Search News


Browse Archives

News

Professional Development for Adjuncts

May 28, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Colleges increasingly rely on non-tenure-track instructors for teaching -- especially remedial courses. Some colleges are reporting previously unheard of success in helping students move out of remedial programs into college-level work. Professional development programs to share the latest teaching techniques tend to be designed in ways that effectively exclude part timers, who can't be expected to be on campus at odd hours, without pay, when they need to teach elsewhere to make a living. What's wrong with this picture?

At Valencia Community College, in Florida, officials decided that system made no sense. At a presentation Tuesday at the National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development, Valencia officials promoted their approach as a way to provide more support -- and more money -- to those on the front lines of remedial instruction. NISOD, part of the Community College Leadership Program of the University of Texas at Austin, is one of the largest gatherings of community college leaders -- and the Valencia presentation built on the idea, much discussed in sessions at the meeting, of the need to collect data and act accordingly to improve teaching and learning.

While adjuncts at Valencia could not be reached to get their view of the program, many are voting with their feet to participate -- and several faculty development experts at other community colleges who were at the NISOD session said that efforts they had tried that lacked the features of Valencia's efforts had fallen apart, with many adjuncts criticizing them.

Two key features are present in the Valencia program that are lacking in many others: flexibility and pay. The former is important because of adjuncts' schedules. While Valencia has some professional development programs in person, every program is offered in in-person and online formats, so all are available to people on their own schedules. As to the latter, when adjuncts have completed 60 hours of professional development, their pay per credit hour goes up by $33. As a result, the greatest gains go to those who teach multiple courses, as many do at the college. The pay increase is for three years, and can be renewed if the adjuncts complete another 60 hours. Those who finish 60 hours are also given a new title, "associate faculty." (Nellis said that he would like to see the financial incentive at double its current level, but is happy to have what he has, given budget constraints.)

In less than three years, about 20 percent of adjuncts at Valencia have earned that title and the pay increase, and many more are in the process of doing so.

"We depend on part-time teachers," said Patrick A. Nellis, director of faculty development at Valencia. "Faculty development brings them into the culture of the college."

Valencia is a participant in Achieving the Dream, a national program to use data to improve community colleges, and Nellis walked the audience through the data that led to the faculty development program. The college worried about gaps in the educational attainment of its white and minority students. For many students, failing remedial math ends their college careers. While 43 percent of sections at Valencia over all are taught by adjuncts, about 80 percent of remedial math sections are taught by part timers. (In conversations after the session, some in the audience said that the most surprising thing about Valencia's numbers was that 20 percent of remedial math courses are taught by those on the tenure track; at many campuses, all of those sections would go to adjuncts.)

To improve retention, especially of minority students, Nellis said, "the battleground is developmental math." Since Nellis said it would be unreasonable to expect adjuncts to attend sessions on teaching at set hours or without compensation, the system he outlined was developed. Some in the audience expressed doubts about getting administrative support for policies that would increase adjunct pay, but Nellis noted that the Valencia plan creates the greatest incentives to participate and offers the greatest financial rewards to those who teach multiple courses a semester. Finance officials liked that approach, and Nellis said it ended up amounting to more money than the token stipends some colleges give for participation in professional development.

Nellis also noted that the system Valencia created puts pressure on him to produce more modules of professional development. Since the instructors must renew their professional development status, Nellis said it would be wrong to have them take the same courses over again. The offerings cover topics such as teaching diverse students, teaching online, changing the way group work is used (Nellis said that group work is indeed a valuable teaching tool, but ideas are changing on how to use it), as well as subject-specific material on math. The instructors were also surveyed to help develop programs, and were asked, for example, to identify the concepts that were the most difficult to teach in mathematics.

While the program is too young to be able to point to results in student learning, Nellis said that surveys are conducted of adjuncts on whether and how they change their teaching styles after participation. Among the changes reported by many instructors: more attention to the different learning styles of different students, more use of writing assignments to teach mathematics, and more use of attitude surveys to find out what math anxieties or misconceptions students have, so they can be addressed. Nellis said Valencia educators hope some combination of those or other ideas will help more students, and then spread to more instructors.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Professional Development for Adjuncts

  • Right on Track
  • Posted by PSFoster on May 28, 2008 at 10:55am EDT
  • This program is right on track. Those who work at community colleges know that many of the adjuncts are specialists in their field, but not really trained in teaching. Community colleges attract students with such a wide variety of backgrounds, issues, educational levels, that it is difficult for many instructors to meet the needs. Therefore it is difficult for many students to be able to succeed. This is a great idea and hopefully will produce data to show it's effectiveness. It would seem that at the very least it would help instructors reach more students, and help more students to succeed. Good job!

  • Posted by Betsy Price at UTB on May 28, 2008 at 10:55am EDT
  • Congratulations to Valencia! There are 600,000 adjuncts teaching each semester with a 25% turn over each semester. Most adjuncts teach lower level courses that have the most at risk students. How can we not say we have lots to do in this area?

    Adjuncts have a large commitment to teaching, they certainly aren't there for the money, prestige, or fame of the position!

    As college educators we need to do more to give this excellent group of faculty the same teaching support that we provide our full time professors.

    Betsy

  • Faculty Teaching Freshmen: Common Ground
  • Posted by Cheryl Spector on May 28, 2008 at 1:30pm EDT
  • Congratulations on your creative approach to addressing the challenges we face in our classrooms, and in particular on your successful bid to provide financial incentives for participating faculty.

    At Cal State Northridge, we offer faculty development programs designed for faculty teaching freshmen (for example, "Help! My Freshmen Are Out of Control!" and "Scaffolding Freshmen without a Hanging"). The pedagogical issues shared by anyone faced with a class full of freshmen establish common ground for faculty across the disciplines, regardless of whether the faculty are tenure-track.

    All faculty flourish when given the opportunity to exchange best practices and engage in reflective dialogue about their efforts. But the financial rewards your program offers for adjuncts make good sense, given the fact that tenure and promotion are not likely outcomes.

  • Remediation?
  • Posted by Fred Flener , Retired at Northeastern Illinois University on May 28, 2008 at 1:30pm EDT
  • I wonder what miracle training we can give someone to make them that much better at remediating students who have not succeeded earlier. I started training teachers of mathematics in the early 70's and recall a conversation with an experienced teacher. He said, "These kids don't even know their multiplication tables." He said, "I make sure they know them because I drill it into them." I wondered if this was what their 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grade teachers did without success. Somehow, that model of "drilling" it into them wasn't working. For the rest of my career, I tried to look for some reasons why a 14 year old with a vocabulary of, say, 10,000 words could not retain a half dozen multiplication facts. (It was always a few like 7X8, or 6X9 that they couldn't remember.) If I could give a very simplistic explanation it is, they didn't "understand" much of the math they were asked to memorize.
    Shelia Tobias focused on something called "math anxiety," and her efforts at remediating it were primarily getting the students to "understand" the concepts, and it seemed to work. Essentially, if the 40,000 adjuncts are "professionally developed" what will they be expected to do with their students. If it is the same thing the elementary and high school teachers did, why will we expect it to work any better? The first level of research should be to determine why the students didn't learn in the first place, then we can focus on "remediating."

  • Posted by vlorbik , scholar in exile on May 29, 2008 at 12:00pm EDT
  • well, i've held off ever posting here for a long time since you have to "register". but this is the limit. here are a few paragraphs i wrote several years ago on a related topic. there's more at the blog.

    Let's agree that it's unlikely that a handful of salespeople will be able to teach faculty much in a few hours about skills that they've spent a lifetime of study developing. What is the real purpose of the considerable time spent on faculty development programs?

    This isn't entirely a rhetorical question. I'm frankly mystified by quite a bit of the process. It's clear to me that, to some extent, such programs are tools whereby management controls faculty. Indeed, in my particular case, I believe they played a vital role in management's decision to dispose of me. But all or nearly all of the faculty at any given institution are apt to be far more compliant than I was and pretend to go along with whatever nonsense is presented. My question is: how does the process benefit anybody?

    The part of the answer I understand is that between the official presentations, a considerable amount of useful mingling occurs. We certainly benefit from being brought together out of our classrooms from time to time, and the demands on our time are such that we pretty much have to be forced to do so.

  • Posted by Caridad Sanchez , VP of Academic Affairs at Florida National College on May 29, 2008 at 12:40pm EDT
  • What program or publisher is being used to provide the professional development workshops?

  • Let Them Eat Professional Development
  • Posted by Tina Trent , humanities instructor at a Florida community college on June 10, 2008 at 11:15am EDT
  • What about just paying these adjuncts a real wage based on their performance and labor instead of making them jump through another hoop to gain some shockingly paltry wage bump? $33 a credit hour? Wow, that'll pay for an occasional soda. You can earn more working at Taco Bell.

    And for that matter, who is making money off such "professional development" boondoggles? Administrators, of course, who will arrange for taxpayers to pay any sum of cash for "programming" administered by other administrators, like "professional development," rather than simply paying teachers a living wage to bloody well teach. I'm amazed that anybody falls for this.

  • Don't believe every thing you hear
  • Posted by Fred on June 12, 2008 at 5:10am EDT
  • Dear Editor,

    You've hit the nail on the head when you say “While adjuncts at Valencia could not be reached to get their view of the program, ...”. I wonder why the press could not reach even one adjunct. Either the press did not look or adjuncts were reluctant to speak for a number of reasons. I, an adjunct at Valencia , suggest that it is the latter.

    One reason is that we are too busy driving to our next gig. Oh yeah, sure, I could go online to experience the professional development offered by Valencia but I have no desire to die on the road while preparing for the next class. If you believe in using your time wisely then time is better spent preparing for your students that is who we are trying to encourage and motivate. Isn't it?

    Another reason is how does it transfer to another institution. It does not. So what is Valencia trying to do? Is it to show how good they are with adjuncts?

    Adjuncts value their students and their profession. Unfortunately, Valencia does not. History has shown that speaking out against the poor decisions of Valencia produces unemployment. Even the fortunate full-time faculty are suppressed, and their efforts to make real advances are undermined. The result of this approach to education is low moral. Valencia does not realize that you get the best from people when you let them feel like they are part of the process rather than being run over by it.

    I know how Valencia will deal with the problem of low enrollment of adjuncts. They will require adjuncts to attend professional development classes. Yes, they will look good and even pat themselves on the back but they will have done nothing. I'm sure they will get a really big raise while the people on the front lines of education will simply be ignored. Big deal $33per credit hour. What about health benefits? Perhaps this is the real crime?

    In the first paragraph, you ask “What is wrong with this picture?” The answer is in the first sentence of your article. We have students that have been ill advised to attend college when they should have pursued a vocation. The attitude of Valencia is that they will find this out after Valencia makes a few bucks off of these students. They will end up attending a Vocational School or they just lose interest. Either way they lose time and money. We should be trying to help promote the fruitful paths for our students based on their skill and interest rather than lying to them. What happened to honesty? Let me add that if they show me wrong then good for them.

    My question has to do with who is making money off a program that has a 20% attendance rate for adjuncts at Valencia. Please follow the money.

    I share with you my experience and others but I tell you that I worry about the repercussions from Valencia.

    Sincerely,
    Fred