Search News


Browse Archives

News

The Spellings Plan for Simplification

October 1, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

Margaret Spellings and her staff clearly haven't started packing up their offices just yet.

In a speech tonight at Harvard University, the U.S. education secretary will unveil a proposal to greatly simplify the process by which students apply for federal financial aid. Under the plan, which flows from a set of ideas floated by Under Secretary Sara Martinez Tucker at an Education Department summit in July, the Free Application for Federal Student Aid would shrink from more than 100 questions to 26, and students would find out before their senior year of high school how much federal financial aid they would qualify for.

"This all flies under the rubric of needing to make this process much much less burdensome," Spellings said in an interview in her office Monday. "Right now, it's like we're trying to keep people out of college, not get them in.... The whole thing is, 'You want to go to college? Here are seven pages of bureaucracy, and here's what you're going to have to do to get it.' As opposed to, 'Here's a simple way to do it, and here's what we're going to do for you, so you can get it.' It's the whole psychology."

Just about everybody is in favor of simplifying the federal financial aid system and the process by which students apply for financial help, in the belief that complexity deters and often defeats students -- especially those from low-income families, who are likeliest to be dependent on financial aid to make it to college at all.

Student advocacy groups have urged the government to shrink the size of the form; researchers have undertaken studies aimed at helping families navigate the process; the Republican and Democratic Party platforms both embraced the idea; a College Board-sponsored panel's sweeping plan to rethink the entire student aid system would move in much the same direction as Spellings's; and the recently enacted renewal of the Higher Education Act directed the Education Department to craft a plan to simplify the federal aid form, among other simplification efforts.

Despite that widespread concurrence, the financial aid process has gotten more complicated, not less so, over the years. (Spellings notes, with some irony, that even as the Higher Education Act renewal directed her to try to simplify the form, Congress, in passing the legislation, "was adding 6-7 questions to the form.... Like a lot of policy, this grows up over time, and by the time decades pass, you end up like this.")

Spellings has gotten significant mileage out of the FAFSA, as the federal financial aid application is known; she has taken to traveling with it as a prop and comparing it unfavorably to federal tax returns in complexity and intimidation factor. Under the plan she will unveil in her speech at Harvard's Institute of Politics this evening, the form would be cut to 27 from its current 102 questions.

The remaining questions would focus on demographic information, and would give the government enough information to calculate each aid applicant's adjusted gross family income and family size, which would form the basis for the federal analysis of the student's financial aid needs. The calculation would be based on the tax information that is available at the time, which in most cases would be the year prior to the one that is typically used now.

"We think that, based on adjusted income and family size, we'll have what we need to tell families what they'll have available" from the federal government, David S. Dunn, Spellings's chief of staff, said in an interview Tuesday.

The department's goal, Spellings said in Inside Higher Ed's interview with her Monday, would be to inform students much earlier in the process -- ideally before the start of their senior year in high school -- how much federal financial aid they would receive, rather than to tell them well into their senior year how much they will be expected to pay.

"We're trying to turn it on its head," Spellings said. "We want students to feel empowered by the resources they have, and then apply them to the school of their choice. It's 'How much do you get?,' not 'How much are you expected to give?' "

Spellings said she was hopeful, given the widespread agreement on the principle of simplifying the student aid process and system, that her department's plan would gain support. But "it's the consummate devil's in the details type thing," she said. The initial proposal Tucker laid out a few weeks ago would have cut the FAFSA to 9 questions, instead of the 27 in Spellings's plan, and members of Congress are certainly going to have their own ideas about how the process should change.

"I have full respect for what it's going to take to get this done," she said. "I'm just hoping that Congress gives it careful consideration."

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on The Spellings Plan for Simplification

  • Simple FAFSA
  • Posted by feudi pandola on October 1, 2008 at 8:20am EDT
  • If this nw FAFSA works, then Dr. Spellings will have ended her tenure on a very high note! I'll believe it when I see it though.

  • Pray for Success
  • Posted by Lynette Bennett , Director/Owner on October 1, 2008 at 9:35am EDT
  • I pray that Margaret Spelling is successful. As a private admissions and financial aid advisor, I see it as ridiculous that families and students do not see what the actual costs of attending a particular college will be until it is often too late to consider other comparable options. This in turn forces families to consider alternatives they once thought were out of the question, community college or unreasonable debt. Of course community college can be a great alternative. Knowing this earlier in the process might in turn encourage them to apply earlier to the community college where they might qualify for some scholarship hence lowering the families overall expenses.

    The silver lining in the debt crisis might be that families do realize they have alternatives to taking on or handing over unreasonable high debt load to their children. For our children’s sake let her be successful.

  • Simplify
  • Posted by Billy on October 1, 2008 at 9:46am EDT
  • I work as a financial aid administrator and currently we verify files based on an analysis of their answers. If we find answers we have to fix the errors. This commonly requires gathering the data that was skipped due to the simplified analysis if there data was inaccurate.
    Want to simplify the FAFSA do these two things:
    1. Allow for a direct line by line match with the IRS data submitted for the previous year.
    2. Remove the asset questions completely.

    1. This is a legal issue. But the FAFSA could get a signed statement from the parents (if appropriate) and students. No signed statement no aid. In this statement we could encourage filing their taxes as early as possible since many schools begin processing before tax deadlines.
    2. The asset questions seem so obvious at first but so few students are affected by the savings they have that the primary affect it has is to slow down processing and punish students for saving anything. A student whose parents own a small business but has a calculated zero EFC (no autozero or simplified needs) if they state they have $1 in their checking account would change their EFC from 0 to $1 and cost them $15/semester in Pell grant.

  • Simplify, yes, but....
  • Posted by Melchior on October 1, 2008 at 12:20pm EDT
  • I realize I'm nontraditional in this, but my own eligibility for Pell money (as well as the amount awarded) was I think unfairly calculated because of the built-in assumption that families are "normal"--that parents want to pay for their dependents to go to college, that they will pony up the money to do so, etc. But when your parents' EFC is actually much greater than they are willing or can actually afford to give you (in my case, I got nothing), or when children rightfully disown their parents for serious family problems between them (as I did), the FAFSA offers no leeway. You're considered a dependent--no matter what--based on age, marital status and little else. I would like to see simplification in the general approach, but also a more nuanced approach with mechanisms for helping exceptional cases from falling through the cracks.

  • Posted by c.k. on October 1, 2008 at 12:35pm EDT
  • It does not seem that this proposal is well thought out.

    If assets are removed from the EFC formula, a whole new class of families will now be eligible for the Pell Grant and other federal need-based aid programs: namely, wealthy families with large assets that show large business and/or property rental losses on their tax return and therefore have low or negative Adjusted Gross Incomes. Since these families must file the 1040 return, they are currently now ineligible for the Simplified Needs Test or Automatic Zero EFC and their large assets disqualify them for aid.

    Because these families are more financially savvy than the average person, they realize that it is a waste of time to bother to apply for aid now. But if the proposal becomes law, you can bet that these families would not hesitate to apply - especially if the process was simplified. So any analysis regarding the impact of the elimination of assets from the formula on the federal budget would be flawed and understated, as the entire population is not being considered in the analysis - only current FAFSA filers.

    Some other winners in any "AGI-only" proposals would be: affluent families that contribute large amounts to deductible IRA, Keoghs, 401k, 403b and other tax-deferred retirement accounts; those with large assets invested in tax-free investments or growth stocks that do not generate significant taxable interest, dividends, or capital gains; those who contribute hundreds of thousands of dollars into 529 plans, using them as an income tax and estate tax shelter.

    Those who are floating the ideas of simplification also seem to have short memories. For while their proposals may simplify the filing of the FAFSA, these proposals will probably make the financial aid process even more difficult and possibly more expensive for applicants.

    Years ago - in the pre-FAFSA days of the FAF and ACT aid forms - a student generally filed one form for federal and institutional aid. Once the FAFSA came into existence, students at many schools had to file the FAFSA and other newly-created forms (such as the College Board's CSS PROFILE, detailed institutional aid forms, etc.)

    Any college that awards a significant amount of institutional aid will certainly not be comfortable letting applicants exclude all assets and all untaxed income items. So it would not be surprising to see many more schools requiring additional applications such as the College Board's CSS PROFILE or others - which often charge a processing fee - if these proposals are adopted.

  • This is not a fix.
  • Posted by Michael on October 1, 2008 at 1:20pm EDT
  • This doesn't address the problems of getting federal dollars into those that need it the most. The problems with the educational financial aid form to distribute federal money to students and their families are that it doesn't accurately assess a family’s ability to pay for educational costs. The process does not accurately look at income, assets and expenses. The formula is too closely tied to ones most recent filed tax return to accurately assess a history of income and one’s ability to pay the ever increasing cost of higher education. The formulas don't take into account credit card debt, or even businesses income and assets with fewer than 100 employees. Do you know what the difference in aid between a family with 1 million dollars in their 401k vs. a family with 1 dollar is, if their income is the same? Nothing, there is no difference they qualify for the same aid. I see incredible large discrepancies in families retirement plans all the time.
    Over 25% of students don't attend college because they believe they can't afford it.
    I propose creating EAFSA or EASA the "the equal application for student aid". Base the application on long term income values reported to the social security office. This for starters will give you a better overall picture of income. 401k assets and retirement assets must be assessable on this form. How can you accurately tell a family they should be able to afford their children’s education when you don't even know what their potential is to retire? It is criminal that a family with a huge retirement can get the same aid as a family without one. Also the EASA form needs to keep the schools accountable as well. The value the schools distribute in federal funds should be reported next to the school on the EASA form. This way the student and parents can truly see which school is the best match with respect to their EFC. On a separate line the schools should report what money they are giving to the student. Loans, work-study and other instruments that the student or family are required to repay should not be included on this form.
    Just my 2cents.

  • Unfunded mandates
  • Posted by Phurls on October 1, 2008 at 3:00pm EDT
  • The government can simplify the FAFSA, though it is difficult to imagine the resulting output would more accurately reflect the family's financial strength.

    As such, more applicants would appear more needy (or more eligible) so the stress on the available funding would increase. More dollars would have to be directed into the aid programs to offset the simplification plan or students will be borrowing even more.

  • Tax returns provide plenty of info
  • Posted by Lauren Asher at Institute for College Access & Success on October 1, 2008 at 3:35pm EDT
  • While I have not seen the details, this article makes clear that Secretary Spellings' proposal will use tax data that is already available from the IRS to help simplify the FAFSA process. (For more on this approach to simplification, see http://www.ticas.org/pub_view.php?idx=232.) While AGI alone may not capture the full range of a family's resources, there is plenty of other information in the 1040 that would help flag hidden assets. I'm hopeful that this proposal will get a common-sense solution to FAFSA simplification -- which is authorized in the recently passed Higher Education Opportunity Act -- off the ground.

  • Posted by Bob McCullough on October 1, 2008 at 4:50pm EDT
  • While I applaud the efforts to reduce the intimidation factor of the FAFSA, the fact remains that expected federal aid is a relatively minor contribution to covering the costs of today's higher education. Therefore the argument that an early read on available federal financial aid will be empowering to students and open the doors to more higher education choices seems to fall flat, absent of significant federal investment in student aid.

  • Posted by Mark Kantrowitz , Publisher at FinAid.org on October 1, 2008 at 8:40pm EDT
  • 27 questions would fit on a single 8.5x11 sheet of paper. 9 would fit on a postcard. FinAid's QuickEFC calculator, which has been available for many years at
    http://www.finaid.org/calculators/quickefc.phtml
    is a practical demonstration that 10 questions are sufficient.

    I have also proposed using the same formula that is used to cap monthly payments under the income-based repayment plan, with a slight modification, for need analysis, namely:

    EFC = 15% (AGI - 150% Poverty Line) / Number-in-College

    This is much easier to understand than the current formula, trading off the false sense of precision for simplicity.

  • Posted by Jenifer Catlin , Dr. on October 1, 2008 at 10:10pm EDT
  • It is pathetic when a country has to sacrifice its human capital to maintain economic balance. It shows that those in financial leadership have a vision that is so short sighted that they are not seeing ahead of the present issue. Cutting the financial aid to students today will eventually have a negative impact in every area of the economy 5-10 years from now.It's like a prophrt of doom to our college dreamers.
    Do we have the jobs to slot in the expected high school graduates? What is the alternative for high school graduates? If not post secondary education, then what? What is the plan to pick up the graduates who will normally go on to college? Is our society ready for the implications for so many young, socially and academically active, adults on the loose?

    Additionally, I see the financial aid helping students of very low income families.What about those families of the middle class who risk everything working 2 or 3 jobs per income earner to send their children to college. They raise their income to the point that they rise above the critical income level and cannot receive financial aid. Is it possible that because financial aid is so easily available to low income families only it has become an incentive for families to maintain their level as "the low income families?" At this level there is less pressure to pay as others do. Is it possible that what was suppose to be a stimulant to our low income population has now become a deterrent keeping low income families captive to their income status?

  • Posted by Debbie Prins , Financial Aid Administrator at Community Christian College on October 2, 2008 at 10:30am EDT
  • Thank you for this effort. I get alot of questions from parents of high school seniors about how do I know if I can afford this school. I can't do my FASFA until after January and schools are requiring applications in the fall.

    Also, I have a very underprivileged population of students at my institution and I can say with confidence that the FAFSA intimidates them and I have to do a lot of hand-holding to get them their aid.

    THANKS AGAIN FOR YOUR EFFORTS!

  • Is this for real?
  • Posted by Carolyn on October 3, 2008 at 3:05pm EDT
  • As a student from a low-income family, going to a very high-poverty high school, I knew several students who did not apply for the FAFSA (and consequently did not go to college) because of its complexity and the immense amount of information that their busy parents had little time or energy to provide.

    If my parents hadn't be completely onboard with me going to college, I can't imagine how I would have made it at all.

    Now that I work at a university, I'm excited to see how populations might change now that we have a new FAFSA system. Two possible great outcomes could be: lower middle class parents won't have to take out a second mortagage and low-income students will be able to fill out the form on their own.

  • A Better Way
  • Posted by Reformer on October 4, 2008 at 2:25pm EDT
  • To c.k. and others similarly concerned: Indeed, the proposed change could come at the expense of need-based equity in federal aid distributions. But what effect would it have on the actual aid packages that students receive? In many cases, not much. When federal calculations are subsumed in the packaging process by college enrollment managers, with their yield cells and their rankings regressions, federal precision is obliterated anyway.

    A better way: link federal simplification to more federal leverage over institutional and state aid, to achieve more need-based equity in the total packages students actually get. That is the direction of the recommendation of the Rethinking Group, which is several steps ahead of the Secretary. Whether they have a workable plan (probably not) should be the focus of the debate, not a defense of the regrettable status quo.