. University of Virginia $132,700
7. Rutgers University at Newark $130,600
8. Rutgers University at New Brunswick $130,100
9. Rutgers University at Camden $129,100
10. Cornell University (statutory units) $127,800

Among liberal arts colleges, Wellesley College retained the top spot while -- in a sign it may pay to work at women's colleges -- Barnard moved up two slots to claim second place.

Top 10 Liberal Arts Colleges in Average Salary for Full Professor

College Average Salary
1. Wellesley College $139,100
2. Barnard College $132,000
3. Amherst College $131,700
4. Claremont McKenna College $129,900
5. Pomona College $129,100
6. Harvey Mudd College $128,500
7. Swarthmore College $126,500
8. Williams College $126,400
9. Middlebury College $125,800
10. Wesleyan University $124,500

Many community colleges do not participate in the AAUP survey, but among those that do, the City University of New York and other institutions in the New York area top the list from year to year.

Top 10 Community Colleges in Average Salary for Full Professor

Community College Average Salary
1. Westchester Community College $108,300
2. Queensborough Community College $98,300
3. Hostos Community College $97,900
4. LaGuardia Community College $94,800
5. Miami University at Hamilton $94,500
6. Union County College $94,000
7. Borough of Manhattan Community College $92,900
8. (tie) Bronx Community College $92,000
8. (tie) Kingsborough Community College $92,000
10. Tunxis Community College $85,100

Institutions at Which Average Salary for Associate Professor Is at Least $100,000

Institution Average Salary
1. Stanford University $122,200
2. California Institute of Technology $120,200
3. Babson College $110,100
4. Thomas M. Cooley Law School $108,200
5. (tie) Princeton University $107,500
5. (tie) University of Pennsylvania $107,500
7. Massachusetts Institute of Technology $106,400
8. Claremont Graduate University $106,200
9. Harvard University $106,100
10. New Jersey Institute of Technology $105,300
11. Cornell University (endowed units) $103,400
12. University of Chicago $103,300
13. Duke University $102,500
14. Northwestern University $100,500
15. Dartmouth College $100,000

For the first time, the top average salary for an assistant professor tops $100,000.

Top 10 Universities in Average Salary for Assistant Professor

University Average Salary
1. California Institute of Technology $101,300
2. University of Pennsylvania $95,900
3. Harvard University $95,400
4. Stanford University $94,300
5. Massachusetts Institute of Technology $93,300
6. University of Chicago $90,700
7. Bentley College $90,500
8. Cornell University (endowed units) $89,800
9. Claremont Graduate University $88,500
10. Northwestern University $87,900

While some colleges boast of high salaries, many in higher education work for a fraction of what the big-name institutions pay. At these 16 institutions, the average salary for a full professor is not more than $50,000. Many of these institutions are small, religious colleges.

Institutions Where Average Salary for Full Professor Is $50,000 or Less

Institution Average Salary
1. Saint Paul's College $38,300
2. Union College (Kentucky) $39,200
3. Tabor College $40,400
4. Lackawanna College $41,300
5. Walla Walla University $42,200
6. Kentucky Christian University $43,300
7. Alderson-Broaddus College $44,100
8. Missouri Valley College $44,800
9. Faith Baptist Bible College and Seminary $45,200
10. Ohio Valley University $48,100
11. Rocky Mountain College of Art and Design $48,200
12. Antioch College $48,800
13. St. Andrew's Presbyterian College $49,600
14. Kansas Wesleyan University $49,700
15. Oklahoma Panhandle State University $49,800
16. Missouri State University - West Plains $50,000
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Faculty Salaries and Priorities

  • AAUP's analyses
  • Posted by SeenItAllBefore on April 14, 2008 at 10:55am EDT
  • I'm very glad to see Hartle calling AAUP on one of its analytic flaws. It is but one though. While I appreciate very much having the AAUP data, it is only at the institutional level that it is useful. I almost never appreciate any of their higher-level analyses, esp. not those at the national level. This is strictly an advocacy organization, not an unbiased research organization. Now there is nothing wrong with that. However, AAUP presents its work as (supposedly) the authoritative unbiased source. Anything but! Hartle's notes are but one good example of the ways in which AAUP develops its analyses in order to promote particular advocacy positions: chiefly, the case for ever higher salaries, and damn the consequences. Just take a look back year by year over their annual "Economic State of the Profession" reports. Without a doubt, and with only the occasional one-year exception, when they just can't help but acknowledge that salaries and compensation increased at rates so far above inflation that it cannot possibly be presented otherwise, you get the sense that faculty salaries are falling ever further and further behind national norms, behind inflation, etc. Something along these lines is the endless theme of the AAUP annual reports. And this year's is just one more blatant example. Now, if these trends were actually true, by now, over time, the American professoriate long ago now would have fallen cumulatively into some depths that would have been unequivocally obvious to everyone, and would long have prevented schools from successful faculty recruitment. Again, the reality is anything but!! AAUP has annually cried wolf all but endlessly, in the face of the longer-term economic facts regarding the realities of faculty salaries and compensation. Another truly example of AAUP's egregious analyses is the one about 1.5 years ago of male-female salary differentials, altogether uncontrolled for the things that actually determine salaries, and that explain the raw male-female differentials very well, such as the number of years in rank, for which they just don't have the data, but they don't let that stop them from publishing what they've got anyway, regardless of how misleading it really was. The irony, and the egregious AAUP research practices, is that the AAUP has an extensive manual on how to conduct gender equity studies in faculty salaries. It notes well how variable such as years in rank absolutely must be taken properly into account. And yet, they themselves were perfectly comfortable publishing extensive data that purported to expose patterns of serious gender dis-equity in faculty salary structure without having taken into account the effects they themselves instruct individual schools to include.

  • Who are the Haves and Have Nots?
  • Posted by P.D. Lesko , Executive Editor at Adjunct Advocate magazine on April 14, 2008 at 11:50am EDT
  • Reports such one are used (and misused) by those outside of higher education to paint college faculty as under-employed, over-paid, navel-gazers, who don't give a fig about undergraduate instruction. That so much is made of the "slipping" compensation of the minority of college faculty, who teach a minority of the nation's 16,000,000 college students, it's rather easy to take the data and use them to paint unflattering portraits of tenure-line faculty.

    That the AAUP's salary survey (once again) excludes part-time faculty is a sin of omission that I only hope God can find it in her heart to forgive them for; I certainly have never understood why AAUP researchers don't include part-time faculty in the organization's salary survey.

    Finally, before sobbing into our gin and tonics over the stagnating salaries (and salary gaps) of those on the tenure-line, let's remember that colleges reserve for those same faculty incredible perks and very generous benefit packages.

    The perks may include health care, life insurance, disability insurance, free and/or discounted college tuition for themselves and their children at their own schools and/or schools that participate in tuition exchange programs, access to mortgage assistance and home down payment assistance programs financed at attractive rates, and overseen by their employers, free Internet access, free computer equipment, reduced prices for software, free or reduced rate gym and library memberships, office space, free research assistance, rental car discounts, discounts on meals at university facilities, discounted and/or free tickets to university sporting, theater and musical events.

    I hope whomever AAUP members elect this April to serve as president will lead the organization away from funding such myopic studies, and back into the funding of actual representational activities (which would help ameliorate the pay inequities that exist, say, between female and male faculty). Further, I hope AAUP's new president will guide the organization to fund research into pay and benefits that reflects the current make-up of the professorate.