Quick Takes: House Passes Veterans' Aid Bill, AAUP Opposes Loyalty Oath Dismissals, Fired Toledo Official Defends Views, Perkins Shortfalls Predicted, Chicago Boost for Econ, Diane Jones Explains
The House of Representatives voted 256-166 Thursday to support a major expansion of education benefits provided to veterans who have served since 9/11. The measure now moves to the Senate. While support is strong in both houses -- and includes some Republicans -- the Bush administration has backed more modest changes, and the House measure does not have a veto-proof majority.
The American Association of University Professors has issued a statement opposing the dismissals of people who do not sign loyalty oaths that are still required of some public employees. While many see the oaths as "a harmless remnant of a dark period in American history," the statement notes that two Quaker instructors at the California State University System recently lost positions because of their refusal to sign. "Affirmative oaths are not likely to fade away any time soon, but refusal to sign the oath should not, in and of itself, be a justifiable reason for not appointing a faculty member or for terminating an appointment," says the statement.
Crystal Dixon has kept quiet as she was suspended and then fired by the University of Toledo, where she had the top human resources position, for a column she wrote questioning whether gay people suffer denial of their civil rights. On Wednesday, however, she defended herself in public, saying that she had a "divine mandate" to challenge homosexuality, WTOL 11 News reported. She said she could have continued to work at the university, which bars bias against gay people. "To say that I cannot have a personal opinion regarding the practice of some humans, and not be effective in my job as a human resources leader is preposterous," Dixon said.
Almost 30 percent of colleges expect shortfalls in their Federal Perkins Loan Funds this year, according to a survey being released today by the National Association of College and University Business Officers and the Coalition of Higher Education Assistance Organizations. An additional 18 percent are not sure if they will have a shortfall.
The University of Chicago, long known for the strength of its economics department, plans to invest $200 million to create a new research institute, to be named for the late Milton Friedman, who was on the faculty. Plans call for the institute to start ramping up this fall.
Diane Auer Jones, assistant secretary for postsecondary education at the U.S. Education Department, said in an interview Thursday that the opportunity to head the Washington Campus was too good to pass up, even though it will require her to leave her prominent federal post just nine months after taking it. Jones will become CEO and president of the group, a consortium of 16 business schools that work to educate graduate students and corporate executives about government decision making. The job is the perfect intersection of Jones's background in government, academe and business, she said, and although the opportunity came at an "imperfect" time, it was too good to pass up, she said. Jones insisted, though, that it was a logical time for transition at the Education Department, given that the department has completed two rounds of negotiated rule making and will be starting a new one as soon as Congress passes the Higher Education Act. Jones said she was confident the Education Department could find someone strong to fill the job for the last eight months of the Bush administration.
Comments on
Quick Takes: House Passes Veterans' Aid Bill, AAUP Opposes Loyalty Oath Dismissals, Fired Toledo Official Defends Views, Perkins Shortfalls Predicted, Chicago Boost for Econ, Diane Jones Explains
Toledo Firing Decision
Posted
by JIm
on May 16, 2008 at 9:50am EDT
Crystal Dixon's views on homosexuality may be unenlightened, as I believe they are, but the University of Toledo has no legitimate grounds for firing her because of them. On the surface, it would appear that the university had no problems with her job performance until after she wrote her column. If her work was satisfactory, then her personal beliefs are immaterial. In my opinion, Crystal Dixon has a slam-dunk legal grievance against the university, which should have known better. My prediction is that Toledo is going to end up paying her big bucks for its mistake.
Ms Dixon
Posted
by Eric
on May 16, 2008 at 11:10am EDT
If Ms Dixon's views and "G-d given mandate" allow her to refuse to hire or to protect those clauses in the employment contracts of the queer employees, then I would say that the University was correct in letting her go. If the school has a policy of non-discrimination based on sexual-orientation or gender-identity and she is flatly opposed (with her own jihad against it), then it stands to reason that she might not be hiring or might even be campaigning against hiring the best people for the job simply because they fall under the queer category. She says that queers can become straight but that black cannot become white ; Michael Jackson has proven otherwise. If she wants to have her ethnicity protected, then she should support the queer candidates ; if not, then she should be allowed to lose her job for not choosing to become white.
Thank you AAUP
Posted
by QuakerProf
on May 16, 2008 at 1:50pm EDT
Thank you to Jonathan Knight and the AAUP for their statement on the issue of loyalty oaths. While these oaths do not affect Quakers, Bretheren, and Mennonites (the peace churches) alone, members of our denominations have been perhaps most public in their struggles against the oath requirements.
I applaud the AAUP for taking a stand on this important issue related to religious, but also academic, freedom, and I hope Wendy Gonaver's legal action leads to a reconsideration of these leftovers of the McCarthy era.
Toledo
Posted
by Dan
, HR Administrator, Large midwest research university
on May 16, 2008 at 3:25pm EDT
Jim: No, Toledo won't pay "big bucks for its mistake". It made no mistakes.
Ms. Dixon's conduct irreparably harms her ability to do carry out her duties, it violates the professional ethics of the HR profession, and it violates the core values of the University of Toledo.
This isn't even a close call. Off-duty conduct is not insulated from proper discipline when it impacts an employee's inability to do his or her job.
This is another message referencing "the big bucks" and "Toledo's mistake". With all due respect, this really makes you sound like you agree with Ms. Dixon's views despite your statement that they are "unenlightened".
Agreeing with Ms. Dixon's views (which I find to be homophobic, bigoted, and without any place in an institution of higher education) doesn't magically transform them into protected speech.
She was wrong. She was fired. University of Toledo was correct.
And there will be no "big bucks" for a mistake that was never made.
Evidence, please?
Posted
by Jack Olson
on May 16, 2008 at 4:15pm EDT
What evidence is there that Crystal Dixon has discriminated against homosexual people in the course of her work? If there is, that would be grounds for termination because it is against university policy. If there is not, then she wasn't fired for misconduct, she was fired for thoughtcrime.
If she sues the university for wrongful dismissal, they will have to present convincing evidence of misconduct on the job. It's put up or shut up and pay up. I predict they'll settle out of court with a non-disclosure agreement so they don't have to admit having done the wrong they're shelling out for.
Dixon still doesn't get it
Posted
by Amy
, graduate student
on May 16, 2008 at 6:40pm EDT
A “divine mandate”? Insert any other protected class in place of the work "homosexuality" and see how that sounds. Really, how would anyone know if she had discriminated against and GLBQT job candidates? How would I, a gay person (and former HR manager), stand a chance at getting hired with someone with those personal beliefs at the helm? Yes, she is entitled to her beliefs as anyone is entitled to be a racist or anti-Semite. Just don't expect applause and protection when you are outed for those beliefs.
"Divine mandate" vs. University "mission"
Posted
by John Martin
, Assistant Professor
at Louisiana Tech University
on May 18, 2008 at 9:15pm EDT
Ms. Dixon's right to free speech only insures her right to publicly share her views, however hateful. It doesn't entitle her to keep a job that requires (yes, requires) her to treat every potential employee fairly and without bias, under the law. Declaring a "divine mandate" to oppose homosexuality is essentially saying that she answers to a higher law, and thus can't be held accountable by the university for acting on her beliefs. They don't have to prove that she has actually done so, only that she's expressed a clear willingness to pursue her mission over her professional responsibilities. Her attitude being already publicly expressed, she can't with any credibility tell gay or lesbian employees that she's going to treat them fairly or show them the proper respect. Trust has been broken, and trust is essential to a human resources position.
If you go to a doctor for birth control pills and they refuse to prescribe them because of religious beliefs, they're violating basic doctor-patient trust, and any hospital would be justified in firing them. Do they lose their medical license, or their abilit to get a job at a more sympathetic hospital? No. But their current employer doesn't owe them "tolerance" of their ideas when it affects the mission of the institution. The same analogy can be applied to the university's decision. Her personal mission is in direct conflict with that of the school, and they have a right to part ways with her.