Search News


Browse Archives

News

Baylor Fires Its President

July 25, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Baylor University's regents ended the rocky tenure of John Lilley Thursday, removing the president from his post effective immediately.

“The reality is the board lost the confidence in John’s ability to unite the various Baylor constituencies,” Howard Batson, chairman of the Board of Regents, said during a news conference

Lilley took the helm at Baylor, a Baptist university in Waco, Texas, at the start of 2006. With wounds still fresh from the troubled tenure of Baylor’s previous president, Robert B. Sloan, Lilley soon found himself embroiled in his own set of controversies. He drew critics, for instance, for injecting himself into the tenure process, rejecting several candidates who had their colleagues’ approval.

Lilley later backed off the tenure issue, however, approving seven of the 10 professors who appealed their denials.

Batson was short on specifics in discussing the regents’ decision, but he acknowledged the tenure issue had been a source of conflict. He also cited a “branding” controversy, alluding to Lilley’s push to change the Baylor Bears’ football helmets. Lilley wanted to abandon the standard logo -- an interlocking “BU” -- a proposal that drew fury from alumni steeped in tradition.

Lilley declined to expound on his reaction to the regents’ decision, but he did submit a statement via e-mail to The Baptist Standard, a weekly news journal published in Texas.

“I deeply regret the action of the board, and I do not believe that it reflects the best interests of Baylor University,” Lilley’s statement read.

Asked to elaborate, Lilley said, “I just think my love for Baylor is such that as a triple alumnus I just want to be very careful about what I say, and I fashioned that statement and that’s just really all I care to say right now.”

The regents had offered Lilley the opportunity to serve out his five-year contract as the board began a search for a new president. He rejected that offer.

The regents have named Harold Cunningham, a former board chairman, as “acting” president. Cunningham is expected to serve for a “brief” period before an interim president is chosen by the board, according to a news release about the leadership change, news of which could not be found on the home page of the university's Web site.

Lilley, 69, said he was retired “as of this morning” and returning to his home in Reno, Nev. Prior to coming to Baylor, Lilley had spent four years as president of the University of Nevada at Reno.

Wounds Still Fresh From Past President

Lilley walked into a perilous situation by any measure. Sloan, the last permanent president before Lilley, left under a cloud of controversy in the aftermath of several faculty no confidence votes. Faculty said Sloan had created a “culture of fear” on campus, and Sloan subsequently lost the regents’ support. They fired him in early 2005.

“John came at a very difficult time in the history of Baylor University,” Batson acknowledged. “There’s no doubt about that, and nobody’s saying John’s responsible for any disharmony in the Baylor family.”

Lynn Tatum, a senior lecturer in Baylor’s honors college, said faculty were “nervous” about the future given Baylor’s recent history.

“We can only hope that the Baylor Board of Regents will take this opportunity to actively engage faculty (and students, donors, alumni, and staff) in a dialogue on how we can effectively move forward,” Tatum said in an e-mail. “The silver lining in the turmoil is that Baylor’s constituents feel passionately about our university. Hopefully we can build on this passion in order to find effective leadership.”

Baylor Poised for Change

Baylor is in the midst of a transformational period. A plan known as “Baylor 2012” aims to dramatically increase the university’s emphasis on research. Lilley had embraced that vision, but was having trouble bringing together the “Baylor family,” Batson said.

“It wasn’t that John wanted the university to be this but the regents wanted it to be that,” he said. “It’s the balancing act of getting to the goal line that we all want to be at, which is a top tier university that has the unique Christian environment.”

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Baylor Fires Its President

  • At least is was for a "Good" reason?!
  • Posted by Incredulous on July 25, 2008 at 8:35am EDT
  • The president, a three time alum, showed interest in the tenure process and updating the logo?

    Is that it? No fake degrees or scholarships for friends? No absconding with college funds, drunk driving charges or affairs with students?

    What is the world coming too? How can you stand this man on your campus for even one more minute?

  • Presidents and Tenure
  • Posted by Jim on July 25, 2008 at 9:25am EDT
  • Details in the story are sketchy, but it appears Lilly ran afoul of the faculty for injecting himself into the university's tenure process. But this is a perfectly appropriate (and, in fact, expected) role for any university president. If Lilly's vision for Baylor was to strengthen research, then raising the bar on tenure would be an essential part of any plan.

    At most universities, tenure recommendations from departments, colleges, and provosts are advisory to the president. It sounds like Lilly was simply exercising the perogative of his position. That his vetos angered those who had supported his rejected candidates is not surprising. What is surprising is the lack of trustee support, and especially the trustees' unsophisticated belief that real change can take place in a university without ruffling feathers.

  • Univ. Pres. fired AGAIN!
  • Posted by Nevada Prof on July 25, 2008 at 9:40am EDT
  • Before being fired by Baylor, he was fired by the University of Nevada, Reno, because the UNR faculty rose in revolt. There seems to be a pattern here.

  • Lilley deserves termination
  • Posted by BU prof on July 25, 2008 at 10:40am EDT
  • Speaking from the perspective of an insider, it is clear that Lilley deserved termination. Here are some of the key reasons:

    1. He violated university policy on numerous occasions including tenure and promotion policies, civil rights policies, and others.
    2. He failed to respect the tenets of shared governance and academic freedom, violating numerous policies of the AAUP
    3. He discriminated against faculty based on their freedom of speech, gender, race and other protected status (this is a point that has received very little media attention because no one wants to touch it; however, the facts are clear and overwhelming).
    4. He subjected faculty to an environment of arrogant leadership and completely disregarded the input of faculty, alumni, and staff.
    5. His lack of social skills damaged the university's ability to increase the endowment by killing donations from influential donors in contrast to politically correct reports from the regents that praise him for his contributions (while firing him in the same announcement).

    So, in my opinion, those are clearly enough reasons for termination. We need someone who can lead with a conscience.

  • Student Perspective?
  • Posted by JND on July 25, 2008 at 2:10pm EDT
  • My daughter was an undergraduate at Baylor during all of Lilley's tenure there. Her comment was that all of the students hated him for his high-handed approach in dealing with students.

  • Untimely (?" Firing of BU President Lilley
  • Posted by Patsy Vaughan Pentecost , Ms. at Baylor Alum on July 25, 2008 at 7:45pm EDT
  • Baylor's Board of Regents continues to have many problems "running our ship," so to speak; it is an intelligent group of persons who I hope is allowing God to be in charge of its decisions. I pray that whoever becomes our next BU President will be "the one" who can help all of us unite and be the Baylor University we should be...forever lighting the ways of time in the manner God would have us to do.

    While I know I speak of an action about which I am not informed regarding our Regents' firing of our President Dr. Lilley - BU Alum - I "hurt" for him and his family as they return to their Nevada home. May God bless them and may they forgive us for this seemingly abrupt action (although I, too, was at issue on the Tenure and Interlocking BU controversies feeling they were being mishandled). Please accept these comments of mine in Christian love written with the best of intentions.

    bugwbgg@hotmail.com