Search News


Browse Archives

News

Health, Behavior and College GPA

October 21, 2008

Share This Story

FREE Daily News Alerts

Advertisement

The list of traits and behaviors that college officials believe are bad for their students is long, and the list of successful counter-tactics is short. Drinking is bad for me? My parents drink; why shouldn't I? I spend too much time on the computer? It's where I find out what I need to know and keep up with friends. I don't get enough rest? I'm young; I'll sleep when I'm dead.

Ed Ehlinger, director of the University of Minnesota's Boynton Health Service, said that while he and other health officials have long argued that such activities hurt students academically, there has been little or no "documentation that it actually was true."

So Ehlinger and colleagues at other colleges and universities in Minnesota this year expanded their longstanding College Student Health Survey to, for the first time, try to document that "the stuff that our parents have told us all along" is true. In addition to collecting the usual information about the frequency and intensity of various student behaviors and traits, the researchers also gathered data about students' perceptions of the impact on their academic performance and about their actual grade point averages.

The ensuing report, which includes data on nearly 10,000 undergraduate students at two-year and four-year colleges in Minnesota, both backs up some long-contended assertions on the part of college health officials and also suggests some areas of concern that caught the researchers by surprise.

In the former category, it's unlikely to stun anyone that students who reported both that they use alcohol or drugs and that they believe that behavior affected their academic performance had far lower GPAs than did students who said they did not have an "issue" with alcohol or drugs (2.92 vs. 3.28 for alcohol and 2.94 vs. 3.25 for drugs). But Ehlinger said that it was heartening to him that the study's data back up the conventional wisdom that that "there's a linear relationship -- as high-risk drinking goes up, grade point average goes down (from an average GPA of about 3.30 for students who had not engaged in binge drinking in the preceding two weeks to about 3.10 to 3.15 for those who had done so twice or more in the previous two weeks).

More surprising, Ehlinger said, were findings about the strong associations (though not necessarily causation) between lower GPAs and tobacco use and lack of health insurance.

Students who reported smoking or using smokeless tobacco in the previous 30 days had significantly lower mean GPAs than did other students, a result he attributed not to tobacco use itself but because "tobacco use is an indicator for other behaviors," including alcohol, stress and credit card debt. In addition, the 9.3 percent of respondents who said they did not have health insurance had a lower average GPA than did their peers (3.17 vs. 3.25), which Ehlinger said was "probably linked to stress and to not having access to preventive health services."

Among the survey's other findings:

  • Stress was the most commonly reported health and personal issue that seemed to have a negative association with academic performance. Seven in 10 students reported having an "issue" with stress, and about a third said they believed it affected their academic performance. But feeling stress didn't necessarily hurt academic performance; the study found "no documented relationship between students' reported stress level and their mean grade point averages," suggesting that many students "felt stressed but felt like they could handle the stress," said Ehlinger. But students who truly experienced stress -- as measured by exposure to established stressors such as getting married, failing a class, facing excessive credit card debt, or seeing a close friend or relative die or fall seriously ill -- did have lesser academic performance, in line with the number of such stressors they experienced. "Those things do pile up, and each of them adds" to the effect, Ehlinger said.
  • Grade point averages fell as hours that students spent watching television or on the computer for purposes other than work or study grew. The 25 percent of undergraduates who reported watching television two hours a day had an average GPA of 3.21, as did the 18 percent who said they spent two hours a day in front of the computer screen for non-school or work purposes. The roughly 10 percent of students who spent four or more hours in one of those activities had GPAs of about 3.00. Those who reported spending less than an hour a day in those activities had GPAs of about 3.3.
  • GPA also increased with the number of days of adequate sleep a student had in the previous seven days. Data on that and many of the other behaviors appears in the table below.

Ehlinger said the study had several purposes, including persuading campus administrators to pay attention to the health of their students ("Give them access to insurance and health care," "have an environment that helps reduce stress," etc.), prodding faculty members to "care not just about the brain" but about the "brain inside the body" of their students, and to students themselves. "The message is that there are simple things -- not necessarily easy things, but simple things -- that you could do to positively impact your GPA, like turning off the computer and getting to bed," Ehlinger said.

"We all know these things," he added, "but when you see them linked directly to GPA, it may be just the impetus to push them toward a change in behavior."

Health and Personal Issues and Grade Point Average, Minnesota Undergraduate Students

Behavior or Activity % Reporting the Issue % Saying the Issue Affected Academics Mean GPA for Students Who Say Issue Affected Academics Mean GPA for Students Who Did Not Report the Issue  
Stress 69.9% 32.9% 3.12 3.23  
Sleep Difficulties 40.8 20.0 3.08 3.27  
Concern for Troubled Friend/Family Member 42.4 15.8 3.08 3.25  
Relationship Issues 34.8 14.1 3.10 3.25  
Excessive Computer/Internet Use 30.4 13.0 3.04 3.27  
Financial Difficulties 44.0 12.8 3.03 3.28  
Mental Health Issues 21.5 12.3 3.08 3.25  
Upper Respiratory Infection 36.5 11.5 3.12 3.23  
Alcohol Use 32.8 7.5 2.92 3.28  
Learning Disability/ADD 7.2 4.3 2.93 3.26  
Moved/Changed Residence 21.5 3.8 3.05 3.24  
Drug Use 6.5 2.2 2.94 3.25  
Serious Injury 4.6 2.0 3.01 3.25  
Allergies 29.7 1.8 3.04 3.24  
Chronic Conditions 10.3 1.8 3.17 3.24  
Mono 3.1 1.6 3.19 3.24  
Eating Disorder 4.6 1.2 3.13 3.24  

Source: College Student Health Survey

See all postings »
Advertisement
Advertisement

Matching Jobs

Comments on Health, Behavior and College GPA

  • Posted by Fred Sullivan on October 21, 2008 at 6:30am EDT
  • The most strking thing is that the GPA's are all so high. Perhaps it's not just Lake Wobegon where all the children are above average.

  • High GPAs
  • Posted by Professor Mom on October 21, 2008 at 7:10am EDT
  • That is exactly what I was going to say! I had planned on sending this article to my on-again, off-again college son who has most of these "issues," but with such high GPAs in both groups, I don't think he would be convinced. He might, instead, want to transfer to Minnesota so that he could pull up his GPA while still engaging in all of his vices!

  • Health, Behavior and College GPA
  • Posted by Marie on October 21, 2008 at 7:10am EDT
  • Again, it takes a "study" to confirm what parents have know all along...sigh. I think this points more to the underestimation of the role of the family than it does to anything else...

  • Posted by R on October 21, 2008 at 7:45am EDT
  • I would have liked to see the average GPAs of students reporting drug use, binge drinking, stress, etc. who did NOT claim that it affected their academic performance.

  • Posted by Richard Linn on October 21, 2008 at 8:35am EDT
  • Studies of this type, although intriguing, share a common problem - that of interpretation. One cannot conclude that binge drinking causes lower GPA, as the article in Inside Higher Ed suggests. Rather, one can only conclude that binge drinking and lower GPAs are related. It could very well be that some other factor(s), such as student innate intelligence, personality, temperament, etc., is the "causal" factor, so that students with low innate intelligence tend to be binge drinkers and also are the students with low GPAs. A much more informative study would be one that started with "good" or "excellent" students based upon SAT scores at entry into the college, and then looked at the relationship between binge drinking and college GPA. At least then one potential confound would be controlled for.

  • Health, Behavior and College GPA
  • Posted by Jim Blackburn on October 21, 2008 at 11:10am EDT
  • My goodness! As a college student in the 60s, I (and my parents) would have been thrilled had I earned any of the average GPAs reported in this article. Perhaps I should have attended a college in Minnesota?

    Jim Blackburn

  • Posted by A on October 21, 2008 at 12:25pm EDT
  • Perhaps the reason the reported GPAs are so high is that the other students are too embarrassed to have their data included in the study. I know that if I had an "average" GPA I wouldn't want to tell everyone about it. Yes, I'm rather proud of my 3.67.

  • Posted by Bobby Bob on October 21, 2008 at 3:20pm EDT
  • This is a classic example of needing to be careful to distinguish correlation vs. causation. Take binge drinking for example. Yes, no one will argue there is a negative correlation between drinking and grades (more binge drinking = lower grades). But this does not prove binge drinking is the CAUSE of bad grades. In fact I would argue it is a person's "intelligence" that effects their grades (who would have thought!). Because intelligent people tend to drink less this makes it seem that there drinking is the cause, but it is most likely not.

    Anyhow, an introductory statistics course can explain this better, but I am just trying to warn everyone to keep their heads straight.

  • Health Insurance
  • Posted by Dan H. at University of Virginia on October 21, 2008 at 3:50pm EDT
  • I've got to question the stated explanation for the relationship between the lack of health insurance and lower GPAs. Could it be that students from families that can't afford health insurance also might not have had the same academic preparation advantages as their better-off classmates?

  • cause and effect
  • Posted by Prof Ed on October 21, 2008 at 4:25pm EDT
  • Isn't it possible that lower grades, smoking and binge drinking are all common products of stupidity?

  • R is right
  • Posted by DFS on October 21, 2008 at 7:25pm EDT
  • So often some statistical analyses are underdone -- they often lack the testing for correlation vs causality, they overlook the obvious question, or they are often just amateur.

    But any kind of self-reported survey is just that, ultimately, self-reported.

    Perhaps after a few beers it will make better sense.

    I'll get back to you, Rae. :)

  • Posted by Anon E. Moose on October 21, 2008 at 8:30pm EDT
  • I agree with the others...

    The real story here are the inflated grades!

    If someone can still "earn" a "B" while drinking, drugging, not sleeping, nt eating breakfast et al., then something is seriously wrong at that school!

    Jiminy Crickets! I had to work my tail off c. 1990 at a "highly selective" college just to earn my 3.46 GPA. No wonder my former students c. 2007 got so testy when I followed my department chair's advice to "fight grade inflation." "C" is no longer the letter indicating "average."

  • I thought the article was good
  • Posted by jbjones on October 22, 2008 at 8:55am EDT
  • I asked permission to link the article to my high school web site because I thought the material did just what it set out to do -- establish a link between drugs and alcohol and lower grades overall.
    From that aspect the article and the report which I did download and read do have information that students in high school, college, and their parents and mentors do need to read. If after reading the report you do not think about your own behavior then you probably skimmed the report instead of reading it to digest the facts and research.

  • Next Study...
  • Posted by George on October 22, 2008 at 11:55am EDT
  • I agree. Their next study should be grade inflation at the institutions at which they conducted this study. I also found it rather interesting that the differences in grades were seldom more than 5% and only 10% in the more extreme situations. I saw much more of a difference with my peers back in the dark ages when we were undergrads.

  • Heavy research
  • Posted by Bob S. on October 29, 2008 at 5:10am EDT
  • These studies are so deep! How about one that compares the inability to read and comprehend with GPA? Or, skipping classes and GPA? Maybe there's a relationship between taking test exams and passing courses? Wow! This stuff is heavy! Maybe there's even a cause-effect relationship between sleeping in class and comprehending what happened there? On the other hand, just because you cannot read, don't study or attend callses does not mean that's why you are failing. That is too obvious. Maybe it's genetic or racial... We need to study these issues more deeply. After all, this is college?

  • Interpretation question- Entering Characteristics?
  • Posted by Phil Wood at U of Missouri on October 29, 2008 at 9:55am EDT
  • I kind of wonder what to make of data such as these, given that we don't know anything in the report concerning entering characteristics of the students. For example, it may be that students who drink, in fact earn lower grades as a result. Maybe, however, low ability students (in terms of graduating HS grades or ACT scores) tend to drink and earn higher grades, so it seems to me that the question of what policy recommendations flow from the data are a bit more complex than the report would indicate.
    For what it's worth

  • major
  • Posted by Sadi Carnot on November 16, 2008 at 5:10am EST
  • Is there a separate study for different majors. I'm sure there are differences between Engineers and sociology majors.