Search News


Browse Archives

News

Whose Job Is It?

June 16, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Florida lawmakers have spent the last several months slashing university budgets, and now they’re looking to the state’s community colleges for help filling some of the universities' traditional roles.

A handful of Florida community colleges have been offering accredited bachelor’s degrees for years, but last week Gov. Charlie Crist officially sanctioned a bold and controversial plan that will expand that practice and change the complexion of higher education in the state.

At a ceremony Thursday, Crist signed a bill that establishes a new college system in Florida, where a population boom has outpaced the growth and funding of the university system. For supporters, the creation of the “Florida College System” is a reasonable step toward stimulating degree production at a lower cost to the state and would-be students. Critics, however, call the idea yet another rushed plan (in a state that has a history of college governance on the fly) that threatens the traditional missions of community colleges and creates competition with their university partners.

Linda Serra Hagedorn, professor and chair of educational administration and policy at the University of Florida, says she’s concerned that expanding the missions of community colleges could eventually cause the institutions to drift away from core principles, including open access admissions policies. Hagedorn, who studies community colleges, is also curious about what such an expansion says about the state’s priorities.

“Why is it that we feel that we can fund community colleges to do this, but we can’t fund the universities to do it? That’s another problem that I’m having,” said Hagedorn, whose university is undergoing layoffs and program eliminations after a $47 million budget reduction.

Need for Degrees Not in Dispute

The need to increase the state’s bachelor’s degree production, in one way or another, has been well documented. In early 2007, a consultant hired by state higher education leaders reported that Florida ranked 43rd in the nation for bachelors degrees awarded per 1,000 residents between the ages of 18 and 44. Given projected population growth -- nearly 20 percent by 2014 -- the Pappas Consulting Group suggested that the state consider creating a separate category of institutions that would focus solely on undergraduate education.

The Pappas report suggested that community colleges could be a part of a new state college system that focused purely on awarding undergraduate degrees, but the report also cautioned that such moves had the potential to change the focus of community colleges and dilute their traditional missions.

The report also noted that universities in Florida have increasingly focused on graduate degree production, even amid calls for increased emphasis on undergraduate education. Florida increased bachelor's degree production by 42 percent between 1993 and 2003, according to the Southern Regional Education Board. At the same time, however, Florida's master's degree production went up by 59 percent, and doctorates increased by 56 percent.

Even as community colleges are called upon to do more, leaders of the colleges say they'll stick to their existing missions. Indeed, Florida’s new legislation specifically requires the colleges to maintain remedial class offerings and open access admissions. That said, there’s no doubt change is afoot. The legislation changes the names of the nine colleges participating in a pilot program, dropping the word “community” in a symbolic shift that has caused some uneasiness.

Miami-Dade College, which already offers eight bachelor’s programs, changed its name years ago. Norma Martin Gooden, provost for academic and student affairs at the college, says she’s heard little criticism of the change.

“The community feels that we are part of the community,” she said. “We are responsive to them, no matter what we’re called.”

There is no requirement, however, that community colleges change their names if their degree offerings expand as well. The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools has accredited bachelor’s programs at several colleges, and some have opted to keep “community” in their names.

“Those that kept (their names) seemed to be saying philosophically we’re very closely tied to the local community and we want to keep that community word in our name to convey that philosophy,” said Tom Benberg, chief of staff for SACS’ Commission on Colleges.

Ken Walker, president of Edison College, traditionally a two-year institution in Fort Myers, Fla., said he became an advocate for expanding the college’s degree offerings after years of hearing hard-luck stories from students.

“It started with the students,” he said. “I kept getting comments and questions from our students, saying ‘I really wish I could stay at Edison and get a bachelor’s degree; I can’t afford to go off to a university.’

“Single moms and working parents who are basically place-bound didn’t have a way to go up to a university and pursue a bachelor’s degree, but that has become the ticket to the better paying jobs in this economy.”

Walker laments that universities, which are increasingly competitive, turn away thousands of Florida students each year because of their admissions standards and space limitations. That problem has been exacerbated this year, because universities across the state have frozen enrollments in the face of funding cuts.

Walker says he is aware of concerns about whether community colleges can offer bachelor's degrees of the same quality provided by universities, but he points to the fact that his programs meet the same accreditation standards as their university counterparts. Changing perceptions about quality, however, will take time, he said.

“It’s like anything else. It takes time when you’re making changes, when you’re adapting,” Walker said. “Perceptions change slowly, but it will happen and it will be a good thing.”

Some Blame Low University Funding

Stephen Katsinas, director of the University of Alabama’s Education Policy Center, says there’s a good reason Florida’s demand for degrees now so outweighs its ability to offer them. Universities simply haven’t been funded at the levels necessary to prepare for the long-anticipated population growth that’s taking place in the Sunshine State, he said.

“If Florida had made the investments they should have been making in the late '70s, and especially in the '80s and '90s, they would not be in such dire straits,” said Katsinas, a professor of higher education and former Florida resident.

Supporters of expanding the role of Florida’s community colleges point to savings opportunities. The colleges’ faculty members, who are seldom required to do research, work for less than their university counterparts and carry heavier teaching loads. As a result, community colleges can typically offer tuition that’s about 30 percent lower than a public university in Florida, the St. Petersburg Times reported.

It’s little wonder that state officials are now looking for a cheaper way to educate residents, Katsinas said. Florida’s tax structure, often maligned by higher education leaders and politicians alike, hasn’t rewarded population growth. Furthermore, the aging population has put a strain on resources in Florida, where the state has to match about $1 for every $3 the federal government provides in Medicaid, Katsinas said.

“I do not know how you can separate this [bachelor’s degree] issue from the long-term funding cycles that have negatively affected Florida, where population growth, plus uncontrolled Medicaid cost increases --- over which the state has almost no control -- have lowered the discretionary funds available for public higher education at all levels,” Katsinas said.

Not Opting In

Ken Pruitt, the president of the Florida Senate and a product of Indian River Community College, heralded the legislation creating the college system as “second edition to the G.I. bill.” But some college leaders aren’t quite ready to get on board with the program. The president of Tallahassee Community College, which sits in close proximity to Florida State and Florida A&M Universities, says Tallahassee has no desire to expand its offerings. Ditto for colleges near the University of Central Florida, a fast-growing institution in Orlando with 49,000 students.

When other community colleges in Florida started offering bachelor’s degrees several years ago, UCF officials were quick to ensure that didn’t happen in their own backyard. The university has created a formal consortium with four nearby community colleges. Known as “Direct Connect to UCF,” the partnership ensures that graduates of the participating colleges will be automatically admitted to UCF -- so long as those colleges stay out of the bachelor’s degree business.

“It just makes sense, at least where we are, to collaborate instead of compete,” said David Harrison, vice provost for UCF’s regional campuses.

According to Central Florida's most recent tally, there are 18,000 students who have declared an intention to be in the “direct connect” pipeline. This year, the university had more than 4,000 graduates -- more than half the graduating class -- who had transferred from community colleges.

Florida’s new college system will begin with a pilot program, in which nine of the state’s 28 community colleges will participate. The colleges, most of which already offer bachelor’s degrees, will make recommendations to the Legislature about the approval process for future bachelor’s degrees and a new funding model for the state college system.

In short, Florida has created a task force that will make recommendations for how to put in place a system that has, in essence, already been implemented. Sherman Dorn, an associate professor of education at the University of South Florida, said he’s not surprised to see the state acting first and planning later.

“I’ve been in Florida for 12 years; nothing surprises me,” said Dorn, who heads the university’s faculty union. “No, it’s not rational. Yes, it’s Florida.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Whose Job Is It?

  • Florida's lagging legislature
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project on June 16, 2008 at 8:35am EDT
  • This isn't the first time Florida legislators have found themselves trying to close the barnyard door long after the horses are gone.

    It has been about 5 years since Florida community colleges first began to add four-year programs in teacher education and nursing to their offerings. A complex mix of factors made this possible, including Florida's chronic low rates of turning out four-year degrees, the perceived shortages of public school teachers and nurses, grassroots pressure, and ambitious policymakers and politicians. But the Florida Legislature should have addressed the need for a comprehensive state-wide transition policy before now.

    And although Dr. James Wattenbarger, the chief architect of Florida's community college system, was deeply opposed to the move, it does make sense from a resource management perspective: teaching degrees are about 1/20 as expensive as chemistry and engineering degrees for the state to produce. But as we see it, the problem is with lax quality control and poor program oversight. All too frequently, it seems, the hiring of community college instructors is determined more by what church they go to, or who their friends are, than their academic preparation.

    The concern is that they will allow a continuation of previous policy which applies statewide to 2 yr programs:

    http://fccj.edu/campuses/mccs/instruction/leadership/iaffairs/iac_minutes/4_10_06/wdarmstrong.pdf

    None of this is addressed by Florida's new legislation. In fact, rather than determine what the foundational or minimal standards should be before the adoption of new four-year programs at community colleges, the lagging Florida legislature is only now setting up a community college-dominated task force to make recommendations regarding the "criteria for establishing" the "Florida state colleges."

    Predictably, the State University System is wary of these changes, and there may be some resistance to accepting the new Bachelor in Applied Science (BAS) degrees for graduate study. Adding to the confusion is the lack of clear direction from the state's accrediting agency, especially in regard to faculty qualifications, where ongoing problems with dual enrollment have yet to be resolved. They should be worrying about more than what names to give the new institutions.

    The Florida legislature finds itself in a rear-guard action: having already granted privileges to certain community colleges, the politicians must now forge some kind of a consensus regarding program quality that will satisfy SUS.

    But if the problems with Florida's dual enrollment is any indication, this effort to bridge the accountability gap will also fail, and the gap continue to widen. The lesson seems to be the longer the legislature waits before acting, the more futile their efforts become.

  • Community Colleges lead reform
  • Posted by Pamela Kerouac , State Systems Manager at College Board CLEP on June 16, 2008 at 11:20am EDT
  • This straightforward approach is in response to our state’s economic vulnerability. I hope this effort is encouraged and not over- thought or complicated with the persistent cacophony of cries about who deserves the “rightful” portion of the state’s funding. This is another example of how community colleges are blazing new trails for higher education reform and highlighting the strength of the action agenda for community colleges nationwide. We should acknowledge the Florida College System’s commitment to transform higher education; emphasizing access, success, and a culture of evidence. It is important to read the bill and the clear intent, in order to understand this new vision.
    As the bill reads, Section 5, 1004.875, Florida Statutes, creates the State College Pilot Project.--
    (1) The Legislature finds that it is in the best interest of the state to provide the residents of the state affordable access to baccalaureate degree programs that are designed to meet regional and statewide employment needs.
    It is so refreshing to see the state send a strong signal spelling out the support for CCs, who have always been capable of serving all students and responding to the urgent workforce need to "grow our own".

    As for the concerns expressed in the article, I encourage those who want to know the full intent of the bill to read it, as the following excerpt clearly states:
    a. Maintain as the institution's primary mission responsibility for responding to community needs for postsecondary academic education and career degree education as prescribed in s. 1004.65(6).

    b. Maintain an open-door admissions policy for associate-level degree programs and workforce education programs.

    c. Continue to provide outreach to underserved populations.

    d. Continue to provide remedial education.

    e. Comply with all provisions of the statewide articulation agreement that relate to 2-year and 4-year public degree-granting institutions as adopted by the State Board of Education pursuant to s. 1007.23.

  • Zwerling's Law predicted this
  • Posted by Glen S. McGhee , Dir., at FHEAP on June 16, 2008 at 11:55am EDT
  • Regarding Kerouac's remarks, there is a larger context that needs to be addressed, since these changes to Florida's community college system were predicted by Zwerling's law more than thirty years ago.

    Zwerling's law (1976) states that "... As the rate of enrollment-increase in any educational system becomes geometric, a second vocational education track emerges."

    The new statutory language makes clear its job-relatedness intent.

    Likewise, its non-competitive nature.
    According to David Labaree, "the [new] expansion schools [such as the land grant "Agricultural & Mechanical" colleges] were generally assigned to play a more practical-vocational function than those that preceeded them. The new type of college, while drawing off the increasing enrollments, was not supposed to provide direct competition with existing colleges for their traditional constituency. This meant not only creating new colleges but also making sure that they were functionally differentiated from the old ones" as their graduates were channeled into "positions in a stratified job structure" (Labaree, 210).

    As examples, Labaree uses the land grant colleges, and the state teachers colleges. We can now add Florida's junior and community colleges to this list.

    It is, however, well-known that the practical-vocational intentions behind the creation of these institutions were soon suppressed and superceded by subsequent "mission drift" -- institutional advancement beyond the initial parameters, in the direction of greater competitiveness and higher institutional status, or, as Labaree notes, "... the emergence of a new hierarchy of higher education based less on the practical-liberal arts distinction and more on the differentiated exchange value of the university credentials" (212).

    This is another reason, I think, to be wary of the new four-year programs at community colleges already grappling with quality control problems. The combination of "political pressure for wider access and consumer pressure for a kind of credential that would enhance the chances for social mobility" make the community colleges especially vulnerable, since they occupy the bottom rung of the status hierarchy in higher ed (Labaree, 212-213).

    This addition of four-year programs to the community colleges indicates that two-year colleges are certainly NOT immune to these kinds of pressures, and there is no reason to expect the underlying pressures that caused these transformations to disappear once the process has been completed.

    Judging from the past history of the life-cycle of institutional development for land grant colleges, state normal schools, and the state teachers colleges, it can be safely predicted that this morphing process will continue moving forward with the addition of more and more four-year programs until the "state colleges" become indistinguishable from the public universities. Although this historical process of institutional stratification is well under way, it is has been largely unrecognized; now that it has been set in motion, it is quite beyond the power of the legislature and the accreditors to control it, or even guide it. The same thing has already happened with dual enrollment.

    This should sound the alarm for those concerned about maintaining quality in higher education, and given the less than impressive record of the community colleges, and the lack of concern by their accreditor, this does not bode well for the future.

    (Zwerling's Law Cited by David Labaree, 1997, Note 67 on Steve Zwerling, Second Best, 1976, page 61.)

  • Expand role of community colleges?
  • Posted by Keith Wheelock , Professor at Raritan Valley Community College on June 16, 2008 at 1:50pm EDT
  • I am entering my 17th year as professor at Raritan Valley Community College. During this period RVCC has greatly extended its offerings to community residents. This includes in computer technology, nursing, science, other work-oriented technical courses, and learning opportunities for mature residents.

    RVCC also has entered into agreements where several colleges can offer courses on RVVC's campuses provide bachelor degrees.

    I am concerned by suggestions that community colleges become four-year institutions. The core mission of community college is to provide programs for students on the first rung of high education. In this, RVCC's survey courses provide a more vigorous and supportive learning experience than what is available at many of New Jersey's four-year institutions.

    The strengths of a community college differ from those expected at four-year institutions. Community college focus is on teaching rather than specialized research. Also, community colleges draw on a broader array of part-time specialized teachers than is the case at four-year institutions.

    My concern is that efforts to create a four-year instiution out of existing community colleges could have a tectonic impact on the faculty and student body cadres that currently focus on the core community college mission: to draw on a diverse population and to provide them quality survey courses that permit qualified students, after modest cost and flexible scheduling, to then go on to four-year institutions.

    Any effort to diminish this core mission would seem a disservice to the broad community which, through community colleges, represents nearly half of all students at New Jersey public higher education institutions.

    Keith Wheelock

  • Posted by c.c. teacher in Flori-duh on June 16, 2008 at 3:25pm EDT
  • This change is necessary in Florida. We need to remember that the original mission of community colleges, before all of the reaching downward began, was simply to provide access to education. In particular, Florida's mission under Lawton Chiles was to provide access to higher education within 50 miles of every Florida resident. Now, "open admissions" acts to serve many students who are unmotivated and underprepared, a job better suited for a technical school. With the name "college" anywhere in the name, it would be beneficial to treat it as such--a college that requires SOMETHING in the way of standards.

  • Posted by Old Timer on June 17, 2008 at 5:05am EDT
  • With a perspective of only 12 years, Dorn can be excused for not knowing that many of the existing universities (UCF, UNF, UWF, FIU, FAU) were created in the 1960s to satisfy pretty much the same need - to provide undergraduate degree programs close to where a growing population lived, usually in conjunction with a community college (such as Miami-Dade in the case of FIU). If he did know this, he would realize just how irrationally rational this idea is. After all, FGCU was added as recently as the late 1990s to continue this process, but converting a community college is cheaper than starting from scratch.

  • Posted by sk on June 17, 2008 at 9:10am EDT
  • Old timer needs a new pair of glasses.
    Dorn was bemoaning the poor planning of lawmakers, allowing changes and then legislating after the fact. It is, as he says, irrational.

  • Posted by Anna L on June 17, 2008 at 7:45pm EDT
  • Much of what constitutes education could be taught on the WEB. Students should be allowed to skip at least two years of college by proving proficiency (by passing tests) in basic factual subjects including American History, basic math, English grammar,a foreign language, factual chemistry, physics and biology. Practicum in speech (English as well as a foreign language), science, would need to provided for a finite period of time.
    There are open universities on the WEB in England, which could serve as models. Details regarding how subjects would be taught would need to be worked out as would the qualifying exams. Many core subjects in college require much more memorization than participation, and I feel one does students a favor when one allows them to learn at their own pace. (Turn off the class, take a break and then come back; replay the class as needed. No problem with students falling asleep in class.) Under such circumstances, students could also study with the best teachers.

    The cost of incorporating this sort of education would be minimal, which may be exactly why this type of proposal is usually rejected.

    What a pity, it's about the degree and not the education.

  • Posted by Rafael H. on June 18, 2008 at 6:25am EDT
  • Um, Anna L, two things might surprise you:

    1. The Worldwide Web is often called the Web. That's not an acronym. Spelling it in all caps undermines your credibility (think "pipes").

    2. You are correct that students can learn via the Web; they've been doing in in Florida for years. Many community college students complete their bachelor's degrees online at state universities. In fact the Open University in Great Britain influenced some of the methods used here. There are even master's degrees online in Florida. It's not for everyone and every subject, but it has its strengths. Students can and do learn at their own pace (within the constraints of the semester system) and examinations are proctored for security.

    Two things also stand out in your comments:

    1. A class is an interactive social event that sometimes includes prepared presentations. It's not a movie that you can start and stop, any more than you could a cocktail party. If a course is that static and one-way, even face-to-face learning is not going to be very robust.

    2. Cost is a complex issue. Computer-based courseware (which is only *part* of a course) is hugely expensive to develop, and even less slick course development costs time and resources. You can recoup costs over time, but it's not a matter of -- again -- filming a lecture and replaying it for ten years.

  • Florida - You get what you vote for
  • Posted by Robert Pedersen , Independent Scholar on July 8, 2008 at 1:35pm EDT
  • Why is anyone surprised that Florida has chosen to alter the mission of some of its former community colleges? Such changes have been made for decades, largely in response to an unwillingness of legislatures to pay the cost of a traditional baccalaureate program at a conventional college and local desire to have a "real" college in town. The first was Detroit Junior College, which became Wayne State University in the early 1920s. Then there was Union College in New Jersey, whose history is so complex that there isn't space to describe it. At least one of the tribal colleges, initially established as community colleges, has become a university. In Texas, at least 4 community colleges were reorganized as state universities in the 1950s, causing great consternation among the era's community college leaders. I was personally involved in gaining the right of the University of West Virginia's Parkersburg campus to grant a limited number of baccalaureate degrees, which was followed by an entirely local decision to convert Arkansas' Fort Smith Community College into the University of Arkansas at Fort Smith. The bottom line is that what is happening in Florida is nothing new. In its case, a few communities have finally gotten their much desired "real" colleges and the state legislature has saved a few million dollars. It is likely that Georgia will follow suit, and one should expect other sun-belt states, faced with the challenge of meeting their Medicaid costs, the unexpected costs that have resulted from the adoption of "three-strike" laws in high crime states (we shouldn't forget that 1 in 100 Americans is in jail, and the cost is approximately $50K per prisoner), voter refusal to adopt a state income tax, and a steady demographic shift of the population from the rust belt to the sun belt. Today's community college "leaders" need to accept that these changes are nothing new and are the result of forces entirely beyond the control of educators. It is time to stop being "concerned" about the possible loss of open admission policies, an overworked faculty, the gutting of state universities (at which these "leaders" typically work, and so have a personal, not objective interest in these developments). Educators need to become more aggressive in making clear to many voters that it is THEIR children who will see their educational opportunities seriously reduced if not eliminated altogether. We need a generation of college and university leaders of the caliber of Wilson, Butler and Jordan, whose public standing was so great that one became president when he defeated a Republican ticket that included Butler. Politicians have their personal agendae, and attempting to influence them is a waste of time. Rather, we need to go directly to the voters and remind them that their generations had the support of the very generous GI Bill and then the Pell program. We need to teach them (and teaching is what we claim to do) that education is one of the pure goods and deserves full public support. We need to re-read and up-date Garms and, if necessary, guilt those generations that enjoyed the benefit of substantial federal aid into providing today's youth with the same level of opportunity. This won't be easy -- one only has to consider McCain's initial position on the current GI bill for Iraq vets -- but this is more than simply a decision to fund Medicaid and prisons rather than higher education. Politicians hate to hear this, but they have a moral obligation to provide today's youth with the same access to opporunity that they enjoyed. Just ask Newt who paid his way through college. He got his and now wants to change the rules because the students are increasingly either economically marginal or have the wrong racial heritage. This is not a case of "class warfare" as the right wing would dismiss any argument for equity of access to higher education. It is a simple case of inter-generational equity. It is time to take the right wing head on and demand a return to a society built on the value of equity and not a badly-conceived attempt to restore a Darwinian world.