Advertisement

Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

Your Campus ID and Insurance Card, Please

In recently adopting a health insurance requirement for students, officials at the University of St. Thomas were cognizant of the context: rising health care costs and scarce resources. The Minnesota university offers its own sponsored health plan, but many undergraduates come to college already insured, mostly through their parents’ employer-sponsored plans.

“In order to be able to offer the kinds of services that students these days need and want, you need to be good stewards of resources. For those families that have insurance already, for us not to use it, we weren’t being good stewards of scarce resources,” said Madonna McDermott, director of the Student Health Service and Wellness Center at St. Thomas, which now has contracts with four top insurance providers in the area. (About 80 percent of the university’s undergraduates, McDermott said, are from Minnesota.)

Upon coming to the clinic, students’ insurance carriers are billed for services, either for in-network care if students are insured through contracted carriers, or, if not, for out-of-network services. (However, staff try to work with out-of-state students, McDermott said, in “optimizing their own insurance coverage.”)

“We’re seeing it increasing,” McDermott said of the model in which student health clinics — traditionally sheltered from many of the harsh realities of U.S. health care — bill the many insurance plans that students come to college already on. “And increasing pretty rapidly, I would say.”

Only a minority of college health centers bill insurance providers — other than for those students insured through university-sponsored plans. Yet, many health center directors echoed McDermott’s observation of increasing interest in the model. They all cite similar reasons: In short, this is a time when the skyrocketing cost of health care is one of few financial certainties.

“We said, OK, this is something we need to do because this is an untapped pool of resources,” said Kent Smith Jr., vice president for student affairs at Ohio University. Ohio just signed a contract with Highland Campus Health Group, which handles insurance billing and collections exclusively for college health centers, a few weeks ago. With the revenue it hopes to tap into, the university is considering a renovation and addition to its health facility, and is expanding services this fall: Smith mentioned plans to add evening and weekend hours, to hire two additional psychologists, and to contract with a company that can provide a 24-7 mental health hot line.

Plus, because Ohio’s health center is funded by a general student fee, revenue from insurance companies may free up funds for other areas, Smith said. He estimates that next year an extra $200,000 of general fee funds can go to other areas, and by year three, $500,000. “It’s real money.”

Billing insurance companies is arguably a matter of stewarding not only institutional resources, but student and familial ones, as well. Students “should be able to utilize that insurance when it’s already bought and paid for,” said James A. Boyle, president of the College Parents of America, a Washington advocacy group.

But even many proponents of the model say it’s not for everyone. Among the barriers are potentially significant start-up costs — and investments in extra staffing, at least when billing is done in-house. The number of insurance plans out there is staggering, particularly for colleges attracting students from a broad geographic range, but many pointed out that several major carriers, including United and Aetna, are national in scope, easing (though by no means making easy) the process of establishing in-network arrangements.

But beyond that, shifting to rely on third-party insurance billing represents a cultural change, many agree.

The change is in some ways almost intangible. College health centers started as bastions of seemingly free care, funded, yes, by student fees, but then offering needed services largely at no extra charge, as needed. Many college health centers still offer free office visits, but charge for supplementary services and tests, which at some larger centers can include pharmaceutical services and X-rays — which now, advocates of this approach say, can largely be paid by insurance rather than out of pocket. (Centers often do encourage students to file insurance claims themselves, but few report much success with that approach.)

Yet, only a minority of colleges — 30 percent — require that all full-time students have health insurance, according to a March report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, and 20 percent of all traditional-aged college students are uninsured (these figures, however, vary pretty dramatically by sector). Experts report a movement toward health insurance requirements on college campuses — as St. Thomas, for instance, just instituted. Still, introducing co-pays and insurance cards to the college health mix can raise concerns about introducing real or perceived barriers to care on campus — especially when it comes to services that used to be funded by a general or health fee, and provided to students as needed at no extra charge.

“The hard part,” said McDermott of St. Thomas, “is if you have a student who has sub-optimal insurance or they’re out of network. There is a cost that they didn’t have before. That part is hard. We try to work with them to minimize the cost.”

“One of the largest fears that we have had was, ‘Are students going to view this as creating a financial barrier to accessing health care?’ It’s really quite the opposite,” said Glenn Egelman, director and physician-in-chief of Bowling Green State University’s Student Health Service, which, after first contracting with Highland in December 2004, now is an in-network provider for about 85 percent of students who come for office visits.

“It’s tradition,” he said, relative to reasons for resistance to the model. “Traditionally the universities have not charged insurance. And there’s something nice about that.”

“I think that currently, it is a minority of universities that are billing health insurance for office visits. However I would pose that in 10 or 20 years, it will be a majority,” Egelman said. “But it also depends on the type of institution. And the financial background of that institution. So the universities need to — and are, I think — beginning to take a look at how would an endeavor like this fit in with the student culture, how does it fit in with the university, the campus culture, and the financial aspects of the campus?”

“Student health services range everywhere from a single nurse to some who probably have over 100 staff,” said Chad Henderson, president of the American College Health Association and director of the Dr. Pauline B. Wood Health Service at the University of Rhode Island, which has been doing third-party billing since 1996. “It would seem to me that for a place operated by a single nurse or single nurse practitioner, that third-party billing could become a complex issue in that they would have to keep auditable records with substantial documentation to withstand an insurance audit.”

“The other problem is that coverage on the outside is decreasing. The person who may have been on a 90-10 plan this year is going to find out it’s only an 80-20,” Henderson said, of a common cost-sharing structure in insurance plans.

“And the premiums are going crazy.”

Elizabeth Redden

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

“good stewards of scarce resources.”

When will we all wise up? We need national nonprofit single payer health insurance.State and municipal governments, businesses (large and small), employers and employees, colleges and students, families and individuals are struggling under the burden of our multipayer for-profit non-system. Health insurance companies are not health care PROVIDERS; they are simply middlemen who move our money into their profit stream. Even Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP are now funneling our tax dollars to private HMOs.

Other free-market democracies get it—why are we so duped? The Lewin group analysts report that a taxpayer-funded, single payer plan would save trillions and allow for future cost control. Even the Nobel laureates in economics acknowledge the proper role of government in sectors of the economy where the market does not work.

Take the time to read HR 676—the single payer bill now in Congress. Urge your representative and presidential candidate to co-sponsor the resolution. Get involved at the grassroots level. The people are ahead of the politicians on this.

Under HR 676, we would pay for health care as we now pay for fire and police protection. We would be guaranteed treatment for all medically necessary care, with choice of physician and hospital.

College administrators and other employers could simply take the annual health care hassle off the table.

Afraid of higher taxes? Do the math: Add up your taxes and your health care premiums, deductibles, co-pays, drugs right now. Under single payer, an estimated 95 percent would pay less. And there would be the peace of mind of knowing that we as a people are caring for each other.

Now there’s athought for the 4th of July!

Harriette Seiler Member, Kentuckians for Single Payer Healthcarewww.kyhealthcare.org

Harriette Seiler, Doctoral student, Higher Ed at Univ of Louisville, at 11:55 am EDT on July 3, 2008

Sit and watch as the sick die slowly

I concur with everything you just said about the issue, it amazes me that people are so anti-universal health care. I know people in multiple countries with systems of government that have a goal to take care of their people and not watch them starve slowly. Hopefully our generation will do something about it.

RTC, Graduate Student, at 9:35 pm EDT on July 3, 2008

Political Problems

The first thing that strikes me about HR 636 is that the taxes imposed are entirely regressive. Taxes on work income are at 9%, and stock transactions are 1/3 of 1%? It seems like only the richest 1% will pay the same percentage as the guy working the fryer at McDonald’s. Anyone making minimum wage would start at a tax rate of 22% (social security + medical). People who don’t work and just live off investment income won’t pay a cent unless they reach the top 5% of national income.

Granted, a non-profit system could save money in the overall scheme of things. But if we wave our magic law over the land and suddenly 40 million new people are covered, where are the doctors and hospital beds going to come from to treat everyone? In the short term, the only effect can be a dilution of the available medical resources across a larger population. Will we truly emulate France, and end lawsuits against doctors? I doubt it so long as our lawyers outnumber doctors in Congress 5:1.

But its better than a lot of proposals floating around. Hillary and Bush both hinted at something that looked like $100-$150 billion to the for-profit insurance companies. For now and into the foreseeable future, these are the types of plans that are more likely to get support from the media, the committee chairs, and the party officers that really set the agenda.

How about we pay for medicine by raiding the “police the world” fund or the “bailout billion-dollar banks” fund? I say no new taxes until the government at least stops spending money on stuff we don’t need or even necessarily want.

John at FreeCollegeBlog, at 8:05 am EDT on July 6, 2008

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to Your Campus ID and Insurance Card, Please

or search for jobs directly.

Assistant Director of Alumni and Student Relations — Job ID 907
SUNY — Empire State College

Empire State College, a nationally recognized leader in nontraditional higher education for adult students, invites ... see job

Extension Educator, Center for Youth Development, St. Paul Campus
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job

Internship Manager- Career Center
Gonzaga University

Oversees, develops, manages, guides, & sets policy for the internship program. see job

Learning Disabilities Specialist
Ohlone College

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Application may be obtained from: HUMAN RESOURCES 43600 Mission Blvd., Fremont, CA 94539-0390 Office: ... see job

Director of Counseling Center
Keene State College

We are Creating a World of Possibilities! see job

Director Student Relations
University of California, Riverside

The University of California Riverside invests in your future through employee training and career development, access to ... see job

Director of Academic Development and Retention Service
Bennett College

Bennett College is a small, private, historically Black liberal arts college for women. As a United Methodist Church-related ... see job

Student Services/Social & Cultural Coordinator
University of California, Riverside

The University of California Riverside invests in your future through employee training and career development, access to ... see job

Dean, Student Support Services
North Orange County Community College District

NORTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY Dean, Student Support Services Job #FCM975 THE POSITION ... see job

Student Services Specialist (Specially Funded)
Maricopa Community College District

Provides one-stop student service to new and continuing students, with specific focus on advising students interested in ... see job