Search News


Browse Archives

News

Solution to Financial Woes: More Classes?

May 7, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

To relieve some of the financial strain at Kean University, administrators are turning to the tried and true: working overtime.

Facing a potential 17- to 24-percent tuition increase this year amid increasing budgetary pressures, officials at the public college in New Jersey are floating several proposals that would all in some way expand the number of classes taught and increase instructional time. In the most discussed plan, the university would move from an academic week in which most classes are taught Monday through Thursday to a six-day week, including Saturdays.

Moving away from its current schedule, in which Friday is saved mainly for special classes and studios, would place Kean on par with many peer institutions. California State University at Northridge, also primarily a commuter campus with many students who work full time, added Saturday classes about a decade ago to accommodate varying schedules. But some professors at Kean are wary of the potential changes, which the president and Board of Trustees must approve for spring 2009, when they’re slated to take effect.

Colleges in other states have pursued a similar path, but New Jersey’s public institutions have lagged. Now, facing a tightening state budget forecast, they too are being forced to consider longer academic weeks and other measures in an attempt to use the facilities they have -- and already pay to sustain seven days a week -- more efficiently.

The university estimates that on Fridays, for instance, only 13 percent of general-purpose classrooms are being used at any given time. To increase classroom utilization, one of the proposals includes an incentive plan that would discount 20 percent of tuition for a course taken on Friday afternoons and Saturdays. More classes would also be held in the morning, and an expanded week could make way for more sessions -- for example, holding class three times a week instead of two.

By flattening the schedule, the university says it could attract more students, get those enrolled out the door more quickly and add flexibility for those who work on the side. The change would effectively make the campus more accessible to different kinds of students, and according to university projections, it could keep the tuition increase to single digits. Under the current proposed state budget, the university would face $4.5 million in cuts.

“It’s simply not sustainable to maintain the current business model. This isn’t a one-time quick fix. We’re taking a very proactive, long-term approach,” said a Kean spokesman, Stephen J. Hudik.

Part of that approach would require hiring new professors, who -- at least at the outset -- would largely be adjuncts, according to Kenneth Sanders, Kean’s associate provost for academic affairs. The plan wouldn’t necessarily burden current professors with additional teaching hours -- at least for now -- since the faculty are bound by contractual obligations through the campus union.

Still, there has been an outcry among some professors. Many faculty members have been wary of speaking on the record, a pattern common to a university that’s seen its share of scrutiny of its campus climate and commitment to openness. Some have suggested that counter-proposals are in the works, and Sanders acknowledged that the response has been “mixed.” Critics say that students and faculty were never consulted during the process.

“It’s a cultural change,” Sanders said. “It’s not totally unusual in the life of a university to alter scheduling,” but at Kean, he added, he was unaware of any major shift in the past 25 to 30 years.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Solution to Financial Woes: More Classes?

  • OMG!
  • Posted by Buzz on May 7, 2008 at 7:05am EDT
  • Isn't this a violation of academic freedom? A gross violation involving unprofessional and inappropriate application of neo-heteronormative behaviorial response in lieu of pseudo-Democrat control techniques?

  • Posted by durango on May 7, 2008 at 8:25am EDT
  • Back in the '50's, Saturday classes were the norm at many colleges in the North East. Does anyone else remember that?

  • The End of Civilization As We know It
  • Posted by Judge Dee on May 7, 2008 at 10:05am EDT
  • The U of Oklahoma used to have MWF/TThSa schedule for all courses.

    But, of course, this would interfere with the all important keg party that begins Thursday night and lasts until the wee hours of Monday morning.

  • Posted by Greg on May 7, 2008 at 11:20am EDT
  • I don't see these colleges as having a lot of non-trads. They might want to check with their local CC's to see what their students are doing. Ours fill up T-Th classes first. Then M-W, and then M-W-F almost by default. Saturday classes do well, but they are one day. I too attended UNL in early sixties when classes were offered MWF and then THS.

  • Class Schedule Change
  • Posted by Janet Hubbs , Asst./President/Inst. Quality at Ocean County College on May 7, 2008 at 11:55am EDT
  • Ocean County College (NJ) moved from a 5-day/week (M-W-F and T-Th) to a 6-day week (M-Th, T-F, and W-S--using the latter judiciously)--last fall (FA 2007). The transition was seamless and in spite of dire predictions and laments, we have had no complaints and a 7.3 percent enrollment increase. Our facilities utilization is vastly improved. What was seen as an administrative "plot" is now simply "business as ususal."

  • Posted by stick up for the students! on May 10, 2008 at 11:25pm EDT
  • If the Kean administration raises tuition between 17-24 percent as they are saying they would have to, then Kean will lose its state funding. It's an empty threat to silence the students. Students, by the way, who schedule their classes for 3 days/week so they can work enough to be able to afford to go to school! Students who, with reduced hours available for work plus an extra gas-guzzling commute, will no longer be able to afford Kean even with a smaller tuition increase.

  • It's still Potemkin University
  • Posted by 22years@Kean on May 12, 2008 at 5:20am EDT
  • Your 11/22/05 piece on Kean (Potemkin University) was so accurate it took my breath away. This article is a complete reversal -- a disheartening press release from the Administration.

    The new schedule is presented as a way to increase revenues, but it is a continued reflection of the desire to humiliate the faculty. As Scott Jaschik said in 2005: “The president is feared and disliked by many on the campus. Professors, administrators and students say he belittles them and many report that he has personally insulted them and their colleagues.” This is even more accurate today.

    The proposed rules for the application of the new schedule clearly show the president’s intentions. Below, some highlights:

    • No two-day schedule exception for dept chairs, or authorized sick leave.
    • Three-day only for those with authorized released time for research.
    • Teaching distribution to AM, PM, EV similar to offerings of department.
    • No more than two back-to-back sessions.
    • Double sessions only in last two periods of evenings, Friday PM & Saturdays.


    • Multi-section courses must be offered in each time block starting
    AM – 7am -12:15 pm
    PM – 12:30 pm -4 pm
    EV – 4:15 pm -10 pm
    Weekend – Friday after 4 pm & any time slot on Sat & Sun.
    • Full-time faculty must teach one course in each time block, each semester unless no courses are offered by a program in a time block.

    --------

    This last bullet shows especially clearly the need to control the faculty. How can anyone pursue a research agenda with a four-course load spread out over each one of these four time blocks? How will this increase our revenues?

  • Kean Schedule
  • Posted by Kean faculty at Kean on May 13, 2008 at 6:55pm EDT
  • Saturday classes are not a new idea at Kean. A search of Fall offerings, for instance, turns up fifteen counselor ed courses offered on Saturday in F08. But Saturday classes are a small and unimportant part of the scheduling proposals. (We now have two sets of proposals, the second one more drastic than the first.) If faculty believed that these ideas would be of help to students, we would learn to live with them. But the students have made the loudest protests. The proposed changes would force them to make more trips to campus for the same amount of instruction.There is not even a pretense that these changes are intended to make life easier for students - their apparent purpose is to make life harder for a faculty that is finding our president more and more difficult to deal with.