Search News


Browse Archives

News

One Year Later

April 16, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

This week at Virginia Tech, the university honors the 32 students and faculty killed in a campus shooting rampage one year ago today. Among the week's solemn events, Brian Gendron conducted a combination choral and orchestral performance of Brahms's "Ein deutsches Requiem" on the campus Saturday. β€œThe text itself deals with comfort and consolation of the living," said Gendron, director of choral activities at the university. It begins with a biblical verse, "Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted."

Colleges and the country at large are still feeling reverberations from the gunshots on Virginia Tech's campus, the massacre triggering national debates about gun control, mental health care, and campus security. In the past week, several colleges temporarily shut themselves down in the wake of threats to student safety. Coastal Carolina University canceled classes and activities as a precautionary measure Tuesday after a homicide and break-in occurred near campus. Threatening graffiti led to closures at Oakland University, in Michigan, and Malcolm X College and Saint Xavier University, both in Chicago. At Saint Xavier, which is to reopen today, President Judith A. Dwyer had asked all students to leave campus. The specific nature of a threat found last Thursday was of particular concern, she wrote in a campuswide message. The threat said, "Be prepared to die on 4/14."

Just outside Chicago, at Northern Illinois University, a "Huskies for Hokies" candlelight vigil is planned for this evening. Students and officials there are seeking to honor Virginia Tech just as students and staff in Blacksburg offered support after five Northern Illinois students died in a February campus shooting. Other tributes and services will be held today in a variety of settings, from Eureka College, in Illinois, to Wake Forest University, in North Carolina, to a St. Louis Cardinals game.

At more than 70 locations, including 32 college campuses, "lie-ins" are planned to call for tighter U.S. gun laws. Abby Spangler, a cellist who last April launched the grassroots effort -- organized under the domain name, ProtestEasyGuns.com -- recalled Tuesday the first protest. "I e-mailed my friends and asked them to lie down with me in front of City Hall in Alexandria, Va., to represent the 32 faculty and students who were murdered at Virginia Tech. We lay down for three minutes to represent the amount of time it took the Virginia Tech shooter to buy his gun.”

Nationally, The New York Times reports, state lawmakers are considering more measures restricting guns. As the newspaper reports, the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence is tracking 52 bills it has identified as priorities, an increase from 30 two years ago. Yet, so too, the Times reports, are some states considering bills that would expand gun rights, including for college students and faculty.

As one national student organization, the Students for Concealed Carry on Campus (SCCC), argues: "In the wake of recent school shootings, such as the massacre at Virginia Tech, SCCC contends it is now abundantly clear that 'gun free zones' serve to disarm only those law-abiding citizens who might be able to mitigate such tragedies." The group won't be holding any protests this week, saying that today is to be a day of remembrance.

In Blacksburg today there will be art, music, dance, meditation -- even a game of softball played in memory of the victims -- in addition to an official commemoration ceremony this morning and a vigil tonight. John Welch, a junior international studies and French major at Virginia Tech, will spend part of the day off-campus, teaching French to students at Blacksburg's Harding Avenue Elementary School. He is the president of Teach for Madame, formed in honor of Jocelyne Couture-Nowak, a French instructor killed in last year's shootings. Since January, a core group of seven Virginia Tech students have been teaching 50 elementary schoolers beginning French every Wednesday, today no exception.

"It's something I guess to look forward to tomorrow, despite what tomorrow means to everybody," Welch, a former student of Couture-Nowak, said Tuesday. "Where it came from is this idea of how to best serve someone's memory."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on One Year Later

  • the core problem
  • Posted by Clayton E. Cramer on April 16, 2008 at 10:10am EDT
  • When I was young, the idea that someone would go into a school or a shopping mall and intentionally murder complete strangers was shocking. It isn't shocking anymore. What changed?

    Not gun availability. If anything, gun control tightened from 1968 to 2004. What did change between the mid-1960s and today--and which has an obvious connection--is that our society made a conscious decision to destroy the public mental hospital system, starting with the Community Mental Health Centers Act of 1963 (which Ronald Reagan was still just a washed up actor).

    Existing hospitals were emptied. A series of lawsuits by the ACLU made involuntary commitment extraordinarily difficult. People that in 1960 would have been hospitalized because they were mentally ill, and therefore were considered a threat to themselves or others, today are wandering the streets, a large fraction of the homeless population that also blossomed during the 1970s.

    The vast majority of these headline mass murder events had histories of mental illness, recognized as such--but not adequately treated. The Virginia Tech killer. The Northern Illinois University killer. Patrick Purdy, who murdered five children on a playground in Stockton in 1989. Laurie Dann, who shot up an elementary school and provided poisoned baked goods to a college fraternity in the late 1980s. The list goes on and on of people who were recognized as mentally ill, but against whom no action was taken until they killed someone.

    Deinstitutionalization was one of the major mistakes of the 1960s and 1970s. The mentally ill are paying the price for it today, and so is the rest of our society.

  • Gun Free Zones encourage school shooting.
  • Posted by Gun Free Zone School Shootings on April 16, 2008 at 2:15pm EDT
  • I believe that the fact that schools are gunfree zones encourages people to attack students and faculty because they know no one will be armed and able to stop them.
    being from kansas which just passed a concealed carry law and having watched the guns forbiden signs appear in all the local businesses. i fully expect to see the armed robbery and such crime rate to rise since thieves will feel safe in a business which forbids legal carry of concealed firearms on their premises.

  • De-institutionalism the core problem? Really?
  • Posted by Rod Bell , Adjunct Professor at College of DuPage on April 16, 2008 at 3:45pm EDT
  • The Reagan policy of "de-institutionalization" (drastically reducing the incarceration rate of the diagnosed mentally ill) was undertaken, most believe, in order to reduce government spending. But the policy also enjoyed the benefit of a still-lively liberal-left criticism of the policy of incarceration. Think of Ken Kesey's ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOO'S NEST, or R.D. Laing's THE POLITICS OF EXPERIENCE.

    Like the iconic innocent person being put to death by the state, the concept of the different-but-not-crazy person being incarcerated by a system whose authority could not be challenged except through the gatekeepers who constituted that authority was anathema for many.

    Unless a decidedly robust (and currently unknown) method for diagnosing--what, the liklihood? the near-certainty? the possibility?--a proclivity to mass murder is discovered, there would be, shall we say, trade-offs among the benefits of prophylactic institutionalization.

  • Correction of sorts
  • Posted by Rod Bell , Adjunct Professor at College of DuPage on April 16, 2008 at 3:45pm EDT
  • My earlier post rather implied that Clayton Cramer's comment ("the core problem") was blaming de-institutionalization on Reagan, and ignoring the influence of 60s-70s counterculturalism on the phenomenon. That's mainly because I didn't read his post very carefully and just shot from the hip.

    I think he's right. I also think, however, that it would have been--and still would be--a tough time for some people diagnosed as mentally ill, since many of the same folks who rejected virtually all authority in 1970 became all to willing to assert their own world-views as privileged just a few years later--when they had the authority to enforce their views. So, I still think it's a trade-off, but I apologize for my initial misreading.

  • Posted by mtwain at Univ of Md grad on April 18, 2008 at 4:35am EDT
  • Below is an informative press release IMO FYI
    The organization's home page is at:
    http://www.marylandshallissue.org

    "Lie-in" is Easier than Buying a Gun, says Maryland Shall Issue, Inc.
    Libertytown, MD April 16 Today, the Brady Organization will use the anniversary of the violent tragedy at Virginia Tech to further their plans to disarm Americans to make us safer. However, disarming people - slaves and Indians in early America; Jews in Nazi Germany, etc. - has always made them more vulnerable, not safer. The most effective way to minimize such violence, says Maryland Shall Issue, Inc., is to recognize the natural right of people, including adult students, to defend their own lives. Armed citizens can and do intervene more quickly than can police to halt such violence, yet the Brady Organization is anti-self-defense and wants to push for more anti-gun laws. Anti-gun regulations at VT were the problem – they ensured that the law-abiding victims were unarmed and unable to stop the violence. Gun-free zones are killing fields.
    http://johnrlott.tripod.com/op-eds/IBDNIUGunFreeZone022508.html

    More than 10,000 existing laws regulating firearms did not prevent the tragedy at Virginia Tech, and no new restriction on firearms will prevent similar future tragedies. If we could get the criminals and insane to abide by firearms restrictions, why not just get them to follow the laws against murder? Lives could have been saved by allowing the students the tools to defend themselves instead of requiring them to just wait helplessly until armed help could arrive. Students for Concealed Carry ( www.ConcealedCampus.com ) is working to abolish "gun-free zones" in schools. They will be holding an "Empty Holster" protest in colleges and universities across the country during next week - April 21-25.

    No one seriously argues that the police and military can function to protect citizens from violent criminals and enemies without firearms. However, responsible citizens in a democracy also need arms for the very same reasons - to defend themselves, their family, their community and their country. As Patrick Henry said, "If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?” Common sense gun laws for well more than the first 100 years of our great country not only allowed, but REQUIRED citizens to have firearms and ammunition. The right to defend one's life is a natural right - a right our founding fathers said "shall not be infringed." Unfettering this right of the people would return the country to its roots of freedom and responsibility.

    Anyone in Maryland wanting to stage a 'lie-in' to protest easy guns should have to undergo an FBI background check and approval from the Maryland State Police while lying there for 7 days -- the same requirements our law-abiding gun buyers have.

    Contact: Henry Heymering of Maryland Shall Issue, Inc. 240-446-6782