Search News


Browse Archives

News

University Fires Professor Who Mooned

August 25, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Becoming a YouTube star by mooning a room of students and professors doesn't exactly provide job security for a professor without tenure.

If there was any doubt about that, Fort Hays State University cleared it up Friday when it dismissed Bill Shanahan as assistant professor of communications and debate coach. The university acted after a video posted on YouTube showed Shanahan exchanging four-letter words, jumping up and down, and dropping his pants in an extended argument with a debate coach from the University of Pittsburgh. While the altercation took place in March, the video surfaced only this month -- and it has attracted thousands of views, prompted debate, and inspired some to set the incident to music.

Once the video surfaced, Fort Hays announced it would review the situation -- and on Friday, it said Shanahan would be dismissed.

"Everyone has the right to freedom of speech, but these actions are not acceptable for someone who is representing our university," said Edward H. Hammond, president of the university, in a statement. "Professor Shanahan's conduct falls below the standard established to protect our university, its faculty, students and alumni. As a representative of FHSU, he had a duty of care that was seriously breached by his behavior. If the coach of one of our athletic teams became angry and 'mooned' officials, student athletes and fans during a sports event, he or she would no longer be a coach at Fort Hays State University. Standards for our debate program are certainly just as high."

The statement noted many "good things" Shanahan had accomplished at Fort Hays and Hammond said that Shanahan was "highly esteemed by his students and his debaters."

The university's announcement also included a statement from Shanahan: "I greatly appreciate the strong support I have received from FHSU over the last 10 years in the fullest tradition of academic freedom and the outpouring of support and concern expressed by countless colleagues, students and former students. I am terribly sorry that my actions reflected poorly on the university. However, they must be judged in the unique context of college debate, marked by its passion and rigorous intellectual engagement. I hope this incident does not detract from the incredible work done by Fort Hays State debate over the last decade or my other contributions to FHSU, which are far greater than a 9-minute YouTube clip."

Richard Hughen, a professor of philosophy at Fort Hays State and also president of the campus chapter of the American Association of University Professors (which is the faculty union there), said that the incident raised multiple issues. "It should be clear that a faculty member can be dismissed for unprofessional behavior," he said, adding that it was "pretty obvious that Dr. Shanahan did not exercise appropriate restraint nor did he show respect for the opinions of others in this incident."

But even if there may be grounds for dismissing Shanahan, that doesn't mean the president should be making the decision himself, he said. "Dr. Shanahan had a right to have a hearing by his peers to see if his colleagues agree that his behavior -- perhaps accumulative behaviors -- justified his dismissal," he said. The faculty union should have been involved and it was "an affront" to it that the AAUP did not play a role, Hughen said, adding that it would be "premature" to announce any action the organization might take as a result.

In announcing the decision to dismiss Shanahan, the university also provided more details about how the incident transpired. One factoid Fort Hays was sure to include was that when Shanahan lowered his pants, he exposed "his underwear-clad backside" -- the video itself was not shot from an angle that would provide evidence one way or the other on just what he had exposed.

Details were also released on the origins of the dispute between Shanahan and Shanara Reid-Brinkley, the Pitt coach. Fort Hays found that its team had "exercised its prerogative under the debate rules to dismiss Reid-Brinkley as a judge" of a match between the teams from Fort Hays and Towson University. Both Towson team members and Reid-Brinkley "said the decision to remove a black female judge was an act of white hegemony, which is to say an exercise of the power whites enjoy over people of color," the Fort Hays statement said. Hammond, the university president, noted that while Shanahan's behavior was wrong, "I understand why Mr. Shanahan was outraged by the not-so-veiled accusations of racism. During his 10 years at FHSU, I have known Bill to be a fervent champion of the underdog and racial equality."

A spokesman for Pitt said that the university was still investigating the incident.

Under the rules of the Cross Examination Debate Association, each team gets to strike one prospective judge without giving any reason why. What was unusual about the altercation that cost Shanahan his job, association leaders said, was that Reid-Brinkley and the Towson team knew that she had been blocked from judging the competition. Blocking takes place before judges have been selected, so each team removes one person as a potential judge before a judging panel is selected at random from those remaining in the pool. Blocking choices aren't announced, so those not selected aren't supposed to know if they were blocked or just happened not to be chosen.

The debate association found itself under attack Friday. Not only did Fort Hays fire its debate coach, but it suspended its debate program. Hammond, noting that he was once a college debater, said he valued the competition, but was shocked at the state of debate today. "Our society has become increasingly confrontational and uncivil," he said. "Our investigation revealed that those ills have also infected college debate. We have a responsibility not only to deal with the specific incident but to stand up against this decline in the standards of college debate."

He added that until he viewed the video of his university's competition, "I had no idea that college debate had degenerated into the kind of displays that we witnessed.... If anyone doubts my conclusion, that person should view the entire debate, which was laced with four-letter words, a lack of personal respect and a lack of civil discourse."

That analysis has angered leaders of the debate association, which has been conducting its own investigation of the incident involving the Fort Hays and Pittsburgh coaches.

"In the course of thousands of debates that can take place in a single tournament, and you multiply that by all of the events, and it's so rare that it takes 30 years for something like this to happen," said Darren Elliott, president of the Cross Examination Debate Association, and an assistant professor of speech and coach of the debate program at Kansas City Kansas Community College.

Elliott said that the tenor of the debate viewed by everyone on YouTube "is outside the norm of what debate is like," and that people should not judge debate programs by that incident.

At the same time, the association released a statement indicating that it would review its curriculum and bylaws to make sure that debate programs upheld appropriate levels of civility.

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on University Fires Professor Who Mooned

  • Posted by Michele on August 25, 2008 at 9:00am EDT
  • "However, [my actions] must be judged in the unique context of college debate, marked by its passion and rigorous intellectual engagement." This, in defense of mooning.

  • -un-tenured
  • Posted by QuakerProf on August 25, 2008 at 12:26pm EDT
  • “Dr. Shanahan had a right to have a hearing by his peers to see if his colleagues agree that his behavior — perhaps accumulative behaviors — justified his dismissal,”

    Actually, that is what -tenure- means. Untenured faculty can certainly be dismissed without a hearing of their peers.

  • Passion and Debate
  • Posted by cts on August 25, 2008 at 1:20pm EDT
  • The whole point - I thought - of rational debate was to set [unruly] passions aside in favor of reasoned argument. I do not blame the Fort Hays coach for being offended by the accusation of the Pitt coach; I do fault him for behaving stupidly, offensively, and irrationally in response. While it might be interesting to learn how the Pitt coach had information she should not have had, and to see how her school deals with her own unprofessional conduct, I have to say the dismissal of the Fort Hays instructor was the only reasonable recourse the college had.

    Whether the dismissal followed college or AAUP rules is a separate matter. I would like to think that a tenured faculty member would also be dismissed for such outrageous behavior.

  • KUDOS TO HAMMOND
  • Posted by chris b on August 25, 2008 at 1:25pm EDT
  • An appropriate action by FHSU, both in respect to Shanahan and for its relationship and responsibility to college debate in general.

  • Debate debate
  • Posted by Richard on August 25, 2008 at 3:25pm EDT
  • I wonder if the faculty senate would have been concerned about due process if the 'mooner' had been an athletic coach.

  • Posted by E. Moran on August 25, 2008 at 3:51pm EDT
  • "Both Towson team members and Reid-Brinkley “said the decision to remove a black female judge was an act of white hegemony, which is to say an exercise of the power whites enjoy over people of color,”"

    Yeah. Makes me kinda wanna drop my drawers, too.

    Time for a new set of excuses.

  • Raging professors
  • Posted by feudi pandola on August 25, 2008 at 4:05pm EDT
  • I watched these two morons screech at each other for over 8 minutes on the You Tube posting. This is what higher education has become? Fire BOTH of these idiots!

  • Posted by disgusted on August 25, 2008 at 5:35pm EDT
  • And what sort of repercussion has Shanara Reid-Brinkley suffered for provoking the whole incident?

    I bet none.

    It would be racist to actually hold her responsible for inciting the incident.

  • MAturity, where art thou?
  • Posted by Observer on August 25, 2008 at 6:20pm EDT
  • Who staged the debate? World Wide Debate and Tag Team Federation.

    It is hard to believe how immature those we elect to educate our children have become. Immaturity seems to come with a PhD and tenure. After all, what would you call professors' temper tantrums in the classroom, snide and debasing comments on student papers, sniping at colleagues, withholding tenure and recommendations, treatment of staff and grad students, the idea that professors are the only competent ones to run a University?

    Maybe this person should to be reinstated just to give him credit for the brazen honesty of his immaturity.

  • And they have the nerve to whine
  • Posted by Stubbornly Rational on August 25, 2008 at 6:20pm EDT
  • Let's see.

    He invoked a legal debate procedure.
    She freaked out.
    Both used very offensive language. She used the F-word numerous times at the beginning of the altercation.

    But HE got fired, she would never be fired in any modern university. Then, in this forum, people "of color" STILL maintain that her behavior cannot be racist since whites dominate blacks.

    Even someone with an 80 IQ (outside a university, that is) can sense something is wrong with this argument.

  • Lets be fair to all involved!
  • Posted by Former Debate Coach on August 25, 2008 at 8:15pm EDT
  • As a former debate coach – and for CEDA at that – it is clear that both these individuals need the attention of their administrations. Both are equally culpable – both brought shame to their universities. In fact, whoever in the Tab Room leaked that Ms. Reid-Brinkley had been struck also deserves some blame in this fiasco.

    Also – CEDA needs to deal with it – and deal with it beyond the rhetoric of “We’ll look at our by-laws….” Jack Howe is no doubt rolling over in his grave! As are all the rest of us out here who served this organization for years cringing. It is true – competitive debate has degenerated more and more over the years. Uncivil argument would be an understatement.

    Come on Pitt – it’s your turn. Mr. Shanahan got his due comeuppance – make sure Ms. Reid-Brinkley gets the same. Her mouth was equally as offensive as Mr. Shanahan’s crass actions.

  • Posted by kgotthardt on August 26, 2008 at 8:55am EDT
  • In some cases, I dismiss perceived inappropriate behavior. This is not one of those cases.

  • 'Observer' and 'Stubbornly Rational'
  • Posted by cts on August 26, 2008 at 11:10pm EDT
  • Let's be a bit fair and sensible, here. Not all faculty are 'immature' or think only they should run universities or any of the rest of the blanket claims laid at our door by 'Observer.' This is hasty generalization at its worst, and I suspect it is not even grounded in personal experience.
    Nor should we assume that the Pitt coach will not be disciplined [fired, I hope] simply because a) she accused another of racism and/or b) she is woman of color. (Why does SR put the phrase 'person of color' in scare quotes, I wonder?) That some people hold that only whites can be racist does not entail - or suggest - that a person of color cannot be fired for misconduct. To reason so is to fall prey to another form of fallacy: non sequitur.

  • Posted by Mark on August 27, 2008 at 5:05am EDT
  • Richard asks if faculty leaders would raise questions of due process if it was an athletic coach who was fired; but since very few athletic coaches are actual members of the faculty, they are not entitled to the same procedural rights -- if the faculty did not have protections for expressions of opinion, there'd be no real academic freedom. Seems to me that this Ft Hayes coach has crossed the line, and that a fair procedure that looked into his conduct would reach a fair conclusion; but instead the president, acting alone and without any clear standard of judgment, decided to fire him. That's too much power by one official.

  • Posted by LG on September 2, 2008 at 5:00am EDT
  • FYI and accuracy - Shanahan was not a tenured or tenure track faculty member.