News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education
July 21
Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.
Advertisement
As a devout free market capitalist, I see all kind of possibilities with this new health care incentive for unmarried live-in partners. If I were a single faculty member of this generous institution, I would put an add out in the classifides for a room mate, charging rent that is quite a bit more than the market value, with the promise of free health care after 18 months. A great way to pay off on the principle for my house or to help pay for my parents healthcare.
Denise, at 2:30 pm EDT on July 21, 2008
Advertisement
or search for jobs directly.
Located in Ithaca, N.Y., Cornell University is a bold, innovative, and inclusive teaching and research university of ... see job
The University of California Riverside invests in your future through employee training and career development, access to ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Mount Holyoke College Library, Information, and Technology Services (LITS) Division seeks an experienced, collaborative, ... see job
Northeastern University, founded in 1898 and located in Boston, is a private research university that is a leader in ... see job
The University of Minnesota is a premier employer and a talent magnet attracting leading faculty and staff from around the ... see job
Join one of the finest regional universities in the nation. James Madison University, home to 18,000 + students, welcomes you ... see job
Dedicated, knowledgeable, experienced person sought for tenure-track Professorship in Nursing/Mental Health specialty see job
Troy University seeks Associate Provost for Academic Support. see job
The UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center seeks a tenure-track faculty member to lead the Population Sciences programs ... see job
Purdue is guilty of misconduct—double jeopardy
So, competitors cannot replicate the Purdue Profs findings and accuse him of misconduct. Two panels address this issue and neither fault him on his research, which was the basis for the complaint. Rather, they fault him for rather minor (important, but minor) infractions that seem unrelated to the original complaint. And these infractions were only found after close scrutiny of the Profs day-to-day activities.
Put all profs to the same stringent test and you will find similar minor problems. Put anyone to such a stringent test and you will find similar minor problems. To be sure, people need to be more transparent in their professional lives, but this was not the basis for the complaint.
Committee no.1 finds no fault. Committee no. 2 finds a little bit. What was Purdue doing—trying the guy until they could find something to pin on him? What a colossal waste of people’s time and what a terrible blow for due process. This is double jeopardy. Purdue’s faculty are the big losers here.
Steven S. Clark, PhDhttp://stevensclark.typepad.com/bioscience_biz/
Steven S. Clark, PhD, UW, at 9:45 am EDT on July 21, 2008