Advertisement

News, Views and Careers for All of Higher Education

U. of California Catches Up on Accountability

Few presidents of public research universities have been as clearly associated with the national accountability movement as Mark Yudof, who as head of the University of Texas System helped put in place a broad framework for public reporting about the performance of the university’s 15 campuses and health centers.

Few public research universities, by contrast, have shown as much ambivalence, if not antipathy, to public accountability as the University of California. The prestigious 10-campus university system has taken a pounding in recent years for its perceived failure to be transparent about how it compensates its leaders, and it has been one of the few institutions to openly decline to participate in the Voluntary System of Accountability being developed by two major associations of public colleges and universities.

When Yudof was appointed as president of the California system last spring, something had to give. At a Board of Regents meeting Sunday, Yudof, on behalf of the UC president’s office, presented the draft of an accountability framework in which the university would make public a broad range of data and other information about the performance of the system and its campuses.

Although the proposed accountability document contains data on dozens of indicators of student success, faculty performance, finances, and research output, among other topics, there is little that is revolutionary or even particularly distinctive about the report itself, Yudof said in an interview Sunday. The University of California has been “significantly behind the curve in doing this stuff,” he acknowledged, and the important thing is that the university is catching up to its peers.

Yudof rebuffs the suggestion that the university has been averse to accountability, though. Virtually all of the information contained in the proposed accountability framework has been in the public domain already, and UC officials have been working for about two years — long before Yudof arrived — on a document to pull the necessary information together into a coherent and clearly designed document.

“I made my position clear before I came, but everyone was ready to take this path,” Yudof said. “The regents have been eager for it, the staff has been working on it, and the faculty leadership and Academic Senate were fine with it. I really didn’t get any pushback.”

The major category of information that is not in California’s draft accountability framework — and that remains an impediment to the university’s participation in the national groups’ Voluntary System of Accountability — is in the realm of measuring student learning outcomes. In opting not to participate in the national accountability system last year, the University of California’s faculty specifically cited the voluntary framework’s requirement that participating campuses use one of three national tests of student learning. That requirement “usurps the role of campus and departmental faculty in assessing student learning,” the university said at the time.

The University of Texas used one of the three measures, the Collegiate Learning Assessment, in its accountability system, and Yudof said he is comfortable with the test. But “a lot of angst” remains at California about “the assessment part of this” and the decision to move ahead with a UC accountability framework without a student learning component is “a nod to the culture” at the university.

Two committees of the UC system are examining “all types of tests and processes” the university might use to assess its performance on student learning, Yudof said. “Maybe there is something better out there.”

He said he is hopeful that that review will allow the university to “move forward” on an acceptable method of measuring student learning, and that the university will eventually participate in the Voluntary System of Accountability. “I’d like us to do that.”

Doug Lederman

Got something to say?


Want it on paper? Print this page.
Know someone who’d be interested? Forward this story.
Want to stay informed? Sign up for free daily news e-mail.

Advertisement

Comments

It’s documentation, not accountability

None of this is really “accountability” because there are no reference points, no criterion-referenced benchmarks for what degrees mean. And the U of C faculty was wise to reject “value-added” test scores of volunteer samples of 100 or 200 students out of 30,000+ as representing what it does. If the test is that good, then passing scores should be set, and everybody required to pass as a condition of receiving a degree. That, at least, sets a benchmark.

What the U of C will do here is properly described as public documentation. There’s nothing wrong with it, and it may prove to be the first step on the road to “accountability,” but that road requires a more thoughtful map. For examples, look at the degree “qualification frameworks” established under the Bologna Process in Europe in Ireland, Scotland, Netherlands, Germany, and Sweden, and get some ideas and inspiration for what is doable that could be called true accountability.

Cliff Adelman, Senior Associate at Institute for Higher Educaton Policy, at 6:50 am EDT on September 22, 2008

Accountability

Cliff misses the accountability forest for the accountability tree.

In its broader sense accountability is the response to the demand that institutions be able to account rationally for their actions, and document how their resources have been used, and explain what has been achieved.

Clearly, efforts in this direction are being made when alternative master narratives or accounts are proposed.

But when they are being pulled together from material already in the public domain, that’s where I have a problem. Accreditation reviews and procedures, where statutory accountability properly lies, need to be made public as well. When institutions and their accrediting guilds still hold the cards, accountability measures can only account for so much.

Glen S. McGhee, Dir., at Florida Higher Education Accountability Project, at 9:45 am EDT on September 22, 2008

Need for data by program

Accountability at UC needs to be at the program level.

The UC system is a loosely-linked network comprised of hundreds of programs disbursed over ten highly autonomous universities throughout the State. These programs and campuses vary tremendously in quality, selectivity and value to the student. Therefore, in order to make intelligent choices, students and parents need data at the program level. .

Ken D., at 11:00 am EDT on September 22, 2008

Advertisement

 Jobs Related to U. of California Catches Up on Accountability

or search for jobs directly.

Science Coordinator
Lansing Community College

Founded in 1957, Lansing Community College serves 40,000 students. A public community college governed by an elected board of ... see job

Dietetic Technician Program Director
Trocaire College

Trocaire College, a growing private Catholic College in the Buffalo NY area is searching for a dynamic Dietetic Technician ... see job

Vice President for Academic Affairs
Rhodes State College

James A. Rhodes State College, in Lima, OH, is West Central Ohio’s largest two-year college with nearly 3,700 students and ... see job

Vice President for Research
University of North Dakota

The University of North Dakota (UND) (www.und.edu) invites nominations and applications for ... see job

Director of Student Learning Assessment
Ithaca College

Job Description: Ithaca College invites applications for the position of Director of Student Learning ... see job

Nursing Program Administrator/Assistant Dean School of Health Professions
Community College of Baltimore County

Job Responsibilities: The Nursing Program Administrator (NPA)/Assistant Dean of the School of Health ... see job

Master of Public Health Program Director
Walden University

Walden University is focused exclusively on providing a superior university experience for adult professionals through the ... see job

Dean, Lutgert College of Business
Florida Gulf Coast University

The University is located in Southwest Florida midway between Naples and Fort Myers. The 760-acre campus is situated in one ... see job

Supervisor — Decision Lab at the Yale School of Management
Yale University

General Purpose
Develop and manage the experimental infrastructure for research conducted in the Decision Lab at ... see job

Dean of Business Administration
DeVry University

Job Description: Title: Dean of Business Programs Reports To: Dean of Academic Affairs Status: F/T, Exempt Location: Fremont, ... see job