Search News


Browse Archives

News

Quick Takes: Psychologists Toughen Ethics Code, Apology From Debate Coach, Enrollment Data, Facebook Snoops, Call for Energy Research, Split at Truman State, Scalia Trashes Chicago Law School, Strike at Windsor, Pre-Nike Life Stumps Syracuse

September 18, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement
  • The membership of the American Psychological Association has voted to amend its code of ethics to specifically bar members from working in settings where people are held outside of the protections of international law or the U.S. Constitution. The vote -- 8,792 to 6,157 -- follows years of intense debate in which some psychologists accused their scholarly association of leaving loopholes in its anti-torture policy. While the APA has barred members from assisting in torture, it hasn't barred members from being in locations where protections against torture may not exist -- and many academic critics said that the association had made a mockery of their ethics. Michael Jackson, a psychology professor at Earlham College who is among those who had been protesting the association's position, praised the vote. "This is an inspiring development," he said. "For the first time in its history, the members of APA have officially repudiated a position taken by their leadership on an ethical issue. It's a testimony to ability of individuals to change the direction of a powerful organization when it has gone wrong."
  • The debate coach who swore, but didn't moon anyone, has issued an apology. A YouTube video of a heated, obscenity-laden argument between the debate coaches of the University of Pittsburgh and Fort Hays State University became an Internet sensation in August. Bill Shanahan, the Fort Hays coach, who dropped his pants during the incident, was subsequently fired. On Wednesday, Pitt announced that Shanara Reid-Brinkley, its coach, would not act as a debate coach for the next year and released a statement on her behalf. “I deeply regret my language choices during this incident,” she said. “Despite serious provocation, such language was unprofessional. I apologize for any embarrassment I have caused the university.”
  • The start of the academic year means counting students -- past, present and future. The U.S. Census Bureau released an analysis of trends from 2000-6, a period in which enrollments grew by 3 million, to 20.5 million. The Education Department released its annual projections on education statistics, this year through 2017. By 2017, the department predicts a 13 percent increase in enrollment, with higher rates for students who are not traditionally college aged and who are not white.
  • A new survey of admissions officers at competitive colleges has found that 10 percent of them look at social networking sites to evaluate applicants. The Wall Street Journal reported that the survey -- by the test-prep company Kaplan -- found that the Facebook snooping wasn't helping applicants. Admissions officers were more likely to report that the reviews "negatively affected" their analysis than that they improved the view of the applicants.
  • More than 70 business, higher education and science organizations on Wednesday issued a petition to the presidential campaigns calling for the next administration to make basic energy research a priority, as one path to long-term energy security.
  • Barbara Dixon is resigning as president of Truman State University because of unspecified differences with the board of the Missouri institution, The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported. Dixon reorganized the university last year from 8 divisions into 24 academic departments -- a change that upset some faculty members -- but it was unclear whether that influenced the board.
  • The University of Chicago -- already the subject of bashing by those who don't like one-time law school faculty member Barack Obama -- had its law school thoroughly trashed this week by another former faculty member, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. Speaking at a meeting of the Federalist Society (a conservative legal group), Scalia said that Chicago's law school has gone downhill since he left. The Chicago Sun-Times quoted him as saying: "I don't think the University of Chicago is what it was in my time. I would not recommend it to students looking for a law school as I would have years ago. It has changed considerably and intentionally. It has lost the niche it once had as a rigorous and conservative law school." Further, in an apparent dig at the courses Obama taught on race and society, Scalia said that when he was a law student, "I took nothing but bread-and-butter classes, not 'Law and Poverty,' or other made-up stuff." A spokeswoman told Inside Higher Ed that the law school did not plan a response to the coverage of Scalia's remarks.
  • Faculty members at the University of Windsor, in Canada, went on strike Wednesday, and classes were called off for the institution's 16,000 students. The Faculty Association says that the university's proposals are insufficient on salaries and would diminish the role of full-time faculty members. The university says that its proposals would promote teaching and research. One issue is a university proposal to create teaching-only positions -- a shift that the current faculty members say will diminish their role, in which they say that their teaching is informed by their research.
  • Syracuse University recently unveiled a statue to honor Ernie Davis, the first black athlete to win the Heisman Trophy, which he did in 1959. The Associated Press reported that the statue -- somewhat unusually -- portrays Davis in Nikes. While Orange athletes do wear Nikes, Davis didn't -- the company wasn't founded until after his triumph.
See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments on Quick Takes: Psychologists Toughen Ethics Code, Apology From Debate Coach, Enrollment Data, Facebook Snoops, Call for Energy Research, Split at Truman State, Scalia Trashes Chicago Law School, Strike at Windsor, Pre-Nike Life Stumps Syracuse

  • If Your Law School is Trashed by the Federalist Societ...
  • Posted by Diogenes on September 18, 2008 at 7:25am EDT
  • or by Scalia, I am quite sure your enrollment will increase significantly. Sorry, Regent.

  • Trash?
  • Posted by justaguy , parent & taxpayer on September 18, 2008 at 7:50am EDT
  • I find the linked Chicago Sun-Times article much more fair and illuminating than the IHE version and would recommend it to all.

  • Scalia's Fantasy World
  • Posted by Phil , Senior Editor at Springer Publishing Company on September 18, 2008 at 9:05am EDT
  • "I took nothing but bread-and-butter classes, not ‘Law and Poverty,’ or other made-up stuff.”

    Yeah, POVERTY is totally made-up. A complete fiction forced on an unsuspecting public by the elitist liberal media.

    Perhaps Judge Scalia can invite us all to his world, where everyone is wealthy? (And presumably white?)

  • APA Ethics Code
  • Posted by Bruce Thyer , APA Ethics Standards at Florida State University on September 18, 2008 at 9:10am EDT
  • Given that most of us psychologists are not constitutional or international lawyers, it will presumably be up to the APA to identify institutions that are violating international or constitutional law, so that its members can take appropriate action to avoid violating this new ethical standard. Lacking clear legal guiance in this matter means the new ethics standard will be one fraught with potential for psychologists to unknowingly violate.

  • Scalia's comments
  • Posted by georgia on September 18, 2008 at 9:45am EDT
  • --Further, in an apparent dig at the courses Obama taught on race and society, Scalia said that when he was a law student, “I took nothing but bread-and-butter classes, not ‘Law and Poverty,’ or other made-up stuff.”--

    Not to put too fine a point on it, but aren't ALL courses "made up stuff," Justice Scalia? Surely none of them spring fully formed directly from Mother Nature or a Creator into the curriculum.

  • Facebook
  • Posted by TBD on September 18, 2008 at 10:30am EDT
  • I don't know how admissions officers look at Facebook if they have not been "friended" by the individual. These sites are usually locked to non-friends.

    This is a sleazy practice. They need to look at the applicant's portfolio.

  • More Unbiased Reporting from IHE
  • Posted by AYY on September 18, 2008 at 11:25am EDT
  • IHE quotes someone who praised the APA vote, but there were also quite a few who voted against it. Were you unable to find anyone who could find a reason to vote against the change in the ethical rule, or did you think that what they had to say was unimportant?

  • More from the Sun-Times
  • Posted by Jason P. on September 18, 2008 at 11:25am EDT
  • "Scalia criticized what he called the trend of many of his fellow justices over the last 40 years to usurp legislators‚ prerogative and 'rewrite' the Constitution with decisions on abortion, gay rights and other issues.

    "'What did I learn at Harvard Law School or at my practice in Ohio or in the federal government that qualifies me to determine whether there ought to be — and therefore is — a right to abortion or to homosexual sodomy or a right to suicide?' Scalia said. 'I don't know any more about that than Joe Six-pack.'"

  • APA and Judge Scalia
  • Posted by Patrick Mattimore , Teacher on September 18, 2008 at 11:40am EDT
  • APA decision by its members is clearly aimed at the participation of psychologists at places like Guantanamo Bay. It will not be hard to understand that.
    At some point liberals should face head on the nonsensical rhetoric of people like Scalia and Thomas who condemn activist and broad constructionist judges. First, it is in no way demanded by the Constitution that that document be narrowly construed- although judges feel compelled to worship at the strict constructionist altar and pay homage to that fiction when they write opinions. Second, it is astounding the degree to which conservative judges are given a pass when they write opinions liberally interpreting the law or overruling traditional areas reserved to state judiciaries as in the case of Gore v. Bush.

  • Antonin Scalia?
  • Posted by Jeff on September 18, 2008 at 2:50pm EDT
  • Where and when will it end for the conservative right? Antonin Scalia bashing his own institution just because another alumnus, with whom he doesn't agree, is running for President? This only makes Mr. Scalia look bad, and quite frankly he's done that enough in the recent past to make what he says now laughable. Isn't he supposed to be above this type of behavior as a Supreme Court Justice?

  • Sun-Times report is better
  • Posted by Jack Olson on September 18, 2008 at 5:15pm EDT
  • Justaguy is right. The report in the Chicago Sun-Times tells you more about what Scalia really said than IHE's brief summary. Scalia didn't mention Senator Obama in his remarks but you have to read the Sun-Times report to know that.