Quick Takes: Why Students Lean Left, Reforms Pledged of Rutgers Athletics, Shooting Death at Northeast Lakeview, NIH Oversight of Emory, Gay Rights Supporters Arrested at Palm Beach Atlantic, SUNY Students Want to Pay More, From Hopkins to Salk Institute
Students get more liberal while they're in college -- but a new study suggests that their peers, not professors, seem to be the reason why, according to the Associated Press. The study, by the Higher Education Research Institute at the University of California at Los Angeles, finds evidence to back up the assertion that many students adopt more liberal positions on many issues from their freshman to their junior year. But the researchers attribute the shifts more to students' exposure to left-leaning peer groups than to the views of their professors, the wire service reports.
Rutgers University on Monday announced that it would add oversight to athletics programs and contracts, following growing criticism of spending on sports at a time that the university is facing declines in state support. The Star-Ledger reported that the university will require legal reviews of all future athletic department sponsorship deals, create policies to prevent conflicts of interest, and review all "high level" compensation packages to determine which ones should be approved by the university board. Rutgers officials also said that they were seeking ways to keep a football stadium expansion -- originally projected to cost $102 million and now seen as more expensive -- on track and on budget, despite lags in fund raising for the effort.
One employee shot a fellow worker to death at at Northeast Lakeview College Monday, the San Antonio Express-News reported. Neither police officers nor officials at the two-year college in San Antonio had a motive for the shooting of a librarian and instructor by another adjunct librarian.
Charles Nemeroff, an Emory University professor, is at the center of a U.S. Senate investigation into conflicts of interest by researchers who are supported by drug companies and federal agencies at the same time. Now the National Institutes of Health is requiring Emory to submit more documentation that its researchers follow reporting and other requirements. Pharmalot, a blog that has been a leader in coverage of the Nemeroff controversy and controversies over the pharmaceutical industry, published a letter from Emory's vice president for research administration to faculty members about the heightened oversight.
Six advocates for gay rights were arrested Monday for trying to sit in the chapel at Palm Beach Atlantic University. The Sun-Sentinel reported that college officials had agreed to a private meeting with the group, but rejected their request to appear in a more public way on the campus, and had them arrested for trespassing, resulting in a trip to jail. Those arrested are part of an effort called the Equality Ride, which involves trips to religious colleges that do not support gay rights. Palm Beach Atlantic says that it doesn't bar all gay students, but does bar all "homosexual behavior."
Evidence from New York State suggests that students realize how tough a budget year public higher education faces. Leaders of the Student Assembly of the State University of New York have endorsed a proposal -- now slated to go to the full Student Assembly -- that would call for modest annual tuition increases, The Times-Union reported. SUNY student leaders have traditionally opposed tuition increases, and the new policy would represent the first time that the Student Assembly has endorsed the idea of paying more. Students did put an emphasis on modest increases, but also said that they realized that potentially significant drops in state support leave the university system in need of revenue.
William R. Brody, the departing president of Johns Hopkins University, has been named to head the Salk Institute, an independent research organization that focuses on the life sciences.
Comments on
Quick Takes: Why Students Lean Left, Reforms Pledged of Rutgers Athletics, Shooting Death at Northeast Lakeview, NIH Oversight of Emory, Gay Rights Supporters Arrested at Palm Beach Atlantic, SUNY Students Want to Pay More, From Hopkins to Salk Institute
Oh, So It's the Students!
Posted
by DFS
on October 14, 2008 at 4:00pm EDT
Does anyone else see the irony in this report by an institution of higher learning, published on an internet site for those interested in higher learning, that it's remarkably not the influence of professors which causes leftist attitudes to be acquired by students in the freshmen to junior years?
We learn something new everyday!
And Weeee're OFF!
Posted
by cts
on October 14, 2008 at 5:15pm EDT
Here we go: 1) the Associated Press prints a story about 2) research done by - surprise, surprise - researchers 3)which appears to undermine the deeply-loved right wing conviction that all academics [or most of us] are leftist proselytizers, and 4) IHE reports on the AP story. The first post in response to this news ridicules the results of the research by suggesting that IHE is responsible for the story, as though this 'ad newspaperem' refutes the results of the study. Of course, the poster need not even bother to discredit the researchers; it is enough that they are researchers [academics] whose work undermines his own view! Why, oh why, don't we require a logic test for voter registration?
Going "Off!"
Posted
by DFS
on October 14, 2008 at 6:40pm EDT
From the AP: "On issues such as abortion, gay marriage and religion, college students shift noticeably to the left from the time they arrive on campus through their junior year, new research shows[.]"
How does anyone accept this limited survey of topics as any "shift to the left?"
Let's discuss the "logic," as demanded by CTS.
A reasonable paraphrase of this reported statement is: "If views on abortion, gay marriage, and religion have changed (assuming toward more liberal views), then students have (liberalized)." -- Again, pick your term of choice; you still understand what is said here.
The contrapositive of this would be: "If students have not '(liberalized),' then views on abortion, gay marriage and religion have not changed."
(For those of you not familiar with the concept of "contrapositive," try wikipedia -- or, even better, try an actual course in mathematical logic, not the philosophical logic being spewed throughout academia.)
I submit that these three criteria are not necessarily to be collectively (each and everyone) changed in the minds of students in order for them to become '(liberalized).'
This is but one logical fallacy of this report.
The obvious one is when I cite that an institution of higher learning ends up having its result published on this site means somehow that this site is "responsible" for the AP's reporting of the original data to begin with. This is BS, and, "We're Off!" again, from the other direction.
(I must admit, though, that I'm still chuckling at CTS's subject line, before I responded. It had taken too long for another comment, and the immediate response was, "We're Off!" Hilarious) Thank you, IHE.
Not so fast
Posted
by AYY
on October 15, 2008 at 4:55am EDT
One could disagree with DFS but not legitimately on the grounds suggested by CTS.
The issue isn't whether profs are successful in indoctrinating students -- it's whether they're indoctrinating them or giving them one sided views or requiring them to parrot back their political preferences It's entirely possible that students might be affected by the leftist students because profs teach their courses in a way that fails to inform students of the weaknesses of leftist approaches.
Sigh
Posted
by cts
on October 15, 2008 at 4:50pm EDT
Oh, DFS, here I thought we were reaching some level of mutual repsect (adjunct faculty). I probably did overreact to your's being the first post; I find myself less and less happy with the quality of conversation here on IHE, and that may be making me cranky.
You are right, I think, that the research criteria are pretty odd, although I believe they also asked about partisan identification. (I may be misremembering.) But, please, do not scorn 'philosophical logic' as though it were some strnage beast unrelated to 'mathematical logic.' Most bona fide logicians whom I know are well versed in both. In fact, contraposition is a relation obtaining between subjects and predicates in propositions - not simply a mathematical relation. Now, of course, if by 'philosophical logic' you mean what many nonphilosophers seem to mean, I'm with you. :-)
To CTS
Posted
by DFS
on October 16, 2008 at 5:35am EDT
Yes, there is mutual respect. :)
I take your point about contraposition.
It was just a long day, and sometimes I get a bit stident.
I'm still laughing at that "We're Off!" line again today!
To DFS
Posted
by cts
on October 16, 2008 at 11:05am EDT
Well, good! I'm always glad to make someone laugh. :-)