Search News


Browse Archives

News

Challenging Beliefs on Asian-American Students

June 10, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Three "pervasive and core fictions" undermine the development of education policy with regard to Asian American students, according to a report released Monday by the College Board and a national commission of experts on Asian-American education.

The report suggests that while Asian-American students have achieved notable successes on admissions tests such as the SAT and admission rates at highly selective institutions, only a subset enjoys such accomplishments. Many other students lag, but they are excluded from support programs and the public discussion about diversifying higher education because of the success of others. The panel that prepared the report with the College Board was set up by the Asian/Pacific/American Institute and the Steinhardt Institute for Higher Education Policy, both of New York University.

The three myths countered in “Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders -- Facts, Not Fiction: Setting the Record Straight,” are:

  • Asian Americans are "taking over" American higher education.
  • Asian Americans are concentrated only in selective universities.
  • Asian Americans are "a homogeneous racial group with uniformity in educational and financial attainment, culture, religion and histories."

The report comes at a time that many talented Asian-American high school students -- and the guidance counselors who advise them -- fear that the most competitive institutions are discriminating against them. The report also comes at a time that the success of some Asian Americans is viewed as license to mock them in ways that strike many as insensitive at best and racist at worst.

To challenge various stereotypes, the report cites data showing, for example, that Asian American students enroll in plenty of college programs having nothing to do with math and science. In fact while Asian American enrollments are high in engineering, even there the figures might surprise many observers -- especially those who in their minds combine students from Asian countries (who are not Americans) with Asian Americans.

Breakdown of Undergraduate Degrees, 2003

Field Percentage of All Bachelor's Degrees Percentage of Degrees Earned by Asian Americans
Business 33.7% 28.8%
Social sciences and humanities 19.5% 26.1%
Engineering 15.9% 21.8%
Education 17.4% 14.2%
Health sciences 7.3% 3.0%
Biological/life sciences 6.2% 6.2%

Echoing other reports that have noted that much of the academic success attributed to Asian Americans is a result of three or more generations of work in the United States, the new study notes that plenty of Asian American students are landing at community colleges, not in the Ivy League, and that these students are attracted by the same qualities that attract other students: a commitment to helping those less prepared advance in American society and an open door policy.

In fact, during the last decade, Asian American enrollments were up most dramatically at community colleges, even though that is only where a minority of Asian Americans enroll.

Enrollment of Asian Americans by Sector

Sector Enrollment, 2000 % Change in Enrollment, 1990-2000
Private, four-year colleges 101,751 +53.4%
Public, four-year colleges 354,564 +42.2%
Community colleges 363,798 +73.3%
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Challenging Beliefs on Asian-American Students

  • Posted by Jack Selzer on June 10, 2008 at 9:15am EDT
  • Scott,
    Is your own interpretation of the data a bit of what you say most others are wont to doing?
    Your concluding paragraph reads:
    "In fact, during the last decade, Asian American enrollments were up most dramatically at community colleges, even though that is only where a minority of Asian Americans enroll."
    Minority of Asian Americans enroll there? Come on!!!!
    And the table shows that

    Enrollment of Asian Americans by Sector

    Enrollment, 2000
    % Change in Enrollment, 1990-2000

    Private, four-year colleges 101,751 +53.4%

    Public, four-year colleges 354,564 +42.2%

    Community colleges 363,798 +73.3%

    Although the enrollment at community colleges went up by a higher percentage than at other institutions, I don't think the number 363,798 would make a "minority" compared to 101,751 and 354,564! Plus, these data are from 1990-2000, as you say, but you are saying it like that is an uncontested truth and is valid today as it always was. This is precisely the kind of "myth" that the report was supposed to challenge! It seems like your unconscious verbal slip since you are usually more reasonable.

  • East Asians, not "Asians"
  • Posted by Thomas on June 10, 2008 at 10:35am EDT
  • This is again setting up a strawman! Everybody knows that "Asian" here does not mean just about anyone from the broad expanse of Asia, but specifically East Asians from the confucianist cultures of China (incl. overseas chinese), Japan and Korea. It is no news that Cambodian, Hmong and Thai-American young people are not "overachievers" but struggle like other immigrant groups. But among Chinese, (I'm married to one, besides knowing many as educator and socially), the relentless pressure to achieve seems part of the culture. Fortunately, as the older generation dies off, the young become more fun, and achieve a happy balance.

  • Which Asians?
  • Posted by Joey on June 10, 2008 at 11:35am EDT
  • I think the previous poster is correct; the stereotypes ("beliefs") in this article seem to refer to East Asian Confucian cultures - but does the data here include all Asian-Americans? (e.g., US citizens with ancestry from, say, India, Pakistan, Turkey?)

  • Name of Report
  • Posted by TRacy Burt , Instructor at CCSF on June 24, 2008 at 2:10pm EDT
  • Hello-

    Thanks for this. I appreciate the comments too. What is the name of the report? Can we download the whole thing to read? Thanks!