Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Pope's Positive Message

April 18, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

In advance of the pope's visit to the United States, many speculated on what he would have to say to Catholic college presidents, with some wondering (aloud, in the news media) whether he would issue a stern, doctrinal rebuke about maintaining Catholic character.

Anyone who feared a simple papal scolding Thursday would have been relieved. In an intimate and very intellectual address to about 400 Catholic education leaders at Catholic University of America in Washington, Pope Benedict XVI maintained a positive tone, explicitly thanking educators for their service and “selfless contributions” toward the end of a short but dense speech that explored responses to moral relativism, the connections between faith and reason, the concepts of truth and freedom, and, also, of academic freedom (the latter in a paragraph that is likely to be much-parsed but seems, several college presidents in the audience said, to be consistent with the church’s prior teachings.)

“The Church's primary mission of evangelization, in which educational institutions play a crucial role, is consonant with a nation's fundamental aspiration to develop a society truly worthy of the human person's dignity,” the pope said from a chair made of maple wood and against the backdrop of a wall sheathed in yellow gold.

“At times, however, the value of the Church's contribution to the public forum is questioned. It is important therefore to recall that the truths of faith and of reason never contradict one another. The Church's mission, in fact, involves her in humanity's struggle to arrive at truth. In articulating revealed truth she serves all members of society by purifying reason, ensuring that it remains open to the consideration of ultimate truths. Drawing upon divine wisdom, she sheds light on the foundation of human morality and ethics, and reminds all groups in society that it is not praxis that creates truth but truth that should serve as the basis of praxis.”

“Truth,” he continued a little later in his speech, “means more than knowledge: knowing the truth leads us to discover the good. Truth speaks to the individual in his or her the entirety, inviting us to respond with our whole being.”

Pope Benedict emphasized that an institution’s Catholic identity is not only a matter of numbers of Catholic students but also "a question of conviction…. Are we ready to commit our entire self -- intellect and will, mind and heart -- to God?” He described the “crisis of truth” as rooted in a “crisis of faith,” and stressed the importance of Catholic formation -- a message, some said, relevant both to representatives of K-12 and higher education in the audience.

“While we have sought diligently to engage the intellect of our young, perhaps we have neglected the will. Subsequently we observe, with distress, the notion of freedom being distorted. Freedom is not an opting out. It is an opting in -- a participation in Being itself. Hence authentic freedom can never be attained by turning away from God. Such a choice would ultimately disregard the very truth we need in order to understand ourselves.”

The pope also described an urgency for what he called "intellectual charity," or the recognition "that the profound responsibility to lead the young to truth is nothing less than an act of love."

And, as for academic freedom, Pope Benedict, a former professor, reaffirmed its importance -- but also, in very strong terms, its limitations.

“In regard to faculty members at Catholic colleges and universities, I wish to reaffirm the great value of academic freedom. In virtue of this freedom you are called to search for the truth wherever careful analysis of evidence leads you. Yet it is also the case that any appeal to the principle of academic freedom in order to justify positions that contradict the faith and the teaching of the Church would obstruct or even betray the university's identity and mission; a mission at the heart of the Church's munus docendi and not somehow autonomous or independent of it,” the pope said.

“He did say that academic freedom wasn’t free, but we knew that,” said Patricia McGuire, president of Trinity University, in Washington, D.C. “Absolute freedom isn’t absolute,” she said, adding that there are limitations on academic freedom in every discipline, not only Catholic theology, based on disciplinary norms. “I think he reminded us of how the pope approaches academic freedom, which is not a new teaching.”

Over all, McGuire said, “I think he had a fundamental message of encouragement."

“It was a very deep, a very nuanced vision that he has reiterated,” said the Rev. Robert Presutti, president of the University of Sacramento. “What he was trying to do was nurture the spirit.”

The Rev. Terence Henry, president of Franciscan University of Steubenville, said he was particularly struck by Pope Benedict’s use of the term “conviction” to describe Catholic identity. For the Rev. Jeffrey von Arx, president of Fairfield University, in Connecticut, the phrase that stood out was “intellectual charity” -- “the idea,” Father von Arx said, “that the pursuit of truth has to lead to the pursuit of compassionate love.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Pope's Positive Message

  • Pope
  • Posted by Steve , Parent of college student on April 18, 2008 at 9:40am EDT
  • It’s clear that academic freedom is a very different concept at religious colleges and universities than it is at unaffiliated ones. That’s fair as long as the rules are clear to everyone. I also believe that any research religious university should have soft landings for faculty whose research starts to conflict with the faith.

  • Free to explain, not criticize
  • Posted by Ron George , Technical Writer at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi on April 18, 2008 at 10:30am EDT
  • Benedict's idea of academic freedom for Catholic scholars seems to be that they're free to interpret what they know from the church's standpoint as apologists and critics of other standpoints but not to be critically aware of the church's standpoint. Sounds like a formula for making ideologists of Catholic scholars, which is no idea at all of academic freedom but an admonition to toe the line or get the hell out. The pope's beguiling smile is still owned by Joseph Ratizinger, whose standpoint hasn't changed a bit from his years the enforcer of church doctrine and the bane of Catholic scholars who dared to have thoughts critical of Catholic tradition.

  • Positive Message??
  • Posted by Skeptic on April 18, 2008 at 10:55am EDT
  • What can possibly be viewed as positive about a message that exaults blind faith above rationality?

    "It is important therefore to recall that the truths of faith and of reason never contradict one another." Does that include accepting evolutionary biology? This Pope (unlike his science advisors) has clearly got problems accepting the reason (and mountains of evidence)behind Darwin's big idea.

    I'm sick and tired of the public attention and undue honor paid to religious leaders whose cockamamy, anti-intellectual, double-talk continues to slow our crawl toward enlightenment.

  • thanks
  • Posted by Poor child on April 18, 2008 at 12:30pm EDT
  • great post! thanks very much for sharing. good job!

  • evolution
  • Posted by also skeptic on April 18, 2008 at 12:30pm EDT
  • You would think by Skeptic's comment that the article mentions the pope's anti-evolutionary position. It doesn't. Do we seriously think that evolution is the only issue that concerns people of faith? Do we seriously think that faith is somehow nullified by (mountains of) evidence supporting Darwinian evolution? I know that there are people of faith who accept the scientific data. So you might want to step down from the soapbox . . .

  • Papal Address on Universities
  • Posted by Mario D. Mazzarella on April 18, 2008 at 1:55pm EDT
  • Between 1946 and 1962, from grammar school to my A.B., I went to Catholic schools. Never once did I hear anyone contradict evolution in any way. It was explained as God's way of working in the world.

  • Papal visit to the United States
  • Posted by James Pakala , Library Director at Covenant Theological Seminary on April 18, 2008 at 6:55pm EDT
  • I'm not Roman Catholic but I've been pleased by what Benedict XVI has been saying during his visit. I'm saddened that some people were outraged that he met privately (and previously unannounced) with victims of clergy sexual abuse. Would hoards of reporters, onlookers and protesters, not to mention endless media preoccupation, really have been good for anyone?

  • Posted by Not Surprised on April 19, 2008 at 11:50am EDT
  • Some of these comments remind me of an old saying, “For every 100 people that don’t like the Catholic Church, 99 don’t know what the Church teaches.” Granted I am not an expert theologian however I have had 18 years of formal Catholic Education with nearly two decades of employment at a Catholic Institution of Higher Learning. With that being said, I somehow manage to remain faithful. Pope Benendict’s comments were not strong enough because most Catholic Colleges have lost their way. He needed to address the intellectual self gratification that is rampant at Catholic Colleges. The Church has not required an unreasonable expectation of Catholic Institution; teach what the official church teaches, test it, question it but at least present it accurately. If the Church is so wrong why are so many in higher Ed afraid to share accurately what the churches teaching and prove it otherwise? In other words, present all teachings in its best light and then let the students follow their path to the truth.

    Perhaps, if more faculty and administrators could get out of their classroom and offices and look at the reality of the adolescents experience they may get a better idea the kind of crisis these young people are in. Many college students have lost any comprehension of what love is, they lack experiences with actual satisfaction that comes with genuinely achieved pleasure, they do know play, they lack the ability to form human one on one relationship without the use of electronic assistance and hope is found in the here and now. The young people no longer find splendor in a simple kiss or holding a hand; they have multiple partners and endure the risk of two dozen STD’s. Life is disposable and so is the experience. They take prescription drugs to wake up, to sleep, to smile and to laugh. They cut themselves, starve themselves, panic themselves, they have friends with benefits and find reverence for almost everything but their fellow human being. The ideology of life given to them in the past three or four decades is not making for a better world for them. They need what hope the Church has to offer.

    Granted not every student struggles with debilitating condition but more than should, considering much that has been given to them. I do see hope in those that have a deep faithfulness unfortunately not supported in their Catholic classrooms or hallways. A matter of fact they are not tolerated by some pedagogy and either minimized or restricted from having a voice. Theycontinue to endure because they are experiencing authentic joy. Unfortunately, almost every other voice is welcomed in Catholic Higher Education these days but the voice of the Church.

  • Extremes
  • Posted by kgotthardt on April 21, 2008 at 8:15am EDT
  • Whoa! Not Surprised, you are pretty surprising yourself. Do you judge your students so harshly? Are all your students Catholic? My understanding is one need not be Catholic to attend a Catholic institution.

    Conversely, Skeptic, why so bitter? You seem to represent the extreme opposite of the spectrum. There are Catholics and non-Catholics who manage to be somewhere in-between. I'm wondering about your perspective.

  • Posted by Not Surprising on April 21, 2008 at 1:20pm EDT
  • Thank you, my desire was to send a harsh message but not be offensive. If it was offensive to anyone I am sorry. At Catholic Insitutions we need to love when it hurts to love which means we need to bring the truths of the Church to the table in a fair and accurate way even if it is contra cultural. In this way young people will have something to choose from. It is in that choice that true freedom exist. Chirst message provides a fullfilling life that is instrinsically statisfy and everyone deserves the choices of knowing it whether their Catholic or not, whether they likely choose it or not.
    The purpose of our Catholic Identity is to bring this light forward. If we do not, what then is our purpose. Higher Education is an enormous undertaking if its purpose is much like the public institution down the street. The Catholic College has failed if students who attend the institution believe they do not need to hear the Catholic message because they are not Catholic. Similarly, a Catholic must expect to hear the Muslim message if they attend a Muslim Universtiy. Catholic Idenity should not be relegated by number of Catholic students but instead by the desire to live out the mission for which the insititution was founded on.

  • Posted by kgotthardt on April 22, 2008 at 8:50am EDT
  • "The Catholic College has failed if students who attend the institution believe they do not need to hear the Catholic message because they are not Catholic." Thanks for the clarification. THAT I understand and agree with. However, aren't there mandatory philosophy or general education courses that cover such a purpose? I know in my Catholic high school, we had religion classes that everyone had to attend. The other courses did not interject beliefs per se.

    As an aside, interestingly enough, our morality class was taught by a very interesting ex-nun.

  • Posted by Not Surprising on April 22, 2008 at 7:05pm EDT
  • Well there should be generals eds that cover this but that is not always the case. When Catholic insitutions have Catholic Gen eds, at times it is almost worse. Some of the most inacurate representation of Church teaching has been in the theological classrooms at Catholic Colleges in United States. Look at who writes the Catholic College Theology textbooks and whether the teaching authority of the Church accepts their work as accurate. You will be sadly disappointed. It is in my opinion that bulk of dissenting theologians have found job security in Catholic Institions throughout this country. One can only wonder, is this where they find the most protection? Who is going to challenge them with "the power of Academic Freedom" that they cloth their teachings with? What 18-19- or 21 year old ( who likely has been formed poorly in Church teachings because the parents were Post Vatican students who learned much about the feelings of the faith and lacked a basic tenets of Church teachings) will question the work of a PHD Theologian on so called "Catholic Teachings." I simply think, present both sides fairly and then let students find their way to truth. They should not be indoctinated into the PHD's desired agenda for Church reform. Even if they would be willing to say, "this is not what the Church teaches", one might be a bit more accepting." Instead many use a self- understanding of Vatican II "reform" to present what the Church is saying according to their agenda. Then there is the endless bashing of the hierarchy.

    More importantly, at Catholic Colleges, Staff outside the classroom, must witness to the message of Christ whether they are Catholic or not (if they choose to work there)so that students can experience the Gospels and the beauty of living out of Christ's message. It is in the witness of the message which will ring true in their hearts which I believe far exceed any lessons taught in the classroom and likely help them discover truth.

  • To Skeptic
  • Posted by Phyllis LeBlanc on April 23, 2008 at 1:15pm EDT
  • Skeptic, your comments are ridiculous and just plain mean. It's no surprise that you do not give your name. Please explain why you disagree with the compatibility of faith and reason. You obviously do not agree with the Pope's point of view.

  • Posted by Leonard Adame , Community College Instructor on April 25, 2008 at 5:20am EDT
  • Benedict giving advice on truth, logic, and academic freedom is something that can’t be accepted as honest discourse. His background is shady. And according to Truthout.org. he was a member of Hitler’s youth groups, and though he had no choice in belonging to that institution, he came away from it with a hatred toward communism, or anything that in his mind would mean one is a leftist, which would indicate anyone who argues cogently against the supremacy of Church dogma. This makes the pope uncomfortable, which is the case with all who proclaim that their voice and doctrines come from God.
    Benedict double-speaks as well, claiming he respects academic freedom—as long as it adheres to approved papal dogma. Truth to this man is what he and the Church says it is. It’s the Church that decides what parishioners should think about freedom and human reproduction and sexuality. Truth to the pope is the equal of intimidation, admonishments stipulating in threatening biblical tones that people can’t inquire on the nature of human beings, the cosmos, and politics and religion unless they do so in a manner pre-approved by Benedict and the Church.
    I grew up a catholic. I sat on pews every Sunday in what seemed, though I couldn’t have articulated this as a young child, a time warp, an eerie span of time during which the priest’s actions blurred and came into ultra-sharp focus intermittently. Time during those early Sunday mornings became a clear molasses, a viscous aura in which normal actions at normal speed left reality during the hour of mass. The grimacing statues, ever the visage of an oozing despair on their faces, never failed to remind that I was born bad, as my mother explained and warned, herself a victim of an even more stringent and damning Catholicism.
    Over the years, the power of that experience at mass had become somewhat diluted, mostly because I’ve tried to ignore the church and its eternal demand that people comply with its dictums and insistence that it alone provides the means of finding one’s spiritual and moral groundings. But whenever a pope pops up in this hemisphere, those times fly at me like bats coming back from gorging on insects. So it is with this pope’s visit.
    Being an academic, I now, because I’m presumptuous enough to think I’ve found wisdom in this life, find the pope’s messages, disguised as profound information. But at best that "wisdom" is sophomoric and at worst propagandistic—not to mention self-serving. I find myself becoming even wearier every time I hear or read his proclamations, encouraged by a critically challenged media that the man has a superior intellect and therefore is one to whom all should listen rapturously and obey.
    The man can become downright lofty at times, saying “The Church’s mission, in fact, involves her in humanity’s struggle to arrive truth....” On its surface, this may seem an ideal thing to say. But clearly his statement serves as camouflage for what he really means: that freedom, academic or otherwise, can be realized only through the filters of Catholicism. Somehow he finds this logical, a pursuit guided by an ancient, anachronistic GPS. Of course those who had other means of spiritual journeys were brutalized, tortured, and BBQ’d ala Joan of Arc. What’s crucially interesting is that in all of the talks I’ve heard and read by our itinerant popes, seldom has been mentioned the dark history of Catholicism.
    All of this to say that Father von Arx’s statement about the Pope’s musings, “that the pursuit of truth has to lead to the pursuit of compassionate love,” rings exponentially hollow. There’s virtually nothing in the Church’s past and present that would justify von Arx’s view. From the crusades, to the Inquisition, to the suppression of Galileo’s works, to Pope Pius XII’s tolerance of Nazism and anti-semitism, to the recent (but not new) revelations that priests have sexually abused children, priests who were then protected by the Church, all clearly make it nearly impossible to accept Benedict’s claims that the Church is about finding God, truth, freedom, a way to makes us all live as brothers and sisters.
    I suggest Pope Benedict read Bishop Spong, a true progressive, a former cleric who does away with Church mendacity and distortions and in fact helps people to discover their humanity, their virtue, spirituality, their inherent goodness and how to let these qualities manifest themselves in all of us.