Search News


Browse Archives

News

Campus Battlegrounds for the Fall

June 25, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

With the presidential election officially down to two major party candidates, supporters of Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama are turning their attention to strategies for winning over key constituencies. When it comes to one target group -- students on college campuses -- both campaigns see significant opportunities, but challenging barriers, too.

McCain would seem to have the bigger hill to climb, given Obama's ability to entice and excite young voters, and aides to the Arizona Republican acknowledge that hurdle. But Obama has his own campus problem: keeping disaffected supporters of Sen. Hillary Clinton from bolting to McCain after their bruising primary campaign.

In the weeks Clinton's concession this month, rumors have been buzzing that disappointed supporters of the vanquished Democrat may cross party lines to support McCain -- and in a few instances they have.

In a letter last week to members Students for Hillary at the University of Iowa, the group's co-chairs, Cody Eliff and Nicole Dziuban, expressed their support for the Republican senator from Arizona. The letter cites reasons such as the unfair treatment of Clinton by the media and by the Obama campaign, as well as Obama being "unqualified" to be president. Also in the letter, Eliff says that Obama did not win the nomination, but was handed it by the Democratic National Committee, citing how it handled the results from the Michigan primary.

The letter also suggests that those who don't want to support McCain consider backing Cynthia McKinney, a former U.S. representative from Georgia and the Green Party candidate for president.

The decision was a hard one for Eliff, who says he has always been a Democrat. Eliff said he had considered for a few months what he would do if Clinton were to not get the nomination. "I don't plan to ever change my party affiliation," he said.

Eliff, who acknowledges that he agrees more on the issues with Obama than with McCain, said he has received mixed responses. Staffers for the campus's Obama campaign asked him to rethink his decision -- and "hate mail" has poured in from Obama supporters, he said -- but the leader of the Clinton student group at Grinnell College have offered their support, according to Eliff.

The Iowa situation may be more the exception than the rule. At another Big Ten institution, the University of Michigan, Democrats on campus are coming together; the College Democrats and student groups for Obama and Clinton have merged to form a unified front in support for Obama.

Although the nomination lasted much longer than the Republican process, and at times became contentious, Nathaniel Styer, chair of the College Democrats at Michigan, says he is not worried about the groups coming together. “The students who led the groups came from College Democrats and we're all very close friends,” he said. Tom Duvall, member of the executive board of the College Democrats and chair of Students for Barack Obama at the University of Michigan agreed. He said Clinton and Obama had similar platforms, while McCain's is very different. At the core, he says, they're all Democrats.

Sam Hodge, national political director for the College Democrats of America, says the long nomination process forced the Democrats to campaign and compete in all the caucus and primary contests, giving the party a presence in every state. This will help when it comes to organizing students for the general election, he says.

Jason Evans, public relations director for the College Republicans at the University of Georgia, says he believes that the long and bitter nomination process in his rival party has been divisive, and that some Clinton supporters would get behind McCain because they both have similar moderate agendas.

McCain's Campus Challenges

But he admits that the long race also has made Obama more of a household name because of all the media coverage from the competition. “I think it's kind of a double edged sword,” he says.

More fundamentally, Evans says, Obama has resonated across the country among young people, posing a challenge for Republicans like him trying to get out the youth vote for McCain.

“It's going to be a very difficult fight” in competing with Obama and his appeal to college students, Evans says. He did say he thought McCain had made an effort to mobilize youth and his chapter will do all it can to get students behind McCain. “We're just going to do the best we can with the resources we get from his campaign,” he says.

Patchwork Nation, a project by the Christian Science Monitor, has broken the nation into 11 voting demographics and tracked the ways in which Obama and McCain have gone after them. According to the project, since February 1, Obama made 27 visits to locations that fall under the "Campus and Careers" category, or 11 percent of his visits. McCain has made only two such visits, or 1 percent of his campaign stops, according to the project.

Just as Obama faces potential defectors to Clinton, McCain has his own set of issues about holding onto the conservative voters who should be his. Within the College Republicans at Georgia, Evans says, not all are sold on McCain. Although the group will campaign for the senator because because its policy mandates supporting the party nominee, Evans himself does not plan to vote for the Arizonan, he says. His personal view: McCain is a “complete compromiser,” which blurs the party lines.

Strategies for Winning Over Students

The presidential campaigns plan a mix of traditional and other techniques to reach student voters.

Ethan Eilon, executive director of the College Republican National Committee, says his organization will be sending 60 paid field staff to campuses across the country to recruit and mobilize students for the Republican cause. “It's not too high tech, but it gets the job done,” he says.

The group is also utilizing the Internet to help organize students and Republican student groups across the country. In February of 2008, Eilon says, the committee launched STORM, an online network for students to organize chapters, talk to each other and plan events. So far, STORM has 95,000 users, he says.

The group will be hosting an event in Minneapolis in conjunction with the Republican National Convention and holding a contest that will give away hotel stays for students wanting to attend the convention.

The College Democrats of America will be taking a similar approach. Hodge says his organization will be sending people to targeted precincts in battleground states as well as reaching out to federation and student chapter leaders to get Democrats involved. Phone banking, knocking on doors, and registering voters will all be strategies used to recruit supporters for the Democratic cause. “Wherever college Democrats are at, we're going to have an effort,” he says.

Styer, of the Michigan Democratic group, says that much of his organization's efforts on campus will be dedicated to voter registration until the deadline. “The more students we have registered, the more Democrats we have registered,” especially in a university-dominated town like Ann Arbor.

The group also plans to bring speakers to campus. On Thursdays, “Dems on the Diag” -- the central meeting place on the Michigan campus -- will register voters and pass out literature on the Democratic party. The group also plans to do the same at football games, the center of campus life at the Big Ten university.

Even though two campaigns will battle each other intensely on campuses around the country, they will also cooperate. At Georgia, says Evans, the College Republicans plans to have biweekly voter registration events -- in conjunction with the Democratic student group. Joint registration efforts took place at the end of the last term, Evans says, and were very successful.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Campus Battlegrounds for the Fall

  • I'll take my CR Well Done
  • Posted by Diogenes , Tired Anonymous Administrator at Maine State System on June 25, 2008 at 8:15am EDT
  • The College Republicans in my state lost all credibility when they tried to take over the Student Senates in our state university system (Maine). This after their their failed anti-Muslim "Islamo-Fascist" Day campaign (that even the Bush administration renounced for its unmitigated bigotry. See the link I provided and scroll down to "Under the Radar" just for fun)last fall really cooked their goose. Add to that that many of the CR's protested or walked out of the auditorium when they announced that McCain clinched the nomination at their annual Washington conference, and I doubt you'll find the fanatical zeal of 2004 in their actions. Everyone (and not just faculty and the administrations) here on all 7 Maine campuses are watching them very carefully. Well that's one state. What about the other 49?

  • Campuses intellectually/financially bankrupt
  • Posted by Russ on June 25, 2008 at 8:50am EDT
  • "The College Republicans in my state lost all credibility .."

    Yeah, yeah. And soft-side faculties being 97% to one of two major political parties (guess which one) is a result of objective "truth-seeking." And the world is flat, too.

    And all this data, foretelling of future financial problems due to government over-spending are just B.S. --

    http://perotcharts.com/category/budget-deficit-charts/page/12/

    The public knows when it is being handed a load. Really.

  • Posted by RJS on June 25, 2008 at 10:05am EDT
  • Hey Russ, do you have a source for that 97% figure? I've long been curious about what the numbers for faculty party affiliation actually look like (though for my money it ultimately doesn't matter, since the two parties have never had substantially different policies on any important issue, as we would expect from Big Business Party #1 and Big Business Party #2). Thanks!

  • Data
  • Posted by Russ on June 25, 2008 at 11:00am EDT
  • Gad .. this is so easy .. like taking money from freshmen ..

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121062988605186401.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

    http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjdhZWM1NzFmZWQ4M2RmZWExN2NkOTNmN2FmZTY5MzY=

    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/10/08/politics

  • To RJS
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on June 25, 2008 at 1:35pm EDT
  • Needless to say, Russ’s 97% Democrat, 3% Republican is not correct for American colleges and universities in general – and his URLs certainly do not substantiate his claim. Nevertheless, there is no doubt about the fact that there is a remarkable imbalance between registered (and practicing) Democrats and Republicans in higher education, with the stratified and aggregate numbers varying all over the academic landscape. I have taught in political science departments with more than 80% registered Democrats, and I have taught in business schools with well over 60% of the faculty being registered Republicans and with more than 80% leaning to the right of center (lots of Libertarians there).

    In truth, I think it’s much ado about nothing. As a ranting, left-wing, knee-jerk, bleeding-heart, liberal “Democrat” myself, I am struck by ...

    1. the almost even distribution of left- and right-leaning graduates of my undergraduate classes (although there seems to be an imbalance of left over right amongst my graduate students, with the imbalance growing from entering students to graduating students).

    2. the fact that, amongst my colleagues, the right-leaning faculty tend to be “proselytizers” in greater proportion than my left-leaning colleagues.

    3. how easy it is and how comfortable I am taking and defending “political” positions with my students – both right and left, Republican and Democrat -- which are in complete opposition to my and their political perspectives. The only exceptions for me are (1) global warming, (2) national debt, (3) the value of the dollar, and (4) universal health care where I have difficulty even appreciating the “other side,” let alone disguising my faux support of it.

    Don’t get me wrong, there is a sense in which Russ is almost correct (see the table at the conclusion of the following essay) ...

    http://www.paloaltoonline.com/weekly/morgue/2005/2005_02_23.guest23blues.shtml

    But the reason I think this is much ado about nothing is because, in the academic disciplines that really matter – and there is a tremendous amount of “intellectual” pap that almost dominates the American academic scene – politics and capitalism are almost irrelevant. In biology, physics, the earth sciences, astronomy, mathematics, the humanities, and the performing arts “academic politics” is generally seen to be the purview of political scientists, sociologists, psychologists, gender and racial studies experts ... you know where I’m going.

    Further, except for some really weird certification purposes, American higher education is becoming less and less important (and relevant) in the scheme of things ... and it is especially becoming less and less important in the education – as opposed to the training – of young people. By 2020, America’s “college-age” youngsters will be getting waaay more of their educations on-line than in our “spectacular” and self-proclaimed “world-class” colleges and universities.

    And guess what? The Internet is wonderfully egalitarian insofar as politics is concerned. The distribution is much more “33% Republican, 31% Democrat, and 36% Independent or other than it is Russ’s silly numbers. And, frankly, I can hardly wait. Political Science, for example – not that any thinking person really believes it is a science – should be explored, studied, and learned on-line, and not be taking up space and resources that could be used in state-supported hard science and mathematics programs.

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/3.09/netpolitics_pr.html

  • Where's the 97%?
  • Posted by Faculty Person on June 25, 2008 at 2:10pm EDT
  • Russ, I looked at your links and I simply fail to find the 97% figure you were challenged on.

    Yes, the academy is more liberal and more inclined to vote Democratic than the general public but 97%? I don't think so.

  • Platform Specifics
  • Posted by Bob on June 25, 2008 at 3:45pm EDT
  • Instead of a fluff piece on what college demopublicans are running around doing or not doing, how about a point by point comparison of their respective education platforms such as they are (not)!?

  • Our campaign coverage
  • Posted by Doug Lederman , Editor at Inside Higher Ed on June 25, 2008 at 4:25pm EDT
  • We did that more than a year ago, here:
    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2007/05/16/election

    And we've provided occasional updates since then on those (relatively rare) occasions in which the candidates have had something meaningful to say, for example below:
    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/06/18/qt
    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/06/17/qt
    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/04/28/qt
    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/04/17/qt
    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/04/23/qt
    http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/04/16/qt

    We will continue to monitor what the candidates are (and aren't) saying about issues in and around higher education, but in the meantime, we thought that the activities of the campaigns concerning the student vote were worth pointing out.

    Best,

    Doug

  • Data is very clear
  • Posted by Frank on June 25, 2008 at 10:25pm EDT
  • http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121062988605186401.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

    " .. And according to one professor's analysis of voter registration, the 800-strong faculty includes just 32 Republicans .."

    That's 96% Democrat.

    How much clearer does this have to be? This is getting absurd, right out of Monty Python skit. There is not an infinite amount of time.

  • Republicans at CU
  • Posted by Not a mathematician on June 26, 2008 at 9:35am EDT
  • Frank...Are faculty at CU required to be registered to vote and required to register with one of the two main parties?

    Given that approximately 79% of US citizens register to vote and that almost 1/3 of registered voters are independents, it does seem a stretch to say that ALL of the non-identified faculty in the sample are 1) US citizens, 2) registered voters, and 3) registered as Democrats.

    Time is not infinite, but often it is good to use some of our time to think before speaking.

  • Doug
  • Posted by Bob on June 26, 2008 at 9:45am EDT
  • I appreciate the response, but as I know you are aware much has changed in a year, most importantly we need an update on Obama vs. McCain now that Clinton is out of the picture. I would not want to base my knowledge of platforms based on what was said a year ago, especially since the two candidates are now making new statements.

  • Not a mathematician / no data?
  • Posted by Russ on June 28, 2008 at 2:50pm EDT
  • " .. good to use some of our time to think before speaking .."

    You've actually got a data-set of your own that disputes the Colorado study? And all the others?

    Where is it? Data, especially one's own, is good, isn't it?

  • Where's the 97% beef? Right here
  • Posted by Russ on July 1, 2008 at 4:40pm EDT
  • http://insidehighered.com/news/2008/06/25/campaign

    "This article first examines the ideological composition of American university faculty and then tests whether ideological homogeneity has become self-reinforcing. A randomly based national survey of 1643 faculty members from 183 four-year colleges and universities finds that liberals and Democrats outnumber conservatives and Republicans by large margins, and the differences are not limited to elite universities or to the social sciences and humanities .."

    Gad, it gets tiring, to work with those whose minds are closed. Guess what political party they belong to -- three guesses.

  • Weird Russ ... Really Weird
  • Posted by Frizbane Manley on July 3, 2008 at 3:25pm EDT
  • Two things:

    First, I think it’s close to the limit when one provides a URL for an article that takes you right back to the article in which the URL is provided. Weird!

    Second, suppose, for example, that I incessantly claimed that 67% of newborn babies in some unnamed domain of definition are male and then responded to skeptics by providing URLs that failed to substantiate my claim. After a while you would surely appreciate my exasperated retort ...

    “Gad, it gets tiring, to work with those whose minds are closed. Guess what gender they belong to — three guesses.”

    Not that it will be easy, Russ, but if you make an effort to distinguish between left, liberal, and Democrat on the one hand and right, conservative, and Republican, respectively, on the other, maybe your reading the following article (and be sure to look closely at the multimedia displays) ...

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/03/arts/03camp.html?th&emc=th

    will help you understand so why so very few of us are as bent out of shape as you are about (1) the party ID (that’s Democrat vs. Independent vs. Republican) and (2) the political disposition (that’s liberal vs. moderate vs. conservative) of members of the academy.

    But maybe not!