Quick Takes: Law School Group Responds to Boycott Threat, Security Breach at Princeton Review, Fast Start for Federal Rule Making, Promoting Honest Talk on Drinking, Realities of Drinking in a College Town, Lawsuit Attacks Women's Studies
The Association of American Law Schools has announced what it hopes will be a solution to a threatened boycott of its annual meeting in January, in San Diego. One of the meeting hotels is the Manchester Grand Hyatt, whose owner has been a major donor to the campaign to bar gay marriage in California -- an action that led advocates for gay rights to boycott his hotel. The law school group announced that while it would honor its contract with the hotel, it was exercising its contract rights to have all official events, sessions, registration and so forth at the other conference hotel, the San Diego Marriott. In this way, it will be possible for someone to attend any part of the meeting without setting foot in the Hyatt.
The Princeton Review, the test prep company, accidentally published on its Web site the standardized test scores and personal data of thousands of Florida students, as well as internal company information about its strategies for coaching students on the SAT and other tests, The New York Times reported. A Princeton Review competitor discovered the security breach and provided information on the situation to the Times on the condition that the rival not be identified. The Princeton Review has now blocked access to the information.
The law may have taken twice as long to pass as it should have, but the U.S. Education Department is moving swiftly to carry out legislation to renew the Higher Education Act. The department has already scheduled four regional public hearings (at Texas Christian University, the University of Rhode Island, Pepperdine University, and the department’s Washington headquarters) to solicit suggestions about aspects of the 1,000-plus-page law on which the government should consider issuing clarifying regulations. The department’s announcement also said its officials hoped to begin negotiations by February — which of course will take place under a new presidential administration.
More than a year ago, John M. McCardell Jr., Middlebury College's former president, started a campaign to promote the idea of lowering the drinking age to 18 from 21, which he argues is unrealistic and prevents honest discussions about alcohol use on campuses. At the time he started the campaign, many college presidents privately applauded him but doubted whether he would get much public support. But now dozens of college presidents have signed a statement backing the discussion McCardell is seeking.
In the neighborhood where Iowa State University students drink, the impact of keg deliveries has done so much damage to sidewalks that the pavement is being replaced with rubber, The Ames Tribune reported.
A self-proclaimed men's rights lawyer on Monday filed a lawsuit in federal court charging that Columbia University is engaged in illegal discrimination against men by maintaining women's studies programs, and that these programs amount to a religion that should disqualify Columbia from receiving certain state and federal funds. The lawyer, Roy Den Hollander, is currently engaged in a series of suits against what he perceives as anti-male bias. For example, he is challenging the legality of "ladies' night" specials at nightclubs. In an interview Monday, he acknowledged that Columbia's women's studies programs are open to male students and faculty members, but said that the lack of an equivalent men's studies program illustrated bias. In addition, he said that those who disagree with feminist teaching are mistreated in courses. "The professor will hide under the table and the feminists in the class will go after you for saying anything anti-feminist," he said. Den Hollander earned an M.B.A. at Columbia in 1997, but acknowledged never having taken a women's studies course then, or sitting in on courses now. He said he prepared his lawsuit based on Web sites of courses and programs. Columbia officials could not be reached for comment.
Comments on
Quick Takes: Law School Group Responds to Boycott Threat, Security Breach at Princeton Review, Fast Start for Federal Rule Making, Promoting Honest Talk on Drinking, Realities of Drinking in a College Town, Lawsuit Attacks Women's Studies
Kudos
Posted
by Bob
on August 19, 2008 at 8:20am EDT
Rubber Sidewalks. Iowa State is ahead of the curve on this one. Now when an inebriated student falls down they can bounce right up again. Think of the money saved on injuries and liability.
Now if we can only get the classrooms rubberized...
You can't make this stuff up, folks.
Posted
by Iris Devadason
, Prof.of English (retd)
on August 19, 2008 at 8:55am EDT
Another MCP rears his ugly head, even if a brilliant lawyer!
What is the need for a mens's studies program when the world has been all-male/patriarchal ever since it began.
Has he never heard of the atrocities committed against women all over the world?
This is ridiculous. Iris Devadason, (member Womens'Studies dept. while teaching at The United Theological College, Bangalore, India.
Academia at Its Best......
Posted
by Chuck
on August 19, 2008 at 10:20am EDT
Another reason why I positively love InsideHigherEducation.com........
Where else one can wake up, read some interesting pieces on university debates and issues, and then be wonderfully amused by the witless remarks of an Iris Devadason in response to a hilarious law suit against Women's Studies filed by Den Hollander?
In her lectures and classes about the atrocities against women during the many millennia of male patriarchy, does Ms. Devadason remind her students that most of those men were raised by women?
Probably not.
Posted
by About Time.
on August 19, 2008 at 10:30am EDT
Discrimination against men is endemic in (but not limited to) academia. Let's hope Roy Den Hollander becomes a leader who fights sex discrimination the way the great Ward Connerly is fighting racial discrimination. Mr. Connerly's experience shows Mr. Hollander will need tenacity, deep pockets, and a think skin.
Reductio ad absurdum
Posted
by Sandy Thatcher
on August 19, 2008 at 10:50am EDT
Hmmm, has Mr. Hollander ever considered that his logic should lead him to file suit against all those universities that have programs in Asian Studies, Latin American Studies, Middle Eastern Studies, etc., but not American Studies? And must every university therefore represent every area studies or country focus including, say, Canadian Studies, New Zealand Studies, Luxemburg Studies? What about Native American Studies? Must it not be provided by every university in the United States? After all, they were the original habitants here. And if we have men's studies and women's studies, then surely we must have gay and lesbian studies, transsexual studies, S&M studies, etc. Why just pick on one area as discriminatory, Mr. Hollander? There are plenty of targets out there for you to attack.
oops -- AALS solution -- NOT
Posted
by Peter
on August 19, 2008 at 12:50pm EDT
Does the AALS realize its "alternative" San Diego hotel is owned by the same person as the original meeting-site hotel?
Not So Brilliant Lawyering
Posted
by cts
on August 19, 2008 at 1:35pm EDT
Den Hollander's suit claims that 'Feminism' is a religion in a constitutionally relevant sense. Admittedly, the Supremes have had a hard time coming up with a simple definition of 'religion' for constitutional purposes, but any-old 'view' is not going to cut it in court. Even if Mr. Den Hollander thinks there is a single view to be identified as 'Feminism' [love the cap], he will be hard-pressed to demonstrate that it counts as a religion.
Of course, if it IS a religion, its practice - and study - are protected. So, unless we give up teaching about Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, etc. in our colleges, no school could selectively choose to not include the religion of Feminism among its subjects of study. Well, perhaps he intends to prove that instruction concerning those other religions is never invested with any hint of support on the part of the instructors? Good grief. If ever there was frivolous litigation, this is it.
P.S.
Posted
by cts
on August 19, 2008 at 1:40pm EDT
Chuck is right: the suit is absolutely hilarious. I encourage anyone who needs a laugh to look at it. Truly crazy. Let's hope no court is willing to waste time and money on this nonsense.
Posted
by Sarah
on August 19, 2008 at 1:50pm EDT
Why don't they just call it "gender studies" & be done with it?
drinking age
Posted
by tim french
on August 20, 2008 at 6:20am EDT
In most of Canada its either 18 or in most Provinces ,19. This causes "double carding" at on campus pubs and events especially early in the year. Students are generally required to show their student I D as well as an age of majority card with photo. Birth certificates ARE accepted with other photo ID like a drivers permit.
Posted
by Iris
on August 22, 2008 at 5:10am EDT
Hi again,
Chuck's reply , esplly the last line, is funnier than the original lawsuit!!
Poor dears!! Iris