Search News


Browse Archives

News

'Graduate Education and the Public Good'

April 24, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

At a time when skepticism about higher education and its need for public support edges ever higher, association leaders appear to be settling on a branding strategy of trying to convince people that colleges deserve an increasing share of resources.

Three years ago, the American Council on Education, which represents all of academe, along with other groups kicked off a campaign that framed higher education as not just a private investment but a public good. Last year, a report from the College Board took the same tack, asserting that college graduates are more engaged citizens and make healthier decisions than those who don’t earn a diploma.

The effort to highlight higher education's influence on society continues with "Graduate Education and the Public Good," a report that the Council of Graduate Schools is releasing today in time for a legislative forum at the Library of Congress in Washington. Former students making their case to lawmakers about the need to fund graduate education will certainly echo the report's central argument: While people are "increasingly savvy" about private benefits (largely financial) associated with having a master's degree or doctorate, the public good associated with increased levels of education is "often taken for granted because it may be intangible or difficult to measure."

In its attempt to explain to politicians and the general public the importance of graduate education, CGS is borrowing a page from the playbook of the politicians themselves. As a way of driving home the "public good" message, the group sprinkles throughout the report stories of graduate school alumni who are making contributions to society through their careers, largely in public health or public service. And it lists in another document more than 300 former graduate school students, nominated by member institutions, who are deemed to be accomplished in their fields.

The graduate school group's report notes the government's historical support of graduate education, pointing to the National Defense Education Act of 1958 that supported fellowships for doctoral students.

The call for increasing federal support for graduate education has been sounded elsewhere over the years, perhaps most notably in the National Academies' "Rising Above the Gathering Storm" report, which recommended increased fellowship funding as a way to attract more scholars. CGS has in recent years released two reports that asked the government to respond again to global challenges and highlighted graduate education's role in increasing America's innovation and competitiveness.

"Graduate Education and the Public Good" is the next phase of the council's efforts, the group notes in the report. Evidence presented about how graduate education contributes to society shouldn't surprise anyone in higher education circles.

There's the overall message that top-flight graduates fill the jobs that drive the economy and produce the research that spurs innovation. The report also points to contributions made by former students in the arts.

Then there's the education cycle argument -- that graduate school alumni go on to fill the leadership positions in academe that are important in running the enterprise and training future faculty researchers. Still, the report notes that while the perception is people who receive Ph.D.s mostly stay in higher education, the majority (in 2000, at least) worked outside academe. Authors make specific mention of the contributions made in public health and other high-demand fields.

The report points to research that people with higher degrees are more likely to read newspapers, vote and be civic minded than their counterparts. And it presents the point that people who don't get advanced degrees can benefit indirectly -- top degree earners earn more on balance, bring in tax revenue and rely less on public assistance.

Finally, the report mentions the importance of the foreign graduate students who fill many domestic teaching positions or return to their host countries to serve as diplomats and collaborate with U.S. researchers.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on 'Graduate Education and the Public Good'

  • Total hogwash
  • Posted by Unemployed PhD on April 24, 2008 at 12:15pm EDT
  • What a load of total political hogwash. This is another con job by educrats who want to line their own administrative pockets. There is an enormous oversupply of PhD and EdD programs and graduates, and there has been for a very long time. Such programs should be radically cut back across the country -- most of them serve only to inflate the egos of "university" administrators working at institutions that should be chopped down to undergraduate colleges.

    Attention, Congress: Don't believe a word of what these money-grubbing porkers tell you!

  • Some Hogs Need to Be Washed
  • Posted by Gainfully Employed Ph.D. on April 24, 2008 at 2:20pm EDT
  • I think that the Unemployed PhD (above) might be a little bitter that graduate education did not yield benefits that were expected. Graduate education may be a hog that needs washing, or it may be a golden egg that needs polishing. I guess it depends upon your perspective. Whatever the cost, the benefits of graduate education are hard to dispute. In the context of the CGS report, suggesting that less education would be better is, well, boorish.

  • post-graduate education
  • Posted by Betsy Smith , Adjunct Professor of ESL at Cape Cod Community College on April 24, 2008 at 3:00pm EDT
  • I received two post-graduate degrees in French from Yale in the 1960s and '70s. We were a class of about 30. Several years later, when I went back for a visit, my department had drastically trimmed the number of students because the job market for French Ph.D.s, even those from Yale, the top-ranked graduate school in the country in French, was decreasing every year. I have enormous respect for the academics who realized that it was irresponsible to be churning out Ph.D.s in a climate where there were not enough jobs. I have enormous disgust for academics who keep admitting new Ph.D. students, knowing full well how unlikely the chances are that these students will eventually find a tenure-track position. How does it better society to be creating a permanent and growing underclass of adjunct faculty?

  • Posted by Robert , PhD Student on April 24, 2008 at 8:40pm EDT
  • There are some fields, however, that can certainly employ all of their newly minted PhDs. I'm in economics, and we definitely believe in the labor market clearing.

    I know this doesn't hold in all fields, but look at the bright side for a change.

  • Posted by Earning the PhD on April 25, 2008 at 5:20am EDT
  • I am in the middle of earning my Ph.D. and find it interesting that people would advocate that less education is better? Learning to critically think, research and write are things that serve our public well. Getting the degree isn't only about the job you have afterwards, it's about the skills you develop in the process and how you apply them. I'm not sure how those skills are labeled bad for the public to have in creating a better society, regardless of the field in which someone may work.

  • Posted by prasanna , "would be a" PhD at IIT madras on April 25, 2008 at 6:45am EDT
  • The skills acquired during a higher ed or research program are essentially life skills.it is true regardless of the field of specialisation.People get better trained to think critically and act scientifically to handle problems.higher ed is definitely inevitable for a modern society.