Search News


Browse Archives

News

Forestry: No Longer Evergreen?

April 30, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

In a state like Washington that's filled with forests and has long been synonymous with forestry, it's easy to imagine that students would line up to get their degrees in the high-demand field. But Washington State University's program, the only accredited undergraduate one of its kind in the state, has roughly 20 students who are majors, down from about 50 a decade ago.

Soon, it could face extinction, as the dean of Washington State's College of Agriculture, Human and Natural Resource Sciences recently recommended phasing out the undergraduate major in forestry. The university has gone through years of tight budgets, and academic heads across the university have been asked to evaluate their programs -- and in some cases make cuts.

Keith Blatner, chair of natural resource sciences, said nothing is definitive. He said it appears likely that even if the major gets axed, the university will continue to offer some forestry-related courses that count toward other degrees, and support some aspects of forestry research.

Blatner said he appreciates the university's interest in focusing more on research and graduate education, while also keeping in mind its mission as a land grant institution. He's urging university leaders to take a long view of the situation, as he said programs like his often go up and down in popularity.

"It's important to have an accredited program in the state," Blatner said. "I'm concerned with what will happen to students otherwise."

Of particular concern to Blatner are the community college transfer students who he estimates represent more than half of forestry majors at Washington State. Those students count on such a program to be geographically near them, and would face higher out-of-state fees were the program to no longer exist. The University of Washington offers a four-year program in forestry with a fifth year option to pursue a master's degree. The master's program is accredited by the Society of American Foresters, but the undergraduate program is not.

Blatner and Hal Salwasser, dean of Oregon State University's College of Forestry, said they both have noticed other natural resources disciplines across the country facing similar enrollment problems. Oregon State's program, which offers various courses of study relating to forest resources, has bucked that trend over the last five years, having grown 30 percent to roughly 600 undergraduates, according to Salwasser.

Blatner said low enrollments at many institutions could partly be a product of the increasing urbanization of students who aren't interested in a quintessentially non-urban field.

It's also a matter of perception. Students wanting a "green" field of study might view forestry as helping business raise trees to chop, for instance. Both Blatner and Salwasser said that shows a misunderstanding of the field.

"People often times say, 'You're a forester. You must be a park ranger or a logger," Blatner said. "Those are unfortunate connotations -- we're resource managers and forest managers."

Salwasser said the job market for forestry graduates is generally booming. He expects mass retirements from an aging workforce over the next five to 10 years, with "an inadequate number of students in the pipeline to meet the workforce needs." Those jobs, Salwasser added, require an understanding of technology and communication that students get from such forestry programs.

Blatner agreed that jobs are plentiful for his graduates, who often work in state agencies or as forestry consultants. In previous decades, though, there was a backlog of forestry graduates who weren't getting the plum jobs out of college, Blatner added. He fears that counselors are still advising students that their job prospects aren't great in the field.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Forestry: No Longer Evergreen?

  • Forestry: No Longer Evergreen?
  • Posted by Alan Ek , Head, Department of Forest Resources at University of Minnesota on May 1, 2008 at 10:45am EDT
  • "The issue may appear to be one of demand, but it is common to many discovery programs, i.e., smaller programs that students typically "discover" once they get to a large University. The real problem may be failure by large institutions to support their component programs and associated stakeholders with appropriate marketing and recruiting resources. Instead, there is a trend to centralized marketing of the institution itself and a focus on overall numbers of applicants rather than specific majors. In fact, many discovery majors (e.g., forestry and agriculture) have important and strong job markets, but few resources to market themselves to students. Thus while decisions on program retention are seemingly based on careful analysis, they are often, in reality, the result of long term neglect by the institution. Surprisingly, few academic administrators and faculty are experienced in marketing and recruiting."

  • what about urban forestry?
  • Posted by Stacey Ray on May 1, 2008 at 11:45am EDT
  • Yes, traditional forestry programs often see cyclical enrollments, but what about urban forestry? Urban Forestry is a new, emerging field with skilled graduates needed all over the country.
    UW just eliminated their undergrad degree in UF to focus on traditional forestry, but Wazzu should look to the future...urban areas are going to continue to grow in WA. Urban Foresters are needed statewide to ensure our urban areas have trees, making them safe, desireable, clean, healthy places to live far into the future.
    I'm in the field of urban forestry, and can attest to the lack of qualified candidates out there to apply for jobs becoming available in this new field. In the next 10-20 years, most if not all cities in WA will have an urban forester or municipal arborist on staff. It's the future of forestry, and both UW and Wazzu should be more inclined to offer students an academic program that prepares them for this emerging, "green-collar" job field.

  • Posted by Earl Emerson on May 6, 2008 at 5:45pm EDT
  • Forestry jobs still aren't plentiful and show no sign of becoming so. This is just a continuation of the same old tired rhetoric by school administarators to recruit students and justify their jobs. Try asking someone on the street what it's like and not some bureaucrat.

  • Jobs are plentiful, but you need to have right skill set
  • Posted by Carl Yee, PhD , Forest Consultant on May 7, 2008 at 5:25am EDT
  • I am afraid Mr. Emerson must be looking behind the wrong trees if he can't find a forestry job.

    My experience is that with the decline in grads and the increase in regulatory burdens in forestry, finding qualified people who are bright,have a good head on their shoulders, energetic, have a good work ethic and are comfortable and safe in the woods is a combination that is harder and harder to find.

    However, going to work for a government agency is not where the greatest number and opportunities exist for a new forester. Try consulting and industrial forestry organizations; that is where the jobs are today.

    Also, you need to be willing to move and not keep looking for the job you plan to retire in 30 years from now. We use to call that the "Bass Lake Syndrome" whenI was in school.